SPEECH ACTS IN WEDDING CEREMONY
OF THE ANGKOLA CULTURE
A Thesis
Submitted to Post-Graduate School English Applied Linguistic Program in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of
Magister Humaniora
By:
EFRINI PANJAITAN Registration Number: 8106111007
ENGLISH APPLIED LINGUISTICS STUDY PROGRAM POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL
SPEECH ACTS IN WEDDING CEREMONY
OF THE ANGKOLA CULTURE
A Thesis
Submitted to Post-Graduate School English Applied Linguistic Program in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of
Magister Humaniora
By:
EFRINI PANJAITAN Registration Number: 8106111007
ENGLISH APPLIED LINGUISTICS STUDY PROGRAM POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Thanks to Allah, the lord of the universe who has given me the
opportunity to finish this thesis. Thank you so much my dear lord. It is also
impossible to be finished without guidance, support and valuable knowledge from
many people whose names can not be mentioned one by one.
First, the writer would like to express her sincere gratitude to Prof. Amrin
Saragin, M.A, Ph.D her first advisor and Prof. Dr. Busmin Gurning, M.Pd her
second adviser, for their valuable advice, guidance, constructive comments and
previous time spent on supervising and commenting the process of writing until it
come to its present form. Second her special gratitude goes to the head of English
applied linguistics, Prof. Dr. Busmin Gurning, M.Pd and secretary Dr. Sri Minda
Murni, M.S, who has generously encouraged her in completing this study, all
lecturers, for her valuable knowledge and instruction they have implemented to
her during the years studying and librarians of the State University of Medan for
leading some useful books and other sources that are needed in writing this thesis.
The writer would like to sincerely thank to anonymous participant who
contributed suggestions, critics and advises to this study. My deepest gratitude
goes to Prof. T. Silvana Sinar, M.A. Ph.D, Dr. Eddy Setia, M.Ed, TESP and Dr.
Anni Holila Pulungan, M.Hum, without their excellent academic guidance and
support, this thesis would not have been possible.
Then, a very special deep of gratitude is directed to her beloved father
Matnatsir Panjaitan and beloved mother Nura’ni Gultom together with her
Rohman SKM and her brothers Ronald Panjaitan S.Kom, Marhot Panjaitan S.Pd
and Abdul Rahman Nasution S.Pd for their full love, support, care and prayers.
Finally, a special debt of gratitude is addressed to all her beloved best
friend Yulia Warda S.Pd.I, M. Hum and Maitri Rahmadhani SS. M.hum, Vivi
Novalia Sitinjak SS. M. Hum and all her classmates LTBI A2 for their close
friendship and encouragement in finishing this thesis.
Medan,15 Maret 2013 The writer
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.1 The Background of The Study ... 11.2 The Problems of the Study ... 4
1.3 The Objective of the Study ... 5
1.4 The Scopes of the Study ... 5
1.5 The significance of the Study ... 6
CHAPTER II REVIEW OF LITERATURE 2.1 Pragmatics ... 7
2.2 Speech Acts ... 9
2.2.1 Kinds of Speech Act ... 12
2.2.1.1 Locutionary Acts ... 12
2.3AngkolaCulture ... 26
2.3.1AngkolaLanguage ... 26
2.3.2AngkolaRegion ... 28
2.3.3 Three Pillars (Dalihan Na Tolu) onAngkolaCulture ... 28
2.3.4 The Components ofDalihan Na Tolu ... 29
2.3.4.1Kahanggi ... 29
2.3.4.2Anak Boru ... 30
2.3.4.3Mora ... 30
2.4 Wedding Ceremony onAngkolaCulture ... 31
2.5 Speech Acts Aspects ... 35
2.6 The Previous Relevant Study ... 35
2.7 Conceptual Framework ... 38
CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD 3.1 Research Design ... 40
3.2 Data and Data Sources ... 41
3.3 Subjects of Study ... 41
3.4 The Instrument of Data Collection ... 41
3.5 The Technique of Data Collection ... 42
3.6 The Technique of Data Analysis ... 42
3.7 Triangulation ... 44
CHAPTER IV DATA ANALYSIS AND FINDINGS 4.1 Data and Data Analysis ... 45
4.1.2 The Ways of Uttered Speech Acts Used
by the Elements of Dalihan Na Toluin
Wedding Ceremony of theAngkola
Culture ... 47
4.1.2.1 Indirect Speech Act 4.1.2.1.1 Using Umpama ... 47
4.1.2.1.2 Direct Speech Act ... 50
4.1.2.2.1 Using Idiom... 50
4.1.2.2.2 Using Kinship ... 53
4.1.3 The Dominant Types of Speech Acts Used by Each Elements ofDalihan Na Toluin Wedding Ceremony of theAngkolaCulture ... 56
4.1.3.1 Speech Acts byMora“ WifeGiver”in Wedding Ceremony of theAngkola Culture ... 57
4.1.3.1.1 Types of Speech Acts Used byMora Si Habolonan... 57
4.1.3.1.2 Types of Speech Acts Used byMora Sian Boru... 64
4.1.3.2 Speech Acts byKahanggi “A Group of People fromthe Same Clan with “Suhut” on Wedding Ceremony in the AngkolaCulture ... 70
4.1.1.2.1 Types of Speech Acts Used byKahanggi Ni Suhut ... 70
4.1.1.2.2 Types of Speech Acts Used byKahanggi Pareban ... 78
4.1.3.3 Speech Acts by Anak Boru “Receiver of Wife”in Wedding Ceremony in the AngkolaCulture ... 84
4.1.3.3.2 Types of Speech Acts Used
byAnak Boru Pisang Raut... 92
4.1.4 The Reason of Using the Dominant Types of Speech Acts Used by the Elements of Dalihan Na Toluon Wedding Ceremony in theAngkolaCulture ... 97
4.2 Findings ... 99
4.3 Discussion ... 101
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION 5.1 Conclusion ... 104
5.2 Implication... 105
5.3 Suggestion ... 106
LIST OF TABLES
Page
Table 1. Speech Acts Categories into the Types of Speech Acts... 40
Table 2. The Number Types of Speech Acts Used by the Elements ofDalihan Na Toluon Wedding Ceremony in theAngkolaCulture ... 43
Table 3. Thanking Speech Acts ... 44
Table 4. Blessing Speech Acts ... 45
Table 5. Statement Speech Acts... 47
Table 6. Explaining Speech Acts ... 48
Table 7. Suggestion Speech Acts ... 49
Table 8. Advising Speech Acts ... 49
Table 9. Greeting Speech Acts... 51
Table 10. Thanking Speech Acts ... 51
Table 11. Blessing Speech Acts ... 52
Table 12. Admonishing Speech Acts ... 53
Table 13. Advising Speech Acts ... 53
Table 14. Statement Speech Acts... 54
Table 15. Thanking Speech Acts ... 56
Table 16. Blessing Speech Acts ... 56
Table 17. Statement Speech Acts... 57
Table 18. Informing Speech Acts... 59
Table 19. Concluding Speech Acts ... 59
Table 20. Admonishing Speech Acts ... 60
Table 21. Suggestion Speech Acts ... 61
Table 22. Advising Speech Act... 62
Table 23. Greeting Speech Acts... 63
Table 24. Thanking Speech Acts ... 63
Table 25. Blessing Speech Acts ... 64
Table 26. Statement Speech Acts... 65
Table 28. Suggestion Speech Acts ... 67
Table 29. Explaining Speech Acts ... 67
Table 30. Greeting Speech Acts... 68
Table 31. Thanking Speech Acts ... 69
Table 32. Blessing Speech Acts ... 70
Table 33. Admonishing Speech Acts ... 71
Table 34. Suggestion Speech Acts ... 72
Table 35. Statement Speech Acts... 73
Table 36. Greeting Speech Acts... 75
Table 37. Thanking Speech Acts ... 75
Table 38. Blessing Speech Acts ... 76
Table 39. Statement Speech Acts... 77
Table 40. Advising Speech Acts78 Table 41. Explaining Speech Acts ... 78
Table 42. The Percentage Types of Speech Acts Dominantly Used by the Elements ofDalihan Na Tolu in Wedding Ceremony of theAngkolaCulture ... 88
Table 43. The Number Types of Speech Acts Used by Mora Sihabolonanin Wedding Ceremony of theAngkolaCulture ... 89
Table 44. The Number Types of Speech Acts Used byMora Sian Boruin Wedding Ceremony of theAngkolaCulture... 89
Table 45. The Number Types of Speech Acts Used byKahanggi Nisuhutin Wedding Ceremony of theAngkolaCulture ... 90
Table 46. The Number Types of Speech Acts Used byKahanggi Parebanin Wedding Ceremony of theAngkolaCulture ... 91
Table 47. The Number Types of Speech Acts Used byAnak Boru Nisuhutin Wedding Ceremony of theAngkolaCulture ... 91
Table 48. The Number Types of Speech Acts Used byAnak Boru
LIST OF DIAGRAM
Page
Diagram 1. Wedding Ceremony Research by Types of Speech Acts
LIST OF APPENDIXES
Page
Appendix 1. Pictures ofAngkolaWedding Ceremony ... 110
Appendix 2. Interview Transcript ... 112
1
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
1.1 The Background of the Study
Indonesia has many vernacular languages and cultures. Language is used
by the society as a tool for communication. As a means of communication
thoughts ideas language is used for creating friendship, economic, education etc
while Culture is used as basic systems of life in the society. Without language,
someone cannot interaction one another and without culture the community does
not have roles and characteristics of the society. It is agreed that language cannot
be separated from the culture as language is one product of culture.
Knowing the culture of the society will help us build comfortable
interaction. One can be impolite if s/he cannot do interaction based on the context
of situation. Different ethnic groups have different ways in doing communication.
When the speaker makes utterance to the hearer in context, the communication
between speaker and hearer will be success if they can gather goal of
conversation, automatically the hearer can get the main point of what does the
speaker mean.
In wedding ceremony the participants would like to extent the speech,
such as; Mora, Kahanggi, Anak Boru or called as the elements of Dalihan Na
Tolu. The elements of Dalihan Na Tolu have an important role in extending
2
families, especially for all participants who attend in wedding ceremony.
Therefore, the elements can be received well by them in wedding ceremony.
Different person has different expressions and actions to say something. It
is occurred in wedding ceremony of the Angkola culture. For instance, when the
speakers or elements ofDalihan Na Tolu started to speech onMakkobar, some of
the speakers are directly say “Pajolo do hita mangucapkon syukur tu tuhanta
nauli basai, nadung mangalehen di hita hatorkisan songoni hahorasan di hita
imada di parlagutanta dipantar siriaonon”. This utterance shows that the speaker
has lost their honors or manners to hearer because some of them have not used
greeting speech act on their speech. Greeting speech act is honored words that
used byAngkolasociety to greet king, Mora, Kahanggi, Anak BoruandNatobang
Natoras in wedding ceremony event. So in wedding ceremony of the Angkola
culture a speech should be opening by used greeting speech act by say “ sattabi
sappulu diraja, sattabi di na mora, kahanggi, anak boru sa sudena na adong i
pattar paradatan on”. This utterance shows the respect one to their family or this
utterance shows how the participant used speech act on their speech in wedding
ceremony of theangkolaculture. It is clear that there is a gap between theory and
reality on wedding ceremony because on given speech the speaker using different
utterances on language use.
Based on the phenomenon of language use on wedding ceremony, it is
believed that the elements of Dalihan Na Tolu have different acts on language
3
types of speech acts used by the elements of Dalihan Na Tolu in wedding
ceremony of theAngkolaculture.
It is clear that the elements of Dalihan Na Tolu have different types of
speech act in giving speech in wedding ceremony of the Angkola culture.
Consequently, the speakers would miscommunication, when they extended their
speech. Moreover, the speakers should master the language itself or speech act in
order to they are able to extend it very well. Automatically speakers can develop
their speech in certain context.
On the other hand, the researcher was conducted speech acts whereas
speech act is explanation how speaker used language to accomplish intended
action and how hearer infers intended meaning from what is speaker say. In this
case, the hearer may different in getting the meaning of the utterances from the
speakers. Based on Austin theory (1962) the meaning of the utterances can be
divided into three kinds, they are locutionary acts, illocutionary acts and
perlocutionary acts. For instance, could you pass the salt? It is identified as
locutionary act because this utterance indicated as literal meaning, then the
utterance above on illocutionary actmeans “pass the salt, please”it is indicated as
the hearer would assume whether the addressee would able to pass the salt. As a
pelocutionary act, the utterance above is indicated to realize the speaker’s
intention to ultimately get hold of the salt. From the explanation can be realized if
one utterance may have some interpretation.
Based on Searle’s book(1969) about speech acts an essay in philosophy of
4
communication. He found that when we communicate each other , we are not
only produce symbols, words and sentences which have not meaning but also the
production of the symbols, words and sentences that have meanings, whereas, he
has developed the speech act especially the illocutionary acts or the types of
speech act into representatives, directives, communicative, expressive and
declaratives. From his book can be concluded that illocutionary act often occur in
doing communication because the speaker and hearer came from different cultural
background, so the ways of communication different.
Relating to explanation above, the researcher interested in choosing this
topic because of some reasons; 1) There are different languages meaning uttered
by speakers in giving speech, 2) There are different utterance and action used by
speaker in giving speech. 3) The reason why do speakers used utterance or action
dominantly in their speech, 4) The process of speech acts used by speakers in
giving speech in wedding ceremony of theAngkolaculture.
The reason mentioned above are considered as the reason why this
research should be done that is in order to describe the types of speech acts used
by the elements of Dalihan Na Tolu which is observed by the researcher to the
5
1.2 The Problems of the Study
This problems of the study are formulated as the following
(1) What types of speech acts are used by the elements ofDalihan Na Toluin
wedding ceremony of theAngkolaculture?
(2) How are the speech acts used by the elements of Dalihan Na Tolu in
wedding ceremony of theAngkolaculture?
(3) What types of speech act is dominantly used by each of the elements?
(4) Why is the type dominantly used by the elements of Dalihan Na Tolu in
the ways they are?
1.3 The Objectives of Study
In relation of the problems, the objectives of the study are
(1) to describe types of speech acts are used by the elements of Dalihan Na
Toluin wedding ceremony of theAngkolaculture,
(2) to described how are speech acts used by the elements of Dalian Na Tolu
in wedding ceremony of theAngkolaculture,
(3) to find out the types of speech acts is dominantly used by each of elements
and
(4) to describe why is the type dominantly used by the elements of Dalihan
6
1.4 The Scopes of the Study
This study attempts to describe and to explain the speech acts used by the
elements of Dalihan Na Tolu speakers in wedding ceremony specifically in
spoken language. The main aspect of this study is to describe and investigate the
types of speech act (illocutionary act) of Dalihan Na Tolu use in their speech.
Besides that, the researcher also scopes the location of research namely gang
Padang Bolak on Desa Tembung Kecamatan Percut Sei Tuan Kabupaten Deli
Serdang North Sumatra.
1.5 The Significance of the Study
Findings of the study are expected to give contributions theoretically and
practically
(1) Theoretically, the research findings are expected to enrich the theories of
linguistic speech acts, specifically the spoken medium by certain
community, mainly theAngkolaculture especially the elements ofDalihan
Na Tolu.
(2) Practically, the findings of this study can be used as a model to identify
and understand speech act for social interaction, which have the same
characteristic with the Angkola culture in expressing suggestion, advising,
informing, statement, and so on. The researcher hope that it is useful for
104
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
5.1 Conclusion
The study concerned on speech acts used by the elements of Dalihan Na
Toluon wedding ceremony in the Angkola culture. It was aimed at describing the
utterances used by the elements of Dalihan Na Tolu. Based on the analysis the
conclusions are stated as the following:
(1) The elements ofDalihan Na Toluperform their speech acts by using direct
and indirect speech act. Direct speech act used by them by uttered idiom
and kinship form while indirect speech act used by them by uttered
Umpama.
(2) The five types of speech acts by Searle are not used by the elements of
Dalihan Na Tolu at all in their interaction. They are only used four types
namely representative acts, directive acts, expressive acts and declarative
acts, while commissive acts did not found on their interaction on Angkola
wedding ceremony event.
(3) Directive acts is the dominantly used by the elements of Dalihan Na Tolu
in wedding ceremony of theAngkolaculture.
(4) Directive act is dominantly used by the elements of Dalihan Na Tolu
because in wedding ceremony the speaker required to use advised,
suggestion, blessing and other utterance about married life. Sometimes
105
There will be the tendency that every culture has differently and similarity
of using the types of speech acts.
5.2 Implication
Based on the conclusion those have been state previously there are some
implications that can be gain.
(1) Angkola societies do not fell ashamed anymore of being incompetence in
speaking their native in wedding ceremony that is why the used of
Angkolalanguage rarely.
(2) Angkola language which is the identity of their ethnic group could be lost
especiallyadatlanguage if the speakers in wedding ceremony are not able
to speakAngkolalanguage.
(3) This research will be useful as guidance to the student and lecturers who
106
5.2 Suggestion
It is suggested to those who concerned with wedding ceremony in the
Angkolaculture to learn about the types of speech acts.
(1) It is suggested toAngkolanative speakers to get involved in their wedding
ceremony as language is used by using speech acts because speech acts
help the participants especially the elements of Dalihan Na Tolu as the
language users to communicate well in daily communication and cultural
event.
(2) It also suggested to all parents of Angkolanative speaker as real model of
good educator to use and to teach their children about Angkola culture in
their daily activity.
(3) It is suggested to the lecturers who play an important role in teaching
pragmatics and sociolinguistics to give attention in teaching speech acts
especially about speech acts inter ethnic in north Sumatra.
(4) It is suggested to all of us as the writer and reader who read this thesis in
order to understand the types of speech acts. The used of the speech acts
REFERENCES
Ad- Darraji H.H.A, Thomas C.V.F, Ismail S.A.M.M, Abdul E.S. Offering as a Commissive and Directive Speech Act: Consequence for Cross Cultural Communication. International Journal for Scientific and Research Publications. Volume 2, issue 3, March 2012, ISSN 2250-3153.
Akram, Muhammad. 2010. Speech Acts: A Constructive Study in Urdu and English.Applied Linguistics Forum, 30(1)
Ary. D. J and Razerviech, H. 1979. Introduction to Research and Education, New York: hold Rineheart and Wiston.
Austin, John. 1962.How to Do Things with Words, Oxford: Clarendon
Baleghizadeh, Susan. Speech Acts in English Language Teaching, Iranian Journal of Language Studies(IJLS), Vol. 1(2), 2007
Bogdan. R. C and Biklen, S. K. 1992. Qualitative Research for Education: An Introduction to Theory and Method: United Stated of America
Brown, P & Lavinson, S. 1987. Politeness, Some University in Language Usage, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Coulthard, Michael .1998. An Introduction to Discourse Analysis, Longman Group UK Limited
Cristal, D. 1985. A Dictionary of Linguistic and Phonetics, 2nd. Edition. Oxford Blackwell
Cruse, A. 1978. Meaning in a Language; an Introduction to Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Daulay, Irma. K. 2011. Speech Act Analysis of Conversation in Tourism Information Center, Thesis was not published. Medan: English Department Faculty of Language and Arts State University of Medan.
Finch, G. 2000.Linguistic Term and Concept, London: Mac Millan Press ltd
Hufford, J & Heasley, G. 1983. Semantics: A course book, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Kalisz, Roman. 1993. Different Cultures, Different Languages and Different Speech Acts RevisitedPaper and Studies in Contrastive Linguistics. Vol. XXVIII.
Kess, J. 1992. Psycholinguistics and Study of Natural Language, Amsterdam: Benjamin Publishing Press.
Larsen, D & Freeman. J. 1980.Discourse Analysis in Second Language Research. Massachusetts: Newburry House Publishing Inc.
Laura, J. B & Donna. M. B. 2010. The Language Structure of Modern English, Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamin Publishing Company
Leech, G. 1983.Principles of Pragmatics, London: New York Longman.
Levinson, Stephen. C. 1983.Pragmatic, London; London University Press
Liu, G. 2006.What is Pragmatics?Article Network: www. Pragmatics.co.id
Maria Palma Pahey. 2005. Speech Acts as Intercultural Danger Zone: A Cross Comparison of the Speech Acts of Apologizing in Irish and Chilean Soap Opera.Journal Intercultural Communication.ISSN 1404-1634, Issus 8.
Miles, M & Huberman, A. M. (1984).Qualitative Data Analysis,Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publishing Company
Nasution, P. 2005. Adat Budaya Mandailing Dalam Tantangan Zaman, Medan Forkala
Palmer, F. R. 1981.Speech Acts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Peccei, J. S. 1999.Pragmatics, London: Taylor & Francis Limited
Purba, M. H. 2010. An Analysis of Illocutionary Act in Movie the Pursuit of Happiness, thesis publish, Medan: English Department Faculty of Letter North Sumatra University
Purnomo, M. D. 2008.Speech Acts Used by Street Children in Medan, thesis was not published. Medan: Postgraduate School State University of Medan.
Purnomo, M. D. 2010. Speech Acts Used By Street Children in Medan: Journal Linguistik Terapan Pascasarjana UNIMED,Vol. 7 No. 1.
Rankema, J. 1993. Discourse Study, an Introductory Textbook. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamin’s publishingCompany
Richard, S. W and Jack, C. R. 1980. Speech Acts and Second Language Learning, Applied Linguistic. Vol.1. No. 2
Sari, Nirmala. 1998. An Introduction to Sociolinguistic, Jakarta DEPDIKNAS Directoral Jendral Pendidikan Tinggi.
Searle, J. R. 1979.Expression and Meaning; Study in the Theory of Speech Acts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Siregar, Kondak. 2009. Corak Pelaksanaan Pernikahan Etnis Angkola Di Sumatra Utara,KulturaVol. 10. No. 1
Sibarani, S. 2008. Tindak Tutur Dalam Upacara Perkawinan Masyarakat Batak Toba, Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Sumatra Utara
Tiodora, L. 2011.Speech Acts in Twilight Movie Script,thesis was not published. Medan: English Department Faculty of Language and Arts State University of Medan.
Yule, George. 1996.Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Yule, George. 2006. The Study of Language (third edition). United Stated; Cambridge University Press.
Burger, Christine. M. 1992. Working Taxonomy of Speech Act Used By Communication Instructions in Oral Speech Critiques. Master's Theses. (http://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/etd_theses/379) Accessed on 3 August 2012
Olshtain, Elite and Andrew Cohen. The Learning of Complex Speech Act Behaviour, Tesl Canada Journal Irevue Tesl Du Canada. vol. 7. no. 2 March1990.
(http://teslcanadajournal.ca/index.php/tesl/article/viewFile/568/399) Accessed on 3 August 2012
Sharifi, S and Karimpu, H. Thematic Roles and Grammatical Features of Cursing and Blessing Speech Act in Kurdish (Ilami Dialect). Studies in literature and Language. Vol.5, 1, 2012, pp 54-58. (www.cscanada.org). Accessed on 3 August 2012