AN ANALYSIS OF PRESUPPOSITION AS FOUND IN A NOVEL HARRY POTTER AND THE HALF BLOOD PRINCE.

AN ANAI,YSIS OF PRISVPPO$IION _{AS trOI'ND IN A NOVEL} EARRY POTTER AND

IIE

EALF DLOOD PRTNCE

A

lqESIs

Sat

itzrt

it

Pardol

FrUUnqt

tt

rh.

Re4dttuDt

fotrt

D.sH.

oJS@t@tNt

d

YAIAT YOEANA

ENGI,ISE I'EPARTMENT:fACIJLTY OT LETTERS ANDAI,AI| f]NTVNN$TY

nensuslap jenis

da

harM

prcauposisi

dale

ujam ol€h penutu

dalm

nov€l rcMbur.

Tsn

presuposisi olch Yule

disuatd

mtuk

ncdsmlie

d0la. Data

dik@pu&ar

densd

netodc

sinal

bcbas

libtr

czl^t \mnrL

itiuuht

obsenation ncthod) a^n Eknik

.

t^t

(tute td*inE k.hnique)

Kcnudie

ddla

di

ahis

dense

nelo.le

pada

lrdenatik. t{asil

malisis

disjihs

seum

deskriprifdcns

nenpei.aLikdkonlekssehi.ggrmalaDpesuposisipngmalik

Ddi n6il

penelitio

dilendM

b,nw4

p€nma

terdala1

6

jcnis pesuposisi

ymg dikenukakd

oleh

vde,

yafi

Iiirentiul

Ptutut11Llitt.4 Stuctural P.erupposilion, Factiw PresLpwsitiaa Ldical Prcsuwosition, l\on

Factiv

Ptesqposition,

d6

Cotnret

Fdttul

P4uppatnioh

Kc&\

nakn

presuposisi dal)al

dmstap

dengd

ndp€rhatile

konlers

ydg

.d,

Dantr

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1B

lgroundof the

RMrcb

In

,lcltverina infomation, ps,pie ne€d

ro

n*c

a

conveNrion. Ttris

oonveNdion onlains of infomalion lhat is deliver€d

lirm

speaker ro rhc listncr The spe,ler eys some

uner

ces

tho

lbe lislenq will get _{$mc errain infomltion,}

This inlomation could b€nor sbted

dd

could be noteid.

A.codingt

Yul€0996.

p.25) prcslppos ition is sonething rhe speakerasunesb be th€ Mse piof ro naking an une@cd.In ihis

cr*.

the prcsuppositions

e

own.d bydle

spakc6.llcc

is m

urtem€

in which lhe infom.rion sssumed, "John dnves a

cd"

By rhh udermce. lhe speaker ptosuppos.s that rohn is a person tha! exisrs

dd

hc can drive a cor. Ttis

utteme

day bave norc

the

one _{oFsupposilion} thrt John hs the ce

dd

he hs

er

ndE

than ono. However, this crn be a trong assunplion p6uDposition G

aoe

lilerarurB ihan on

almo$

y other topic in pFgnatics exceptin8 perhaps spccci acts md it is more @noehed about rhc dislindion

beNd

lhe ordin.ry usage olrhc qord

presupposition and

ilsl{hniel

usge within linguistics Yule (1996, p.26) eys lhrr pGupposition is @red as a Elationship bchven two propositio.s.

A

scnlcncc co.tains of iwo plopositions

I

dd

_{4 Md} we

de

using

t

symbol >> lnar

neds

r'.!upp..e.

.te r $e

!.r

01! _)/e,he

Frr'on.lip

(=e)

Pdanarics is Lhe study ofspeakeis meoning. Accoldins to YuLe (i996- p.3). lragnatlc h concemed wilh the study olnodinE dsconnunicdtcd by d spcakcr (or

wneO and intcarcEd by

a

lislener (or reader). This sludy @ncems with the intertdation of thc spco&els m@ing in

!

pdliculsr conlexl

sd

how ihe context cln iniuene the

ufteBne.ltho

spsaker. Th€ listener or E3der will inlelp€l ihe melning

ol

the speakels

untucd

Therefore, the

inre$dtdon

known by

de

lhrener

Bili

bc de presuppositions. This lopic

h

interc$ed ro he s.alrTed hauu€

l]1crc should bc a g@d undetsunding belwed the speald

dd

lhe list€ner in

odd

lo

re.ch a

su(e$

comhunicalion b.tqeen lhem. The lincnq snout

firi

undcfttr d

dre presupposilion

fon

uttemnes ollhe speakcr.

ln inrcDEling a presuppsnion. ir is mlAledro othcr idpodnt dioiplinc ihai

is Semantics It is

b{aus

ihere is no way in which a theory ol pcsupposition cm

ignorc scnstics.

A €mdric

thcory is rcgardcd

th.t

il

is nol only in lenns

ol

eddricJ

explanalion o I bdic rtrtenen lsi bur aho th€

elari.i

ol se'ndtic io

sy

u

and pmamatics.lt mishr sal that s emant ics conccms sith findinslhc bsic

neoins

olrword

d PEgmdios is a sudy oludemccs nedinC expr€sed by rhc spdkc^.

PEgmarics

is

trying

lo

Eveal the m€mine thal is

msr

b!

the sperl€A

in

d

CHAPTER 4

CONCLUSION

ln

thn

chapter, the wriier presents _{the result}

ol

dp

dard dulysis ot Pftluppdsiih

a

lound :n a novcl llarry

Pote

nd the lralf Bl@d ftince. Aner daltzing th. udetucs in thc snth novcl ol Harry Pot6r srics,lho wrirer linds our that there ae six t}?esoipresupposirirnrhat lound in lhis novcl. Thcy dc cxhrc.tidl !.esupposnion,

lirlivc

prcsupposnion, non-factive p.€supposition,

lexial

presupposilion- srructuhl p€supp.snion,

dd

counter&ctual pBupp.sirion. It

6

bc s*n ihat the six gTes thar pmp.s.d b] Yule in his book

ol

Pmgnatics, arc round

Aicr

rie

witer

drllad

fiften

co.lemations in

tic

pErious chaprer, th€

srncr nids

thal

*ch

converslion

h$

sirnifimt

utlemce

rhd

onkins

or

!

prcsupposition. Thcrc

m

fiftccn prdupposilions rh,i round. Aner clssiryins rhc

typ€s of pEsuppositio., the miter anallzes what h ihc inlomrllon b.ins intended

ii

$e

Drcsupposition by considering the conlcxl lhal

i.nuoes

$c

conveHtion.

ll-..lir' rl. nrfl

nd. oL' da,

fc.onrer

Fil)

1f

'er(e. rhe me,ySe

rhar:

delivered by the speaker. The

wiler

@

salyrc

dc

mmins ot

pragnaric

Dresupposnion rhroush fic ontexl.ln addition, the wrikr findsout lhar lrom l5 dat..

rhere de 3 exisrenrial presupposilions or 20% (dialosue

l,2

ud

ll).3

stactual

prestrppositio.s or 20% (dialosue 8.

I

od

l0),

I

laclivc presupposilions or 2crolo

prcsupF.silionso!13,3%(dialosue4andT).Afterdoi.Bijlemallsis,Lhewrirerliftis

thar tne

mdins

of those prcsupposnions conlai. of infomalional 3nd expBsive. ft

co

be pruyed lhal

lho*

peupposnions lhrt unered by L\e ste*er. The sp@lc6

sharc infomdion

$d

erpre$ then reeli.g and anitude throueh pBupposition. 11 is because lhey ne.d !o deliver i.fomation rhal lhe spcskea helieve fie listener already known

th.t

intcndcd mqning. Frcm

$is

ffirch.

lnc

wjier

lle

@ncludes that

every sisniricut unedce thd @nlain a pdupposirion _detemind lor exmple thar.

yor

(posssive), dogsous (adj{rivd. rensin (vqb),

ed

inremsative

urdc.'

Aner dallzing pr€supposition in tho Harry Potd

ed

the Hrlf Blo.d

Pnre,

lhe

witer

@nclud6 lnar rhe panicipdls

or

anveNtions _{sct the} pr.supposcd

infomrtio. $at

und€d by lhe sp€ater. Tbe

naning ol

presupposition

c

be

malyzed by considdng the ontcxt of ils ufterece. PBupFosnion

cd

bc us.d to

rclol

lne inlormation lhst conain in rn utle6nce by the speakd. Fudhcmorc, thar infomarion

m

bc dclivcred io th€ Eadc6 by $e miler. Ther€roF, This salysis helps the Eade* td unde^hd inrdd€!

ntuing

bccaw Ha..y Poner md ils sries

Abbott, B. (2000). Pdupposnions

6

no.sscn ioni ..rru.,4/ ot p _rdpndtict

32l tt

₉

htlp://ciles*d.isl.psu.cddviewdo./downlord?doi=l0. t. t .l 1 3.405?&rep=qt

Bolinger,

D..

d

Donald

.

seds. (198I).

,,lvertr

,/

/,,!zzss

Nee

york: Htroud Bace Jovaolich Inc

BroM,C, & Yule, C. (1983). Dri..?Ds d,z4,ss. cmbridge: Cmbridsc Unive6ity

Cunins.

r.

(2002). Prugnrlns

ant

discatts.:

A

rcso,rce book

tot

studenB. Roudodge, London

ud

New Yod(.

Hud$n.

Crover.

(2$0). tr:yntiat

tntratl,ctoty

Linsuistics

MBwt\rsri

Black{ell Publishes lnc.

Leech, Ceoffr€y N. (r 933).

P,r.iple:

oJ

Ptasndis, Lotd6:

Lf€fran,

I-€vinson, Sqncn. c. ( 1933). 2r,srar?s. Cmbridge: Cambridsc Univesity pres. Li. FenE _{Q0o5) lret"ppositio, ,1tulysi i" ll,\,qtisina In&@a.. Voluoc 2. No,I I}

(Scrial

No.2l).

Wuhu

Univc6iiy. Rerieved

on

Mat

5,2l]l0

aron htp://x^w.linguis!.ore.cn/do./su20051 14u20051 I t3.pdl

Mtrkmd, R.,dd

Marlna

Per€t T. (l9AU

l0

Steps in

tttiti"s

the R.s.arch papet. Caliomia:

Bmnt

Educationsl Selics, Inc.

M.s.. Kaslm. (2002). Elsalar Aarara: Masalah .tdn Pc*.nbansannra. y ocyakfia: ''Pmdigma Yogyalatu.

Renkena,

Js.

_{{1993). Drrr.o,rse} Ahabsis: An

Intodrtorr

tettb@t. Ansrcrdanr:

-robn Bcnjmins PublishinA Conpmy.