• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

MEASURING THE DISEASE - perpustakaan rs mata cicendo

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "MEASURING THE DISEASE - perpustakaan rs mata cicendo"

Copied!
23
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

MEASURING THE DISEASE

Nina Ratnaningsih

(2)

Count diseased people

ILLNESS CASES

(3)

Ratio, proportion, rate

Add dimension of

time ?

(4)

Measuring the disease

Frequency EFFECT

● How common the disease

● How is the risk of

diseases in an subject

● How fast the diseases develop

● How strong the effect of ex in one group comparing

another group

● How much diseases attributable to ex

● How much the cases would be eliminated if exposure were also eliminated

(5)

How common the disease

Proportion → prevalence

Related to burden of disease

Help the decision maker to determine the investment/ planning

In specific point of time/time period

Cross sectional design

(6)
(7)

How big is the disease risk

● Risk = incidence cumulative

● proportion of an initially disease-free population that develops disease, becomes injured, or dies during a specified (usually limited) period of time.

● To know the etiology/risk of the disease

● Cohort design with fixed population and short period of follow up

(8)

How fast the disease develop

● Person time rate = incidence rate = risk rate

● cohort design with dynamic population, and fixed population with long period of Follow Up

● The rate provides the capacity to anticipate future incidents and plan accordingly

● Simply said “ there’s new cases__ /Persons- year”

(9)
(10)

Formulas

(11)

How strong the effect :

Comparing the groups with/out exp

RISK RATIO RATE RATIO ODDS RATIO

RISK Ex/

RISK Uex

RATE Ex/

RATE Uex

Odds ex / Odds uex

(12)

Formulas

RISK RATIO

a/(a+b) : c/(c+d)

RATE RATIO → RISK RATIO

ODDS RATIO a/b : c/d

Ratio = 1, ex=uex Ratio > 1, risk>

Ratio < 1, risk <

(13)

Simply said….

● the exposed group has ____ times the risk of developing illness as the unexposed group.

● illness among exposed group is developing at ___times the rate that illness is developing among unxposed group

● the odds of ilnes is ___ times greater in exposed group

Note : OR always overestimate than RR OR = RR if outcome less than 10%

(14)

Disease Proportion that atributable to exposure

● Atributtable risk = risk difference = excess risk

● Atributtable risk %

● Estimate the cases would be eliminated if exposure were also eliminated.

● Cohort design

● AR = Iex - Iuex AR%= AR/Iex x 100

● Simply said “ if exposure were eliminated, the illness will decrease _____ which would represent ____%

reduction of the ilness incidence

(15)

How about in population?

● Population Atributtable risk =PAR

● Population Atributtable risk % = PAR%

● Estimate the incidence of disease in population that would be eliminated if exposure were also eliminated.

● Cohort design

● PAR = Ip - Iuex PAR%= PAR/Ip x 100

● Simply said “ the reduction of___new cases of illness is expected if the exposure were eliminated, which would represent ____% reduction of the ilness incidence

(16)

Number Need To Treat

It is used to see how many individuals need to take the treatment in order to prevent one bad event

NNT = 1/ AR

Simply said “To eliminate 1 case of illness, we

need to prevent exposure from ______ people who would been exposed

(17)

Example

The preventive advantages of eating fish have been reported in numerous studies. A recent

cohort study1 reported that not eating fish increased the risk for stroke. The table below shows

the results of this study:

(18)

A recent cohort study1 reported that not eating fish increased the risk for stroke. The table

below shows the results of this study:

Ie = a/(a+b) =0,0505 or 5,03/100

Iu = c/(c+d) =0,287 or 2.87/100

Ip = (a+c)/(a+b+c+d) = 0,0432

or 4,32 per 100

(19)

RR = (Ie) / (Iu) = 5,04 / 2.87 = 1.75 per 100 AR = (Ie) - (Iu) = 5,04 / 2.87

= 0.0216 = 2.16 per 100 AR % = (AR/Ie ) x 100

= 2.16/5.03 x100 = 43%

PAR = (Ip) - (Iu)

= 4.32-2.87 =1.45 per 100 PAR %= (PAR/ Ip) x100

= (1.45/4.32) x 100 = 33.6%

NNT = 1/ AR = 1/ 0,0216 = 46

(20)

● Those who never eat fish have 1.75 times as much risk

(higher incidence) as those who eat fish almost daily (RR = 1.75)

● If those who do not eat fish change their eating habits and begin to eat fish almost daily, their incidence of strokes will decrease by 2.16 per 100 individuals (AR = 2.16 per 100), which 43% reduction of their stroke incidence (AR% =

43%).

(21)

● A reduction of 1.45 new cases of stroke per 100 population (exposed and unexposed) is expected if everybody eats fish almost daily (PAR = 1.45 per 100), with 33.6%

reduction of the incidence in the population (PAR% = 33.6%).

● To eliminate 1 case of stroke, we need to prevent “never eat fish behaviour” from 46 people who have the risk of it

(22)

Number Need To Treat

20.000 people 2.500 people

Interesting for policy maker !!

(23)

THANK YOU

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

The net reproductive rate R0, the net predation rate C0, the transformation rate from prey population to predator offspring Qp and mean total number of prey eaten by different life

Table 1: The parameters and their definitions Variables Definition of variables Natural growth rate Rate of removal or harvesting The size of population at time