TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
DECLARATION... i
ABSTRACT ... ii
PREFACE ... iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ... iv
TABLE OF CONTENTS ... v
LISTS OF APPENDICES ... viii
LISTS OF TABLES ... ix
CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background of the Study ... 1
1.2 Research Question ... 3
1.3 Purpose of the Study ... 4
1.4 Scope of the Study ... 4
1.5 Significance of the Study ... 4
1.6 Research Methodology ... 5
1.7 Thesis Organization ... 6
CHAPTER TWO: REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE 2.1 Description on Professional Development... 7
2.2 The Portrait of Professional Development in Indonesia ... 8
2.3 The profile of a Professional English Teacher ... 9
2.4 Self-Reflection in Professional Development ... 12
2.5 Some Possible ways of English Teacher Professional Development ... 13
2.4.1 Classroom Action Research ... 14
2.4.2 Professional Literature ... 15
2.4.3 Developing with Colleagues ... 15
2.4.3.1 Cooperative/Collaborative Development... 15
2.4.3.2 Peer Teaching/Peer Observation ... 16
2.4.3.3 Teachers’ Group... 16
2.4.3.4 Teachers’ Association ... 17
2.4.3.5 Virtual Community ... 17
2 .4.4 A Broader View of Teachers Development ... 18
2.6 Some Factors influencing Teacher Professional Development ... 18
2.7 Related Research Report ... 20
2.8. Synthesis ... 21
CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH METODOLOGY 3.1 Research Design... 23
3.2 Data Collection ... 23
3.2.1 Participants and Setting of the Study ... 24
3.2.2 Instrument ... 24
3.2.2.1 Questionnaire ... 24
3.2.2.3 Document Analysis ... 26
3.2.2.4 Classroom Observations ... 26
3.2.3 Validity ... 27
3.3 Data Analysis ... 27
CHAPTER FOUR: DATA ANALYSIS AND DISCUSSIONS 4.1 The Activities to Develop Teacher Professionalism ... 29
4.1.1 Self-Reflection ... 30
4.1.1.1 Data from Questionnaire ... 30
4.1.1.2 Data from Interview ... 31
4.1.1.3 Synthesis and Interpretation ... 33
4.1.2 Classroom Action Research ... 35
4.1.2.1 Data from Questionnaire ... 36
4.1.2.2 Data from Interview ... 36
4.1.2.3 Synthesis and Interpretation ... 37
4.1.3 Cooperative Development ... 38
4.1.3.1 Data from Questionnaire ... 38
4.1.3.2 Data from Interview ... 39
4.1.3.3 Synthesis and Interpretation ... 40
4.1.4 Peer Teaching/Peer Observation ... 41
4.1.4.1 Data from Questionnaire ... 41
4.1.4.2 Data from Interview ... 42
4.1.4.3 Synthesis and Interpretation ... 43
4.1.5 Teachers’ Group and Teachers’ Association ... 44
4.1.5.1 Data from Questionnaire ... 45
4.1.5.2 Data from Interview ... 45
4.1.5.3 Data from Document Analysis ... 47
4.1.5.4 Synthesis and Interpretation ... 47
4.1.6 Seminars, Workshops, and Trainings ... 50
4.1.6.1 Data from Questionnaire ... 50
4.1.6.2 Data from Interview ... 50
4.1.6.3 Data from Document Analysis ... 52
4.1.6.3 Synthesis and Interpretation ... 52
4.1.7 Virtual Community via Internet ... 54
4.1.7.1 Data from Questionnaire ... 54
4.1.7.2 Data from Interview ... 54
4.1.7.3 Synthesis and Interpretation ... 55
4.1.8 Reading Professional Literature ... 56
4.1.8.1 Data from Questionnaire ... 56
4.1.8.2 Data from Interview ... 56
4.1.8.3 Synthesis and Interpretation ... 57
4.1.9 Teacher Professional Development (TPD) Broader Activities ... 58
4.1.9.1 Data from Questionnaire ... 58
4.1.9.2 Data from Interview ... 59
4.1.9.3 Synthesis and Interpretation ... 60
4.2.1 The Characteristics Developed through Self-Reflection ... 62
4.2.1.1 Data from Questionnaire ... 63
4.2.1.2 Data from Interview ... 63
4.2.1.3 Synthesis and Interpretation ... 65
4.2.2 The Characteristics Developed through Classroom Action Research 66 4.2.2.1 Data from Questionnaire ... 66
4.2.2.2 Data from Interview ... 66
4.2.2.3 Synthesis and Interpretation ... 67
4.2.3 The Characteristics Developed through Cooperative Development .. 68
4.2.3.1 Data from Questionnaire ... 68
4.2.3.2 Data from Interview ... 69
4.2.3.3 Synthesis and Interpretation ... 70
4.2.4 The Characteristics Developed through Peer Teaching/ Peer Observation ... 71
4.2.4.1 Data from Questionnaire ... 71
4.2.4.2 Data from Interview ... 71
4.2.4.3 Synthesis and Interpretation ... 72
4.2.5 The Characteristics Developed fro through Teachers’ Group and Teachers’ Association ... 74
4.2.5.1 Data from Questionnaire ... 74
4.2.5.2 Data from Interview ... 74
4.2.5.3 Synthesis and Interpretation ... 75
4.2.6 The Characteristics Developed fro through Seminars, Workshops, and Trainings ... 76
4.2.6.1 Data from Questionnaire ... 77
4.2.6.2 Data from Interview ... 77
4.2.6.3 Synthesis and Interpretation ... 78
4.2.7 The Characteristics Developed through Reading Professional Literature ... 80
4.2.7.1 Data from Questionnaire ... 81
4.2.7.2 Data from Interview ... 81
4.2.7.3 Synthesis and Interpretation ... 81
4.2.8 The Characteristics Developed through TPD Broader Activities ... 82
4.2.8.1 Data from Questionnaire ... 83
4.2.8.2 Data from Interview ... 83
4.2.8.3 Synthesis and Interpretation ... 84
4.3 The Implementation of the Characteristics into the Teaching Performance ... 88
4.3.1 The Implementation of Technical Knowledge ... 88
4.3.2 The Implementation of Pedagogical skills ... 93
4.3.3 The Implementation of Interpersonal Skills ... 99
4.3.4 The Implementation of Personal Qualities ... 101
CHAPTER FIVE: CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 Conclusions ... 103
5.2 Recommendations for Further Study ... 107
LISTS OF APPENDICES
LIST OF TABLES
Table 2.1 Characteristics of Good Language Teachers ... 10 Table 2.2 Questions of Self-Reflection ... 13 Table 4.1 T1 and T2’s Questions of Self-Reflection ... 30 Table 4.2 Names of Seminars, Workshops, and Trainings Attended by T1 .... 51 Table 4.3 Names of Seminars, Workshops, and Trainings Attended by T2 .... 51 Table 4.4 Names of Seminars, Workshops, and Trainings Attended by T3 .... 51 Table 4.5 Participants’ Broader TPD Activities (Questionnaire Data) ... 59 Table 4.6 Participants’ Broader TPD Activities (Interview Data) ... 59 Table 4.7 Characteristics of Good Language Teachers (Reproduced
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
This chapter presents the introduction to the study. It covers background of
the study, research question, purpose of the study, scope of the study, significance
of the study, research methodology, and thesis organization.
1.1 Background of the Study
The publication of Government Regulation number 19, 2005 about the
national standard of education has prioritized teachers’ quality in educational
field. In fact, according to Suherdi (2007: 2), students’ failure in the national
examination (Tribun Jabar, 17 Juni 2007 in Suherdi, 2007: 2) is able to be
avoided as long as the teaching and learning process is conducted optimally.
Suherdi’s statement conforms to that of Rivkin et al. (2000, in Hammond, 2006:
19), i.e. that students who were assigned to effective teachers had significantly
greater gains in achievement than those assigned to several ineffective teachers.
However, we cannot deny that there are many teachers who seem reluctant
to develop their teaching quality. They claim they do not have enough time since
they need to earn more income to support their family livelihood (see Suherdi,
2007: 6). This implies that their incomes are unsatisfactory. However, there are
things other than income that needs to be taken care of. What expected is the
awareness from the teachers themselves to develop their professionalism in order
In addition, the program of teacher certification as the result of the
publication of Republic Indonesia law number 14, 2005 requires teachers to make
serious effort to develop their professionalism in order to be certified and
professional teachers (see Supriyanti, 2007).
Actually, teachers have many possible ways to develop their
professionalism. They can do it either formally or informally. The formal
professional development is one which is planned in the teacher trainings or
education. The informal professional development is the activity that the teachers
do in their daily practice such as reading books or journal, meeting with
colleagues, joining in the teachers’ group activities, and even conducting a
classroom action research (see Agustina, 2007).
The previous studies on teacher professional development (TPD) were
carried out for different purposes but mostly focused on TPD program design and
effectiveness. In her research on teacher inquiry group, Johar (2002) found that
the group has empowered teachers for their professional development. Besides,
Atey (2006) conducted a case study concerning professional development through
collaborative research and found that participating in collaborative action research
gave the teachers a framework for systematically observing, evaluating, and
reflecting on their L2 teaching practices.
In Indonesia, Widodo (2004: 253) made a survey to identify the needs of
individual English teachers and the preferred programs for professional
development. He found that the programs mostly needed by respondents were
interschool visit, but teacher training was the most needed program among others.
Another research was carried out by Ghozali (2007) who investigated teacher
development through teacher community learning and found that the teachers
made significant progress from the program.
The previous research on TPD indicated the necessity to investigate the
teachers’ effort in the present time to develop their professionalism. Dede et al.
(2006) make recommendations for areas of TPD research in term of the impact of
professional development programs on teacher teaching quality change,
particularly improvement through transformation practice. This kind of research
covers the advantages that teachers gain through TPD activities and the extent to
which they apply those advantages into the teaching performance.
This study focuses on investigating the teacher professional development
issue including the activities conducted by teachers in developing their
professionalism, the characteristics of good language teachers developed through
each activity and the implementation of those characteristics into the teaching
performance.
1.2 Research Question
The following questions are developed in order to guide the inquiry
process of the present study:
a. What activities do the teachers carry out in order to develop their
professionalism?
b. What characteristics of good language teachers are developed through each
c. How do the teachers implement these characteristics into the teaching performance?
1.3 Purpose of the Study
The purposes of this study are formulated based on the problems
investigated. This study aims to:
a. explore the activities carried out by teachers in developing their
professionalism.
b. find the characteristics of good language teachers developed through each TPD
activity conducted.
c. investigate the implementation of the characteristics into the teaching
performance.
1.4 Scope of the Study
This study attempts to investigate professional development of three
English teachers of Junior High School in Pidie Regency, Nanggroe Aceh
Darussalam. This study specifically presents and describes teachers’ activities in
developing their professionalism, the characteristics of a good language teachers
developed through each TPD activity conducted and the implementation of the
characteristics in the teaching performance.
1.5 Significance of the Study
This study is expected to give contribution to the teacher professional
development (TPD) issue theoretically and practically. Theoretically, this study is
of possible activities they can carry out to develop their professionalism and
advantages they can gain through each activity. Moreover, learning from others’
experiences will motivate teachers to take lesson from them. As a result, they can
make efforts to conduct those activities for themselves.
1.6 Research Methodology
The present study is qualitative in nature. It is appropriate for
understanding process by which events and actions take place (see Maxwell,
1996).
In selecting the participants, purposive sampling is used, in which one
selects a sample from which he/she can learn the most (Merriam, 1988: 48). The
selected participants are three Junior High School English teachers in Pidie
Regency, Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam who were active in attending in-service
trainings and conducting other TPD activities.
The data were collected through questionnaire, interview, documents
study, and observation. The first research question, i.e. the teachers’ activities in
developing their professionalism is answered through data from questionnaire,
interview, and document analysis. The second research question, i.e. the
characteristics of good language teachers developed through each TPD activity is
answered using data from questionnaire and interview. Finally, the third research
question, i.e. the implementation of the characteristics in the teaching performance
is answered using data from observation.
Data were analyzed in several steps. First, the findings from questionnaire
research questions. Second, the findings from document analysis were analyzed to
answer the first research question. Third, the findings from classroom observation
were transcribed and analyzed to answer research the third research question.
1.7 Thesis Organization
This thesis is organized into five chapters. The first chapter is introduction
which highlights the basic concerns of the study. The second chapter deals with
theoretical framework on which to base the present study. The third chapter
discusses research methodology including research question, research design, data
collection, and data analysis. The fourth chapter elaborates research findings and
discussion. The fifth or the last chapter presents the conclusions of the study and
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
This chapter describes some important elements related to research
methodology. The elements are: (1) research design, (2) data collection, and (3)
data analysis.
3.1 Research Design
The present study employs a qualitative case study approach in order to
document detailed information of how people interact in particular situation (see
(Silverman, 2000: 6). The purposes of a case study are to arrive at a
comprehensive understanding of the groups under study and to develop general
theoretical statements about regularities in social structures and processes (see
Becker, 1968, cited in Merriam, 1988: 11). In line with this, Stake (1988, in
Nunan, 1992: 75) states the difference between a case study and other research
studies is that it focuses on one single case, not the whole population of cases.
Moreover, in most other studies, Stake further states that researchers search for an
understanding that ignores the uniqueness of individual cases and generalizes
beyond particular instances, while in the case study, the search is for an
understanding of a particular case.
3.2 Data Collection
Data collection covers some aspects including participants and setting of
3.2.1 Participants and the Setting
This study employs purposive sampling which is defined as selecting a
sample from which one can learn the most to discover, understand, and gain in
sight (Merriam, 1988: 48). One of the aims of selecting the sample purposively,
according to Maxwell (1996, cited in Alwasilah, 2007: 147) is to get the
uniqueness or representativeness of background, individual or activities.
There were three participants selected. All of them are English teachers at
Junior High School in Pidie Regency, Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam who graduated
from S1 program. The relevance of the choice of the subjects to the purpose of the
present study is that the teachers were certified teachers who actively participated
in some professional development activities such as teachers’ training and other
teachers’ in-service programs. Thus, since this study is concerned with teacher
professional development, it needs the subjects with those characteristics.
3.2.2 Instrument
This study used four types of instruments, i.e. questionnaire, teachers’
interview, observation, and document analysis. It is overviewed as follows.
3.2.2.1 Questionnaire
There are two kinds of questionnaires in this research, i.e. open-ended
questions which allow the respondents to give a totally free answer and closed
questions in which the answer are provided to the respondents and they are
The open ended questions were employed to explore the first research
question concerning the activities conducted by the participants in TPD and the
second research question concerning the characteristics of good language teachers
developed from each TPD activity. The questions were constructed based on
Richard and Lockhart’s (1994) theories of self-reflection and Harmer’s (2001)
view about some possible ways of TPD programs for English teachers. They
consist of ten items, i.e. (1) self-reflection, (2) classroom action research, (3)
cooperative development, (4) peer teaching/peer observation, (5) teachers’ group
(6) teachers’ association, (7) seminars, workshops, and trainings, (8) virtual
community, (9) reading professional literature, and (10) broader TPD activities.
The closed questions were employed to explore research question number two
concerning the characteristics developed through each activity conducted. They
were constructed based on the list of characteristics of good language teachers
consisting four skill areas proposed by Brown (2001). They consist of ten items
including the characteristics developed through each of the ten activities
conducted. The questionnaire itself can be observed in Appendix 1.
3.2.2.2 Interview
Interview is another technique used in this study. The purpose of
interviewing people is to find out what is on their mind, what they think and how
they feel about something (see Fraenkel and Wallen, 1993: 385).
The interview of this study was employed to gather data for the first
research question, i.e. the activities conducted by the participants in TPD and the
during the TPD activities. The interview which was conducted twice was
tape-recorded. It was then transcribed to enhance the data. The interview guide can be
observed in Appendix 2, while the interview transcriptions can be observed in
Appendix 3.
3.2.2.3 Document Analysis
Document analysis is also employed in the present study. Merriam
(1988:1) says that the researchers can use documentary materials as data. It aims
to strengthen the data gained from other techniques.
The data from document analysis were used to answer the first research
question, i.e. the activities the teachers carried out in order to develop their
professionalism. The present study examines document concerning seminars,
workshops, or trainings and MGMP activities. The document analysis can be
observed in Appendix 4.
3.2.2.4 Classroom Observation
Certain kind of research questions can be best answered by observing how
people act or how things look (see Fraenkel and Wallen, 1993: 384). In this study,
class observation was conducted to answer the third research question, i.e. the
implementation of good language teachers’ characteristics in the participants’
teaching performance. It was based on the Brown’s (2001: 430) list of good
language teachers’ characteristics. The researcher who worked as the observer
used audio visual recording in order to record the teaching activity. The
were transcribed to enhance the data for implementation of the characteristics in
the teaching performance. However, since the accurate data gained were only
from two observations, there were only two transcriptions made. The classroom
observation transcription can be observed in Appendix 5.
3.2.3 Validity
Validity is another word for truth (see Silverman, 2005: 210). The validity
of this research was made by using the triangulation referring to the use of a
variety of instruments to collect data (see Fraenkel and Wallen, 1993: 400). Thus,
the combination of different ways of data collection in this research including
questionnaire, interview, observation, and document analysis should ensure
validity and reliability of the data.
3.3 Data Analysis
The data for this research will be mostly analyzed qualitatively. Analyzing
data in a qualitative study involves synthesizing the information the researcher
obtains from various sources such as observations, interviews and document
analysis into coherent description of what he or she has observed or discovered
(see Fraenkel & Wallen, 1993: 383).
The process of data analysis is presented through the following steps. First,
the findings from questionnaire and interview were categorized based on the
research questions in order to help data analysis process. They were analyzed to
answer the first research question, i.e. the activities the teachers carried out in
characteristics of good language teachers developed from each TPD activity
conducted. Second, the findings from document analysis were analyzed to answer
the first research question, i.e. the activities the teachers carried out in order to
develop their professionalism. Third, the findings from classroom observation
were transcribed and analyzed to answer the first research question, i.e. the
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This chapter presents the conclusions or the major findings of the study
and recommendations for further study. The presentation covers two sub parts.
The first part is conclusions and the second part is the recommendations for
further study.
5.1 Conclusions
This study investigated English teacher professional development (TPD).
There were three research problems investigated toward this issue. The first
research problem is “what activities do the teachers carry out in order to develop
their professionalism?” It was found that the teachers conducted or participated in
various activities. They are self-reflection (Richard & Lockhart, 1994), classroom
action research (CAR), cooperative development, peer teaching/peer observation,
teachers’ group and teachers’ association, seminars, workshops, and trainings,
professional literature, and some broader view of TPD activities (Harmer, 2001).
The only activity the teachers did not participate was being involved in virtual
community because of lack of time. In addition, CAR was also was still rarely
conducted by the teachers. There was only one participant conducted CAR and it
was not even completed. Moreover, self-reflection, teachers’ association
(MGMP), and teachers’ trainings were believed as the most useful programs.
they conducted in teachers’ trainings and MGMP really supported them to be
certified teachers.
The fact that the teachers have conducted various TPD activities indicates
that they have awareness to develop their professionalism. However, there were
two activities which were not conducted or rarely conducted, i.e. virtual
community and classroom action research. This was caused by some factors, i.e.
lack of time and the system of work environment such as lack of school facility.
This phenomenon indicates that teacher professional development is influenced by
many factors. The factors are both personally and environmentally. To handle the
personal factor teachers should have personal commitment to devote time for
professional development. Meanwhile, environmental factor requires government
support in term of providing sufficient school facility. Thus, when a professional
development is expected to be ongoing, these factors should be handled
appropriately. Moreover, the fact that self-reflection is considered as one of the
most important TPD activities indicates that professional development should be
started with personal intention. Finally, the fact that teachers’ association or
MGMP and teachers’ trainings are believed as the most useful TPD activities and
support them to be certified teachers indicates that such programs should be
provided more for teachers for their professional development.
The second research problem is “what characteristics of a good language
teacher are developed from each activity?” It was found that in general, through
each activity, each participant could develop large numbers of the characteristics
interpersonal skills, and personal qualities. Moreover, there were four
characteristics which were the most developed. Three of them are technical
knowledge and one is personal skill. The technical knowledge are (1) understands
the linguistic system of English phonology, grammar, and discourse, (2) knows
through experience what it is like to learn a foreign language, (3) understands the
close connection between language and culture. The personal sub-skill is
“maintains and exemplifies high ethical and moral standard”. The least developed
characteristic was the personal sub-skill “sets short-term and long-term goals for
continued professional growth”.
The fact that the teachers can develop many characteristics from the TPD
activities indicates that the activities provide many advantages for their
professional development. They can develop not only the knowledge/skill related
to teaching and learning, but also the skill related to personal and interpersonal
skills. This helps teachers to become more professional. Moreover, the fact that
the most developed skills were in terms of content knowledge indicates that the
teachers in the future should also focus more on developing the pedagogical or
practical skills. Third, the fact that the characteristic “sets short-term and
long-term goals for continued professional growth” was the least developed skill
indicates that the teachers are still weak in planning their professional
development so that in future, they should make a strategic planning for their
professional development.
The third research problem is “how do they implement the characteristics
effort in implementing the characteristics although some characteristics were still
weak. In terms of technical knowledge, they put the knowledge into practice when
they implemented the pedagogical knowledge. They also tried to implement
pedagogical skills optimally. For example, various techniques used were
appropriate to the approaches of language skills teaching, lesson plans were
prepared and some alterations were made to suit students’ need, students’
linguistic need were fulfilled, feedbacks, interaction, cooperation and team work
were provided optimally, classroom management principles were applied,
textbooks material and simple visual aids were adapted, and the assessment were
conducted interactively as ongoing assessment. The interpersonal skills were also
implemented appropriately. The teachers had good awareness of students’ cultural
traditions, kept good rapport with the students, sometimes provided appropriate
humor, valued the students’ ability, worked with students of lesser ability, and
sometimes offered challenges for high ability students. In terms of personal
qualities, they had positive personality for being well-organized, being flexible,
maintaining an inquisitive mind in trying out new ways of teaching and applying
high ethical and moral standard. However, some implementations of the
pedagogical skills were not evidenced during the observation such as “creatively
adapting audio, visual and mechanical aids” and “innovatively creating brand new
material when needed”.
The fact that the teachers have generally implemented the characteristics
in the teaching performance indicates that the professional development activity
Moreover, the fact that they were still weak in implementing some of the
characteristics indicated that they should focus more on the areas of weakness so
that all characteristics are fulfilled and they become more professional.
5.2 Recommendations for Further Study.
There are some methodological and practical recommendations proposed.
The methodological recommendations concern the delimitations of the present
study and the possible enhancement for further research. First, since the scope of
the present study were only three English teachers at a Junior High School in
Nanggroe Aceh Darussalam, more research on teacher professional development
with larger scope are recommended. Second, since this study was not a
longitudinal study, more longitudinal research investigating the effect of teacher
professional development programs to the quality of the teaching performance are
recommended.
The practical recommendations also concern the delimitations of the
present study and the possible enhancement for further research. First, since the
teacher professional development (TPD) activities investigated in this study were
only those suggested by Richard & Lockhart (1994) and Harmer (2001), more
researches with more possible activities of TPD are recommended in order to
enrich the TPD possible activities. Second, since this study only focused on the
implementation of the skills of good language teacher’s characteristics in the
teaching performance, more researches focusing on the implementation of those
skills into all aspects of the teachers’ professional life are recommended in order
with the findings of this study that teacher professional development is influenced
by many factors, more research on this issue are recommended in order to enrich
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Agustina, Noor Qomaria, 2007. Teacher Professional development. The 55th TEFLIN Conference Proceedings.Jakarta: UIN Syarief Hidayatullah
Ali, Mohd Sofi, Dr. 2002. Professional Development of ESL Teachers in Primary Schools. Jurnal Pendidikian IPBA. Vol 2, no. 5
Allen, Edward David & Valette, Rebecca M. 1977. Classroom Techniques: Foreign languages and English as a second Language. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanofich, INC
Alwasilah, A. Chaedar. 2008. Pokoknya Kualitatif: Dasar-dasar Maerancang dan Melakukan Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: PT Dunia Pustaka Jaya.
Atay, Derin. 2006. Teachers' Professional Development: Partnerships in Research. Turkey TESL-EJ. Vol. 23, no. 4
Atkinson, D. 1987. 'The mother-tongue in the classroom: a neglected resource', ELT Journal. Vol 44, no.1
Berdie, Douglas R & Anderson, John F.1974. Questionnaires: Design and Use. Metuchen, N.J: The Scarecrow Press, Inc
Brown, H. Douglas. 2001. Teaching By Principles. Second edition. England: Longman
Carbery, Susan. Practicalities of Ongoing Assessment. In JALT Testing and Evaluation SIG Newsletter. Vol. 3
Dede, C, Ketelhut, D. J, Whitehouse, P, Breit, L, & McCloskey, E. 2006. A Research Agenda for Online Teacher Professional Development. Harvard Graduate School of Education. Available online on gseweb.harvard.edu/~uk/otpd/Dede_research_agenda_final.pdf. Retrieved on 23 March, 2009
Eggins, Susan. 1994. An Introduction to Systemic Functional Linguistic. United Kingdom: Pinter publishers Ltd
Ellis, Rod. 1994. The Study of Second language Acquisition. New York: Oxford University press
Fraenkel J & Wallen, N. 1993. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. USA: MacGraw Hill Inc
Fulther, Glenn & Davidson Fred. 2007, Language Testing and Assessment. USA: Rougledge
Gebhard G, Jerry. 1996. Teaching English as a Foreign or Second Language. University of Michigan
Ghozali, Imam. 2002. Teacher Development through Teachers Community Learning: An Alternative model for focused changes. The 55th TEFLIN. Jakarta: UIN Syarief Hidayatullah
Goker, Suleyman D. 2005. A School-based Management and Supervision Model in EFL Schools. TESL Journal, Vol. XI, no. 1
Graham, George, et al. 2007. Children Moving. New York: Mc Graw Hill
Hammond, Linda Darling. 2006. Powerful Teacher Education. USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Harmer, Jeremy. 2001. The practice of English Language Teaching. England: Longman
Harmer, Jeremy. 2007. How to Teach English. England: Longman
Harmer, Jeremy. 2007. How to Teach Writing. England: Longman
Harnawidagda, Hadjid. Autonomous Learning to Promote Teaching Competency for English Teachers in Remote Areas. The 55th TEFLIN. Jakarta: UIN Syarief Hidayatullah
Iida, Atshusi. 2009. Teacher Autonomy and Professional Teacher Development: Exploring the Necessities for Developing Teacher Autonomy in EFL Japanese Contexts. EFL Journal Vol. 35, no. 3
Johar, Norazida B. 2002. Teacher Inquiry Group: A Tool for Professional Development Among EL Teachers. International Conference Languages Teachers Training Institute
Labaw, Patricia J. 1937. Advanced Questionnaire Design. USA: Cambridge
Lewis, Gordon, & Bedson, Gunther. 1999. Games or Children. New York: Oxford University Press.
Listyani. 2007. What is a Good language Teacher? An Overview of Students and Teachers’ Reflection. The 55th TEFLIN. Jakarta: UIN Syarief Hidayatullah
1 Lohman, Margaret C. 2006. Factors Influencing Teachers' Engagement in Informal Learning Activities. Journal of Workplace Learning. Vol. 18, no.3
Maengkosaputra, Arief. 2004. Memberdayakan MGMP, Sebuah Keniscayaan. In Pendidikan Network. Available online on re-searchengines.com/art05-14.html, Retrieved on 2 July, 2009
Maggioli, Gabriel H.D. 2003. Professional Development for Language Teachers. Online Resources: Digests. National Administration of Public Education
Mahfuddin, Azis. 2009. Profesionalisme Jabatan Guru di Era Globalisasi. Bandung: Rizki Press.
Maxwell, Joseph A. 1996. Qualitative Research Design. An Interactive Approach. London: SAGE Publication
Merriam, Sharan B.1988. Case Study Research in Education. A Qualitative Approach. San Francisco. California: Jossey-Bass Inc. Publishers
Miller, John P & Seller Wayne. 1985. Curriculum Perspective and Practice. USA: Longman Inc
Nunan, David. 1989. Understanding Language Classroom. New York: Prentice Hall
Nunan, David. 1991. Language Teaching Methodology. New York: Prentice Hall
Nunan, David. 1992. Research Methods in Language Learning. USA: Cambridge University Press
Nunan, David and Lamb, Clarice. 1996. The Self-Directed Teacher. USA: Cambridge University Press
Octaberlina, Like Rascova. 2007. An Ideal English Teacher is the answer to increase the Students English Mastery. The 55th TEFLIN. Jakarta: UIN Syarief Hidayatullah
Pinter, Annamaria. 2006. Teaching Young Language Learners. New York: Oxford University Press
Prihantoro. 2007. Setting up Standard for professional English Teacher: An Attempt to Promote ELT Professionalism. The 55th TEFLIN. Jakarta: UIN Syarief Hidayatullah
Pettis, Joanne. 2002.Developing Our professional Competence: Some Reflection. In Richard, Jack C & Renandya, Willy A. (E.d). Methodology in Language Tecahing. USA: Cambridge University Press
Pollard, Andrew. 2005, Reflective Teaching. London: Continuum
Purjayanti, Ani. 2007. Good language Teacher: Whose Perceptions? The 55th TEFLIN. Jakarta: UIN Syarief Hidayatullah
Rahayu, Puji. 2007. Developing Teachers’ Professionalism through Action Research. The 55th TEFLIN. Jakarta: UIN Syarief Hidayatullah
Reece, Ian & Walker, Stephen. 1997. Teaching, Training and Learning. Great Britain: Business Education Publishers Limited
Richards, Jack C. 1990. The language Teaching matrix. USA: Cambridge University Press
Richards, Jack C. 2001. Curriculum development in language teaching. USA: Cambridge University Press
Richards, Jack & Lockhart, Charles. 1994. Reflective Teaching in Second Language Classrooms. USA: Cambridge University Press
Richards, Jack & Renandya, Willy A. Methodology in Language Teaching. USA: Cambridge University Press
Robiasih, hasti. 2007. Scaffolding Teachers to Be More Professional through an Action research. The 55th TEFLIN. Jakarta: UIN Syarief Hidayatullah
Rohani. 2007. Lesson Study: A Promising EFL Teacher Development Plan. The 55th TEFLIN. Jakarta: UIN Syarief Hidayatullah
Sadik, Andjarwati. 2007. The Good language Teacher: Students’ Perspective. The 55th TEFLIN. Jakarta: UIN Syarief Hidayatullah
Silverman, David. 2000. Doing Qualitative Research. London: SAGE Publication
Sosiowati, I. G. A. G. 2007. Good Language Teacher in the Era of Globalization. The 55th TEFLIN. Jakarta: UIN Syarief Hidayatullah
Suherdi, Didi. 2007. Menakar Kualitas proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: UPI Press
Sukarni, E.I & Suwarginingsih, M.N. 2007. The Importance of Change of Attitude Related to Teachers’ Professionalism: A Case Study at St. Albertus High School Malang. The 55th TEFLIN. Jakarta: UIN Syarief Hidayatullah
Supriyanti, Nuri. 2007. Teachers Going Certification: Matters over Mind? The 55th TEFLIN. Jakarta: UIN Syarief Hidayatullah
Tang, Jinlang (2002). Using L1 in the English Classroom. English Teaching Forum
Tejo, Ester. W. 2007. Developing Personality to Build up Creative Language Learning as a Life Skill. The 55th TEFLIN. Jakarta: UIN Syarief Hidayatullah
Thornbury, Scott. 2007. How to Teach Speaking. New edition. England: Longman
Thornbury, Scott. 2007. How to Teach Vocabulary. New edition. England: Longman
... 2007. Undang – Undang sistem Pendidikan Nasional (SISDIKNAS) 2003 (UU RI N20 TH 2003). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika
Wang, Hong & Cheng, Living. 2008. The Impact of Curriculum Innovation on the Cultures of Teaching. Chinese EFL Journal. Vol. 1, no.1
Widodo, Singgih. 2004. Professional Development Programs for Teachers of English. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. Vol. 11, no.3
Widayati, Sri. 2007. Reflective Practice: An Attempt to Promote Teacher Professional Development. The 55th TEFLIN. Jakarta: UIN Syarief Hidayatullah
Yamin, Martinis. 2007. Professionalisasi Guru & Implementasi KTSP. Jakarta: GP Press.