Lampiran 1. JBI Tools
JBI CRITICAL APPRAISAL CHECKLIST FOR ANALYTICAL CROSS SECTIONAL
Reviewer : Febby Ronaldhy Yushiro
Date : Januari 2021
Author : Elis Noviatil, Iim Imas Masru’ah, Fidya Anisa Firdaus
Year : 2018
Record Number : 1
Yes No Unclear Not
applicable 1. Were criteria for inclusion in the
sample clearly defined?
2. Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail?
3. Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way?
4. Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition?
5. Were confounding factors identified?
6. Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated?
7. Were the outcomes measured in a valid and realible way?
8. Was appropriate statistical analysis used?
Overall appraisal:
Include Exclude Seek futher info
Comments (Including reason for exclusion):
Artikel ini mendapatkan skor 75% sehingga dinyatakan layak untuk dilakukan sintesis data.
Lampiran 2. JBI Tools
JBI CRITICAL APPRAISAL CHECKLIST FOR ANALYTICAL CROSS SECTIONAL
Reviewer : Febby Ronaldhy Yushiro
Date : Januari 2021
Author : Thirsa O. Mongi1 , Merdy Kansil2 , Merry Meisye Feitje Rawis3
Year : 2018
Record Number : 2
Yes No Unclear Not
applicable 1. Were criteria for inclusion in the
sample clearly defined?
2. Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail?
3. Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way?
4. Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition?
5. Were confounding factors identified?
6. Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated?
7. Were the outcomes measured in a valid and realible way?
8. Was appropriate statistical analysis used?
Overall appraisal:
Include Exclude Seek futher info
Comments (Including reason for exclusion). Artikel ini mendapatkan skor 75%
sehingga dinyatakan layak untuk dilakukan sintesis data.
Lampiran 3 JBI Tools
JBI CRITICAL APPRAISAL CHECKLIST FOR ANALYTICAL CROSS SECTIONAL
Reviewer : Febby Ronaldhy Yushiro
Date : Januari 2021
Author : Siti Nursondang1 , Setiawati2 , Rahma Elliya2
Year : 2015
Record Number : 3
Yes No Unclear Not
applicable 1. Were criteria for inclusion in the
sample clearly defined?
2. Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail?
3. Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way?
4. Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition?
5. Were confounding factors identified?
6. Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated?
7. Were the outcomes measured in a valid and realible way?
8. Was appropriate statistical analysis used?
Overall appraisal:
Include Exclude Seek futher info
Comments (Including reason for exclusion):
Artikel ini mendapatkan skor 75% sehingga dinyatakan layak untuk dilakukan sintesis data.
Lampiran 4 JBI Tools
JBI CRITICAL APPRAISAL CHECKLIST FOR ANALYTICAL CROSS SECTIONAL
Reviewer : Febby Ronaldhy Yushiro
Date : Januari 2021 Author : Minta Ito Harahap
Year : 2018
Record Number : 4
Yes No Unclear Not
applicable 1. Were criteria for inclusion in the
sample clearly defined?
2. Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail?
3. Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way?
4. Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition?
5. Were confounding factors identified?
6. Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated?
7. Were the outcomes measured in a valid and realible way?
8. Was appropriate statistical analysis used?
Overall appraisal:
Include Exclude Seek futher info
Comments (Including reason for exclusion): Artikel ini mendapatkan skor 75%
sehingga dinyatakan layak untuk dilakukan sintesis data.
Lampiran 5 JBI Tools
JBI CRITICAL APPRAISAL CHECKLIST FOR ANALYTICAL CROSS SECTIONAL
Reviewer : Febby Ronaldhy Yushiro
Date : Januari 2021
Author : Jek Amidos Pardede
Year : 2020
Record Number : 5
Yes No Unclear Not
applicable 1. Were criteria for inclusion in the
sample clearly defined?
2. Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail?
3. Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way?
4. Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition?
5. Were confounding factors identified?
6. Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated?
7. Were the outcomes measured in a valid and realible way?
8. Was appropriate statistical analysis used?
Overall appraisal:
Include Exclude Seek futher info
Comments (Including reason for exclusion):
Artikel ini mendapatkan skor 75% sehingga dinyatakan layak untuk dilakukan sintesis data.
Lampiran 6 JBI Tools
JBI CRITICAL APPRAISAL CHECKLIST FOR ANALYTICAL CROSS SECTIONAL
Reviewer : Febby Ronaldhy Yushiro
Date : Januari 2021
Author : Sherwood Burns-Nader
Year : 2013 Record Number : 6
Yes No Unclear Not
applicable 1. Were criteria for inclusion in the
sample clearly defined?
2. Were the study subjects and the setting described in detail?
3. Was the exposure measured in a valid and reliable way?
4. Were objective, standard criteria used for measurement of the condition?
5. Were confounding factors identified?
6. Were strategies to deal with confounding factors stated?
7. Were the outcomes measured in a valid and realible way?
8. Was appropriate statistical analysis used?
Overall appraisal:
Include Exclude Seek futher info
Comments (Including reason for exclusion):
Artikel ini mendapatkan skor 75% sehingga dinyatakan layak untuk dilakukan sintesis data.
Lampiran
LEMBAR BIMBINGAN SKRIPSI Nama : Febby Ronaldhy Yushiro
Nim : P17211173024
Nama Pembimbing I : Dr. Erlina Suci Astuti, S.Kep., Ns., M.Kep
NO TANGGAL REKOMENDASI PEMBIMBING
TANDA TANGAN PEMBIMBING
1 28 September
2020
Untuk membuat latar belakang yang baik harus ada 4 hal yang dicantumkan.
1. Masalah
2. Skala masalah atau besarnya masalah
3. Kronologi masalah 4. Konsep solusi 2 19 Oktober
2020
Latar belakang masih belum jelas, kronologi masalah belum jelas, dan refrensi harus 10 tahun terakhir 3 4 Januari
2021
Memperbaiki judul dengan metode
“Literature Review”
4 7 Januari 2021
Alinea 1 dan 2 masih kurang enak dan informative. Alinea 1 harus di dahului dengan tumbuh kembang, anak sakit, anak di rumah sakit. Di akhir alinea 2 ditambahkan dampak masalah anak cemas dan dukungan keluarga 5 8 Januari
2021
Memperbaiki alinea 1 dan 2 terkait proses tumbuh kembang sehat sakit, dan memperbaiki tujuan khusus 6 11 Januari
2021
Menambahkan sub judul kecemasan pada anak pra sekolah, kemudian memperbaiki kerangka konsep 7 13 Januari
2021
Memperbaiki kerangka konsep
8 28 Juni 2021
- Memperbaiki tabel jurnal
- Point pembahasan menyesuaikan dari - Tujuan khusus dan mencakup fto - Menambahkan opini
- Kesimpulan kurang 1
9 13 Juli 2021 - Memperbaiki kolom tabel jurnal - Mmengubah point pembahasan
dengan menggunakan jurnal lain - Mengubah point kesimpulan sesuai
tujuan khusus
10 21 September
2021
- Revisi abstrak menunggu konfirmasi penguji
Lampiran
LEMBAR BIMBINGAN SKRIPSI Nama : Febby Ronaldhy Yushiro
Nim : P17211173024
Nama Pembimbing Ii : Dra. Swito Prastiwi, M.Kes NO TANGGAL REKOMENDASI PEMBIMBING
TANDA TANGAN PEMBIMBING 1 10 Oktober
2020
Memperbaiki penelitian hasil responden kecemasan dan dukungan keluarga, kemudian memperbaiki tujuan khusus
2 7 Januari 2021
Latar belakang alinea 1 dan 2 tidak nyambung dan memperbaiki tujuan khusus
3 21 Januari 2021
Memperbaiki isi dari bab 2 kemudian memperbaiki kerangka konsep 4 27 Juni
2021
Menambahkan jurnal pada bab 4 5 28 Juni
2021
Memperbaiki tabel jurnal Kesimpulan kurang 1
6 13 Juli 2021 Memperbaiki kolom tabel jurnal Mengubah point kesimpulan sesuai tujuan khusus
7 21
september 2021
Revisi abstrak menunggu konfirmasi penguji
8 27 Januari 2022
ACC Skripsi
Lampiran 8 Data Riwayat Hidup Peneliti
Data Riwayat Hidup (Curriculum Vitae)
Nama : FEBBY RONALDHY YUSHIRO
Jenis Kelamin : Laki-laki
Tempat, Tanggal Lahir : Ujung Pandang, 4 Februari 1999
Alamat : Aspol Mondoroko G.4 C8/7, Singosari Malang
Agama : Islam
Nomor HP : 081331750243
Email : [email protected]
Riwayat Pendidikan :
1. 2006 – 2011 : SD Negeri Purwodadi 1 2. 2011 – 2014 : SMP Negeri 20 Malang 3. 2014 – 2017 : SMA Islam Malang
4. 2017 – 2021 : Politeknik Kesehatan Kemenkes Malang
