13. Freeman, R., 1999, The Psychology of Dental Patient Care : Barriers to Accessing Dental Care : Patient Factor, British Dental Journal., Vol.

Teks penuh

(1)

41

the approach of the WHO global oral health programme. Community

Dent Oral Epidemial.2005;33:81-92

2. Martono, H., 2008, Gerakan Nasional Pemberdayaan Lanjut Usia,

Gemari, Juni 2008, Tahun XI, edisi 89, h.66

3. Departemen Kesehatan RI, 2001, Pedoman Pembinaan Kesehatan

Usia Lanjut bagi Petugas Kesehatan, ed 5, Jakarta.

4. Martono, H., 2008, Gerakan Nasional Pemberdayaan Lanjut Usia,

Gemari, Juni 2008, Tahun XI, edisi 89, h.66

5. Nugroho, W., 2008, Keperawatan Gerontik dan Geriatik, ed 3, EGC, Jakarta, h 02.

6. Papas AS. Geriatric Dentistry, Aging and Oral Health. CV Mosby. St Louis. 1991. p: 71-3

7. Agtini MD. Presentase pengguna protesa di Indonesia. Media Litbang

Kesehatan. 2010; 2. P: 50-58.

8. McMillan AS, Wong MCM. Emotional Effects of Tooth Loss in

Community-Dwelling Elderly People in Hong Kong.Int J Prosthodont. 2004; 17: 172-76

9. John MT et al. Demographic Factor, Denture Status and Oral

Health-Related Quality of life. Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2004; 32: 125-32.

10. Anonim, 2004, Access to Dental Care In Australia, Australian Dental

Journal., Vol.49 (4) p.206-208.

11. World Health Organization. WHOoQL : Measuring Quality of Life.

Swizerland: World Health Organization; 1997.p.1-4.

12. Barnes IE. Perawatan Gigi Terpadu untuk lansia Ggerodontology). Butterworth Heinemann Ltd. 1994. p: 26-41.

(2)

13. Freeman, R., 1999, The Psychology of Dental Patient Care : Barriers

to Accessing Dental Care : Patient Factor, British Dental Journal., Vol.187 p.141-144

14. Caglayan, F,. Altun, O., Miloglu, O., Kaya, M., dan Yilmaz, A., 2009,

Correlation Between Oral Health-related Quality of Life (OHQoL) and Oral Disorders in a Turkish Patient Population, Med Oral Patol Oral

Cir Buccal,14(11):573-578,

http://www.medicinaoral.com/medoralfree01/v14i11/medoralv14i11p5 73,pdf, 21/01/14

15. Departemen Kesehatan Republik Indonesia, 2003, Pedoman Tata Laksana Gizi Usia Lanjut untuk Tenaga Kesehatan, Direktorat Gizi

Masyarakat Direktorat Bina Kesehatan Masyarakat, Jakarta.

16. Rutkauskas JS Clinical Dicision Making in Geriatric Dentistry. The Dental Clinics of North America. 1997;41. P:658.

17. Bianco VC, Rubo JH. Aging, Oral Health and Quality of Life. Periodontal Disease – A Clinician’s Guide 2010. P: 357-68.

18. Greenberg MS. Butket’s Oral Medicine Diagnosis and Treatment, BC

Decker Inc. 10 ed.2003. p:613-17.

19. Tumer DT, Ship JA, Dry Mouth and its Effect on The Oral Health of

Elderly People, J.Am Dent Assoct. 2007; 138 :15S-20S.

20. Musacchio E et al. Tooth Loss in the Eldery and its Association with

Nutritional Status, Socio-economic and Lifestyle Factors. Acta

Odontologica Scandinavica. 2007 ; 65 : 78-86.

21. Ahmad SF. An Insigh into The Masticatory Performance of Complete

Denture Wearer. Annals of Dentistry University of Malaya. 2006; 13 : 24-33.

22. Dogan BG, Gokalp S. Tooth Loss and Edentulism in The Turkish

Elderly. Archives Gerontology and Geriatrics. 2012; 54 : 162-66.

23. Sundjaja Y. Attitudes of Saudi male patients toward the replacement of

(3)

24. Muller F, Schimmel M Tooth Loss and Dental Prostheses in The Oldes

Old. Europan Griatric Medicine. 2010; 1 :39-43.

25. Mc Cord,J.F., Grand,A., Youngson,C., Watson,R.M., Davis,D.M.,

2003, Missing Teeth A Guide to Treatment Options, Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone, h.11-15.

26. Osterberg, T., Era,P., Gause-Nilsson, I., Steen, B., 1995, Dental State

and Functional Capacity in 75 Yeart Olds in Three Nordic Localities, J Oral Rehabil., 22:653-660.

27. Okada,K., Enoki,H., Izawa,S., Iguchi,A., Kuzuya,M., 2010,

Association Between Masticatory Performance And Anthropometric Measurement and Nutional Status in the Elderly, Geriatri. Gerontol. In January 10(1) :56-63

28. Hugo, F.N., Hilgert, J.B.,de Sousa, M.L.R.,da Silva,D.D.,Pucca Jr

G.A.,2007, Correlates of Partial Tooth Loss and Edentulism in the Brazilian Elderly, Community Dent. Oral Epidemiol.,35 :224-232.

29. Davis,DM.,Fiske,J.,Scott,B., Radford, D.R., 2000, The Emotional

Effect of Tooth Loss : A Preliminary Quantitative Study, Br.Dent.J.,188: 503-506.

30. Preshaw,P.M., Walls, A.W.G.,Jacobovics, N.S.,Moynihan,P.J.,Jepson,

N.J.A, Loewy,Z., 2011, Association of Removable Partial Denture Use with Oral and Systemic Health, J.Dent, 39: 711-719

31. Abnet,C.C. ,Qiao, Y.I., Dawscy,S.M. 2005, Tooth loss is Associated

with Increased Risk of Total Death and Death from Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer, Heart Disease, and Stroke in A Chinese Population-Based Cohort.Int.J.of Epidemiol., 34: 467-74

32. Park, K.,2007, Concept of Health and Disease, dalam Park, K., (ed), Park’s Textbook of Preventive and Sosial Medicine, 19th ed., Banarsidas Bhanot Publisher, jabalpur, 12-47.

33. Mehrstedt, M., Tonnies, S., and Micheelis, W., 2007, Oral Health

Related Quality of Life in Patients with Dental Anxiety, Community

(4)

34. Haryanto AG, Anton Margo, Lusiana KB, Freddy Suryatenggara,

Indra Setiabudi,1991, Ilmu Geligi Tiruan Sebagian Lepasan.jakarta: Hipokatres

35. Roy,T.,2002, Economic History and Modern India: Redefining the

Link, J.Eco.History, 62(2): 611-612.

36. Rusanen, Jana,et al. Quality of Lifein patient with severe malocclusion before treatment. Finlandia : Europian Journal of Orthodontics.2009. 37. Harris, N.O, 2004. Introduction to Primery Preventive Dentristry,

dalam: Harris, N.O dan Garcia-Godoy, F: Primary Preventive Dentristry, 6th ed., Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

38. GD, slade and Aj. Spencer. NCBI. Pub med.hov [ online][cited :Januari 18,2014]. http//www.ncbi.nml.nih./gov/pubmed/8193981 39. Wangasaraharja K, Dharmawan OV, Kasim E. Hubungan antara

kesehatan mulut dengan kualitas hidup terkait kualitas pada usia lanjut. Universa Medicina. 2007:26(4) :18809

(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)

Lampiran 3. Informed consent

INFORMED CONSENT

PENELITIAN PERBEDAAN KUALITAS HIDUP PASIEN GERIATRI DI RSUP. DR. KARIADI SEMARANG YANG MENDAPAT PERAWATAN

GIGI DAN TIDAK MENDAPAT PERAWATAN GIGI

Setelah mendengar penjelasan dan diberi kesempatan untuk mengajukan pertanyaan-pertanyaan mengenai tujuan, manfaat, prosedur, lamanya waktu, dan resiko penelitian ini, saya atas nama pribadi memahami tujuan, manfaat, prosedur, lamanya waktu, dan resiko penelitian ini serta bersedia tanda tangan dibawah ini secara sukarela untuk berpartisipasi dalam penelitian ini:

Nama : ... Jenis kelamin : ... Umur : ... Alamat : ... ... No Telp/Hp : ... Dengan ketentuan apabila ada hal-hal yang tidak berkenan pada saya, maka saya berhak mengajukan pengunduran diri dari penelitian ini.

Semarang,.../.../2014

Peneliti Responden

(Wahyu Wijayanti) (...) Saksi

(9)

Lampiran 4. Kuisioner OHIP-14

Kuisioner Oral Health Impact Profile -14

Pertanyaan-pertanyaan pada kuisioner ini menanyakan tentang keluhan-keluhan yang Anda rasakan akibat permasalahan pada rongga mulut Anda dalam satu bulan terakhir.

Contoh:

Seberapa sering Anda merasakan keluhan ini dalam satu bulan terakhir Tidak pernah Sangat jarang Kadang-kadang Sering Sangat sering Apakah Anda memiliki kesulitan

dalam mengucapkan kata/kalimat (berbicara) karena permasalahan pada rongga mulut?

0 1 2 3 4

Jika selama satu bulan terakhir Anda sering merasa kesulitan dalam mengucapkan kata/kalimat (berbicara) karena permasalahan pada rongga mulut Anda, maka Anda melingkari pilihan no 3.

Seberapa sering Anda merasakan keluhan ini dalam satu bulan terakhir Tidak pernah Sangat jarang Kadang-kadang Sering Sangat sering Apakah Anda memiliki kesulitan

dalam mengucapkan kata/kalimat (berbicara) karena permasalahan pada rongga mulut?

0 1 2 4

Sekarang buka halaman selanjutnya dan dimohon untuk menjawab semua pertanyaan yang ada.

Jika Anda kurang mengerti mengenai maksud dari pertanyaan tersebut, dimohon untuk menanyakan kepada petugas yang mendampingi Anda.

Setelah semua pertanyaan terjawab, dimohon untuk mengumpulkan kuisioner ini kepada petugas yang mendampingi Anda.

(10)

Kuisioner Oral Health Impact Profile -14

Seberapa sering Anda merasakan

keluhan ini dalam satu bulan terakhir Tidak pernah Sangat jarang Kadang- kadang Sering Sangat sering Apakah Anda pernah merasa kesulitan

dalam mengucapkan kata/kalimat (berbicara) karena permasalahan rongga mulut Anda?

0 1 2 3 4

Apakah Anda pernah merasa tidak dapat mengecap rasa dengan baik karena permasalahan pada rongga mulut Anda?

0 1 2 3 4

Apakah Anda pernah merasakan sakit pada rongga mulut Anda?

0 1 2 3 4

Apakah Anda pernah merasa tidak nyaman saat mengunyah makanan karena permasalahan pada rongga mulut Anda?

0 1 2 3 4

Apakah Anda pernah merasa kawatir /cemas karena permasalahan pada rongga mulut Anda?

0 1 2 3 4

Apakah Anda pernah merasa ‘tegang‘ karena permasalahan pada rongga mulut Anda?

0 1 2 3 4

Apakah Anda pernah merasa tidak puas dengan makanan yang anda konsumsi karena permasalahan pada rongga mulut Anda?

0 1 2 3 4

Pernahkah Anda harus berhenti secara tiba-tiba saat sedang mengunyah makanan karena permasalahan pada rongga mulut Anda?

0 1 2 3 4

Apakah Anda pernah mengalami kesulitan untuk merasa rileks/santai karena permasalahan pada rongga mulut Anda?

0 1 2 3 4

Apakah Anda pernah merasa malu karena permasalahan pada rongga mulut Anda?

0 1 2 3 4

Apakah Anda pernah menjadi mudah tersinggung karena permasalahan pada rongga mulut Anda?

0 1 2 3 4

Apakah Anda pernah melakukan kesulitan untuk melakukan kegiatan sehari-hari karena permasalahan pada

(11)

rongga mulut Anda?

Apakah Anda pernah merasa hidup anda

kurang memuaskan karena

permasalahan pada rongga mulut Anda?

0 1 2 3 4

Apakah Anda pernah merasa susah untuk melakukan apapun karena permasalahan pada rongga mulut Anda?

(12)

Lampiran 5. Formulir data sampel

PENELITIAN PERBEDAAN KUALITAS HIDUP PASIEN GERIATRI DI RSUP. DR. KARIADI SEMARANG YANG MENDAPAT PERAWATAN

GIGI DAN TIDAK MENDAPAT PERAWATAN GIGI

I. IDENTITAS Nama : ... Jenis kelamin : ... Umur : ... Alamat : ... ... No Telp/Hp : ... II. DIAGNOSA

Diagnosa perawatan gigi : Ya / Tidak

(13)

Lampiran6. Hasil uji analisis statistik Frequencies Jenis kelamin 18 45.0 45.0 45.0 22 55.0 55.0 100.0 40 100.0 100.0 Laki-laki Perempuan Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent OHIP.2 18 45.0 45.0 45.0 6 15.0 15.0 60.0 11 27.5 27.5 87.5 5 12.5 12.5 100.0 40 100.0 100.0 tidak pernah sangat jarang kadang-kadang sering Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent OHIP.1 21 52.5 52.5 52.5 11 27.5 27.5 80.0 4 10.0 10.0 90.0 3 7.5 7.5 97.5 1 2.5 2.5 100.0 40 100.0 100.0 tidak pernah sangat jarang kadang-kadang sering sangat sering Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

(14)

OHIP.5 20 50.0 50.0 50.0 1 2.5 2.5 52.5 7 17.5 17.5 70.0 8 20.0 20.0 90.0 4 10.0 10.0 100.0 40 100.0 100.0 tidak pernah sangat jarang kadang-kadang sering sangat sering Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent OHIP.4 13 32.5 32.5 32.5 1 2.5 2.5 35.0 3 7.5 7.5 42.5 6 15.0 15.0 57.5 17 42.5 42.5 100.0 40 100.0 100.0 tidak pernah sangat jarang kadang-kadang sering sangat sering Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent OHIP.3 14 35.0 35.0 35.0 6 15.0 15.0 50.0 10 25.0 25.0 75.0 7 17.5 17.5 92.5 3 7.5 7.5 100.0 40 100.0 100.0 tidak pernah sangat jarang kadang-kadang sering sangat sering Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

(15)

OHIP.8 18 45.0 45.0 45.0 4 10.0 10.0 55.0 12 30.0 30.0 85.0 5 12.5 12.5 97.5 1 2.5 2.5 100.0 40 100.0 100.0 tidak pernah sangat jarang kadang-kadang sering sangat sering Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent OHIP.7 13 32.5 32.5 32.5 7 17.5 17.5 50.0 3 7.5 7.5 57.5 3 7.5 7.5 65.0 14 35.0 35.0 100.0 40 100.0 100.0 tidak pernah sangat jarang kadang-kadang sering sangat sering Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent OHIP.6 19 47.5 47.5 47.5 3 7.5 7.5 55.0 4 10.0 10.0 65.0 9 22.5 22.5 87.5 5 12.5 12.5 100.0 40 100.0 100.0 tidak pernah sangat jarang kadang-kadang sering sangat sering Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

(16)

OHIP.11 21 52.5 52.5 52.5 3 7.5 7.5 60.0 8 20.0 20.0 80.0 3 7.5 7.5 87.5 5 12.5 12.5 100.0 40 100.0 100.0 tidak pernah sangat jarang kadang-kadang sering sangat sering Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent OHIP.10 21 52.5 52.5 52.5 10 25.0 25.0 77.5 4 10.0 10.0 87.5 3 7.5 7.5 95.0 2 5.0 5.0 100.0 40 100.0 100.0 tidak pernah sangat jarang kadang-kadang sering sangat sering Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent OHIP.9 21 52.5 52.5 52.5 5 12.5 12.5 65.0 8 20.0 20.0 85.0 4 10.0 10.0 95.0 2 5.0 5.0 100.0 40 100.0 100.0 tidak pernah sangat jarang kadang-kadang sering sangat sering Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent

(17)

Perawatan 20 50.0 50.0 50.0 20 50.0 50.0 100.0 40 100.0 100.0 Ya Tidak Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulativ e Percent OHIP.14 20 50.0 50.0 50.0 7 17.5 17.5 67.5 8 20.0 20.0 87.5 3 7.5 7.5 95.0 2 5.0 5.0 100.0 40 100.0 100.0 tidak pernah sangat jarang kadang-kadang sering sangat sering Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent OHIP.13 19 47.5 47.5 47.5 5 12.5 12.5 60.0 5 12.5 12.5 72.5 6 15.0 15.0 87.5 5 12.5 12.5 100.0 40 100.0 100.0 tidak pernah sangat jarang kadang-kadang sering sangat sering Total Valid

Frequency Percent Valid Percent

Cumulative Percent OHIP.12 20 50.0 50.0 50.0 6 15.0 15.0 65.0 8 20.0 20.0 85.0 6 15.0 15.0 100.0 40 100.0 100.0 tidak pernah sangat jarang kadang-kadang sering Total Valid

(18)
(19)

Descriptives Crosstabs Descriptive Statistics 40 61 87 72.58 7.136 40 .8571 4.0000 2.710714 1.1850002 40 Umur

Rerata skor kualitas hidup Valid N (listwise)

N Minimum Maximum Mean Std. Dev iation

Umur * Perawatan Crosstabulation

13 14 27 65.0% 70.0% 67.5% 32.5% 35.0% 67.5% 7 6 13 35.0% 30.0% 32.5% 17.5% 15.0% 32.5% 20 20 40 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Count % within Perawatan % of Total Count % within Perawatan % of Total Count % within Perawatan % of Total Usila Usila tua Umur Total Ya Tidak Perawatan Total

(20)

Chi-Square Tests .114b 1 .736 .000 1 1.000 .114 1 .736 1.000 .500 .111 1 .739 40 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.

0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6. 50.

b.

Jenis kelamin * Perawatan Crosstabulation

7 11 18 35.0% 55.0% 45.0% 17.5% 27.5% 45.0% 13 9 22 65.0% 45.0% 55.0% 32.5% 22.5% 55.0% 20 20 40 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 50.0% 100.0% Count % within Perawatan % of Total Count % within Perawatan % of Total Count % within Perawatan % of Total Laki-laki Perempuan Jenis kelamin Total Ya Tidak Perawatan Total Chi-Square Tests 1.616b 1 .204 .909 1 .340 1.628 1 .202 .341 .170 1.576 1 .209 40 Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases Value df Asy mp. Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (2-sided) Exact Sig. (1-sided)

Computed only f or a 2x2 table a.

0 cells (.0%) hav e expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 9. 00.

(21)

Explore Jenis kelamin Descriptives 20,28 3,594 12,69 27,86 20,25 25,50 232,565 15,250 0 41 41 31 -,202 ,536 -1,694 1,038 16,23 3,785 8,36 24,10 15,59 3,50 315,136 17,752 0 44 44 33 ,519 ,491 -1,622 ,953 Mean Lower Bound Upper Bound 95% Confidence

Interv al for Mean

5% Trimmed Mean Median Variance Std. Dev iation Minimum Maximum Range Interquartile Range Skewness Kurtosis Mean Lower Bound Upper Bound 95% Confidence

Interv al for Mean

5% Trimmed Mean Median Variance Std. Dev iation Minimum Maximum Range Interquartile Range Skewness Kurtosis Jenis kelamin Laki-laki Perempuan Kualitas hidup Statistic Std. Error Tests of Normality ,179 18 ,134 ,876 18 ,022 ,289 22 ,000 ,778 22 ,000 Jenis kelamin Laki-laki Perempuan Kualitas hidup

Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.

Kolmogorov -Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk

Lillief ors Significance Correction a.

(22)
(23)

Kualitas hidup NPar Tests Mann-Whitney Test Ranks 18 21,72 391,00 22 19,50 429,00 40 Jenis kelamin Laki-laki Perempuan Total Kualitas hidup

(24)

Explore Umur Test Statisticsb 176,000 429,000 -,600 ,548 ,563a Mann-Whitney U Wilcoxon W Z

Asy mp. Sig. (2-tailed) Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed Sig.)]

Kualitas hidup

Not corrected f or ties. a.

Grouping Variable: Jenis kelamin b.

(25)

Descriptives 17,22 3,037 10,98 23,47 16,89 15,00 249,103 15,783 0 41 41 32 ,202 ,448 -1,760 ,872 19,77 5,189 8,46 31,07 19,52 20,00 350,026 18,709 0 44 44 38 ,152 ,616 -1,994 1,191 Mean Lower Bound Upper Bound 95% Confidence

Interv al for Mean 5% Trimmed Mean Median Variance Std. Dev iation Minimum Maximum Range Interquartile Range Skewness Kurtosis Mean Lower Bound Upper Bound 95% Confidence

Interv al for Mean 5% Trimmed Mean Median Variance Std. Dev iation Minimum Maximum Range Interquartile Range Skewness Kurtosis Umur Usila Usila tua Kualitas hidup Statistic Std. Error Tests of Normality ,202 27 ,006 ,839 27 ,001 ,290 13 ,004 ,804 13 ,008 Umur Usila Usila tua Kualitas hidup

Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.

Kolmogorov -Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk

Lillief ors Significance Correction a.

(26)

Kualitas hidup NPar Tests Mann-Whitney Test Ranks 27 19,74 533,00 13 22,08 287,00 40 Umur Usila Usila tua Total Kualitas hidup

(27)

Crosstabs Test Statisticsb 155,000 533,000 -,594 ,552 ,568a Mann-Whitney U Wilcoxon W Z

Asy mp. Sig. (2-tailed) Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed Sig.)]

Kualitas hidup

Not corrected f or ties. a.

Grouping Variable: Umur b.

Perawatan * OHIP.2 Crosstabulation

17 3 0 0 20 94.4% 50.0% .0% .0% 50.0% 42.5% 7.5% .0% .0% 50.0% 1 3 11 5 20 5.6% 50.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 2.5% 7.5% 27.5% 12.5% 50.0% 18 6 11 5 40 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 45.0% 15.0% 27.5% 12.5% 100.0% Count % within P2 % of Total Count % within P2 % of Total Count % within P2 % of Total Ya Tidak Perawatan Total

tidak pernah sangat jarang

kadang-k

adang sering P2

Total

Perawatan * OHIP.1 Crosstabulation

16 4 0 0 0 20 76.2% 36.4% .0% .0% .0% 50.0% 40.0% 10.0% .0% .0% .0% 50.0% 5 7 4 3 1 20 23.8% 63.6% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 12.5% 17.5% 10.0% 7.5% 2.5% 50.0% 21 11 4 3 1 40 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 52.5% 27.5% 10.0% 7.5% 2.5% 100.0% Count % within P1 % of Total Count % within P1 % of Total Count % within P1 % of Total Ya Tidak Perawatan Total

tidak pernah sangat jarang

Kadang-k

adang sering sangat sering P1

(28)

Perawatan * OHIP.5 Crosstabulation 19 0 0 1 0 20 95.0% .0% .0% 12.5% .0% 50.0% 47.5% .0% .0% 2.5% .0% 50.0% 1 1 7 7 4 20 5.0% 100.0% 100.0% 87.5% 100.0% 50.0% 2.5% 2.5% 17.5% 17.5% 10.0% 50.0% 20 1 7 8 4 40 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 2.5% 17.5% 20.0% 10.0% 100.0% Count % within P5 % of Total Count % within P5 % of Total Count % within P5 % of Total Ya Tidak Perawatan Total

tidak pernah sangat jarang

kadang-k

adang sering sangat sering P5

Total

Perawatan * OHIP.4 Crosstabulation

13 1 3 2 1 20 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 33.3% 5.9% 50.0% 32.5% 2.5% 7.5% 5.0% 2.5% 50.0% 0 0 0 4 16 20 .0% .0% .0% 66.7% 94.1% 50.0% .0% .0% .0% 10.0% 40.0% 50.0% 13 1 3 6 17 40 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 32.5% 2.5% 7.5% 15.0% 42.5% 100.0% Count % within P4 % of Total Count % within P4 % of Total Count % within P4 % of Total Ya Tidak Perawatan Total

tidak pernah sangat jarang

kadang-k

adang sering sangat sering P4

Total

Perawatan * OHIP.3 Crosstabulation

13 3 4 0 0 20 92.9% 50.0% 40.0% .0% .0% 50.0% 32.5% 7.5% 10.0% .0% .0% 50.0% 1 3 6 7 3 20 7.1% 50.0% 60.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 2.5% 7.5% 15.0% 17.5% 7.5% 50.0% 14 6 10 7 3 40 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 35.0% 15.0% 25.0% 17.5% 7.5% 100.0% Count % within P3 % of Total Count % within P3 % of Total Count % within P3 % of Total Ya Tidak Perawatan Total

tidak pernah sangat jarang

kadang-k

adang sering sangat sering P3

(29)

Perawatan * OHIP.8 Crosstabulation 18 2 0 0 0 20 100.0% 50.0% .0% .0% .0% 50.0% 45.0% 5.0% .0% .0% .0% 50.0% 0 2 12 5 1 20 .0% 50.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% .0% 5.0% 30.0% 12.5% 2.5% 50.0% 18 4 12 5 1 40 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 45.0% 10.0% 30.0% 12.5% 2.5% 100.0% Count % within P8 % of Total Count % within P8 % of Total Count % within P8 % of Total Ya Tidak Perawatan Total

tidak pernah sangat jarang

kadang-k

adang sering sangat sering P8

Total

Perawatan * OHIP.7 Crosstabulation

13 5 2 0 0 20 100.0% 71.4% 66.7% .0% .0% 50.0% 32.5% 12.5% 5.0% .0% .0% 50.0% 0 2 1 3 14 20 .0% 28.6% 33.3% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% .0% 5.0% 2.5% 7.5% 35.0% 50.0% 13 7 3 3 14 40 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 32.5% 17.5% 7.5% 7.5% 35.0% 100.0% Count % within P7 % of Total Count % within P7 % of Total Count % within P7 % of Total Ya Tidak Perawatan Total

tidak pernah sangat jarang

kadang-k

adang sering sangat sering P7

Total

Perawatan * OHIP.6 Crosstabulation

19 1 0 0 0 20 100.0% 33.3% .0% .0% .0% 50.0% 47.5% 2.5% .0% .0% .0% 50.0% 0 2 4 9 5 20 .0% 66.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% .0% 5.0% 10.0% 22.5% 12.5% 50.0% 19 3 4 9 5 40 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 47.5% 7.5% 10.0% 22.5% 12.5% 100.0% Count % within P6 % of Total Count % within P6 % of Total Count % within P6 % of Total Ya Tidak Perawatan Total

tidak pernah sangat jarang

kadang-k

adang sering sangat sering P6

(30)

Perawatan * OHIP.11 Crosstabulation 19 0 1 0 0 20 90.5% .0% 12.5% .0% .0% 50.0% 47.5% .0% 2.5% .0% .0% 50.0% 2 3 7 3 5 20 9.5% 100.0% 87.5% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 5.0% 7.5% 17.5% 7.5% 12.5% 50.0% 21 3 8 3 5 40 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 52.5% 7.5% 20.0% 7.5% 12.5% 100.0% Count % within P11 % of Total Count % within P11 % of Total Count % within P11 % of Total Ya Tidak Perawatan Total

tidak pernah sangat jarang

kadang-k

adang sering sangat sering P11

Total

Perawatan * OHIP.10 Crosstabulation

18 2 0 0 0 20 85.7% 20.0% .0% .0% .0% 50.0% 45.0% 5.0% .0% .0% .0% 50.0% 3 8 4 3 2 20 14.3% 80.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 7.5% 20.0% 10.0% 7.5% 5.0% 50.0% 21 10 4 3 2 40 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 52.5% 25.0% 10.0% 7.5% 5.0% 100.0% Count % within P10 % of Total Count % within P10 % of Total Count % within P10 % of Total Ya Tidak Perawatan Total

tidak pernah sangat jarang

kadang-k

adang sering sangat sering P10

Total

Perawatan * OHIP.9 Crosstabulation

19 1 0 0 0 20 90.5% 20.0% .0% .0% .0% 50.0% 47.5% 2.5% .0% .0% .0% 50.0% 2 4 8 4 2 20 9.5% 80.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 5.0% 10.0% 20.0% 10.0% 5.0% 50.0% 21 5 8 4 2 40 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 52.5% 12.5% 20.0% 10.0% 5.0% 100.0% Count % within P9 % of Total Count % within P9 % of Total Count % within P9 % of Total Ya Tidak Perawatan Total

tidak pernah sangat jarang

kadang-k

adang sering sangat sering P9

(31)

Perawatan * OHIP.14 Crosstabulation 19 1 0 0 0 20 95.0% 14.3% .0% .0% .0% 50.0% 47.5% 2.5% .0% .0% .0% 50.0% 1 6 8 3 2 20 5.0% 85.7% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 2.5% 15.0% 20.0% 7.5% 5.0% 50.0% 20 7 8 3 2 40 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 17.5% 20.0% 7.5% 5.0% 100.0% Count % within P14 % of Total Count % within P14 % of Total Count % within P14 % of Total Ya Tidak Perawatan Total

tidak pernah sangat jarang

kadang-k

adang sering sangat sering P14

Total

Perawatan * OHIP.13 Crosstabulation

18 2 0 0 0 20 94.7% 40.0% .0% .0% .0% 50.0% 45.0% 5.0% .0% .0% .0% 50.0% 1 3 5 6 5 20 5.3% 60.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 2.5% 7.5% 12.5% 15.0% 12.5% 50.0% 19 5 5 6 5 40 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 47.5% 12.5% 12.5% 15.0% 12.5% 100.0% Count % within P13 % of Total Count % within P13 % of Total Count % within P13 % of Total Ya Tidak Perawatan Total

tidak pernah sangat jarang

kadang-k

adang sering sangat sering P13

Total Perawatan * OHIP.12 Crosstabulation

19 1 0 0 20 95.0% 16.7% .0% .0% 50.0% 47.5% 2.5% .0% .0% 50.0% 1 5 8 6 20 5.0% 83.3% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 2.5% 12.5% 20.0% 15.0% 50.0% 20 6 8 6 40 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 50.0% 15.0% 20.0% 15.0% 100.0% Count % within P12 % of Total Count % within P12 % of Total Count % within P12 % of Total Ya Tidak Perawatan Total

tidak pernah sangat jarang

kadang-k

adang sering P12

(32)

Explore Perawatan Descriptives .210714 .0739181 .056002 .365427 .154762 .142857 .109 .3305717 .0000 1.4286 1.4286 .2500 2.938 .512 9.995 .992 2.367857 .1272778 2.101462 2.634253 2.396825 2.392857 .324 .5692038 1.0714 3.1429 2.0714 .7500 -.728 .512 .199 .992 Mean Lower Bound Upper Bound 95% Confidence

Interv al for Mean 5% Trimmed Mean Median Variance Std. Dev iation Minimum Maximum Range Interquartile Range Skewness Kurtosis Mean Lower Bound Upper Bound 95% Confidence

Interv al for Mean 5% Trimmed Mean Median Variance Std. Dev iation Minimum Maximum Range Interquartile Range Skewness Kurtosis Perawatan Ya Tidak Rerata skor kualitas hidup Statistic Std. Error Tests of Normality .331 20 .000 .631 20 .000 .096 20 .200* .946 20 .316 Perawatan Ya Tidak Rerata skor kualitas hidup

Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.

Kolmogorov -Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk

This is a lower bound of the true significance. *.

Lillief ors Significance Correction a.

(33)
(34)

Rerata skor kualitas hidup Means Perawatan Tidak Ya Rera ta skor kual itas hidup 4.0000 3.0000 2.0000 1.0000 0.0000 16 10 Report .35 20 .489 3.40 20 1.603 1.88 40 1.937 1.40 20 1.818 6.20 20 1.196 3.80 40 2.866 .20 20 .894 5.45 20 1.820 2.83 40 3.012 .55 20 .887 5.70 20 1.380 3.13 40 2.848 .15 20 .489 3.65 20 2.033 1.90 40 2.296 .15 20 .671 4.25 20 1.618 2.20 40 2.409 .15 20 .489 4.50 20 1.960 2.33 40 2.615 Keterbatasan fungsi Rasa sakit fisik Ketidakny aman psikis Ketidakmampuan f isik Ketidakmampuan psikis Ketdiakmampuan sosial Handikap Mean N Std.

Dev iation Mean N

Std.

Dev iation Mean N

Std. Dev iation

Ya Tidak Total

(35)

NPar Tests Mann-Whitney Test Tests of Normality .413 20 .000 .608 20 .000 .146 20 .200* .960 20 .535 .279 20 .000 .766 20 .000 .184 20 .076 .922 20 .108 .538 20 .000 .236 20 .000 .219 20 .013 .905 20 .050 .382 20 .000 .679 20 .000 .386 20 .000 .751 20 .000 .520 20 .000 .354 20 .000 .125 20 .200* .966 20 .666 .538 20 .000 .236 20 .000 .178 20 .095 .951 20 .383 .520 20 .000 .354 20 .000 .128 20 .200* .937 20 .212 Perawatan Ya Tidak Ya Tidak Ya Tidak Ya Tidak Ya Tidak Ya Tidak Ya Tidak Keterbatasan fungsi

Rasa sakit fisik Ketidakny aman psikis Ketidakmampuan f isik Ketidakmampuan psikis Ketdiakmampuan sosial Handikap

Statistic df Sig. Statistic df Sig.

Kolmogorov -Smirnova Shapiro-Wilk

This is a lower bound of the true significance. *.

Lillief ors Significance Correction a.

(36)

Ranks 20 11.35 227.00 20 29.65 593.00 40 20 10.95 219.00 20 30.05 601.00 40 20 10.75 215.00 20 30.25 605.00 40 20 10.63 212.50 20 30.38 607.50 40 20 11.73 234.50 20 29.28 585.50 40 20 10.75 215.00 20 30.25 605.00 40 20 11.10 222.00 20 29.90 598.00 40 Perawatan Ya Tidak Total Ya Tidak Total Ya Tidak Total Ya Tidak Total Ya Tidak Total Ya Tidak Total Ya Tidak Total Keterbatasan fungsi

Rasa sakit fisik

Ketidakny aman psikis

Ketidakmampuan f isik

Ketidakmampuan psikis

Ketdiakmampuan sosial

Handikap

N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks

Test Statisticsb 17.000 9.000 5.000 2.500 24.500 5.000 12.000 227.000 219.000 215.000 212.500 234.500 215.000 222.000 -5.092 -5.236 -5.612 -5.505 -5.084 -5.598 -5.391 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000a .000a .000a .000a .000a .000a .000a Mann-Whitney U Wilcoxon W Z

Asy mp. Sig. (2-tailed) Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed Sig.)] Keterbatasan f ungsi Rasa sakit f isik Ketidaknya man psikis Ketidakma mpuan f isik Ketidakmam puan psikis Ketdiakmam

puan sosial Handikap

Not corrected f or ties. a.

Grouping Variable: Perawatan b.

(37)

NPar Tests Mann-Whitney Test Ranks 20 10.60 212.00 20 30.40 608.00 40 Perawatan Ya Tidak Total Rerata skor kualitas hidup

N Mean Rank Sum of Ranks

Test Statisticsb 2.000 212.000 -5.376 .000 .000a Mann-Whitney U Wilcoxon W Z

Asy mp. Sig. (2-tailed) Exact Sig. [2*(1-tailed Sig.)]

Rerata skor kualitas hidup

Not corrected f or ties. a.

Grouping Variable: Perawatan b.

(38)

Figur

Memperbarui...

Related subjects :