# Determinan Kepuasan Pegawai Bagian Keperawatan Di Rumah Sakit Umumdaerah (RSPD) Dr. Zainoel Abidin Provinsi Aceh

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

## Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary

Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Kepemimpinan *

Kepuasan Kerja 91 100.0% 0 .0% 91 100.0%

Insentif * Kepuasan Kerja 91 100.0% 0 .0% 91 100.0%

Kondisi Lingkungan *

Kepuasan Kerja 91 100.0% 0 .0% 91 100.0%

Promosi * Kepuasan Kerja

91 100.0% 0 .0% 91 100.0%

Supervisi * Kepuasan

Kerja 91 100.0% 0 .0% 91 100.0%

## Kepemimpinan * Kepuasan Kerja

Crosstab

Kepuasan Kerja

Total

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

(8)

Symmetric Measures

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .266 .101 2.603 .011(c)

N of Valid Cases 91

a Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis. c Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Kepemimpinan (Kurang

Baik / Baik) 3.000 1.270 7.087

For cohort Kepuasan Kerja = Kurang

Puas 1.667 1.088 2.553

For cohort Kepuasan Kerja = Puas .556 .350 .883

N of Valid Cases 91

## Insentif * Kepuasan Kerja

Crosstab

Kepuasan Kerja

(9)

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

b 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 20.27.

Symmetric Measures

Value

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .297 .100 2.935 .004(c)

N of Valid Cases 91

a Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis. c Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Insentif (Kurang Baik /

Baik) 3.429 1.442 8.152

For cohort Kepuasan Kerja = Kurang

Puas 1.739 1.159 2.609

For cohort Kepuasan Kerja = Puas .507 .308 .834

(10)

## Kondisi Lingkungan * Kepuasan Kerja

Crosstab

Kepuasan Kerja

Total Kurang Puas Puas

Kondisi Lingkungan Kurang Baik Count 32 15 47

Expected Count 25.8 21.2 47.0

% within Kondisi

Lingkungan 68.1% 31.9% 100.0%

Baik Count 18 26 44

Expected Count 24.2 19.8 44.0

% within Kondisi

Lingkungan 40.9% 59.1% 100.0%

Total Count 50 41 91

Expected Count 50.0 41.0 91.0

% within Kondisi

Lingkungan 54.9% 45.1% 100.0%

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

b 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 19.82.

Symmetric Measures

Value

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .273 .101 2.677 .009(c)

N of Valid Cases 91

a Not assuming the null hypothesis.

(11)

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Kondisi Lingkungan

(Kurang Baik / Baik) 3.081 1.306 7.272

For cohort Kepuasan Kerja = Kurang

Puas 1.664 1.110 2.497

For cohort Kepuasan Kerja = Puas .540 .333 .877

N of Valid Cases 91

### Promosi * Kepuasan Kerja

Crosstab

Kepuasan Kerja

Total

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

b 0 cells (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 16.67. Symmetric Measures

Value

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .030 .105 .284 .777(c)

N of Valid Cases 91

a Not assuming the null hypothesis.

(12)

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Promosi (Kurang Baik /

Baik) 1.131 .487 2.626

For cohort Kepuasan Kerja = Kurang Puas 1.057 .727 1.537

For cohort Kepuasan Kerja = Puas .934 .585 1.491

N of Valid Cases 91

## Supervisi * Kepuasan Kerja

Crosstab

Kepuasan Kerja

Total

Chi-Square Tests

Value df

Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)

(13)

Symmetric Measures

Value

Asymp. Std. Error(a)

Approx.

T(b) Approx. Sig.

Interval by Interval Pearson's R .321 .099 3.202 .002(c)

Ordinal by Ordinal Spearman Correlation .321 .099 3.202 .002(c)

N of Valid Cases 91

a Not assuming the null hypothesis.

b Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis. c Based on normal approximation.

Risk Estimate

Value

95% Confidence Interval

Lower Upper

Odds Ratio for Supervisi (Kurang Baik /

Baik) 3.829 1.596 9.188

For cohort Kepuasan Kerja = Kurang Puas 1.817 1.211 2.727

For cohort Kepuasan Kerja = Puas .475 .284 .793

(14)

## Logistic Regression

Case Processing Summary

Unweighted Cases(a) N Percent

Selected Cases Included in Analysis 91 100.0

Missing Cases 0 .0

Total 91 100.0

Unselected Cases 0 .0

Total 91 100.0

a If weight is in effect, see classification table for the total number of cases.

Dependent Variable Encoding

Original Value Internal Value

Kurang Puas 0

Puas 1

## Block 0: Beginning Block

Classification Table(a,b)

Observed Predicted

Kepuasan Kerja

Percentage

a Constant is included in the model. b The cut value is .500

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

Step 0 Constant -.198 .211 .887 1 .346 .820

Variables not in the Equation

(15)

## Block 1: Method = Backward Stepwise (Likelihood Ratio)

Omnibus Tests of Model Coefficients

Chi-square df Sig.

a A negative Chi-squares value indicates that the Chi-squares value has decreased from the previous step.

Model Summary

Step -2 Log likelihood Cox & Snell R Square Nagelkerke R Square

1 106.351(a) .188 .251

2 107.061(a) .181 .242

a Estimation terminated at iteration number 4 because parameter estimates changed by less than .001.

Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

Step Chi-square df Sig.

1 4.340 7 .740

2 3.494 6 .745

Contingency Table for Hosmer and Lemeshow Test

(16)

Classification Table(a)

Observed Predicted

Kepuasan Kerja

Percentage

Variables in the Equation

B S.E. Wald df Sig. Exp(B)

a Variable(s) entered on step 1: Insentif, Kondisi, Supervisi, Kepemimpinan.

Model if Term Removed

Variable

Model Log Likelihood

Change in -2

Log Likelihood df

(17)

Variables not in the Equation

Score df Sig.

Step 2(a) Variables Kepemimpinan .720 1 .396

Overall Statistics .720 1 .396

a Variable(s) removed on step 2: Kepemimpinan.

## Frequencies

pinan Insentif

Kondisi

Lingkungan Promosi Supervisi

N Valid 91 91 91 91 91 91

Missing 0 0 0 0 0 0

Percentiles 25 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00 .00

50 .00 .00 .00 .00 1.00 1.00

75 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00

## Frequency Table

Kepuasan Kerja

(18)

Kondisi Lingkungan

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Kurang Baik 47 51.6 51.6 51.6

Baik 44 48.4 48.4 100.0

Total 91 100.0 100.0

Promosi

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Kurang Baik 37 40.7 40.7 40.7

Baik 54 59.3 59.3 100.0

Total 91 100.0 100.0

Supervisi

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

Valid Kurang Baik 45 49.5 49.5 49.5

Baik 46 50.5 50.5 100.0

(19)
(20)
(21)

87 1 0

88 0 0

89 0 0

90 0 0

Updating...