• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

The Role of Engineers in Business

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2018

Membagikan "The Role of Engineers in Business"

Copied!
50
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

8. Metode Depresiasi dan

perhitungan pajak 9. After Tax Cash Flow 10. Analisis Penggantian

7. Analisis Sensitivitas

Tugas-3: Menyusun suatu rencana bisnis/usaha beberapa tahun kedepan, dan dapat mengantisipasi segala kemungkinan agar rencana usaha tersebut layak

secara ekonomis.

6. Evaluasi Investasi

5. Bunga Nominal. Efektif. MARR

4.Bunga majemuk dalam ekivalensi

Tugas-1: Menyusun beberapa skema pinjaman dengan tingkat suku bunga tertentu Tugas-2: Menganalisis rencana investasi dengan

metode NPV; BCR; PBP;IRR.

(2)
(3)

The Role of Engineers in Business

Create & Design

Engineering Projects

Evaluate

Expected

Proftability

Timing of

Cash Flows

Analyze

Production Methods

Engineering Safety

Environmental Impacts

Market Assessment

Evaluate

Impact on

Financial

Statements

(4)

Why Engineering Economy is

Important to Engineers

Engineers design and create

Designing involves economic decisions

Engineers must be able to incorporate

economic analysis into their creative eforts

Often engineers must select and implement

from multiple alternatives

Understanding and applying time value of

money, economic equivalence, and cost

estimation are vital for engineers

(5)

ENGINEERING ECONOMY

Involves : Formulating,

estimating, and evaluating the

economic outcomes of

alternatives designed to

accomplish a defned purpose.

(6)

Role of engineering economy in

decision making

·

Assist people in making decisions

·

Time frame is the future

·

Best estimates of what is expected to occur

o

Cash flows

o

Time of occurrence

o

Interest rates

o

Observed value in the future will differ form the estimate

made now

·

Sensitivity analysis

o

Performed during the engineering economic study to

(7)

ENGINEERING ECONOMY

involves the

systematic evaluation of the economic

merits of proposed solutions to

engineering problems.

To be economically acceptable

(

afordable

),

solutions to engineering

problems

must demotrate a positive

(8)

long-

Engineering economy is the

dollars-and-cents side of the decisions that

engineers make or recommend a frm

to be proftable in highly competitive

marketplace

Trade ofs among diferent types of

costs and the performance provided by

the proposed design or problem

(9)

Engineering Economic Decisions

Profit! Then continue

at the next stage…

Manufacturing

Needed e.g. in the following (connected) areas:

(10)

Accounting vs. Engineering Economy

Present

Future

Past

Engineering Economy

Accounting

(11)

What Makes Engineering Economic

Decisions Difficult?

Predicting the Future

Estimating the

required investments

Estimating product

manufacturing costs

Forecasting the

demand for a brand

new product

Estimating a “good”

(12)

Key Factors in Selecting Good

Engineering Economic Decisions

Objectives, available resources, time and

uncertainty

are the key defning aspects of all engineering

economic

(13)

Types of Strategic Engineering Economic

Decisions in the Manufacturing

Sector

Service Improvement *

Equipment and Process Selection *

Equipment Replacement *

New Product and Product Expansion

*

(14)

Example :

Healthcare Service

Improvement

1 Traditional Plan

:

Patients visit the service

providers

2 New Strategy

: Service

providers visit the

patients

Which one of the two plans

is more economical? The

answer typically depends on

the type of patients and the

services ofered. Examples?

patients

service providers

1

(15)

Service Improvement

(16)

Example 2:

Equipment and Process Selection

How do you choose between using

alternative materials for an auto

body panel?

The choice of material will dictate

(17)
(18)

Example 3:

Equipment Replacement Problem

Key question:

When is the right time

to replace an old

(19)

Equipment Replacement Problem

Now is the time to

replace the old

machine?

If not, when is the

(20)

Example 4:

New Product and Product Expansion

Shall we build or

acquire a new facility

to meet the increased

(increasing

forecasted) demand?

Is it worth spending

(21)

Example 5: Cost Reduction

Should a company buy

new equipment to perform

an operation that is now

done manually?

Should we spend money

now, in order to save more

money later?

(22)

Further Areas of Strategic

Engineering Economic Decisions in

the Service Sector

Commercial Transportation

Logistics and Distribution

Healthcare Industry

Electronic Markets and Auctions

Financial Engineering and Banking

Retail

Hospitality and Entertainment

(23)

PRINCIPLES OF ENGINEERING

ECONOMY *

1. Develop the Alternatives;

2. Focus on the Diferences;

3. Use a Consistent Viewpoint;

4. Use a Common Unit of Measure;

5. Consider All Relevant Criteria;

(24)

DEVELOP THE ALTERNATIVES

The fnal choice

(decision) is among

alternatives. The

alternatives need to be

identifed and then

defned for subsequent

analysis.

(25)

FOCUS ON THE DIFFERENCES

Only the diferences in expected

future outcomes among the

alternatives are relevant to their

comparison and should be

considered in the decision.

(26)

Principle 2

Only the cost (resource) difference

among alternatives counts

Option

Monthly

Fuel Cost

Monthly

Maintenance

Cash paid at

signing

(cash outlay )

Monthly

payment

Salvage

Value at end

of year 3

Buy

$960

$550

$6,500

$350

$9,000

Lease

$960

$550

$2,400

$550

0

(27)

USE A CONSISTENT VIEWPOINT

The prospective outcomes of the

alternatives, economic and other,

should be consistently developed

from a defned viewpoint

(perspective).

(28)

USE A COMMON UNIT OF MEASURE

Using a common unit of

measurement to enumerate as

many of the prospective outcomes

as possible will make easier the

analysis and comparison of

alternatives.

(29)

CONSIDER ALL RELEVANT CRITERIA

Selection of a preferred alternative

(decision making) requires the use

of a criterion (or several criteria).

The decision process should

consider the outcomes enumerated

in the monetary unit.

(30)

MAKE UNCERTAINTY EXPLICIT

Uncertainty is inherent in

projecting (or estimating) the

future outcomes of the alternatives

and should be recognized in their

analysis and comparison.

(31)

REVISIT YOUR DECISIONS

Improved decision making results

from an adaptive process; to the

extent practicable, the initial

projected outcomes of the selected

alternative should be subsequently

compared with actual results

achieved.

(32)

The Others Principles of

Engineering Economics

1.

An instant dollar is worth more than a

distant dollar… $

2.

Marginal revenue must exceed

marginal cost, in order to carry out a

proftable increase of operations

3.

Additional risk is not taken without an

(33)

1

(34)

2

Marginal (unit) revenue has to exceed marginal

cost, in order to increase production

Manufacturing cost

Sales revenue

Marginal

revenue

Marginal

cost

1 unit

(35)

3

Additional risk is not taken without a

suitable expected additional return

Investment Class

Potential

Risk

Expected

Return

Savings account

(cash)

Lowest

1.5%

Bond (debt)

Moderate

4.8%

(36)

ENGINEERING ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

PROCEDURE

1. Problem recognition, formulation, and

evaluation.

2. Development of the feasible alternatives.

3. Development of the cash fows for each

alternative.

4. Selection of a criterion ( or criteria).

5. Analysis and comparison of the

alternatives.

(37)
(38)

Rational Decision-Making Process

Recognize the decision

problem

Collect all needed

(relevant) information

Identify the set of feasible

decision alternatives

Defne the key objectives

and constraints

Select the best possible

(39)

A Simple Illustrative Example: Car to

Lease – Toyota or Honda?

Recognize the

decision problem

Collect all needed

(relevant) information

Identify the set of

feasible decision

alternatives

Defne the key

objectives

and constraints

Need to lease a car

Gather technical and

fnancial data

Select cars to consider

Wanted: small cash outlay,

safety, good performance,

aesthetics,…

Choice between Toyota

and Honda (or others)

(40)

Conclusion

An engineering economy study is

accomplished using a structured

procedure and mathematical

modeling techniques. The

economic results are then used in

a decision situation that involves

two or more alternatives and

(41)

The term

engineering economic decision

refers to any investment or other decision

related to an engineering project

The fve main types of engineering economic

decisions are

(1) service improvement, (2)

equipment and process selection, (3)

equipment replacement, (4) new product and

product expansion, and (5) cost reduction

(42)
(43)

Instructor : Mumu Natapriatna

Time : Wed,Thu, 08:30

to 12:30 pm

Location :

Telp. No. : 022 7311908

Mobile phone No.: 0812

2023600

Email: mumunata@gmail.c

om

Ofce hours:

(44)

IEG2H2-Engineering Economy

Even Semester, 2015

Syllabus

Course Description:

The purpose for this course is to introduce the economic justifcation and decision making of engineering projects, programs, and organizational asset management. This course provide an introduction to discounted cash-fow analysis and its application to practical problems using spreadsheets, an understanding of how to structure practical decision problems and how to model them analytically as well as the role of, and the necessity for, engineering management of private and public organizations.

Required Text

William G. Sullivan, Elin M. Wicks, & James T. Luxhoj, “Engineering Economy,” 12th Ed., Pearson, 2003, ISBN 0-13-039555-2

Newnan, Donald G., “Engineering Economic Analysis”, Engineering Press,Inc., 1992, California, USA Other References

Grant, Ireson, Levenworth, ” Dasar-Dasar Ekonomi Teknik”, PT Rineka Cipta, 2001, Jakarta

Thuesen, G.J. & Fabrycky, W.J., ” Engineering Economy”, 9th Edition, Prentice Hall, Inc., 2001, New Jersey, USA

DeGarmo, Sullivan, Bontadelli, Wicks, ”Engineering Economy”, Tenth Edition, Prentice Hall, Inc., 1997, New Jersey, USA

Steiner, H.M., ”Engineering Economy Principles”, Mc. Graw Hills International, 1996, Singapore Grant, Ireson, Leavenworth, “Principles of Engineering Economy”, John Wiley&Sons, 1990, Singapore Tools:

An ability to set up and manipulate simple spreadsheets in Excel is expected. The use of the HP-12C or T I fnancial calculator may be recommended.

Grade:

(45)

The policy for the student fnal grade will be based on: •> = 85 : A

70 – 84,99 : B 55 – 69,99 : C 40 – 54,99 : D< 40 : E

Assessment:Homework

Homework will be assigned about every week in the form of a problem set. For each problem set, 50% of the points will be awarded for completeness (i.e., a serious attempt at all problems), 50% will be allocated to accuracy in the selected problems. Homework is due at the beginning of the class in Room .... on its due date. Will be collected in class, graded, and returned. Late homework receives 1/2 credit. The basis for grading is efort – full credit for most incorrect answers.

Exams

There will be a midterm exam in the 8th week in class. The fnal exam will be given after the 16th week. Mid-term and Final exam will be open book and notes in class exam. You are expected to take the midMid-term and fnal exam on the dates given. There are no makeup exams! If you have a justifed scheduling confict, you will have to make an arrangement with me one weeks before the exam. Any requests made after that day (other than documented emergencies) may or may not be granted.

Class Participation

Your presence and participation in class are essential for gaining mastery of the material. At frst sight it might seem to you that the concepts in this course are easy and might be quickly “crammed” before an exam. Experience shows that this frst impression is more often than not incorrect, and in this course we therefore require your attendance and participation. From time to time there may be a mini-quiz in class. The results will enter into your class participation grade. Cellar phone is not allowed during the class. Please turn of your cellar phone before you enter the classroom. We will do 360 degree evaluation in each class.

Project

(46)

Week

Date

Content

Reading

Assignment

1

Introduction to Engineering Economy

WGS, Ch.1

2

Cost concept

Money-time relationship (Time Value

Of Money)

WGS, Ch.2,3

3

Economic Equivalence

WGS, Ch. 3

4

Present Worth Method/analysis

WGS, Ch. 4, 5

5

Annual Worth analysis; Quiz

WGS, Ch. 4, 5

6

RoR Analysis

WGS, Ch.4,5

7

BCR Analysis; Quiz

WGS,Ch.11

8

Midterm Examination

9

PP and other analysis

WGS, Ch.4,5

10

Sensitivity Analysis

Newnan. Ch.9

11

Depreciation and Income Taxes; Quiz

WGS, Ch.6

12

After Tax Cash fow

Newnan,Ch.10,1

1

13

Replacement Analysis; Quiz

WGS,Ch.9;

Newnan, Ch.12

14

Project Presentation (1)

(47)

Case #1: Buy, Rent or Repair?

You wreck your car! And you absolutely need one to get around.

A wholesaler offers $2,000 for the wrecked car, and $4,500 if it is

repaired. The car’s standing mileage is 58,000 miles.

Your insurance company offers $1,000 to cover the cost of the

accident.

To repair the car costs $2,000.

A newer second–hand car costs $10,000 with a standing mileage

of 28,000 miles.

(48)

No panic!

(49)

Case #2

Six college students are making plans for spring break. They are

considering traveling 1200 miles to Florida by bus, train, plane, rental

cars, or rental van. Due to bus and train schedules, they limited their

options to plane, two rental cars, or a rental van.

The final data used in their analysis of transportation options are as

follows: round-trip airfare per person ($300); daily rental rate for each

car, all charges except fuel ($50); rental car gas mileage (20

miles/gallon); drop charge for each car ($150); daily rental rate for a

van, all charges except fuel ($80); rental van gas mileage (12

miles/gallon); drop charge for the van ($225); cost to travel to or from

the airport at the spring break destination ($50 per cab, two cabs

(50)

Case #3

A firm is considering three investment

proposals (A,B, & C). A requires $1M

investment, B requires $2.5M, and C requires

$3M. The firm has $4.5M to invest. C is

contingent on A; B and C are mutually

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Tingkat pengetahuan Guru Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini tentang kompetensi profesional mengajar ditinjau dari latar belakang kualifikasi akademiknya.. Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia |

Perogram Keluarga Harapan (PKH) adalah merupakan program pemerintah yang memberikan bantuan tunai kepada RTSM sebagai imbalannya RTSM diwajibkan memenuhi persyaratan

Demikian Pengumuman Pemenang Pelelangan ini dibuat dan ditandatangani pada hari, tanggal dan bulan sebagaimana tersebut di atas untuk dipergunakan sebagaimana mestinya..

Kelompok Kerja Unit Layanan Pengadaan Konstruksi Dan Jasa Konsultansi Dinas Peternakan Perikanan dan Kelautan. Jalan Siliwangi Gang Lika No.315

Terbilang : (== Enam Puluh Sembilan Juta Delapan Ratus Sepuluh Ribu Rupiah===). Alamat

Kelompok Kerja (Pokja) Pengadaan Barang dan Jasa Kabupaten Cianjur Tahun Anggaran 2017, akan melaksanakan Seleksi Sederhana dengan Pascakualifikasi untuk paket pekerjaan

Berdasarkan hasil analisis daya silang atau crossability (karakter biologi), analisis komponen utama dan analisis gerombol (karakter morfologi) didapatkan dua kelompok

Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Predict-Observe-Explain (POE) Pada Materi Koloid Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa.