Strategi Menulis Artikel Jurnal Internasional Bereputasi Untuk Meraih Guru Besar

Strategi Menulis Artikel Jurnal

Internasional Bereputasi

Untuk Meraih Guru Besar

Semarang, 27 Juni 2020

•

Prof. Dr. Rudi Hartono, S.S., M.Pd.

•

Tasikmalaya, September 7, 1969

•

S-1 (English Linguistics-UNPAD Bandung)

•

S-2 (English Education-UPI Bandung)

•

S-3 (Linguistics: Translation Studies-UNS Surakarta)

•

English Lecturer of UNNES Semarang

•

Translation Analyst & Textbook Writer

•

Mobile Phone: 082137054727

•

E-mail:

Intention Professorship Rank Research Results PREWRITING DRAFTING REVISING 1 EDITING 1 SUBMITTING PROOFREADING JOURNAL EDITOR REVISING/EDITING 2 PUBLISHING Published Rejected Accepted Plagiarism Checking Journal Article

Strategi Menulis Artikel Jurnal

q PREWRITING

ü Menyiapkan hasil penelitian (Jika artikelnya research-based). q DRAFTING

ü Mengeksekusi hasil penelitian menjadi article draft.

q REVISING 1

ü Menyempurnakan article draft dari kelemahan content. q EDITING 1

ü Memperbaiki kesalahan tata bahasa, tata kalimat, kosakata/istilah, ejaan, tanda baca, gaya selingkung, dll. Kasus-kasus writing mechanism, plagiarism checking (<25-30%).

q SUBMITTING

ü Menentukan jurnal yang akan dituju (Indexer, Open Access, berbayar, Predator, Expired?).

q REVISING 2

üMemperbaiki isi berdasarkan saran journal reviewer(s) atau editor(s) setelah ada feedback(s) dari mereka.

q EDITING 2

ü Memperbaiki tata tulis berdasarkan feedback(s) dari reviewer(s) atau editor(s).

q RESUBMITTING

ü Accepted atau jika major or minor revision kembali Revising & Editing.

q PUBLISHING

PREWRITING

u

Menyiapkan hasil penelitian (Jika artikelnya

research-based

)

u

Membaca sejumlah referensi terkait dengan topik

draft

u

Diskusi dengan teman sejawat, pakar, peneliti dalam

bidang terkait

u

Mewawancarai para tokoh dan narasumber terkait

bidang kajian

u

Searching, browsing information related to our

topics

DRAFTING

u

Mengeksekusi hasil penelitian menjadi

draft

artikel

u

Melihat

Guideline Submission for Authors

pada menu

jurnal yang dituju (Pastikan jurnal internasional

bereputasi (Web of Science/Scopus) dengan SJR jurnal di

atas 0,15 atau Q2 dengan SJR jurnal 0,10 atau memiliki

JIF WoS di atas 0,05. (Lihat PO PAK 2019)

u

Menulis draft sesuai dengan gaya selingkung jurnal yang

dituju (lihat article template yang sudah disediakan oleh

jurnal yang bersangkutan)

u

Alternatif 1: Ketik naskah dalam bahasa Indonesia,

terjemahkan sendiri dengan menggunakan mesin

penerjemah (misalnya

Google Translate + Grammarly

App).

u

Alternatif 2: Ketik naskah dalam bahasa Indonesia, kirim

REVISING 1

u

Menyempurnakan

draft

dari beberapa kelemahan

content

u

Melihat kembali kesesuaian isi draft dengan topik.

u

Memperkuat isi draft dengan data dan fakta

u

Menguatkan dan mengaitkan isi draft dengan memperkaya

rujukan dari penelitian-penelitian sebelumnya (

Previous

studies

) dan konsep dasar berupa pendapat beberapa pakar

terkait (

theoretical foundations/reviews

)

u

Melakukan

Proofreading

dan

peer-checking

u

Mengecek kemiripan naskah dan kepatutan (

Plagiarism

Checking

) dengan menggunakan mesin pendeteksi plagiasi

(

Plagiarism Checker

), misalnya:

Unplad, WriteCheck,

Copyscape, Duplichecker, PlagScan, Viper anti-plagiarism

scanner, PlagTracker, Unicheck, PlagiarismChecker.com,

Quetext, Turnitin,

dll.

EDITING 1

u

Memperbaiki beberapa kesalahan tata bahasa,

tata kalimat, paragraf, ketelitian data dan fakta,

ejaan, tanda baca, dll. Yang bersifat mekanik

u

Mengecek kembali naskah artikel agar sesuai

dengan cara mengutip dan menulis daftar

rujukan sesuai gaya selingkung jurnal yang

dituju, misalnya menggunakan format terbaru

APA, MLA, Harvard

, dll.

u

Melakukan kutipan tidak langsung dengan cara

membuat parafrase (

paraphrasing

)

u

Mengedit naskah misalnya dengan

Grammarly

SUBMITTING

u

Menentukan jurnal yang akan dituju. Perhatikan

pengindeks (

Indexe

r), Gaya selingkung

(

Submission Guidelines for Authors

),

Open

Access

atau tidak, Berbayar atau

Free

,

Predator

,

Cancelled, Discontinued

?).

u

Lihat daftar jurnal internasional terindeks yang

diakui Kemdikbud per Mei 2020

(

https://nazroel.id/2020/05/29/daftar-jurnal-

internasional-dari-indonesia-terindeks-scopus-per-mei-2020/)

u

Lihat dan telusuri pada laman

https://www.scimagojr.com/journalrank.php?cou

ntry=ID

dan unduh datanya (pada sisi kanan).

REVISING/EDITING 2

u

Merevisi atau mengedit naskah dari

reviewer jurnal jika diterima dengan

minor

atau

major revision

u

Ikuti semua dan kalau bisa tidak komplain

atau membantah. Lakukan saja perbaikan

sesuai saran-saran reviewer(s)

u

Minor revision

: hal-hal kecil-kecil seperti

pemilihan kata, penulisn tabel)

u

Major revision

: mempertanyakan

results

and discussion

, atau menyarankan

penelitian lanjutan sebelum dipublikasikan)

u

Melakukan cek kemiripan terhadap

revised

draft

sebelum

resubmitting

PROSES REVIEW

PUBLISHING

u

Jika artikel kita

ACCEPTED

, maka artikel kita dimuat dan

dipublikasi pada jurnal yang dituju.

u

Open Access (OA)

literature is digital, online, free of

charge, and free of most copyright and licensing

restrictions”(Suber (2012, p. 4)

u

1.

Green OA: Open Access

yang hanya sebatas repository

perpustakaan PT.

u

2.

Gold OA: Open Access

yang memberikan kebebasan

untuk mengakses artikel-artikel yang terdapat pada

database yang melakukan

Open Access

.

u

3.

Hybrid OA: Open Access

yang dilakukan dengan

melanggan suatu jurnal dengan mengeluarkan biaya dan

pelanggan jurnal memberikan akses yang bebas kepada

siapa saja yang ingin menggunakan jurnal tersebut.

Lembaga Pengindeks Jurnal

Internasional Bereputasi

u

Portal Garuda, ISJD

u

Google Scholar (h-index, i-10 index)

u

EBSCO, Gale, ProQuest, CABI

u

Directory of Open Access Journal (DOAJ)

u

Cambridge Scientific Abstract (CSA), Inspec, Pubmed,

Chemical Abstract Services (CAS)

u

Elsevier Products: SCOPUS

, Compendex, Engineering Village,

Reaxys, EnCompassLit, EmbaseImpact Factor (SJR, SNIP)

u

Thomson Reuters

/

Web of Science

Impact Factor (IF)

u

Others: Index Copernicus, CiteULike, Mendeley, Open J-Gate,

Parameter Global Untuk

Mengukur Reputasi Jurnal Ilmiah

1. Impact Factor (Thomson Reuters)

2. Scimago Journal Rank (SJR)

3. Source Normalized Impact per Paper (SNIP)

(Scimago, SCOPUS)

4. H-index (SCIMAGO, SCOPUS, Google Scholar)

5. i10-index (Google Scholar)

Infact Factor (IF)

u Impact factor adalah salah satu cara untuk mengevaluasi kualitas jurnal

yang dilakukan oleh The Institute of Scientific Information (ISI) Journal Citation Reports (JCR).

u Contoh: Impact Factor 2020 adalah sitasi dalam 2020 pada artikel yang

dipublikasi pada 2018 dan 2019 dibagi dengan jumlah artikel yang dipublikasi pada 2018 dan 2019. Angka yang dihasilkan tersebut dapat dipandang sebagai jumlah sitasi rata-rata yang diterima artikel per tahun dalam dua tahun setelah tahun publikasi.

u Cara menghitung:

Sitasi pada 2020 terhadap artikel yang dipublikasi pada: 2019 = 258

2018 = 199 Jumlah = 457

Jumlah artikel yang dipublikasi pada: 2019 = 116

2018 = 71 Jumlah = 187

Scientific Journal Rankings (SJR)

SJR

adalah perangkingan jurnal yang menjelaskan jumlah

kutipan yang diterima oleh jurnal dan prestise jurnal dari

mana kutipan tersebut berasal. Melalui SJR, field subject,

kualitas dan reputasi jurnal memiliki efek langsung pada

nilai sitasi sebuah journal. SCIMAGO Journal and Country

Rank (SJR) adalah alternatif untuk melihat Impact Factor

(IF) sebuah jurnal. Seperti halnya IF, SJR menjadi dasar

perhitungan dari database

SCOPUS

di setiap jurnalnya

dengan perangkingan berdasarkan sistem kuartil (

Q1-Q4

).

q

Q1 menunjukkan 75-100% dari distribusi IF,

q

Q2 untuk posisi tengah-tinggi (antara 50% dan 75%),

q

Q3 menengah ke posisi teratas (25% ke 50%), dan

q

Q4 posisi terendah (kurang dari 25% distribusi IF)

H-Index

H-Index

merupakan indeks untuk mengukur baik

produktivitas maupun dampak dari karya terbitan seorang

ilmuwan. Seorang ilmuan dengan

indeks-h

telah menerbitkan

h

makalah yang masing masing telah dikutip oleh publikasi

lain setidaknya

h

kali. Jadi,

indeks-

h mencerminkan jumlah

publikasi dan jumlah kutipan per publikasi.

q

H-Indeks 1 = ada 1 paper yang disitasi minimal satu kali

q

H-Indeks 2 = ada 2 paper yang disitasi minimal dua kali

q

H-Indeks 3 = ada 3 paper yang disitasi minimal tiga kali

q

H-Indeks 4 = ada 4 paper yang disitasi minimal empat kali

q

H-Indeks 5 = ada 5 paper yang disitasi minimal lima kali

q

H-Indeks 6 = ada 6 paper yang disitasi minimal enam kali

38 Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia

yang Terindeks

Scopus

1. Bulletin of Electrical Engineering and Informatics (BEEI)

http://beei.org/index.php/EEI

2. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE)

http://ijece.iaescore.com/index.php/IJECE/index

3. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Informatics (IJEEI)

http://section.iaesonline.com/index.php/IJEEI/index

4. International Journal of Technology https://ijtech.eng.ui.ac.id/about/1/about-the-journal

5. HAYATI Journal of Biosciences https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/hayati/index

6. International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems (IJPEDS)

http://ijpeds.iaescore.com/index.php/IJPEDS/index

7. Telkomnika http://journal.uad.ac.id/index.php/TELKOMNIKA/index

8. Tropical Animal Science Journal https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/tasj/index

9. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics

https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/IJAL/index

11. Acta medica Indonesiana (Junal Q3)

http://www.actamedindones.org/index.php/ijim

12. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia (Junal Q3)

https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jpii

13. Indonesian Journal of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science (Junal Q3) http://ijeecs.iaescore.com/index.php/IJEECS

14. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology (Junal Q2) http://ijaseit.insightsociety.org/

15. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business (Junal Q3)

https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/gamaijb

16. Agrivita (Junal Q3 – Homepage)

https://agrivita.ub.ac.id/index.php/agrivita/index

17. Indonesian Journal of Chemistry (Junal Q3)

https://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/ijc

18. Journal of Engineering and Technological Sciences (Junal Q2)

http://journals.itb.ac.id/index.php/jets/index

19. Bulletin of Chemical Reaction Engineering and Catalysis (Junal Q3)

https://ejournal2.undip.ac.id/index.php/bcrec/index

21. Electronic Journal of Graph Theory and Applications (Junal Q4)

https://www.ejgta.org/index.php/ejgta/index

22. Indonesian Journal of Geography (Junal Q3)

https://journal.ugm.ac.id/ijg

23. Journal of the Indonesian Tropical Animal Agriculture (Junal Q3)

https://ejournal.undip.ac.id/index.php/jitaa

24. Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies (Junal Q1)

https://ijims.iainsalatiga.ac.id/index.php/ijims/index

25. Studia Islamika (Junal Q3)

http://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/studia-islamika/index

26. Atom Indonesia (Junal Q4) http://aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij

27. Journal of Mathematical and Fundamental Sciences (Junal Q3)

http://journals.itb.ac.id/index.php/jmfs

28. ASEAN Journal of Chemical Engineering (Junal Q4)

http://aseanjche.ugm.ac.id/index.php

29. Biotropia (Junal Q4)

https://journal.biotrop.org/index.php/biotropia

30. International Journal on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (Jurnal Q3) http://www.ijeei.org/

31. Kukila (Junal Q4) http://kukila.org/index.php/KKL

32. Journal of ICT Research and Applications (Junal Q4)

http://journals.itb.ac.id/index.php/jictra/index

33. Al-Jami’ah (Junal Q3)

https://www.aljamiah.or.id/index.php/AJIS

34. Journal of Indonesian Islam (Junal Q2)

http://jiis.uinsby.ac.id/index.php/JIIs

35. Medical Journal of Indonesia (Junal Q4)

http://mji.ui.ac.id/journal/index.php/mji

36. Indonesian Journal on Geoscience (Junal Q4)

http://ijog.bgl.esdm.go.id/index.php/IJOG

37. Indonesian Biomedical Journal (Junal Q4)

https://inabj.org/index.php/ibj

38. ndonesian Journal of Pharmacy (Junal Q4)

Cara Mencari Jurnal Terindeks Scopus https://www.scopus.com/sources

Cara Mencari Jurnal Terindeks Scopus https://www.scimagojr.com/

Struktur Artikel Jurnal Lengkap

Ø

Title

Ø

Authors

Ø

Abstract

Ø

Keyword

Ø

Introduction

Ø

Literature Review

Ø

Methods

Ø

Results

Ø

Discussion

Ø

Conclusion

Ø

References

Ø

Acknowledgements

Ø

Authors’ Bio

Ø

Appendices

Ø

I

ntroduction:

What was the question?

Ø

M

ethods:

How did you try to answer it?

Ø

R

esults:

What did you find?

Ø

a

nd

Ø

D

iscussion:

What does it mean?

a. Tentukan objek yang akan diteliti (bidang pendidikan,

teknologi, kesehatan, pertanian, linguistik, dll.)

b. Temukan apa yang akan diteliti dari objek tersebut

(pengaruhnya, kualitasnya, manfaatnya, dll.).

c. Cari bagian mana dari objek yang akan diteliti.

d. Tentukan media, metode, teknik, pendekatan, strategi,

dll. (Ayunitami, 2019)

e. Perhatikan variabel penelitian.

Variabel merupakan sesuatu yang menjadi objek

pengamatan penelitian (independent, dependent, control, moderating variables) (Sari, 2018)

f. Tentukan metode dan setting penelitian.

g. Perhatikan diksi (Pilihan kata).

Diksi yang diperoleh merupakan diksi yang ilmiah namun tetap dapat dipahami pembaca.

h. Tulis langsung maksimal 15-20 kata (Gaya Selingkung).

Judul karya ilmiah ditulis secara langsung pada pokok permasalahan dan tidak bertele-tele.

Tambahan Info Judul (1)

Ø

The fewest possible words that

adequately indicate the contents of

the paper

Ø

Should not include extra words,

such as “A Study of” or

“Observations on”

Ø

Should be specific enough

Ø

Generally should not include

abbreviations

Tambahan Info Judul (2)

Examples of Four Forms (Mahmood, 2019)

¡

Nominal

Ø

Relationship of interns’ working hours to medical

errors

¡

Compound

Ø

Treatment effect of dietary fiber on serum

phosphorus and

quality of life in hemodialysis

patients

with

constipation:

A

randomized

controlled trial

¡

Full sentence

Ø

Full-face helmets provide greater protection in

motorcycle accidents than other helmet designs

¡

Question

Ø

Do full-face helmets provide greater protection in

a.

The Influence of Method X on Activity Y in the Z

Setting

u

The Influence of Direct Method on Students’

Speaking Skill of the Junior High Schools in

Indonesia

b.

The Correlation between X and Y in Z Setting

u

The Correlation between Reading Habits and

Students’ Writing Skill in Senior High School Level

c.

Improving Y by Using X in University Context

u

Improving Students’ Translation Quality by Using

E-Litrans Tool App in University X

d.

X in Y’s Product(s)

u

Grammatical and Mechanical Errors in Students’

English Composition

Criteria for Authorship

¡

Substantial contributions

to the conception or design of

the work; or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of

data for the work; AND

¡

Drafting the work

or

revising it critically

for important

intellectual content; AND

¡

Final approval

of the version to be published; AND

¡

Agreement to be

accountable for all aspects of the work

in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or

integrity of any part of the work are appropriately

investigated and resolved.

(International Committee of Medical Journal Editors – ICMJE)

35

¡

Often listed from greatest contributions to least,

irrespective of academic status

¡

Order of the author should be a joint decision of the

authors

¡

A supervisor should be co-author, with the

student as first author, in a paper based on

thesis

¡

Mere possession of an institutional position on its

own, such as Head of the Research team, does not

justify authorship

¡

Field workers, language editors and statisticians

are not co -authors

¡

Important to list one’s name the same way on every

paper

¡

Also mention institutional affiliation of each author

¡

Some journals also mention designation and

academic degrees

¡

Give contact detail of the corresponding author

Ketentuan umum terkait dalam membuat abstrak:

u

Jumlah kata sekitar 200-250 kata (sesuaikan

Gaya Selingkung)

u

Pilih

British English atau

American English

harus

konsisten.

u

Terdiri dari

introduksi/pendahuluan, tujuan

penelitian

,

metode

,

hasil dan pembahasan

(jika

perlu), dan

(Ke)simpulan

u

Tenses: Introduksi (Present), Tujuan penelitan

metode, dan hasil (Past), (Ke)simpulan (Present)

3. Abstrak

¡

An important part of the paper

Ø

Relatively widely read

Ø

Used to decide whether to read the rest of

the paper

Ø

Gives editors, reviewers, others a first

impression

¡

Briefly summarizes the paper

¡

Usually a single paragraph

¡

Should be organized like the paper (for

example, in sort of a mini-IMRaD format)

Writing competence is one of significant and basic demands for teachers in delivering their profession as educators. Many teachers feel that writing a book is a pride but it is too difficult for them to do. Many factors influence them not to start to write, such as inner motivation, institution supports, ideas, materials, and opportunities. For examples, many of them are lack of motivation to be confident course book writers, their institutions do not support their efforts and facilitate them well, they have no idea what they are going to write, they are not accustomed to provide their own lesson materials for their daily instruction—only copying from books or other resources, and most of them do not have any opportunity at all to write a course book. Recently we revealed that OBOT has potential activities as an integrated program in preparing teachers to be professional course book writers. Therefore to create teacher-writers and produce course books in one school, One Book One Teacher (OBOT) program came as a solution. OBOT is a program designed for teachers to be a course book writer at schools. In this study, to dig up their responses on course book writing activity and OBOT implementation in their school, we conducted a descriptive survey and observation on 13 teachers in Senior High School Bina Amal Semarang. We distributed questionnaires, tabulated, analyzed and interpreted the data, then drew the conclusion. The research results show that significantly OBOT encourages teachers to write course book actively and leads them to be productive course book writers.

English Gambits

Phrases of Research Objectives:

u The aim of the experiment is to compare __

u Our research aims at finding a solution for this challenging problem

of __

u There is no overall goal, apart from __

u We examine some previous work and propose a new method for __ u There are too many simultaneous goals making it difficult to __

u One of the major aims of this work was to create __

u The main objective is to investigate methods for improving __ u The objectives can be restated in the light of __

u The objective is to devise and implement a system for __

u The objectives were partially met by developing a method to __ u The objective is to demonstrate the feasibility of __

u One of the objectives is to improve the __

¡

3 to 10 keywords

¡

Selected from the title and abstract

¡

Can be selected from a standard

list (e.g., Medical Subject

Headings – MeSH)

Example 1: using comma (,)

One Book One Teacher, writing

competence, writing skill, course book

Example 2: using semicolon (;)

One Book One Teacher; writing

competence; writing skill; course book

4. Keywords

u

Purposes

¡

To provide background of the study

§

In order to help readers understand the paper

§

In order to help readers appreciate the

importance of the research

¡

To identify the question(s) the

research addressed

§

Sometimes stated as a thesis or hypothesis

5. Introduction (1)

u

Contents

§

Information on importance of topic

§

Highlights of relevant previous research

§

Identification of what is lacking in the current

knowledge

§

Approach you used to fill the gap in

knowledge

§

In some cases, the main findings

5. Introduction (2)

Phrases of Previous Studies:

u These results go beyond previous reports, showing that __ u In line with previous studies __

u This result ties well with previous studies wherein __ u Contrary to the findings of __ we did not find __

u They have demonstrated that __

u Others have shown that __ improves __

u By comparing the results from __, we hope to determine __

u However, in line with the ideas of __, it can be concluded that __ u When comparing our results to those of older studies, it must be

pointed out that __

u We have verified that using __ produces similar results

u Overall these findings are in accordance with findings reported by

__

English Gambits

§

First paragraph

§

Middle paragraphs

§

Final paragraph

Topic of Paper

Literature

Review

Justification & Road Map

5. Introduction (3)

(Mahmood, 2019)

English Gambits

Phrases of Introduction:

• Research on __ has a long tradition

• For decades, one of the most popular ideas in __ literature is the

idea that____

• Recent theoretical developments have revealed that __ • A common strategy used to study __ is to __

• This research constitutes a relatively new area which has

emerged from __

• These approaches have been influential in the field because of __ • In the past several decades, __ have played an important role in __ • There are growing appeals for __

• This is the field of study that deals with __

• Most of the theories of __ are however focused on explaining __

Ø

Usually a part of ‘Introduction

’ but

sometimes, a separate section

Ø

Not a comprehensive review of

literature; only a few major papers

Ø

Try to use primary sources.

Ø

Mostly uses

past tense

Ø

Arrange mostly in chronological order.

Ø

Make logical connections between

studies.

Ø

Sometime, summary table is useful

for comparing studies

6. Literature Review

u

Purposes

Ø

To allow others to replicate what you did

§

In order to test it

§

In order to do further research

Ø

To allow others to evaluate what you did

§

To determine whether the conclusions seem

valid

§

To determine whether the findings seem

applicable to other situations

7. Methods (1)

u

Contents

Ø

Describe the context and setting of the study

Ø

Specify the study design

Ø

Describe the ‘population’ (patients,

doctors, hospitals, etc.)

Ø

Describe the sampling strategy

Ø

Describe the intervention, if applicable

Ø

Identify the main study variables

Ø

Describe data collection instruments and procedures

Ø

Outline data analysis methods

7. Methods (2)

u

Amount of Detail to Use

Ø

For well-known methods

§

Name of method, citation of reference

Ø

For methods previously described but not

well known

§

Brief description of method, citation of

reference

Ø

For methods that you yourself

devise

§

Relatively detailed description

7. Methods (3)

u

Guidelines

Ø

Should be written in

past tense

Ø

Some journals use subheads

Ø

May include tables and figures, for

example:

ü

Flowcharts

ü

Diagrams of apparatus

ü

Tables of experimental conditions

7. Methods (4)

English Gambits

Phrases of Research Methods/Designs

u We started by investigating …..

u We designed a new technique for …… u We used a new approach.

u These experiments were carried out to find out …..

u In order to verify the validity of the ….. method, we carried out

several experiments.

u All the tests/measurements were carried out at room temperature. u The (signals) were measured before and after …..

u To illustrate ….., a simulation was performed.

u The ….. analysis was performed in order to ….. We checked for the

presence of …..

u The increase in ….. was not caused by/was not due to a decrease in

……

u The (optimized condition) was obtained from ….

English Gambits

Phrases of Data Collection:

u There were __ participants in this sample.

u Participants first provided informed consent about __ u We performed additional data collection with __

u For this study, we analyzed the data collected from __ u Data were collected and maintained by __

u For this purpose, the researcher employed survey data collected

from __

u The analyzed data included: __

u The procedures of handling the data followed the suggestions of __ u Subsequently, __ were then used to elicit further data.

u Survey data were collected from __

u The sample was heterogeneous with respect to __

u The sample size in this study was not considered large enough

for__

u The sample of respondents included __

Ø

The core of the paper

Ø

Report on data collection and recruitment

(response rate, etc.)

Ø

Describe participants (demographic, clinical

condition, etc.)

Ø

Present key findings with respect to the

central research question

Ø

Present secondary findings (secondary

outcomes, subgroup analyses, etc.)

Ø

Often include tables and figures

Ø

Should present results but not comment on them

Ø

Some journals, however, combine the

Results and the Discussion

8. Results (1)

u

Verb Tense:

Past

u

Examples:

Ø

A total of 417 samples

were

analyzed.

Ø

_____

increased

, but _____

decreased

.

Ø

The median salary of these surgeons

was

_____.

Ø

Three of the mixtures

exploded

.

Ø

This difference

was

not statistically

significant.

8. Results (2)

u

Tables and Figures

Ø

How much should the information in the text overlap

that in the tables and figures?

§

Not extensive overlap

§

In general, text should present only the main points

from the tables and figures

§

Also include a few of the most important data

§

Detail should be clear from the table or figure

Ø

Remember to mention every table and figure in

the text.

§

Example:

Researchers who attended the workshop

published twice as many papers per year (Table 3)

.

8. Results (3)

Phrases of Describing Charts, Figures, and Graphs:

u Fig. 2 shows/presents/depicts/outlines/illustrates/represents ….. u Fig. 3 gives an example of …..

u Such cases are depicted in the following figures. u This is illustrated in Fig. 5.

u ….. is/are shown/given in Figs. 3 and 4. u ….. can be found in Fig. 8.

u As can be seen from Figs. 5 and 3, ….. u As shown in Fig. 1, …..

u As follows from the figures shown above, ….. u From this figure it can be seen that …..

u For the resulting plot, see Fig. 2. u Table II summarizes …..

u The graph/diagram suggests/indicates that …..

English Gambits

u

Common Mistakes

Ø

Illogical sequence of data presentation

Ø

Inaccurate data

Ø

Repetition of data

Ø

Misplaced information between the

methods and results sections

Ø

Inappropriate presentation of data –

overuse and abuse of tables and figures

Ø

Attempts to draw conclusions – this

should be covered in the discussion

section

8. Results (4)

Phrases of Research Results:

u From the short review above, key findings emerge: __

u This is an important finding in the understanding of the __ u A further novel finding is that __

u Together, the present findings confirm __

u The results demonstrate two things. First, __. Second, __ u The results of the experiment found clear support for the __ u This analysis found evidence for __

u Planned comparisons revealed that __ u Our results casts a new light on __

u This section summarizes the findings and contributions made. u This gives clearly better results than __

u From the results, it is clear that __

English Gambits

Ø

Is one of the most difficult parts

to write, because it has more

choice of what to say

Ø

Often should begin with a brief

summary of the main findings

Ø

Should answer the question(s) stated

in the introduction (or address the

hypotheses stated in the introduction

9. Discussion (1)

u

Possible Contents (1)

Ø

Strengths of the study

§

For example, superior methods, extensive data

Ø

Limitations of the study

§

Small sample size, short follow-up, incomplete

data, possible sources of bias, problems with

experimental procedures

§

If the limitations seem unlikely to

affect the

conclusions, can explain

why

9. Discussion (2)

u

Possible Contents (2)

Ø

Relationship to findings of other

research, for example:

§

Similarities to previous findings (your own

and others’)

§

Differences from previous findings

§

Possible reasons for similarities and

differences

9. Discussion (3)

u

Possible Contents (3)

Ø

Applications and implications, for

example:

§

Possible uses of the findings in policy and

practice

§

Relationship of the findings to theories or

models:

§

Do the findings support them?

§

Do they refute them?

§

Do they suggest modifications?

9. Discussion (4)

u

Possible Contents (4)

Ø

Other research needed, for example:

§

To address questions still unanswered

§

To address new questions raised by the

findings

Ø

Sometimes, summary of findings and

recommendations form a separate

section as ‘Conclusion’

9. Discussion (5)

u

Common Mistakes

Ø

Repetition of data presented in the results

section

Ø

Incorrect interpretation of the findings

Ø

Importance of results inadequately

discussed or omitted

Ø

Conclusions not supported by findings

Ø

Irrelevant and faulty discussion points

Ø

Failure to identify any weakness

Ø

Omission of key and relevant references

Ø

Explanations are too long or verbose

9. Discussion (6)

u

Purposes

Ø

To give credit to others for their work

Ø

To add credibility to your work by

showing that you used valid

information sources

Ø

To help show how your work is

related to previous work

Ø

To help readers find further information

10. References (1)

Format Sesuaikan Gaya

Selingkung Jurnal

Ø

Various formats exist for citation in text,

for examples:

§

Accuracy of references is important (Day & Gastel, 2011).

§

Accuracy of references is important.

3

Ø

Various formats exist for items in reference

lists:

§

Pineda D. 2003. Communication of science in Colombia.

Sci. Ed. 26:91-92.

§

Pineda D. Communication of science in Colombia. Sci Ed

2003; 26:91-2.

u

Citation Management

Software

Ø

Examples: EndNote, Reference

Manager

Ø

Allows you to keep a database of

references

Ø

In many cases, provides the citations

and references in the proper format for

your target journal

10. References (3)

Ø

A place to thank people who helped

with the work but did not make

contributions deserving authorship

Ø

Sometimes the place where

sources of financial support

are stated

11. Acknowledgments

Checklist for Review of an Article

1.

Does the title reflect accurately the content of the

paper?

2.

Are the significant words in the title near the

beginning to catch a reader’s attention?

3.

Does the Introduction begin with the big issue

of topical/scientific interest and then narrow

down to the specific topic of the paper?

4.

Does the Introduction locate the study effectively

within the recent international literature in the

field?

5.

Does the Introduction highlight a gap that the

research fills, or present a need to extend

knowledge in a particular area? (Does it say why

the work was done?)

Checklist for Review of an Article

6.

Does the Introduction end with a clear statement

of the aim/hypothesis of the research or

summarize the main activity of the paper

(depending on the field and relevant journal

conventions)?

7.

Are the methods, including statistical analysis,

appropriate for the questions addressed and the

study conducted?

8.

Are the methods given in enough detail to convince a

reader of the credibility of the results?

9.

Do the results provide answers to the questions

raised in the Introduction, or fulfill the objectives

given?

10.

Are the results presented in a logical order (either

similar to the order of presenting the aims or

methods, or similar to the order in which the

Discussion is presented)?

Checklist for Review of an Article

11. Are all the tables and figures needed to tell the story of the

paper? Could any be combined or deleted?

12. Do all the tables and figures stand alone? ( e.g., can readers

understand them without going back to read the text of the paper?)

13. Does the Discussion begin with a reference to the

original aim/ hypothesis/ question?

14. Are the results compared with other relevant findings from

the literature? Are you aware of any other comparisons that could be made? Are appropriate explanations/ speculations included about reasons for observed similarities,

differences, and other outcomes?

15. Are appropriate statements made about the wider

significance of the results, their l imitations, and/ or their implications for practice and/ or future research directions?

16. Does the paper end with an appropriate concluding

paragraph or section that emphasizes the key message( s) and their significance to the field?

Checklist for Review of an Article

17. Is the list of references complete (all the works in the

list are referred to in the paper, and all the works referred to in the paper are in the list)?

18. Are the reference list and in-text references

formatted accurately and in the right style for the target journal?

19. Does the Abstract include all the information required

by the journal, and does it highlight appropriately the key results and their significance?

20. Does the Abstract adhere to the word limit and follow

the prescribed format of the target journal?

21. Are the selected keywords those that will best allow the

article to be located by the full range of its prospective readers?

22. What additional comments do you have for

strengthening the paper?

Pedoman Operasional Penilaian Angka Kredit Kenaikan Pangkat/Jabatan Akademik Dosen

10

sekolah yang memperoleh ijazah/gelar dan Pendidikan dan Pelatihan (Diklat)

Prajabatan (sesuai lampiran II Permen PAN dan RB No. 46 Tahun 2013 dan lampiran

III Permen PAN dan RB No. 13 Tahun 2013); serta unsur penunjang paling banyak

dibutuhkan angka kredit 10% (sepuluh persen) atau boleh tidak ada.

Dalam penilaian kegiatan yang dilakukan untuk usul pengangkatan pertama dan

kenaikan jabatan akademik dalam hal-hal tertentu diberlakukan batas maksimal yang

diakui pada komponen-komponen tertentu. Batas maksimal diberlakukan dengan

tujuan untuk mendistribusikan tugas pokok dan fungsi dosen pada setiap sub unsur

kegiatan dalam satu unsur kegiatan maupun pendistribusian untuk masing-masing

unsur dan pada strata pendidikan (diploma/sarjana, magister dan doktor). Untuk

dapat menduduki jenjang jabatan akademik dan/atau pangkat tertentu, dosen wajib

memenuhi angka kredit kumulatif dengan distribusi unsur utama dan penunjang

tertentu (lihat Lampiran Permendikbud Nomor 92 Tahun 2014). Lebih lanjut,

distribusi unsur utama dalam setiap usul kenaikan jabatan akademik disajikan pada

Tabel 1.

Tabel 1. Jumlah Angka Kredit Kumulatif Paling Sedikit dari Unsur Utama dan Unsur Penunjang NO JABATAN KUALIFIKASI AKADEMIK UNSUR UTAMA UNSUR PENUNJANG PELAKSANAAN PENDIDIKAN PELAKSANAAN PENELITIAN PELAKSANAAN PENGABDIAN MASYARAKAT 1 Asisten Ahli

Magister ≥ 55% ≥ 25% Paling Sedikit 0.50ak dan ≤ 10%

≤ 10% 2 Lektor Magister ≥ 45% ≥ 35% Paling Sedikit

0.50ak dan ≤ 10% ≤ 10% 3 Lektor Kepala Magister/ Doktor ≥ 40% ≥ 40% Paling Sedikit 0.50ak dan ≤ 10% ≤ 10% 4 Profesor Doktor ≥ 35% ≥ 45% Paling Sedikit

0.50ak dan ≤ 10%

≤ 10%

5.1 Unsur Utama

Kegiatan-kegiatan yang termasuk dalam unsur utama pendidikan dan

pelaksanaan pendidikan meliputi tetapi tidak terbatas pada kegiatan-kegiatan yang

disajikan pada Tabel 2. Kegiatan lain yang tidak termuat pada Tabel 2 dapat diakui

sebagai kegiatan sub-unsur pendidikan sepanjang mempunyai fungsi pendidikan

formal dan/atau pelaksanaan pendidikan (pengajaran). Dengan kata lain, kegiatan

yang tidak tertulis pada Tabel 2 tetapi mempunyai fungsi yang sama dengan

Tahapan Pencapaian GB

Jumlah Angka Kredit Kumulatif Paling Sedikit dari Unsur Utama dan Unsur Penunjang

Catatan: Filing yang lengkap dan rapi sangat membantu

Tahapan Pencapaian GB

Persyaratan Khusus Karya Ilmiah

Pedoman Operasional Penilaian Angka Kredit Kenaikan Pangkat/Jabatan Akademik Dosen

23

kegiatan ini antara lain adalah post-doctoral, scheme academic mobility exchange (SAME), pelatihan untuk meningkatkan kemampuan mengajar (seperti pengembangan keterampilan teknik instruksional (Pekerti) dan Applied Approach), dan lain-lain.

5.1.3 Pelaksanaan Penelitian

Seperti telah dijelaskan dalam sub bab sebelumnya bahwa aturan tentang jabatan akademik diharapkan mendukung program pencapaian tujuan pendidikan dan mengejar ketertinggalan dari negara-negara lain dalam produktivitas karya ilmiah. Oleh karena itu, jenis karya ilmiah sebagai syarat utama menduduki jenjang jabatan akademik tertentu dapat berbeda satu dengan yang lainnya. Selain itu, untuk karya ilmiah tertentu yang digunakan dalam kenaikan jabatan akademik diberlakukan batas paling tinggi yang diakui. Penentuan batas paling tinggi yang diakui disesuaikan dengan kriteria jabatan akademik. Tabel 6 menunjukkan tugas, tanggung jawab dalam publikasi karya ilmiah untuk kenaikan jabatan akademik tertentu. Jenis kegiatan, kriteria, angka kredit dan angka kredit paling tinggi pengajuan dalam penelitian dan penyebarluasan IPTEKS disajikan pada Tabel 7.

Tabel 6a. Tugas, Tanggung Jawab dalam Publikasi Karya Ilmiah untuk Kenaikan Jabatan Akademik Reguler sebagai Penulis Pertama dan sekaligus Penulis Korespondensi.

No Jabatan Akademik

Persyaratan Khusus Karya Ilmiah Jurnal Nasional atau Peringkat 3, 4, 5, dan 6 Jurnal nasional terakreditasi atau Peringkat Akreditasi 1 dan 2 Jurnal Internasional Jurnal Internasional bereputasi 1 Asisten Ahli W S S S 2 Lektor W S S S 3 Lektor Kepala/Magister S S W S Lektor Kepala/Doktor S W S S 4 Profesor S S S W

W : wajib ada, atau boleh digantikan dengan karya ilmiah yang angka kreditnya lebih tinggi S : disarankan ada

Catatan: Artikel jurnal internasional terindeks SCOPUS/WoS

merupakan syarat khusus dan wajib dipenuhi (walaupun hanya 1 artikel).

2 Kunci Utama Mencapai GB

1. Akademik

a. Melaksanakan Tridharma PT dengan timeline yang jelas

b. Rajin mengumpulkan surat tugas/sertifikat (filing yang baik)

Lakukan mapping kebutuhan angka kredit

c. Konsultasi dengan Tim PAK PT sendiri

d. Menyusun dokumen pengusulan Angka Kredit

2.

Non-Akademik

a. Berdo’a untuk kemudahan dan kelancaran ikhtiar

b. Shadaqah harta, tenaga, pemikiran/ilmu

c. Minta restu orangtua dan pimpinan/atasan

d. Silaturahmi kepada handai taulan, sahabat karib, dan teman

Akhmadi, H. (2019, August 9). Tips Menulis Paper/Artikel

Ilmiah Dalam Bahasa Inggris, PART 1: Useful Phrases for Academic Writing From Introduction

to Conclusion.

https://heriakhmadi.com/2019/08/09/tips-menulis-paper-artikel-ilmiah-dalam-bahasa-inggris/

Ayunitami, V.D. (2019, Juni 10). Cara Membuat Judul

Karya Ilmiah.

http://vionadewiayunitami.blogspot.com/2013/06/car a-membuat-judul-karya-ilmiah-ilmiah.html

Mahmood, K. (2019). How to Write a Journal Article. University of the Punjab.

Sari, E.Y. (2018, January 24). 6 Cara Menulis Judul Karya

Tulis Ilmiah. https://blog.typoonline.com/6-cara-menulis-judul-karya-tulis-ilmiah/