• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Pengaruh Nilai Tukar, Tingkat Suku Bunga, dan Inflasi Terhadap Profitabilitas Perusahaan Perbankan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Pengaruh Nilai Tukar, Tingkat Suku Bunga, dan Inflasi Terhadap Profitabilitas Perusahaan Perbankan yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia"

Copied!
13
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

LAMPIRAN

LAMPIRAN 1

Sampel Penelitian Perusahaan Perbankan

di Bursa Efek Indonesia

Periode 2011-2014

No

Nama

Perusahaan

Kriteria

Memenuhi

Kriteria

1

2

3

4

1

AGRO

Sampel (S1)

2

AGRS

x

x

x

x

Tidak

3

BABP

x

Tidak

4

BACA

Sampel (S2)

5

BBCA

Sampel (S3)

6

BBHI

x

x

x

x

Tidak

7

BBKP

Sampel (S4)

8

BBMD

x

x

x

x

Tidak

9

BBNI

Sampel (S5)

10 BBNP

Sampel (S6)

11 BBRI

Sampel (S7)

12 BBTN

Sampel (S8)

13 BBYB

x

x

x

x

Tidak

14 BCIC

x

Tidak

15 BDMN

Sampel (S9)

16 BEKS

x

Tidak

17 BINA

x

x

x

x

Tidak

18 BJBR

Sampel (S10)

19 BJTM

x

x

x

x

Tidak

20 BKSW

x

Tidak

21 BMAS

x

x

x

x

Tidak

22 BMRI

Sampel (S11)

(2)

24 BNGA

Sampel (S13)

25 BNII

Sampel (S14)

26 BNLI

Sampel (S15)

27 BSIM

Sampel (S16)

28 BSWD

Sampel (S17)

29 BTPN

Sampel (S18)

30 BVIC

Sampel (S19)

31 DNAR

x

x

x

x

Tidak

32 INPC

Sampel (20)

33 MAYA

Sampel (21)

34 MCOR

x

x

x

Tidak

35 MEGA

Sampel (S22)

36 NAGA

x

x

x

x

Tidak

37 NISP

Sampel (S23)

38 NOBU

x

x

x

x

Tidak

39 PNBN

Sampel (S24)

40 PNBS

x

x

x

x

Tidak

(3)

LAMPIRAN 2

Data Nilai Tukar, Suku Bunga Dan Inflasi Tahun 2011-2014

No

Indikator

Tahun

2011

2012

2013

2014

1

Nilai Tukar

(Kurs)

8.279,49

8.880,39

9.951,37

11.378,30

2

Suku Bunga (BI

Rate

)

6,58%

5,77%

6,79%

7,54%

(4)

LAMPIRAN 3

Perhitugan nilai

Return on Assets

(ROA) perusahaan perbankan

No

Nama Perusahaan

Nilai Return on Assets (ROA)

2011

2012

2013

2014

1

Bank Rakyat Indonesia Agro

Niaga Tbk

0.01292 0.01273 0.01397 0.01336

2

Bank Capital Indonesia Tbk

0.0142

0.0132

0.0159

0.0133

3

Bank Central Asia Tbk

0.038

0.036

0.038

0.039

4

Bank Bukopin Tbk

0.0168

0.0164

0.0175

0.0124

5

Bank Negara Indonesia

(Persero)Tbk

0.0294

0.0292

0.0336

0.0349

6

Bank Nusantara Parahyangan Tbk

0.0153

0.0157

0.0158

0.0132

7

Bank Rakyat Indonesia

(Persero)Tbk

0.0399

0.0433

0.0349

0.0311

8

Bank Tabungan Negara (Persero)

Tbk

0.0171

0.0167

0.0163

0.0107

14 Bank Internasional Indonesia Tbk

0.0111

0.0146

0.0155

0.0066

15 Bank Permata Tbk

0.0166

0.0170

0.0155

0.0116

16 Bank Sinarmas Tbk

0.0107

0.0174

0.0171

0.0102

17 Bank Swadesi Tbk

0.0310

0.0290

0.0304

0.0273

18

Bank Tabungan Pensiunan

Nasional Tbk

0.0379

0.0420

0.0411

0.0336

19 Bank Victoria International Tbk

0.0265

0.0217

0.0197

0.0080

20

Bank Artha Graha International

Tbk

0.0073

0.0066

0.0139

0.0078

21 Bank Mayapada International Tbk

0.0104

0.0204

0.0212

0.0160

22 Bank Mega Tbk

0.0229

0.0274

0.0114

0.0116

23 Bank NISP OCBC Tbk

0.0168

0.0154

0.0156

0.0172

24 Bank Pan Indonesia Tbk

0.0202

0.0196

0.0185

0.0179

25

Bank Himpunan Saudara 1906

Tbk

(5)

LAMPIRAN 4

HASIL UJI MENGGUNAKAN EVIEWS 7

Hasil Analisis Deskriptif

NIlai Tukar

(x

1

)

Suku Bunga

(x

2

)

Inflasi

(x

3

)

(6)

Uji Normalitas dengan Uji Jarque-Bera

Hasil Uji Multikolienaritas

Uji Multikolinearitas dengan Matriks Korelasi

Nilai Tukar

Suku Bunga

Inflasi

Nilai Tukar

1

0.717357624636193 0.3660169295538978

Suku Bunga

0.717357624636193

1

0.6240625003210119

Inflasi

0.3660169295538978 0.6240625003210119

1

0

2 4 6 8 10 12

-0.015 -0.010 -0.005 0.000 0.005 0.010 0.015

Series: RESID Sample 1 100 Observations 100

Mean -0.001536 Median -0.002929 Maximum 0.014706 Minimum -0.017999 Std. Dev. 0.007411 Skewness 0.389564 Kurtosis 2.163020

(7)

Hasil Uji Heteroskedastisitas

Heteroskedasticity Test: White

F-statistic 0.866384 Prob. F(3,96) 0.4614 Obs*R-squared 2.636079 Prob. Chi-Square(3) 0.4512 Scaled explained SS 5.308701 Prob. Chi-Square(3) 0.1505

Test Equation:

Dependent Variable: RESID^2 Method: Least Squares Date: 01/09/16 Time: 11:03 Sample: 1 100

Included observations: 100

Collinear test regressors dropped from specification

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

C 0.004846 0.004959 0.977361 0.3308 X1 -1.00E-06 1.01E-06 -0.991631 0.3239 X1^2 5.36E-11 5.15E-11 1.039763 0.3011 X1*X2 -2.18E-07 3.29E-07 -0.660832 0.5103

(8)

Hasil Uji Autokorelasi dengan Uji Durbin-Watson

Dependent Variable: Y

Method: Least Squares Date: 01/09/16 Time: 10:51 Sample: 1 100

Included observations: 100

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

X1 -1.10E-06 1.76E-06 -0.622199 0.5353 X2 0.123510 0.176559 0.699542 0.4859 X3 -0.147576 0.138009 -1.069322 0.2876 C 0.034765 0.013757 2.527023 0.0131

R-squared 0.014910 Mean dependent var 0.022236 Adjusted R-squared -0.015875 S.D. dependent var 0.010391 S.E. of regression 0.010473 Akaike info criterion -6.240852 Sum squared resid 0.010530 Schwarz criterion -6.136645 Log likelihood 316.0426 Hannan-Quinn criter. -6.198677 F-statistic 0.484327 Durbin-Watson stat 1.134478 Prob(F-statistic) 0.693959

Common Effect Model

(CEM)

Dependent Variable: Y? Method: Pooled Least Squares Date: 01/09/16 Time: 11:48 Sample: 2011 2014

Included observations: 4 Cross-sections included: 25

Total pool (balanced) observations: 100

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

X1? -3.90E-07 1.49E-06 -0.262489 0.7935 X2? 0.172767 0.139566 1.237886 0.2188 X3? -0.366355 0.109282 -3.352381 0.0011 C 0.036857 0.011649 3.163863 0.0021

(9)

Fixed Effect Model

(FEM)

Dependent Variable: Y? Method: Pooled Least Squares Date: 01/09/16 Time: 11:49 Sample: 2011 2014

Included observations: 4 Cross-sections included: 25

Total pool (balanced) observations: 100

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

X1? -2.95E-07 9.79E-07 -0.301349 0.7640 X2? 0.130657 0.092942 1.405792 0.1641 X3? -0.294086 0.075576 -3.891279 0.0002 C 0.033999 0.007730 4.398055 0.0000 Fixed Effects (Cross)

_1--C -0.008006

Cross-section fixed (dummy variables)

(10)

Log likelihood 388.6909 Hannan-Quinn criter. -6.918598 F-statistic 6.492693 Durbin-Watson stat 2.473068 Prob(F-statistic) 0.000000

Uji Chow

Redundant Fixed Effects Tests Pool: DPANEL_DEVI_P Test cross-section fixed effects

Effects Test Statistic d.f. Prob.

Cross-section F 6.209828 (24,72) 0.0000 Cross-section Chi-square 112.165885 24 0.0000

Cross-section fixed effects test equation: Dependent Variable: Y?

Method: Panel Least Squares Date: 01/09/16 Time: 11:50 Sample: 2011 2014

Included observations: 4 Cross-sections included: 25

Total pool (balanced) observations: 100

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

X1? -3.90E-07 1.49E-06 -0.262489 0.7935 X2? 0.172767 0.139566 1.237886 0.2188 X3? -0.366355 0.109282 -3.352381 0.0011 C 0.036857 0.011649 3.163863 0.0021

(11)

Random Effect Model

(REM)

Dependent Variable: Y?

Method: Pooled EGLS (Cross-section random effects) Date: 01/09/16 Time: 11:51

Sample: 2011 2014 Included observations: 4 Cross-sections included: 25

Total pool (balanced) observations: 100

Swamy and Arora estimator of component variances

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

X1? -3.12E-07 9.79E-07 -0.318706 0.7506 X2? 0.138199 0.092770 1.489695 0.1396 X3? -0.307030 0.074951 -4.096392 0.0001 C 0.034511 0.007832 4.406418 0.0000 Random Effects (Cross)

_1--C -0.006692

(12)

R-squared 0.150686 Mean dependent var 0.008507 Adjusted R-squared 0.124145 S.D. dependent var 0.006275 S.E. of regression 0.005872 Sum squared resid 0.003310 F-statistic 5.677458 Durbin-Watson stat 1.841657 Prob(F-statistic) 0.001270

Unweighted Statistics

R-squared 0.103470 Mean dependent var 0.020919 Sum squared resid 0.007583 Durbin-Watson stat 0.803918

Uji Hausman

Correlated Random Effects - Hausman Test Pool: DPANEL_DEVI_P

Test cross-section random effects

Test Summary

Chi-Sq.

Statistic Chi-Sq. d.f. Prob.

Cross-section random 0.000000 3 1.0000

* Cross-section test variance is invalid. Hausman statistic set to zero.

Cross-section random effects test comparisons:

Variable Fixed Random Var(Diff.) Prob.

X1? -0.000000 -0.000000 0.000000 0.1818 X2? 0.130657 0.138199 0.000032 0.1818 X3? -0.294086 -0.307030 0.000094 0.1818

Cross-section random effects test equation: Dependent Variable: Y?

Method: Panel Least Squares Date: 01/09/16 Time: 11:51 Sample: 2011 2014

Included observations: 4 Cross-sections included: 25

Total pool (balanced) observations: 100

Variable Coefficient Std. Error t-Statistic Prob.

(13)

X3? -0.294086 0.075576 -3.891279 0.0002

Effects Specification

Cross-section fixed (dummy variables)

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

BUDHI MULIA dengan menggunakan VB 6.0, karena pada saat sekarang ini PT.BUDHI MULIA masih memakai proses transaksi penjualan sepatu dan sandal tradisional MINANGKABAU masih

Power Management System (PMS) adalah bagian penting dari peralatan kontrol dalam kapal dan biasanya mendistribusikan daya ke berbagai stasiun kontrol yang dapat

Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa sebagian besar WUS tidak pernah melakukan pemeriksan IVA, walaupun sudah ada dukungan dari petugas kesehatan karena wanita usia

Apakah tax amnesty berpengaruh terhadap kepatuhan wajib pajak orang pribadi yang terdaftar di Kantor Pelayanan Pajak Pratama Bangka.. Apakah sanksi pajak berpengaruh

Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Group Investigation Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPS Siswa Kelas IV SD Negeri 56 Pekanbaru.. Tersedia di

Berdasarkan uraian di atas maka dapat disimpulkan bahwa guru pendidikan agama Islam di SMA Negeri 1 Salomekko memberikan program remedial terhadap siswa yang

This paper presents the test results of different scenarios and the respective accuracies compared to a manual registration of the finally computed fundamental and essential

KELOMPOK KERJA GURU (KKG) MADRASAH IBTIDAIYAH KECAMATAN GENUK KOTA