Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER) Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER)
ACEReSearch ACEReSearch
Information Bulletin ACER Archives
1951
Pronunciation errors in the spontaneous speech of a group of pre- Pronunciation errors in the spontaneous speech of a group of pre- school children
school children
Australian Council for Educational Research (ACER)
Follow this and additional works at: https://research.acer.edu.au/ib
Part of the Early Childhood Education Commons, and the Language and Literacy Education Commons Recommended Citation
Recommended Citation
Australian Council for Educational Research. (1915). Pronunciation errors in the spontaneous speech of a group of pre-school children (ACER Information Bulletin No. 21). https://research.acer.edu.au/ib/21/
This Report is brought to you by the ACER Archives at ACEReSearch. It has been accepted for inclusion in Information Bulletin by an authorized administrator of ACEReSearch. For more information, please contact [email protected].
,,
- .,,;
•
I
' f
Serials AUS\ 18
\
Jl,' '
AUSTRALIAN COUNCIL FOR EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH.
INFORMATION BULLETIN NO. 21.
PRONUNCIATION ERRORS IN THE SPONTANEOUS SPEECH OF
AGROUP OF
PRE-SCHOOL CHILDREN,
The information contained in this bulletin may be reproduced and used in any form, subject to
suitable acknowledgments.
21
147
Collins Street,Melbourne. March
1951.
Thlliiiifilf
10010354\
AUSTR.!i.LIAN COUNCIL FGR EDUCATIONAL :d.ESE~\IlCH.
PRCNUNCL"i.TION EililORS IN THE SPONTANEOUS SPEECH OF A GROUP OF PRE-SCHOOL CHILDREN.
Botwoon 20th November and ls~ December
1950,
a study was mado of tho spontaneous vocabulary of a group of twenty-four pre-schoolchildren in an inner suburb of Melbourne. The main purpose of the study was to examine tho quantity and quality of vocabulary used by the
children in a variety of situations, together with as many related factors as possible. Through tho co-operation of a spooch therapist associated with a spooch clinic at tho Childron1s Hospital in Melbourne, a phonetic record was made of samples of the spontaneous speech of each of the twenty-four children. Those records have boon analysed, and the results aro recorded below.
Before they arc examined, howevo·r, certain facts a.bout tho group and the study should bo noted. There were twelve boys and twelve girls in tho group; four of each sox came from tho Lady Gowrie Pro-
School Centro; four from other kindergartens and crechos in the district, and four had no pro-school exporionce. All wero of such an ago at the time of tho study (from
4
years 10 months to5
years8
months) that they could expect to be enrolled at tho nearby state primary school in1951.
(All wore enrolled thoro in February
1951).
The records wore made while the children wore engaged in spon- taneous play (both outdoor and indoor) or in the somewhat moro organised indoor activities of tho Lady Gowrie Centro, at which the complete study was conducted. No attempt was made to standardise tho situations, to ensure that oach child usod the same words or forms of speech, or to obtain the same length of record for each child. Tho therapist spent nine half-days, oach of about three hours, with the group.i and in that time recorded botweon twenty and 160 utterances for each child. Except for four children, more than fifty utterances were rocorded for each child. Tho average length of utterance was slightly noro than four words.
No check was made of the reliability of the records. The,.ro was no attempt to procure parallel records by another therapist. This, though desirable, did not seem ossontial in tho circumstances, and we are satisfied from tho internal consistency of tho records that they are re- liable.
CLASSIFICATION OF ERRORS.
This is not intended as a technical report. Tho errors wore classified simply as omissions, substitutions, and alterations, and in the tables below arc grouped in that form. It will be obvious that, as only a small sample of speech was recorded, not all children had tho opportunity to make certain errors, and many errors which wore recorded against only ono or two children may bo more general than tho records indicate.
INCIDENCE OF ERl\OR:
wron in sooo articular·
tho boys tho range is roo 2 to per cent., wit
for the girls tho range is from
16
to39
per cent., with the median at33
por cont. Thero do not appear to be many errors to which one sex alone is prono, although in this group, half of the girls, and one third or loss of tho boys, mado the following errors:Ooission of finnl 'n' from 'int.
Omission of final 'm' froo 'I'@'.
Ooission of final 've1 froo 1givc1 •
E.g. 11 the tin.
E.g. I in the pit.
E.g. Gi1 her tho rope.
2.
SoLlo errors, such as tho substitution of 1w1 for an 1r 1 within tho word soooed ooro coooon noong tho boys than tho girls.
Both sexes had approxioatoly tho sarJo opportunity to oake those errors: i.o. there wore oxaLlplos of tho correct uso of thoso words in tho smw nuobor of records of each sex.
CONSISTENCY OF ER.ttOR.
One of the interesting features in the records is that with certain exceptions the children do not make the same type of error con- sistently. Tho child who says: 1I 1m-gonna do that .. 1 may repeat him- self, but say 1I'm going to~', or drop tho 1g1 from the participial 'ing' in most, but not all words. SoLle atteopt was made to see whether thoro was a consistont pattern in those soooing inconsistencies, but tho
records rarely yield sufficient oxaoplos for a pattern to bo discorniblo.
In those records whore there are oany exaoplos of a typo of error, tho error appears to bo oore firoly established, but even in those cases, inconsistoncios appear. Thero is, for exaoplo, the case of G--- A--- who dropped tho initial lh1 in words like 'have1 , 'had', 'haven't',
in twenty-nino words, but used it in six others - such as 'house', 1hole1 , and even, on one occasion 1hnvo1 •
Thero is ooro tendency to consistency in tho substitution type of error, particularly:
(al
tho substitution of 1f1 or 'vt for 'th':(b 11 11 11 'th' for 1s1 or 1sst.:
(c 11 11 11 'd' for
't'
within a word:(d) 11 11 11 1w1 for 1r 1 •
Evon in these errors, with the exception of (c), inconsistency is evident.
The oajority of errors classified as 1alterations1 occur rarely.
They show tho saoe inconsistencies as other types. Thus 1my1 oay appoar as 1oe1 , or in its correct form i.o. 1me biko1 or 1my bike!.
About one-half to one-third of the different errors mado occur olsewhore in the child's record in correct foro.
NUMBER OF ER.ROES.
In the following tables, the first of tho two nuri1bors ref rs to the number of children, out of twelve, who oade the error, and the second to the nuober of children who used words in which tho error could have been oade. Tho diffcronco between the two figures shows the nuober of children who used tho form consistently and correctly.
TABLE
1.OMISSIONS
INTHE
RECORDEDUTTERANCES OF 12 PRE-SCHOOL GIRLS AND 12 PRE-SCHOOL BOYS.
3.
\
NUMBERS MAKING OMISSION
OMISSION EXAMPLE CURLS
BOYS
Final 'd' an' for and
11/12 11/12
II ! g' goin' for going
11/11 12/12
II I ti didn1 for cl.idn' t 12/12
12/12
II Int in in 1• for in
7/11 3/12
II I TJ I in Ifm I' for I1 D
6/11 4/12
II f vol gi' for give
6/9 2/8
II I thf wi1 for with
3/8 3/9
JI ! fl o' for of 4/10
1/6
ti
'P'
ut for up3/12 1/12
II 1 sl it' for its
1/12
3/10II I nt1 do1 for don't
2/10 1/10
II
'.ts
1 lo1
for let's1/4 3/5
II f ftl lo' for left
1/3 0/2
Middle 1t1 or 1tt1 bol1ing for belting 1/5
1/9
II I d I huri1red for hunc1red
1/10 1/6
II I tt i I s for its
3/11 3/11
11
111
on1y for only1/7 2/6
!I I r l c1ying for crying
1/11 0/9
Ii
, rr
a1tor for after 1/30/4
Initial 'h' 1ave for have
12/12
12/12II I thl r or.1 for thot1 4/10
5/9
If
'a'
1nothor for another0/2 3/6
4.
TABLE 2.
SUBSTITUTIONS IN THE rtECORDED UTTE:i.i.ANCES OF 12 PRE-SCHOOL GIHLS AND 12 PRE-SCHOOL BOYS.
SUBSTITUTION
Initial 1d1 for 1th1
II I f I for I th I
II II II
II II II
II II II II II If
1v1 for 'th1
1w1 for 'r1
1th1 for 1s1
1z1 for 'th'
1d1 for 1n1
'Y'
for '111 sh1 for I j'
1w1 for 1s1
1t 1 for 1c1
1thi for 1sh1
1t 1 for 1th'
1v1 for 1w1 Middle (1d1 for
't'
or( I dd I for I tt !
If II II
II ll
If II
1v' for 1th'
1w1 for 'r1
1w1 for 111 or 1111
1 i I for I e1
'f1 or 1ff1 for
1th'
Id! for 1th'
1r' for 1v1
NUMBERS MAKING SUBSTITUTION
EXAMPLE GIRLS BOYS
dat for that 9/12 11/12
free for three 6/11 6/12
vose for those wose for rose
·thee for see ze for the dod for nod
yiddle for little shump for jump wome for some tan for can
thould for should teo for them
Vendy for Wendy
5/12
4/9
3/12 1/11 1/11 1/11 1/3 1/12 1/12 1/12 1/12 1/12 budder for butter :12/12 Quver for mother
thwoo for three siwy for silly sit for sot
8/10 5/11 2/10 2/12 birfday for birthday
1/7
brodor for brother
1/7
seron for seven
5/12 5/10 1/12 0/12 1/9
0/9 0/5
0/12 0/12 0/12 1/12 1/12 12/12 9/10 9/12 5/11 0/12
II l GI for Ii I
Final 1d1 for tt1
or 1y1 betten for bitten nod for not
1/4
1/11 :12/12
2/9
2/7
1/3 2/12
11/12
11 1v' for 1th'
11 1f1 for 1th'
II
II II
If II If
1th' for 1s'
1th1 for 1x1
r g' for 'k1
1w1 for 1111
1d1 for 'th1
1 sh1 for I ch1
wiv for with wif for with buth for bus thikth for six loog for look Biw for Bill bad for bath whish for which
2/7 2/7
2/12 1/10- 1/12 0/12
0/7
2/9
2/8 3/8
1/12
1/7
3/11
2 / 12
2 /8
1/8
..,
5 .
TABLE
3.
\ PRINCIPAL ALTERATIONS IN THE RECORDED UTTER.t"l,NCES
OF
12
PRE-SCHOOL GirtLS AND12
PRE-SCHOOL BOYS.' . r
-
NUMBERS MAKING ALTERATION
ALTERATION and EXAMPLE GIRLS BOYS- -
Gonna or gunna for going to
10/12 10/12
or gunner
wanna II want to
4/5 4/6
wanna II want a
1/4 3/5
yer II you
9/12 9/12
ya ti your
2/9 5/12
yar II you are
2/6 2/4
yer II your or you1re
2/9 3/9
godda ti got to
5/6 2/ 4
me II my
9/12 5/12
orf II off
4/10 3 / 9
of H off
1/10 0/9
oim II I I tl.
2/12 4/11
oi II I
2/12 4/J.2
a II
an 1/1 2/ 2
a II of (bit a' wood )
3/9 1/3
cos II because
2/4 1/ 3
doncha II don't you
3/3 0/ 0
asn II hasn't
1/1 2/.1
de II to {goin 1 de play) •
0/12 2/12
giti.me II give me
3/4
0/0gis fl give us
0/0 2/2
mush ti much
2/6 2/2
00 II who
3/ 5 1/4
whach
whad
~
) II what Is1/8 2/8
) wash )
!
.,.
..
i t •
6.
KINDERGARTEN EXPERIENCE.
There was no appreciable difference between the quality of the speech of tho Kindergarten and non~kindergarten children, although the boys from tho Lady Gowrie Centre wore slightly bettor than any other group
(24
por cont. orror as against28
·por cent. for tho other boys1 groups, and30
por cont. for tho girls' groups).NUMBER OF DIFFERENT ERRORS.
Tho minimum number of difforont errors recorded was fourteen and the maximum fifty-four. Both the.so cases were girls. For the boys tho range was from fifteen to thirty-sovon. The medians wore thirty for tho girls and twonty-oight for the boys. Somo of these, of course, were oade only once; others were made as many as twenty or thirty times.
Many of thoo, too, wore spoken correctly on other occasions as the notes on 'Consistency' indicate.
SPECIAL CASES.
Ono girl in tho group recorded fifty-tour different errors in a total of
542
words, tho total number of words spoken wrongly being209.
Only twelve of those fifty-four errors were given correctly on other
occasions during tho period she was under observation. Apart from gross defects such as tho omission of the initial 'h' (twenty-nine times), the final I d1 (eighteen tioos), and tho final I g1 (fourteen tines) and the substitution of final 1d' for 1t 1 (twenty-two times) and initial 1d1 for
1th1 (sixteen tioos) her record was a congeries of onissions, substitut- ions, and mispronunciations such as 'lark1 for 'look', learn' for 1can1 ,
1chioboroo1 for 1chinney1 otc. Sho was fluent, but often unintellig- ible.
Ono girl and one boy lisped. They were friends before tho group was brought togothor, and it would be an interesting speculation whether tho lisp is simple imitative or duo to some physiological defect.
COMMENT AND SUGGESTED IMPLICATIONS.
Tho pro-school environQont, oven when it has included good kindergarten experience, has given to the children speech which includes about
25
per cont. of gross errors (this study is not concerned with pureenunciation, or tho fino quality of vowels). Any work that the school does in this field must take account of the constant effect on the
child's speech of the environment which has already produced defect.
Will its spooch training work bo regarded by the children as unreal?
Can it be effective without tho co-operation of parents? Will it pro- duce the bilingual child whoso school speech is fair to good, and whose outdoor ·speech is likely to be in tho argot and with the accent of his locality? Perhaps tho bost way to teach good speech is to begin in the homo. Are schools prepared to put their aims before the parents and ask
for their holp and co-operation? If the subject is important enough to justify a specialist teacher, perhaps something of a speoialist1s
approach is noodod.
---oOo---