กกก ก ก กก !" # $ % & '(
A Study of Impacts of Biofuel Production on Climate, Land-use, Energy, and Water for Thailand
1 1,2 ก 1,2 ก ! 3
1 "#$ก%&&'#()(! #$ก$)! * $ +ก Email: [email protected]
2 , -./(#0 $ก1 #+ + /1( * $ +ก Email: [email protected], [email protected]
3 * $ +ก E-mail: [email protected]
- &)$*#"$+
("กก%!%#"+ก& ! ,#,"!#& ("ก&(ก-.
ก +ก $ ก#/0ก+ ,กก
"!(*1#0+2((ก .% *!ก"ก(( &ก#(ก #*ก+3#4+#กก
$!+ ก ก+ก *!ก"
ก ก !#(ก5*("! #ก !
" % $ # 6ก&($&ก ,%กกก ก ก ก !#(ก"#ก . +#( *71!กก6ก ก !
#(ก"! ""!* 2"((#"ก+36ก +ก"+ก,##58ก##(ก"#ก .+ *!ก$ก#/#
(#"ก& ก ,"1ก !
#(ก5'"! "## +,ก#/กก ก6,##58$ , *8ก ก ก ก !#(ก5$
3ก (integrated framework) *!ก$#/
#&)'&((#(
- .2(" ""3(ก$ ก41/
()(!&)2 ! ก 5-ก)
Abstract - Biofuels are renewable energy sources that can help reduce oil import dependency, enhance the security of energy, help mitigate green house gas emissions, and promote economic development in the agricultural sector. Consequently, the Thai government has a policy to promote biofuel production. Such a policy has resulted in substantial expansion of agricultural land for increasing energy crop production. Considering the life cycle of biofuel production, it appears that biofuel production has an effect on the use of natural resources such as land, water, and energy, including an impact on climate change. This paper presents a review of study of the impacts of biofuel production on the use of natural resources. A review reveals that most studies focused on a limited perspective by looking at each system separately. Such a limited perspective did not take into consideration the implications
arising from the interdependencies between resources. As a result, biofuel development planning appears to lack of an assessment of the impacts on balancing the use of natural resources. There is, therefore, a need to develop an integrated framework for analysing the implications of biofuel production on the use of natural resources in order to achieve a sustainable development of biofuel planning.
Keywords - Biofuels, Climate, Land Use, Water Footprint, Life Cycle Assessment
1. %
4 6-- , ก!# 27 4 )+ก#8 8 + 1/-/39:2 ()( ./( 74*1$
%;:/:/ก 791 27 -ก)$0 *ก %1 8ก0 (ก ./(4*1ก#/ #1
<-: +ก41 + .2(" (biofuels) 4 "#9 ;:/0 "#/
ก41 27 ก/,:1( 90 ก41 92 1,:1( 36 +'*./( ก 41 27 4*1%11( 44 "4 C .$. 2564 [1] ;:/ (ก-ก-
"#41-4 ก 791 27 %11 ก41.2(
",ก(กG;.( ก-ก%1(ก1
$%)2(34 9)"3$)!/*กก7 กก ) ก)/(3! 74*1$ก"
4 ก3ก../(410 ), (feedstock) 4 ก8) .2(" 7*. / 3กก ก4
$%%1ก (1( 7* ./(417*8) 0 %+(( ( !417*8)0 %+(;
+%1ก !./(4*1*ก 9( 4 ).2 / ,:# #ก3กก4*1 27(
* ./(74*1%188))(% (yield) 39:2 ()( ./(
)(%กH)กก3ก. 4 / ก (large scale) 4 /, 27 %1) '* 2 (ก-ก-)1(41ก/ 274 ก 3ก/9:2 1 )1(ก41 27 ; 4 ก9 ),%+ ก41 %&&'4
ก ก3),./(8)0 .2(" ;:/
4*0 &(;74*1กก(กG;.(
ก-ก ;:/0 *)74*1กก/ ""3(ก$
(Climate change) # 2-:%17ก$:ก ก/%1ก$:ก -#*!#
!9(.2("/)(""3(ก$ ก41/
27 ./(4*1ก ก .2(
"(/.
2. 6ก38#& '(
, ก! .2(9($% -ก ,) 9($% .$. 2554 [2] )/ 1 4 C .$. 2554 ก41 27 ; ((ก 95 / 0.11 1 ) 27 กG;+;J(! ( E10 E20
E85) / 11.54 1 ) 27 ;/ 50.64
1 ) 27 %+(; B5 / 1.9 1 ) (2 2 ./(-ก, ก!ก9# 27 !(
4 C .$. 2553 - ,: .$. 2554 74*1 ก8)%+(;./(กC .$. 2552 .$.
2553 /ก41 27 %+(; B5 / 22.35 19.32 1 ))7)
-ก)/ 1 -*H ก41 27 ; ((ก 95 + 1 ./(-ก# , ก/%
( 27 กG+;J(!* %))2กG;L+)*
(LPG) *.(กG;)7* )! (NGV) ;:/
)2) .$. 2551 - ,:.$. 2554 ก41กG; LPG NGV /9:2 1( 24 240 )7 [2] 4 9(
ก41 27 กG;+;J(!ก.(ก + 1/9:2 ()( ./( ก1 27 กG;+;J(! 95 ./(-ก#3 กกG;+;J(! (./ M , 4*M,41 27 กG;
+;J(! (./ ;:/#,3กก%1 )./(- 9(
ก41.2(")(.2(&(;,.( 1(ก -*H %1-กก41 27 27 กG;+;J(! E20 E85 ;:/0 27 ; / 89(( (1( 20 85 +) )7 1(./(ก
27 กG;+;J(! 91 95 ;:/(#1(ก 9($% .$.2555 [3]
./(-ก#ก)(, ก!# 27 4 )+ก
#/ #1 <-:%1 +-7 8 .(ก (.$. 2555- 2564) *.( Alternative Energy Delvelopment Plan (AEDP:
2012-2021) 9:2 4 C .$. 2553 +ก7* 4*1 ก41 #0 1( 25 9(ก41 2*"4 10 C ;:/4 9(ก41 4
"#9 %1ก7* '*/-8)%+(( (4*1%1 9 1 ))( %+(; (B100) 5.97 1 ))(
,:.2(4* ; 25 1 ))( "4 C .$. 2564 ;:/)(4 C .$. 2556 #กก + *) %1)'*8 .(ก4* [4] +4 9(.2("
%1/'*ก8)%+(;0 7.20 1 ) )(
'*.2(4* ;*.(%+(
%J+- ))H; (Bio-Hydrogenated-Diesel: BHD) 0 3 1 ))( 2 ./(4*1,8)%1)'*
ก -)1(/ก8)%+(( (%+(;
/1( 21 16 )(C )7 ./(กก 8)4 6-- (.$. 2554) )/ 2
-*H ก/ก8).2("./(4*1%1 )8 2 )1(ก/.2 /3ก88) (yield) ./(4*1%1),/( )ก9)9(.2 /7*
3ก. 2 (ก-ก-8ก)(.2 /3ก .(*1 8ก)(ก41ก) 2 ก41/ 27 ก/ ""3(ก$
2 -:#ก$:ก ,:# ! 8ก ก ./(4*1,*-กก)/(3 (-7ก%1("
1 ก41 27 .2(9($% )2) .$. 2546 ,: .$. 2554 (* : 1 )) [2]
.2( 2546 2547 2548 2549 2550 2551 2552 2553 2554 ; ((ก 91 4,551 4,633 4,333 4,465 4,468 3,388 2,877 2,957 3,077 ; ((ก 95 3,082 2,970 2,241 1,471 1,107 341 177 77 41 กG;+;J(! 91 (E10) - - 30 96 244 924 1,415 1,552 1,860 กG;+;J(! 95 (E10) 3 61 645 1,186 1,520 2,439 2,972 2,691 2,122 กG;+;J(! E20 - - - - - 29 83 137 222 กG;+;J(! E85 - - - - 2 9
; 17,408 19,412 19,424 18,225 18,017 13,813 10,293 11,404 18,484
; B5 - - 5 43 627 3,780 8,156 7,053 690
2 ก8).2("9($% )2)C .$. 2546 ,: .$.2554 (* : 1 )) [2]
.2( 2546 2547 2548 2549 2550 2551 2552 2553 2554
%+(( ( - 5.37 68 104 192 322 401 426 510
%+(; B100 - - - 2.3 70 448 560 600 625 .2( 4* - - - -
ก+,-./012ก/34ก 4,กก,/567 89:;;,2<1=->9
3. ก ก
ก !" # $ %
4 *91( 2-0 ก#*!,:# !9(.2(
"ก""3(ก$ ก41/ 27 8ก/)(ก -ก -/%1ก$:ก 4 $%
3.1 # !9(.2("ก""3(ก$ ก 41/ 27
./(-ก5-กก8).2("-70 /-)1(
ก41ก/ 27 ""3(ก$/
*)(ก3ก. ก9 ), ก ก"),0 .2("4 + -70 )1(($ 274 ก8) ;:/, )(# !9(""3(ก$ ก41/
27 4 3/ 1 -*H ก ก8).2("
-/-กก41/ 7*3ก. ./(410
), (feedstock) (1( 7* ! 27 +-)1(ก41 27 4 92 )( ก3ก ก-ก41# QR0 -7 ก
;:/ (ก-ก-0 ( ))(/)184*1กก (กG;.( ก-ก(ก1 *กก41Q#4 /3ก #)1(ก9(.-74*1กก)ก#1 ,3ก13* 27));:/-8ก)(
#"9( 27%1 ก (ก-ก 2ก ก"
),0 .2("4 + -70 /-)1(41 ;:/ 4*0 &(;74*1กก (กG;.( ก-ก ก41 274 ก ก)M74*1 ก 270 -7 ก8ก)(/1(%1
-ก# !ก-*H ก ก8) .2("74*1ก8ก)(""3(ก$ ก41 27 ;:/ก$:ก ก#*!*#
!ก 2-74*1, 8ก)M/
-ก9:2 %1((1
& 1 )(# !9(""3(ก$ ก41/ 27
2@A,=A,B/:C ก,/.8,3D9Eก
2@A,=A,B/:Cก/3CF2ก,/G9>H 89:;;,2I<<J, (2@A,B9L1.MN2) [email protected]>;6PFQ,8
=Q,8QER>1,ก,S
=L;G9HL1 ก,/.8,3D9Eก
=Q,8QER>1,ก,S
=L;G9HL1D/>R,T 2@A,U2 89:;;,2=A,B/:C
G9>HO93=L;4L,M2@A,
89:;;,2=A,B/:Cก,/
.8,3D9Eก .กNC.กPVMF O93W2=L;F:HXYZ>C
R9Q,F34,ก2@A,.=PM
=,/.[RPD2.D\]12 9;=ELOB9L;2@A, ก+,-./012ก/34ก4,กก,/G9>HO93
ก,/567 DY^M O93 M,_L,OR9;
`PVZ>2 (Land) 89:;;,2 (Energy) 2@A, (Water)
=Q,8QER>1,ก,S (Climate)
F:HXYZ>C=A,B/:C G9>[email protected]>;6PFQ,8
=Q,8QER>1,ก,S
=L;G9HL1ก,/56789:;;,2
3.1 กกก !"# $#%&
$#$'ก ก) # *"
-กก$:ก -/%1ก$:ก 8ก9(
ก ก8).2("/)(""3(ก$ ก41 / 27 4 $% 2 4*-0 ก$:ก 8ก9(.2("/)(1 41 * :/
1 ก/ ก41/ (Land Use Change: LUC) ;:/0 ก/ '*ก41+ !/
ก ก41 27)(* 8) ;:/0 /ก ()(!&)2 ! (Water Footprint: WF) [15] *.(ก 5-ก) (Life Cycle Assessment: LCA) ./(#*!
"ก41 8ก)(/1( 0 )1 ;:/8319 %18ก$:ก -7 กH 8ก4 )/ 3
-ก)/ 3 -*H ก$:ก 8ก9(.2(
")(ก41 27 2 -41()(!&)2 !;:/0 ก
#7 *ก41 27)(5-ก9(ก8) ,:
27/41./(79(/ก9:2 +ก41 27 4*-414 ก ก3ก. ;:/-#
)ก)ก 4 ).2 /9:2 (3ก""3(ก$ ก 9(
9(. -*H %1-ก8ก$:ก 91)1
#()(!&)2 !/9(! 27 /3ก
"#* .(-#กก! 27 /3ก"#4)19(
$% [5] 7*-#()(!&)2 !/
กก(1([6],[7] +#()(!&)2 !/4 ก8) ( (-ก 7* (1( กก 27) ก 2,582 1,708 2,410 ) 27/)( ( )7 4 9/
ก41 274 ก ก"),0 .2("4 + 8) 2 ก41 274 ก8)( (-ก 7* ( 1 ) กก 27) (3* 8.3-18.97 11.42-23.54 ) 27/)( ( )7 [8] 2 2./(ก.2(&(;1 ก 8) -ก-41 27กกก8) -ก
&(; 70-400 [16] (ก-ก 2ก9.2 / 3ก. ก/ก41Q-8
ก)(9(ก41 27#" 279(* 27(ก 1 [9] ./(-ก4 ก ก3ก.*กก41 Q#4 /3ก #)1(ก9(.ก41R ก 9 /ก7* -74*1กก)ก#1;:3 27 4)1 *.(,3ก174*1กก UV( 9(#3
* 27)%1
ก$:ก 8ก1 ก41/ ( ./(-กก 9)9(ก8).2(" ./(4*1%1),/
()(#)1(ก74*1กก9.2 /3ก.
+-กก$:ก 8ก9(ก3ก.
)(ก41/ กก )9($% [10] *ก
% +ก 9 .2 /3ก. ;:/%1ก (1( 7*%1( 7 1 % [1] -74*1.2 / 3ก 7*/9:2 /1( 4.1 )(C 4 9/
.2 /3ก(1( 91 91+2)! ,/ + 1 )*กกก 9 .2 /3ก. %4*1 ก 7 1 % -74*1.2 /3ก91 91+2)!
,//9:2 ;:/ก/ ก41/ ก 20 ก / ก41/ ) (Direct Land Use Change:
DLUC) +0 ก/ .2 /3ก-ก.(*0 . 74*1.2 /3ก.(* 84*1 88)(* #(*39:2 (-8ก)(
#/ #1 (*%1 )4 กก/
ก41/ (-8ก4 1 ก ก/ .2 / ก1;:/" %*)(ก3ก.(*
3ก. ;:/%188)ก 8-กก/
.2 /ก13ก. 74*1ก3;กG;
#!( %(G(ก%;!4 (ก$/9:2 ;:/8)("
"3(ก$ [11] 2 2 (ก-ก8ก9(ก/ ก 41/ )1 8ก9(ก/ ก41 / (1( (Indirect Land Use Change: ILUC) กก ก87W./(/ 0 &!2)!*.(3ก.
(./ M ./(-ก.2 /,3ก/ %3ก. [17]
74*1ก8ก1 )( $ !#
*ก*" (Biodiversity) (ก-ก 2ก 3ก./ (Monoculture) ,:ก41# Q
R4 ก0 *)74*1#(
3!9( ก" ./(+%1
7*8ก9(.2("/)(
/1( ,:1ก41 27 กG;+;J(! E10 - ก41 27 &(;1( 6.3 ก( CO2 CH4 CO
NOx 1( 6.4 6.2 15.4 15.8 )7 ./(
กก41 27 ; [13] )*ก-,:5-กก8) .2("1 ก41 &(;4 3 +4 ก ก"),0 .2(
"4 + 8)- ก41 ก/ -ก 8ก$:ก ก ก"),-ก 7*0 %+(( (-ก! 27 0 %+(
; ก41 77.7 % 58% 9(ก41 )(5-ก )7 [14] "
9(ก8)%+(( (-ก 7*
#() /%1)( /414 ก8) (Net Energy Ratio: NER) 1(ก 1 ก41
4 ก ก8)กก /%1*.(3 / ( 4 9/ก8) %+(;-ก 27
!# NER ก 2.5 %1 /9:2 ) 2 2*กก 7$ /*.(2-ก), (co-product) 8)0 ./(ก41 &(;-74*1%1 /9:2 ก 7 /%1-ก ก(
9(! %9 ก;(( (glycerol) H! (palm kernel) .(ก (shell) ก41 &(; - 74*1%1# NER ก 3.8 ;:/กก4 ก/% 7 ก(ก8)0 ;:/-# NER ก 2.42 [18] 2 -*H " 9(
.2(" 2 (ก-ก-9:2 (3ก 9(.
1 9:2 (3กก/414 ก ก8).2(
" (ก-ก 2ก8) /%1-ก$ *.(
2-ก),./(41 &(; ก (กG;.( ก-ก;:/0 *)74*1กก/
""3(ก$ (ก1
3 8ก$:ก 8ก9(.2("/)( ""3(ก$ ก41/ 274 $%
!$ #61& ,8$ 5ก !
& "=ก ก กก
ก " # % ก9 -9
# [5]
• ก41 279(
! 27 7*8)%+(
;4 9)"#* .(
"#4)19($%
• Water Footprint
#/ก41 279(! 27 /3ก4 "#* .(ก 5,538 ../)
"#4)1ก 1,399 ../) / 2("#ก 2,139 ../)
Rattikarn Kongboon and Sate Sampattagul [6]
• ก41 279(
(1( 7*4 9)
"#* .(9($%
• Water Footprint
#/ก41 279((1(ก 202 ../) 7*ก 509 ../)
Shabbir H. Gheewala et al. [7]
• ก41 279(
ก ก8)( ( -ก 7* (1(
กก 27)9($%
• Water footprint
#/ก41 279( 7*
(1( กก 27) ก 2,582 1,708 2,410 ) 27/)( ( )7
3 8ก$:ก 8ก9(.2("/)( ""3(ก$ ก41/ 274 $% ()()
!$ #61& ,8$ 5ก !
& "=ก ก
กก
ก " # % Aweewan Mangmee-
chai and
Prasert Pavasant [8]
• ก41 274 ก ก8)( (-ก 7* กก 27) 9($%
• Water footprint
ก41 274 ก8)( ( 9(กก 27)-(3* 1,510-1,990 ) 27/)( ( 7*
-(3* 2,300-2,820 ) 27/
)( (
M.S. Babel et al. [9] • 8ก9(ก ก
8).2("/)(
27#(+ 24 1 ก/ ก41/
ก41 27 #" 27
• Water footprint 8ก9(ก ก/ ก41/
)(* 27#" 27
ก41 274 ก8).2(
"-ก ! 7* (1(
ก 177 103 140 ..)( GJ )7 ก9.2 /3ก 8ก)(9(ก41 27 ก/ก41Q-8 ก)(#" 274 * 27(ก1
9" ก4 (( < [10]
• 8ก9(ก8) . )(ก41/
กก )9($%
• Seeming Unrelated Regression (SUR)
.2 /3ก 7*-/9:2 / 1( 4.1 )(C ).2 /3ก(1( 91 91+2)! ,/ + 1 )*กก41 +ก 9 .2 / 3ก(1( 7*%1(
7 1 %)(C -84*1.2 /3ก 91 91+2)! ,//9:2 Sorawit Siangjaeo
et al. [11]
• 8ก9(ก / ก41/ 9(
ก8)%+(;)(5-ก ก(กG;.( ก-ก
• Life Cycle Assessment
ก/ ก41/ 3 * + -ก */ 1 3ก */ 2 3ก 7* */ 3 0 .2 / ก1 / 3ก! 27 7*8)%+(;2 3 * ,ก(กG;.( ก-ก%1 Thapat Silalertruksa
and Shabbir H.
Gheewala [12]
• 8ก9(
ก ก8)%+((- ()(/1( $ <ก-
#9($%
• Life Cycle Assessment Input-Ouput Analysis
ก ก8)%+(( (-ก 7*กก 27)-ก(
กG;.( ก-ก(3* 27-91 g CO2eq.
28-119 g CO2eq. )7 )(- /9:2 ,: 10 ./(#8ก/
ก-กก/ ก41/
3 8ก$:ก 8ก9(.2("/)( ""3(ก$ ก41/ 274 $% ()()
!$ #61& ,8$ 5ก !
& "=ก ก
กก
ก " # % Thu Lan T. Nguyen
and Shabbir H.
Gheewala [13]
• $:ก 8ก9(ก41 ( (0 84 27 .2(4 "#9 )(
/1(ก41
• Life Cycle Assessment
ก41 27 กG;+;J(! E10 ก41 27 &(;1( 6.3 ก( CO2 CH4 CO NOx 1( 6.4 6.2 15.4 15.8 )7 ./(กก41 27 ;
Pomthong Malakul et al. [14]
• $:ก "
/1(9(ก X ก8)%+(( ( -ก 7* %+(;
-ก 27 !
• Life Cycle Assessment
ก 8 ) % + ( ( ( - ก 7* #() /%1 )( /41 (Net Energy Ratio: NER) 1(ก 1 ก8)%+(;-ก 27 ! # NER ก 2.5 4 9/ก8) %+(( ( 1 )
%+(; 1 ) -กก(กG;
.( ก-กก 2.86 1.42 kg CO2eq. )7
4. $ก#/#((#(
-กก$:ก 8 -4 *91(/8 -*H ก$:ก 8ก9(.2("9($%
4*-0 ก 8ก4 ก / 1 - 1 ;:/%#(#ก1 ./(-ก*ก- )(5-ก)9(ก ก8).2(" )2) ก3ก. ก9 ก"),0 .2(" - ,:ก 7%41 1 1)8ก)(
""3(ก$ ก41/ 27 2 ./(4*1ก ก .2("(/. -:#
ก(ก$:ก ,:# ! 8ก/)(
ก (3ก (Integrated framework) 2
Y $ก"9(.2 /7*ก3ก.
+--ก""3(ก$ #*9(
1(2-9)*7*ก3ก (zoning) 4*1- ./(%4*1ก8ก)(.2 /7*ก3ก .(* ,:.2 /( ก !W%1
Y #9( 274 .2 / +- 274 * 27 27Z #)1(ก 2724 1 ก(+"#+"#1 กก ) 1(2 4*1/,: ./(4*1,*-ก 27%1(
*
Y "ก41 )(5-ก9(
ก ก8).2(" ก- #+ + ./(/"ก41
Y 8ก1 /1( 1(2*
กก1%9 ก4*1#31 #914- 4*1 ก )ก41Q( ! ก41# ก 7 27-ก + 8).2("8)0 กG;" 0 )1
ก$:ก ,:# !8ก/)(ก ( 3ก4 )$ 2 Gopalakrishnan et al.[19] %1 7ก$:ก ก3ก. 4 9).2 /./(+
(marginal land) + 1 ก41ก/ 27(
" ก 7 274 .2 /8 ก ก 7./(410 (*4*1ก. ,/88)
%13,: 22% 9(#)1(ก 4 .2 / ./(
ก4 6-- ;:/8)%1 2% ,ก(
กG;.( ก-ก%1(ก1 (ก-ก 2ก$:ก 9(
Hermann et al.[20] %17ก$:ก .2 /7*3ก.
4 $ Burkina Faso (&ก ;:/.2 / 4*
"*11 9#(3! )*กก
" +41Q(*
(/,:1 -74*1%188)9(.
/9:2 ( 7# กกก7W%1(ก 1
5. 1&
+ก41 .2("./(
ก41 27 &(; 84*1กก9)9(ก3ก . /$ ;:/-ก(4*1ก8ก)(ก41 ก)*1 2 ก41/ 27 ,:ก/ ""3(ก$ -กก$:ก
#*!8ก-/8 4* 1 ก$:ก ,:
8ก)(ก41ก1 41 * :/ +9ก -,:8ก/(-ก9:2 -ก# !/)(ก 9(กก ;:/-84*1ก8 ก .2("9ก 8ก)(#
9(ก41ก) #919(ก 41/ 27*.(*ก. *.(#
/ #1 (*ก#/ #1 0 )1 2 -:#ก ก(ก$:ก # !
#*!8กก3ก ./(4*1กก .2("(/.
6. กก& ก
# 20 * :/9( -;:/%1 - ก + # ก 8 ) [ ) ( ก #
$ก$)! * $
7. ก!
[1] ก ( ก ! . 8 .(ก 25% 4 10 C (.$. 2555-2564) (Alternative Energy Development Plan: AEDP 2012-2021).
[(( % !]. 91,:%1-ก: http://www.dede.go.th/dede/images/stories/
dede_aedp_2012_2021.pdf. ( /#1 91(3 30 , 2555).
[2] ก ( ก ! . ,)
9($% 2554.[(( % !]. 91,:%1-ก:
http://www.dede.go.th/dede/index.php?option=com_content&view
=article&id=1841:2010-09-22-07-02-07&catid=128. ( /#1 91(3 15 ก 2555).
[3] ก ( ก ! .
9($% 2555. [(( % !]. 91,:%1-ก:http://
www.dede.go.th/dede/images/stories/stat_dede/Alternative_1012/th ailand%20alternative%20energy%20situation%202012.pdf. ( /
#1 91(3 16 , 2555).
[4] 7 ก +8 . )#กก + *) #2/ 2/2556 (#2/ 145). ก]
[5] ก9 -9, ) ก( $ <! "))ก, ^ก
#*!()(!&)2 !9(! 27 7*8)%+(;
4 $%,_ ก+ , ก*
ก %ก*กก,%-ก&! " 1 + +/ 2 5 5 5. [( ( % !]. 91 ,: % 1 - ก: http://dpru.pnru1.com/doc/dprudoc 00000100.pdf. ( /#1 91(3 11 กก`# 2556).
[6] Rattikarn Kongboon and Sate Sampattagul, KThe water footprint of sugarcan and cassava in northern ThailandL, Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40 (2012) 451-460.
[7] Gheewala, S.H., et al., KImplications of the biofuels policy mandate in Thailand on water: The case of bioethanol,L Bioresour. Technol, (2013). [Online].
Available:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.052.
[8] Aweewan Mangmeechai and Prasert Pavasant, KWater Footprints of Cassava- and Molasses-Based Ethanol Production in ThailandL, Natural Resources Reserch, (2013). [Online]. Available: http://
link. springer.com/ article/10.1007%2Fs11053-013-9214-8#page-1.
[9] M.S. Babel, B. Shrestha, and S.R. Perret, KHydrological impact of biofuel production: A case study of the Khlong Phlo Watershed in ThailandL, Agricultural Water Management: 101 (2011) 8-26.
[10] 9" 94 (( <, ^8ก9(ก8).
)(ก41/ กก )9(%_, ก+ , ก 23%ก " 13. (2556).
*9( ก .
[11] Sorawit Siangjaeo, Shabbir H. Gheewala, Kittinun Unnanon, and Amnat Chidthaisong, KImplications of land use change on the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions from palm biodiesel production in Thailand,L Energy for Sustainable Development, 15 (2011) 1-7.
[12] Thapat Silalertruksa and Shabbir H. Gheewala, KSecurity of feedstocks supply for future bio-ethanol production in Thailand,L Energy Policy, 38 (2010) 7476-7486.
[13] Thu Lan T. Nguyen and Shabbir H. Gheewala, KFossil energy, environmental and cost performance of ethanol in Thailand,L Journal of Cleaner Production, 16 (2008) 1814-1821.
[14] Pomthong Malakul, Seksan Papong, Tassaneewan Chom-In, and Soottiwan Noksa-nga. 2554. KLife-cycle energy and environmental analysis of biofuels production in Thailand,L ก ก. 24 (75): 25-40.
[15] Hoektra, A.Y., Chapagain, A.k., Aldaya, M.M., and Mekonnen, M.M.,L The water footprint assessment manual: setting the global standard,L Water footprint Network. (2011). The Netherlands.
[16] P.W. Gerbens-Leenes, A.Y. Hoekstra, and Th. Van der Meer,L The water footprint of energy from biomass: A quantitative assessment and consequences of an increasing share of bio-energy in energy supplyL Ecological Economics: 68 (2009) 1052-1060
[17] Saori Miyaki, Marguerite Renouf, Ann Peterson, Clive McAlpine, and Carl Smith,L Land-use and environmental pressures resulting from current and future bioenergy crop expansion: A review,L Journal of Rural Studies: 28 (2012) 650-658
[18] Somporn Pleanjai and Shabbir H. Gheewala.,L Full chain energy analysis of biodiesel production from palm oil in Thailand,L Applied Energy: 86 (2009) S209-S214.
[19] Gopalakrishnan, G., Negri, M. C., Wang, M.,Wu, M., Snyder, S.W., Lafreniere, L., KBiofuels, Land, and Water: A Systems Approach to Sustainability,L Environ. Sci. Technol. (2009). 43:
6094-6100.
[20] Hermann, S., Welsch, M., Segerstrom, R., Howells, M., Young, C., Alfstad, T., Rogner, H., Steduto, P., KClimate, land, energy, and water (CLEW) interlinkages in Burkina Faso: An analysis of agricultural intensification and bioenergy production,L Natural Resources Forum. (2012). 36: 245-262.