Lampiran 1
SURAT PERSETUJUAN MENJADI RESPONDEN PENELITIAN
Saya yang bertanda tangan di bawah ini:
Nama :
Umur : Alamat:
Menyatakan bersedia menjadi responden penelitian dengan judul
“Hubungan Pendampingan Keluarga dengan Tingkat Kecemasan Ibu Primigravida dalam Menghadapi Proses Persalinan Kala I di Wilayah Kerja Puskesmas Ngemplak” yang akan dilakukan oleh Avylia Widiyawati Setyoko, mahasiswi Jurusan Kebidanan Poltekkes Kemenkes Surakarta, dengan suka rela menjadi responden penelitian ini tanpa paksaan apapun dan dari siapapun. Hal ini semata-mata untuk keperluan ilmu pengetahuan.
Demikian surat pernyataan ini sayabuat dengan sebenar-benarnya.
Boyolali,
Responden,
………
Tabel Tabulasi Data Penelitian
No Nama Umur Pendidikan Pekerjaan Tingkat Kecemasan
Didampingi/
Tidak didampingi
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
Lampiran 4.
HASIL UJI KARAKTERISTIK SAMPEL PENELITIAN
Frequency Table
Usia
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
< 20 Tahun 1 6.3 6.3 6.3
20-35 Tahun 15 93.8 93.8 100.0
Total 16 100.0 100.0
Pendidikan
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
Pendidikan Dasar 7 43.8 43.8 43.8
Pendidikan Tinggi 9 56.3 56.3 100.0
Total 16 100.0 100.0
Frequency Table
Usia
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
< 20 Tahun 2 12.5 12.5 12.5
20-35 Tahun 14 87.5 87.5 100.0
Total 16 100.0 100.0
Pendidikan
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
Pendidikan Dasar 14 87.5 87.5 87.5
Pendidikan Tinggi 2 12.5 12.5 100.0
Total 16 100.0 100.0
Lampiran 5.
HASIL UJI UNIVARIAT
Frequency Table
Pendampingan
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid Didampingi 16 100.0 100.0 100.0
Tingkat Kecemasan
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
Cemas Berat 1 6.3 6.3 6.3
Cemas Sedang 2 12.5 12.5 18.8
Cemas Ringan 9 56.3 56.3 75.0
Tidak Cemas 4 25.0 25.0 100.0
Total 16 100.0 100.0
Frequency Table
Pendampingan
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid Tidak Didampingi 16 100.0 100.0 100.0
Tingkat Kecemasan
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent
Valid
Cemas Berat 2 12.5 12.5 12.5
Cemas Sedang 8 50.0 50.0 62.5
Cemas Ringan 4 25.0 25.0 87.5
Tidak Cemas 2 12.5 12.5 100.0
Total 16 100.0 100.0
Lampiran 6.
HASIL UJI BIVARIAT
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Pendampingan * Tingkat Kecemasan
32 100.0% 0 0.0% 32 100.0%
Pendampingan * Tingkat Kecemasan Crosstabulation
Tingkat Kecemasan Total Cemas
Berat
Cemas Sedang
Cemas Ringan
Tidak Cemas
Pendampingan
Didampingi
Count 1 2 9 4 16
Expected Count 1.5 5.0 6.5 3.0 16.0
% within Pendampingan 6.3% 12.5% 56.3% 25.0% 100.0%
% within Tingkat Kecemasan 33.3% 20.0% 69.2% 66.7% 50.0%
% of Total 3.1% 6.3% 28.1% 12.5% 50.0%
Tidak Didampingi
Count 2 8 4 2 16
Expected Count 1.5 5.0 6.5 3.0 16.0
% within Pendampingan 12.5% 50.0% 25.0% 12.5% 100.0%
% within Tingkat Kecemasan 66.7% 80.0% 30.8% 33.3% 50.0%
% of Total 6.3% 25.0% 12.5% 6.3% 50.0%
Total
Count 3 10 13 6 32
Expected Count 3.0 10.0 13.0 6.0 32.0
% within Pendampingan 9.4% 31.3% 40.6% 18.8% 100.0%
% within Tingkat Kecemasan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 9.4% 31.3% 40.6% 18.8% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig. (2-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 6.523a 3 .089
Likelihood Ratio 6.848 3 .077
Linear-by-Linear Association 3.894 1 .048
N of Valid Cases 32
a. 4 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.50.
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .411 .089
N of Valid Cases 32
Lampiran 6.
HASIL UJI BIVARIAT
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Pendampingan * Tingkat Kecemasan
32 100.0% 0 0.0% 32 100.0%
Pendampingan * Tingkat Kecemasan Crosstabulation
Tingkat Kecemasan Total Cemas Tidak
Cemas
Pendampingan Didampingi Count 3 13 16
Expected Count 6.5 9.5 16.0
% within Pendampingan 18.8% 81.3% 100.0%
% within Tingkat Kecemasan 23.1% 68.4% 50.0%
% of Total 9.4% 40.6% 50.0%
Tidak Didampingi
Count 10 6 16
Expected Count 6.5 9.5 16.0
% within Pendampingan 62.5% 37.5% 100.0%
% within Tingkat Kecemasan 76.9% 31.6% 50.0%
% of Total 31.3% 18.8% 50.0%
Total
Count 13 19 32
Expected Count 13.0 19.0 32.0
% within Pendampingan 40.6% 59.4% 100.0%
% within Tingkat Kecemasan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 40.6% 59.4% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value Df Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 6.348a 1 .012
Continuity Correctionb 4.664 1 .031
Likelihood Ratio 6.617 1 .010
Fisher's Exact Test .029 .015
Linear-by-Linear Association 6.150 1 .013
N of Valid Cases 32
a. 0 cells (0.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 6.50.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .407 .012
N of Valid Cases 32
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Usia * Tingkat Kecemasan 32 100.0% 0 0.0% 32 100.0%
Usia * Tingkat Kecemasan Crosstabulation
Tingkat Kecemasan Total Cemas Tidak Cemas
Usia < 20 Tahun Count 3 0 3
Expected Count 1.2 1.8 3.0
% within Usia 100.0% 0.0% 100.0%
% within Tingkat Kecemasan 23.1% 0.0% 9.4%
% of Total 9.4% 0.0% 9.4%
20-35 Tahun Count 10 19 29
Expected Count 11.8 17.2 29.0
% within Usia 34.5% 65.5% 100.0%
% within Tingkat Kecemasan 76.9% 100.0% 90.6%
% of Total 31.3% 59.4% 90.6%
Total
Count 13 19 32
Expected Count 13.0 19.0 32.0
% within Usia 40.6% 59.4% 100.0%
% within Tingkat Kecemasan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 40.6% 59.4% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests
Value df Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 4.838a 1 .028
Continuity Correctionb 2.503 1 .114
Likelihood Ratio 5.867 1 .015
Fisher's Exact Test .058 .058
Linear-by-Linear Association 4.687 1 .030
N of Valid Cases 32
a. 2 cells (50.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1.22.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .362 .028
N of Valid Cases 32
Crosstabs
Case Processing Summary Cases
Valid Missing Total
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Pendidikan * Tingkat Kecemasan
32 100.0% 0 0.0% 32 100.0%
Pendidikan * Tingkat Kecemasan Crosstabulation
Tingkat Kecemasan Total Cemas Tidak Cemas
Pendidikan Pendidikan Dasar
Count 12 9 21
Expected Count 8.5 12.5 21.0
% within Pendidikan 57.1% 42.9% 100.0%
% within Tingkat Kecemasan 92.3% 47.4% 65.6%
% of Total 37.5% 28.1% 65.6%
Pendidikan Tinggi
Count 1 10 11
Expected Count 4.5 6.5 11.0
% within Pendidikan 9.1% 90.9% 100.0%
% within Tingkat Kecemasan 7.7% 52.6% 34.4%
% of Total 3.1% 31.3% 34.4%
Total
Count 13 19 32
Expected Count 13.0 19.0 32.0
% within Pendidikan 40.6% 59.4% 100.0%
% within Tingkat Kecemasan 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%
% of Total 40.6% 59.4% 100.0%
Chi-Square Tests Value Df Asymp. Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(2-sided)
Exact Sig.
(1-sided)
Pearson Chi-Square 6.910a 1 .009
Continuity Correctionb 5.062 1 .024
Likelihood Ratio 7.846 1 .005
Fisher's Exact Test .011 .010
Linear-by-Linear Association 6.694 1 .010
N of Valid Cases 32
a. 1 cells (25.0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 4.47.
b. Computed only for a 2x2 table
Symmetric Measures
Value Approx. Sig.
Nominal by Nominal Contingency Coefficient .421 .009
N of Valid Cases 32
Jadwal Penelitian
1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 Memilih
Judul 2 Pengajuan
Judul 3 Konsultasi
Judul 4 Penetapan
Judul 5
PengambilanData Pendukung