HUBUNGAN ASUPAN LEMAK DENGAN KETEBALAN TUNIKA INTIMA-MEDIA ARTERI KAROTIS INTERNA PADA PASIEN PASCA STROKE ISKEMIK - Diponegoro University | Institutional Repository (UNDIP-IR)

44 

Teks penuh

(1)
(2)
(3)

JUDUL PENELITIAN :

“HUBUNGAN ASUPAN LEMAK DENGAN

KETEBALAN TUNIKA INTIMA-MEDIA ARTERI KAROTIS INTERNA

PADA PENDERITA PASCA STROKE ISKEMIK”

INSTALASI PELAKSANA : BAGIAN NEUROLOGI RSUP Dr. KARIADI SEMARANG

Persetujuan Setelah Penjelasan

(INFORMED CONSENT)

Bapak/Ibu/Sdr Yth

Anda terpilih sebagai responden penelitian yang berhubungan dengan Faktor Risiko Gizi

(Asupan lemak) dan Gaya Hidup pada pasien stroke yang anda/keluarga anda alami. Apabila

bapak/ ibu/ saudara setuju sebagai peserta penelitian maka tindakan yang akan Bapak/Ibu/Saudara

alami :

Dilakukan anamnesis dan pemeriksaan fisik dan klinis neurologi, dengan wawancara dan

menggunakan palu refleks serta senter.

Pemeriksaan laboratorium dengan pengambilan darah.

Pemeriksaan USG Dupleks Karotis untuk menilai ketebalan dinding arteri karotis interna.

Kunjungan ke rumah untuk konfirmasi pola diet, ukuran dalam penyajian, dan hal-hal lain yang

berhubungan dengan diet, terutama diet lemak.

Penelitian ini mempunyai risiko berupa rasa sakit sewaktu dilakukan pengambilan darah.

Keuntungan Bapak/ Ibu/ Saudara ikut dalam penelitian ini adalah mengetahui dan mendapat penjelasan

tentang pola diet terutama diet lemak, dan beberapa pemeriksaan lainnya; serta ketebalan tunika intima

media arteri karotis interna sebagai faktor risiko stroke yang anda/ keluarga anda alami sehingga

dikemudian hari dapat digunakan sebagai indikator keberhasilan pengobatan yang dijalani.

Setiap data (anamnesis, pemeriksaan fisik, hasil laboratorium dan hasil USG Dupleks Karotis) dijamin

kerahasiaannya. Sebagai responden keikutsertaan dalam penelitian ini bersifat sukarela, setiap waktu

Bapak/ Ibu/ Saudara dapat mengundurkan diri dari penelitian ini tanpa mengurangi kualitas terapi yang

dijalani.

Bapak/ Ibu/ Saudara dapat menghubungi kami sebagai peneliti :

Nama

: dr. Edi Mulyanto

Alamat

: Jl. Wonosari I/41 Semarang

HP

: 081 325 451 835

Setelah mendengar dan memahami penjelasan penelitian, dengan ini saya :

Nama :...

Alamat : ...

Menyatakan

SETUJU / TIDAK SETUJU

untuk ikut sebagai responden penelitian.

Semarang, _______________

Peserta penelitian

Saksi

Peneliti

(4)

KUESIONER PENELITIAN

FAKTOR RISIKO GIZI, GAYA HIDUP DAN FAKTOR RISIKO LAIN DENGAN

DERAJAT ATEROSKLEROSIS PADA PASIEN PASCA STROKE ISKEMIK

PENELITIAN PAYUNG:

HUBUNGAN ASUPAN LEMAK DENGAN

ATEROSKLEROSIS (PENEBALAN IMT) ARTERI KAROTIS INTERNA

PADA PASIEN PASCA STROKE ISKEMIK

1.

Nama

: ...

2.

Tgl lahir / Umur

: ...

3.

Pekerjaan

: ...

4.

Alamat

: ...

Telpon Rumah/Hp...

5.

No RM

: ...

(5)

KUISIONER DATA UMUM DAN KLINIK

6

Penggunaan kontrasepsi hormonal :

(6)

12

Riwayat demam 3 bulan terakhir

1. Ya

2. Tidak

1.

2.

13

Riwayat batuk lama 3 bulan terakhir

1. Ya

2. Tidak

1.

2.

14

Riwayat sakit kencing 3 bulan terakhir

1. Ya

2. Tidak

1.

2.

15

Riwayat sakit saluran cerna 3 bulan terakhir

1. Ya

2. Tidak

1.

2.

16

Riwayat sakit gondok (struma/ tiroid)

1. Ya

2. Tidak

1.

2.

17

Riwayat sakit gangguan fungsi ginjal

1. Ya

2. Tidak

1.

2.

18

Riwayat sakit gangguan fungsi hati

1. Ya

2. Tidak

1.

2.

45

Sistolik saat kontrol di RSDK

46

Diastolik saat kontrol di RSDK

(7)

PEMERIKSAAN NEUROIMEJING

53

Lokasi Hasil CT Scan (Dx Topis) : hemisfer ka

1.

Kapsula interna 4. Cortex

2.

putamen

5. Batang Otak

54

Lokasi Hasil CT Scan (Dx Topis : hemisfer ki

4.

Kapsula interna 4. Cortex

56

USG duplex Carotis Interna

Ketebalan IMT :

...

65

Kadar Total Kolesterol (mg%) :

66

Kadar Trigliserida (mg%) :

67

Kadar LDL (mg%) :

68

Kadar HDL (mg%) :

69

Apolipoprotein B

(8)

PEMERIKSAAN PENUNJANG

72

Elektro Kardiografi (EKG)

1. Normo Sinus Rhytm (NSR) 3.Iskemik/ Infark

2. AF

4. ...

1.

2.

3.

4.

TERAPI

79

Statin selama rawat inap: 10 mg

1. Ya

2. Tidak

1.

2.

80

Statin selama rawat inap: 20 mg

1. Ya

2. Tidak

1.

2.

81

Fibrat selama rawat inap: 100 mg.

1. Ya

2. Tidak

1.

2.

82

Fibrat selama rawat inap: 200 mg

1. Ya

2. Tidak

1.

2.

83

Fibrat selama rawat inap: 300 mg

1. Ya

2. Tidak

1.

2.

Semarang, ………

Petugas pencatat

(9)

FORM FOOD FREQUENCY SEMI-QUANTITATIVE

Nama Subjek:

No. Registrasi Penelitian:

Alamat :

Tanggal Pengambilan Data:

Petugas:

No

Makanan

Estimasi

Waktu Konsumsi

URT/

(10)

No

Makanan

Estimasi

Waktu Konsumsi

URT/

makan

… x hari

… x minggu … x bulan

4

Sayuran

5

Buah

6

Susu dan olahan

7

Makanan jajan

(11)

HASIL PENGHITUNGAN ASUPAN MAKANAN DENGAN PROGRAM NUTRISOFT:

Ny. STYM, SUBJEK NO.62

(12)

HASIL PENGHITUNGAN ASUPAN MAKANAN DENGAN PROGRAM NUTRISOFT:

Ny. STYM, SUBJEK NO.62 (Lanjutan 1)

(13)

HASIL PENGHITUNGAN ASUPAN MAKANAN DENGAN PROGRAM NUTRISOFT:

Ny. STYM, SUBJEK NO.62 (Lanjutan 2)

(14)

LAMPIRAN CONTOH HASIL USG DUPLEK

1.

Subyek no. 32 (Tn Suh)

a.

Ketebalan Tunika intima-media arteri karotis interna kanan : 0,5 mm

b.

Ketebalan Tunika intima-media arteri karotis interna kiri : 0,6 mm

2.

Subyek No 23 (Ny. Sul)

a.

Ketebalan Tunika intima media arteri karotis interna kanan : 0,8 mm

b.

Ketebalan Tunika intima media arteri karotis interna kiri : 0,9 mm

(15)

Analisis Deskriptif data numerik

Media Asupan Serat

Asupan

Cholesterol percent_fat percent_SAF

percent_

Std. Deviation 91.309 8.83361 6.84669 2.03780 2,53139

(16)

Explore

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent Tunika Intima Media 62 100.0% 0 .0% 62 100.0%

Descriptives

Statistic Std. Error

Tunika Intima Media Mean .856 .0344

95% Confidence Interval for Mean

Std. Deviation .2708

Minimum .3

Maximum 1.5

Range 1.2

Interquartile Range .3

Skewness .337 .304

Kurtosis -.251 .599

Tests of Normality

Kolmogorov-Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk

(17)
(18)

Data Kategori :

Jenis Kelamin

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid

> = 55

42

67.7

67.7

67.7

<55

20

32.3

32.3

100.0

Total

62

100.0

100.0

Status Jarak dari Onset

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid

>24

33

53.3

53.3

53.3

< = 24

29

46.7

46,7

100.0

Total

62

100.0

100.0

Skor Mod Ran Scale

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid

Ya

24

38.7

38.7

38.7

Tidak

38

61.3

61.3

100.0

(19)

Status Obesitas

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Hipertensi 54 87.1 87.1 87.1

Tidak 8 12.9 12.9 100.0

Total 62 100.0 100.0

Status Diabetes Mellitus

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Dislipid 46 74.2 74.2 74.2

Tidak 16 25.8 25.8 100.0

Total 62 100.0 100.0

Penebalan Tunika Intima-Media

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid Abnormal 25 40.3 40.3 40.3

Normal 37 59.7 59.7 100.0

Total 62 100.0 100.0

(20)

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid < 2% 2 3.2 3.2 3.2

> = 2% 60 96.8 96.8 100.0

Total 62 100.0 100.0

Kategori Cholesterol Asupan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative

(21)

Chi-Square Tests

Pearson Chi-Square 6.452a

1 .011

Continuity Correctionb 5.204 1 .023

Likelihood Ratio 6.570 1 .010

Fisher's Exact Test .019 .011

Linear-by-Linear Association 6.348 1 .012

N of Valid Casesb 62

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 12,10. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for kategori lemak total

(>30 % / <=30 %) 3.923 1.335 11.527 For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima =

Abnormal 2.267 1.152 4.460

For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima =

Normal .578 .366 .911

N of Valid Cases 62

Crosstab Count

Penebalan Tunika Intima

Total Abnormal Normal

kategori lemak >30 % 17 13 30

<=30 % 8 24 32

(22)

Kategori SFA * Penebalan Tunika Intima

Crosstab

Count

Penebalan Tunika Intima

Total Abnormal Normal

Kategori SFA >10 % 14 26 40

Pearson Chi-Square 1.327a

1 .249

Continuity Correctionb .777 1 .378

Likelihood Ratio 1.319 1 .251

Fisher's Exact Test .288 .189

Linear-by-Linear Association 1.306 1 .253

N of Valid Casesb 62

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8,87. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Kategori SFA (>10 % / < = 10 %)

.538 .187 1.552

For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Abnormal

.700 .386 1.268

For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Normal

1.300 .808 2.092

(23)

kategori PUFA * Penebalan Tunika Intima

Crosstab

Count

Penebalan Tunika Intima

Total Abnormal Normal

kategori PUFA < 6% 15 28 43

Pearson Chi-Square 1.725a

1 .189

Continuity Correctionb 1.066 1 .302

Likelihood Ratio 1.708 1 .191

Fisher's Exact Test .263 .151

Linear-by-Linear Association 1.697 1 .193

N of Valid Casesb 62

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7,66. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for kategori PUFA (< 6% / > = 6%)

.482 .161 1.445

For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Abnormal

.663 .367 1.196

For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Normal

1.375 .816 2.317

(24)

Kategori MUFA * Penebalan Tunika Intima

Crosstab

Count

Penebalan Tunika Intima

Total Abnormal Normal

Kategori MUFA < 2% 0 2 2

Pearson Chi-Square 1.396a

1 .237

Continuity Correctionb .202 1 .653

Likelihood Ratio 2.110 1 .146

Fisher's Exact Test .511 .352

Linear-by-Linear Association 1.374 1 .241

N of Valid Casesb 62

a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is ,81. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Normal

1.714 1.384 2.123

(25)

Kategori Cholesterol * Penebalan Tunika Intima

Crosstab

Count

Penebalan Tunika Intima

Total Abnormal Normal

Kategori Chol >= 300 mg 4 3 7

Pearson Chi-Square .928a

1 .335

Continuity Correctionb .307 1 .579

Likelihood Ratio .908 1 .341

Fisher's Exact Test .425 .286

Linear-by-Linear Association .913 1 .339

N of Valid Casesb 62

a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 2,82. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Kategori Chol (>= 300 mg / < 300 mg)

2.159 .439 10.615

For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Abnormal

1.497 .725 3.088

For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Normal

.693 .287 1.672

(26)

Jenis Kelamin * Penebalan Tunika Intima

Crosstab

Count

Penebalan Tunika Intima

Total Abnormal Normal

Jenis Kelamin L 17 22 39

Pearson Chi-Square .466a

1 .495

Continuity Correctionb .172 1 .678

Likelihood Ratio .470 1 .493

Fisher's Exact Test .596 .341

Linear-by-Linear Association .459 1 .498

N of Valid Casesb 62

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9,27. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Jenis Kelamin (L / P) 1.449 .499 4.208 For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima =

Abnormal 1.253 .645 2.434

For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima =

Normal .865 .576 1.299

(27)

Status usia * Penebalan Tunika Intima

Crosstab

Count

Penebalan Tunika Intima

Total Abnormal Normal

Status usia > = 55 22 20 42

Continuity Correctionb 6.391 1 .011

Likelihood Ratio 8.575 1 .003

Fisher's Exact Test .006 .005

Linear-by-Linear Association 7.740 1 .005

N of Valid Casesb 62

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 8,06. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Status usia (> = 55 /

<55) 6.233 1.586 24.497

For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima =

Abnormal 3.492 1.183 10.308

For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima =

Normal .560 .388 .808

(28)

Status Jarak waktu dari Onset stroke * Penebalan Tunika Intima

Penebalan Tunika Intima

Total Abnormal Normal

Status Onset >24 Count 19 14 33

Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 8.727a 1 .003

Continuity Correctionb 7.262 1 .007

Likelihood Ratio 9.056 1 .003

Fisher's Exact Test .004 .003

Linear-by-Linear Association 8.587 1 .003

N of Valid Cases 62

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 11,69. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper Odds Ratio for Status Onset (>24 /

<=24)

5.202 1.675 16.154

For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Abnormal

2.783 1.288 6.013

For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Normal

.535 .345 .830

(29)

Riwayat Merokok * Penebalan Tunika Intima

Crosstab

Count

Penebalan Tunika Intima

Total Abnormal Normal

Riwayat Merokok Ya 12 12 24

Pearson Chi-Square 1.524a

1 .217

Continuity Correctionb .938 1 .333

Likelihood Ratio 1.518 1 .218

Fisher's Exact Test .290 .166

Linear-by-Linear Association 1.499 1 .221

N of Valid Casesb 62

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9,68. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Riwayat Merokok (Ya / Tidak)

1.923 .677 5.461

For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Abnormal

1.462 .806 2.651

For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Normal

.760 .479 1.205

(30)

Status Obesitas * Penebalan Tunika Intima

Crosstab

Count

Penebalan Tunika Intima

Total Abnormal Normal

Status Obesitas Obes 10 13 23

Pearson Chi-Square .151a

1 .697

Continuity Correctionb .015 1 .904

Likelihood Ratio .151 1 .698

Fisher's Exact Test .791 .450

Linear-by-Linear Association .149 1 .700

N of Valid Casesb 62

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9,27. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Status Obesitas (Obes / Tidak)

1.231 .432 3.506

For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Abnormal

1.130 .613 2.085

For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Normal

.918 .594 1.420

(31)

Status Hipertensi * Penebalan Tunika Intima

Crosstab

Count

Penebalan Tunika Intima

Total Abnormal Normal

Status Hipertensi Hipertensi 22 32 54

Pearson Chi-Square .030a

1 .862

Continuity Correctionb .000 1 1.000

Likelihood Ratio .031 1 .861

Fisher's Exact Test 1.000 .590

Linear-by-Linear Association .030 1 .863

N of Valid Casesb 62

a. 2 cells (50,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 3,23. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Status Hipertensi (Hipertensi / Tidak)

1.146 .248 5.296

For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Abnormal

1.086 .420 2.811

For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Normal

.948 .531 1.694

(32)

Status Diabetes Mellitus * Penebalan Tunika Intima

Crosstab

Count

Penebalan Tunika Intima

Total Abnormal Normal

Diabetes Mellitus DM 6 13 19

Pearson Chi-Square .870a

1 .351

Continuity Correctionb .425 1 .514

Likelihood Ratio .886 1 .347

Fisher's Exact Test .410 .259

Linear-by-Linear Association .856 1 .355

N of Valid Casesb 62

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 7,66. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Diabetes Mellitus (DM / Tidak) .583 .187 1.822 For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Abnormal .715 .340 1.501 For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Normal 1.226 .818 1.838

(33)

Analisis HbA1C & IMT

Status HbA1c

Frequency

Percent

Valid Percent

Cumulative

Percent

Valid

Tinggi

11

17.7

17.7

17.7

Normal

51

82.3

82.3

100.0

Total

62

100.0

100.0

Penebalan Tunika Intima * Status HbA1c Crosstabulation

Status HbA1c

Total

Tinggi

Normal

Penebalan Tunika Intima

Abnormal

Count

5

20

25

% within Penebalan Tunika

Intima

20.0%

80.0% 100.0%

Normal

Count

6

31

37

% within Penebalan Tunika

Intima

16.2%

83.8% 100.0%

Total

Count

11

51

62

% within Penebalan Tunika

Intima

Continuity Correction

b

.002

1

.965

Likelihood Ratio

.145

1

.703

Fisher's Exact Test

.744

.477

Linear-by-Linear Association

.144

1

.704

N of Valid Cases

62

a. 1 cells (25,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4,44.

b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower

Upper

Odds Ratio for Penebalan

Tunika Intima (Abnormal /

Normal)

1.292

.347

4.803

For cohort Status HbA1c =

Tinggi

1.233

.422

3.606

For cohort Status HbA1c =

Normal

.955

.750

1.216

(34)

Analisis GD 1, GD 2, HbA1C & IMT

Tunika Intima Media

Pearson Correlation

1

.048

-.044

-.032

Sig. (2-tailed)

.712

.736

.805

**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).

Nonparametric Correlations

Correlation Coefficient

1.000

.064

.029

-.006

Sig. (2-tailed)

.

.622

.822

.965

N

62

62

62

62

HbA1C

Correlation Coefficient

.064

1.000

.442

**

.389

**

Sig. (2-tailed)

.622

.

.000

.002

N

62

62

62

62

Gula Darah

Puasa

Correlation Coefficient

.029

.442

**

1.000

.446

**

Sig. (2-tailed)

.822

.000

.

.000

N

62

62

62

62

Gula Darah 2

jm Post

Prandial

Correlation Coefficient

.006

.389

**

.446

**

1.000

Sig. (2-tailed)

.965

.002

.000

.

N

62

62

62

62

(35)

Status Dislipidemia * Penebalan Tunika Intima

Crosstab

Count

Penebalan Tunika Intima

Total Abnormal Normal

Dislipidemia Dislipid 18 28 46

Pearson Chi-Square .105a

1 .746

Continuity Correctionb .001 1 .977

Likelihood Ratio .105 1 .746

Fisher's Exact Test .774 .485

Linear-by-Linear Association .104 1 .748

N of Valid Casesb 62

a. 0 cells (,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6,45. b. Computed only for a 2x2 table

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Dislipidemia (Dislipid / Tidak)

.827 .261 2.615

For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Abnormal

.894 .461 1.734

For cohort Penebalan Tunika Intima = Normal

1.082 .663 1.767

(36)

Logistic Regression

Usia, Jarak Waktu dari Onset Stroke, Riw. Merokok, Lemak Total, SFA, MUFA

Dependent Variable Encoding

Original Value Internal Value

Normal 0

Abnormal 1

Categorical Variables Codings

Frequency

Block 1: Method = Backward Stepwise (Likelihood Ratio)

Model Summary

Step -2 Log likelihood

Cox & Snell R

Square Nagelkerke R Square

1 54.647a .373 .504

2 54.674a .373 .504

3 55.376a .366 .494

(37)

Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Step Chi-square df Sig.

1 13.807 8 .087

2 12.373 8 .135

3 5.556 8 .697

Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

IMTproregresi = Normal IMTproregresi = Abnormal

Total Observed Expected Observed Expected

(38)

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

95% C.I.for EXP(B)

Lower Upper Step 1a Status_Usia(1) 2.139 .902 5.626 1 .018 8.491 1.450 49.726

Status_Onset(1) 1.936 .741 6.834 1 .009 6.930 1.623 29.589 Riw.Rokok(1) .582 .698 .695 1 .404 1.789 .456 7.026 kat_lemak(1) 2.133 .836 6.503 1 .011 8.438 1.638 43.468 kat_SFA(1) -1.553 .840 3.415 1 .065 .212 .041 1.099 kat_PUFA(1) -.151 .924 .027 1 .870 .859 .140 5.258 Constant -3.278 1.556 4.440 1 .035 .038

Step 2a Status_Usia(1) 2.159 .895 5.821 1 .016 8.661 1.499 50.026 Status_Onset(1) 1.948 .739 6.956 1 .008 7.014 1.649 29.827 Riw.Rokok(1) .583 .698 .698 1 .404 1.791 .456 7.034 kat_lemak(1) 2.190 .764 8.215 1 .004 8.935 1.999 39.947 kat_SFA(1) -1.495 .760 3.872 1 .049 .224 .051 .994 Constant -3.470 1.041 11.113 1 .001 .031

Step 3a Status_Usia(1) 2.222 .898 6.119 1 .013 9.225 1.586 53.651 Status_Onset(1) 1.910 .734 6.770 1 .009 6.756 1.602 28.488 kat_lemak(1) 2.191 .758 8.348 1 .004 8.941 2.023 39.514 kat_SFA(1) -1.447 .762 3.602 1 .058 .235 .053 1.048 Constant -3.304 .999 10.940 1 .001 .037

(39)
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)
(44)

Figur

Memperbarui...

Referensi

Memperbarui...