Teks penuh

(1)

.

. <…>

[Cohen 1996

].

/

[

].

-taxonomie und kommunikative Grammatik» [1989; 2003], «Language as dialogue: from rules to

principles of probability» [2009],

», 1980).

» [Weigand 2009: 62].

wo-part dialogic

sequence) [

]

[

].

[1980],

(?)

(2)

1

[Sinclair & Coulthard 1975];

Initiation

Response

Follow-up

[Sinclair 1992];

Proposition

Reaction

Evaluation

[Roulet 1992],

(3)

;

.

[2001]

.

): «

.

-, .

(4)

-(1)

(5)

(

)

<…> B.

Imper

[NEG] X,

Imper

[AFF] Y

,

Imper

[NEG] X.

b) *

(

):

-7

.

.

-1970.

- 1972.

-1974.

[2-6

[ 1990: 354].

7

(6)

–313.

Cohen Phil. Dialogue Modeling // Giovanni Battista Varile, Antonio Zampolli (eds.). Survey of the State of the Art

http://www.cslu.ogi.edu/HLTsurvey/ch6node5.html].

Mehan Hugh.The structure of classroom discourse // T.A. van Dijk (ed.). Handbook of discourse analysis. Vol. III. London, 1985. Pp. 120–131.

Roulet E. On the structure of conversation as negotiation // J.R. Searle & al. (On) Searle on conversation. Amsterdam, 1992. Pp. 91–99.

Sinclair J. M., & Coulthard R. M. Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London, 1975.

Sinclair J. M. Trust the text // M. Davies and L. Ravelli (eds.). Advances in Systemic Linguistics. Recent Theory and Practice. London, 1992

.

Pp. 5–19.

Weigand Edda. Sprache als Dialog. Sprechakttaxonomie und kommunikative Grammatik. Tübingen, 1989

(Linguistische Arbeiten 204). 2- übingen, 2003.

Figur

Memperbarui...

Referensi

Memperbarui...

Unduh sekarang (6 Halaman)