Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for
a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and
private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without
the permission of the Author.
SOMF, FAC'rons AFFECTING TH~ ESTABLISPlfThTT
AFD EARLY G?OWI'H OF LUC:.sr.'i'TF:
(l>~edicago sa.tiva L.) ON 1-'ANAWATU SA~D COtnJTRY
A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the
requirements for the degree of Vaster of Agricultural Science in Plant Science
at Jfassey University
Jeffrey Donald ~orton
1974
ABSTRACT.
The thesis reports two experiments carried out during 1973-74.
The field experiment studied the establishment and growth up to one year of two Vrlrieties of lucerne (1hi.irau and College Glutinosa) at three
spacings ( 2502cm.,
9.
16cm. and 15. 22cm. in 15cm. rows) on two soi 1 types (Puke Puke black sand - plain, arid 1-'otui ti sand-dune) and ;:in interp.:rade near Taikorea in the J.:anawatu sand country.From sowing in April, 1973 to December, 1973 soil moisture tension at 10cm. a'1d 30cm. depth was hiP,her in the Fotuiti sand than in the Puke Puke black sa.rid \·1ith the intergrade being intermediate. From December, 1973 to April, 1974 hi{';h soil moisture tensj_on at 90cm. remained low for all three soil types for the duration of the experiment. rrhe water table rose from May, 1973 to September, 1973 and fell from September, 1973 to April!
1974. Both soil moisture tension and water table were controlled by rainfa1l.
T;!air2,u had a si.e;nificantly higher percentaee establishr.ient ttan
College Glu.tinosa in the first 110 days after sowing but these differences were not apparent one year after sowing. Plants spaced at 15. 2?cm. had a significantly hir,her percenta.p:e estahlishment than p 1.ants spaced. at 2.02cm.
or 9.16cm., 110 clays after sowing. Th s difference ai::peared to be associated with dampine;-off by patho?enic fun~ous species. PJ ants spaced at 15. 22cr".1.
;:md 9.16cm. had significantly hicher nodule dry weights and nodule dI"'J 1-.1ei.ohts per unit plant dry weieht than plants spaced at 2.02cm. Coller:e Glutinosa pl2..nts had significantly higher root weif,hts than Wairau pln.nts. On Jfotui ti sand, plants had significantly higher nodule dry weiphts and nodule dry weights per unit plant dry weight than plants on the other two soi 1 types.
Lucerne dry matter production was significantly hir;her at 2.0?.cm. than at 9.16 or 15.2?cm. spacing.
Durine January, 1974, dessication of many plants occured and these plants exhibited root damar,e apparently caused by white fringed weevil
( G:i;-apo01athous leuco loma Boh.). larvae. Subsequent investigations showed that the number of dessicated plants per unit area was greater in Motuiti sand than in the intergrade than in Puke Puke black sand. A similar trend was observed in the number of white fringed weevil larvae per unit area.
A glasshouse experiment was set up to investigate the mortality of luceme seedlings (Variety: Wairau) from
8
to 14 weeks after sowing in F'otui ti sand under two moisture regimes (1(1 and 2(1 of dry soil weight) with three populations of white fringed weevil larvae (22, 4d and88
larv2e/m2). It was shown that there was a significantly greater plant mortality at 1o%r . ~.c.
thanat
2C'!f
M.C. Furthermore at 1o% Y.C., surviving plants in plots with a popula-tion of 22 larvae/m2
had significantly higher root dry weights than plants in plots with population of 44 and 88 larvae/m2
• Jt was concluded that at high soil moisture tensions, damage by white fringed weevil larvae was more critical to the survival of the luceme plants.
ACIO:OWI,EDGErt~JTS
Grateful acknowledgement is made to t•r. E. Roberts for his supervision throuehout this study. I also acknowledge help freely given by the following people.
Professor R.J. Tohnsley for discussion on experimental designs and assistance with their analysis.
Professor B.R. Watkin and r-~essrs A.G. Robertson, A.C.P. Chu and R.E.H. Sims of the Agronorey Depa.rtment, r,•assey University for discussion and advice throughout the study.
Mr W.R. Kernohan for the use of a suitable area of land.
The study was carried out while the author was holder of:
W.J. McGowan Scholarship (
1973)
D.S.I.R. Experimental Grant
(1 973)
John Alexander Hurley Scholarship
(1974)
Acknowledgements
Contents
List of Figures
Li st of Plates List of Tables
'
Introduction
CON'I'ENTS
Chapter I Literature Review (A) Introdu-::tion
(B) General Description of Lucerne 1. 'l1;ype£1 2.~d Varieties of l,ucerne
2. Lucerne V2.rieties used in };xperiment
2.1 Orir,in and Ch8racteristics
2.2 Root Systems
3. Historjcal Development
4.
Lucerne in New Zealand1
2
3
5
6
5.
Aerononw of Lucerne7
( C) Description of the Manmratu/Rangi t ikei Sand Country
9
1. Topor,raphy 2. Climate
2.1 Rainfall 2. 2 Temperature 2. 3 Wind
3. Soils
(D) Requirements for Establishment of Lucerne 1. Introduction
2. Requirements for Germination and Emerr,ence 2.1 Soil V-oisture
2.2 Soil Temperature
2.3 Seed Viability and Vigour
2.4
Depth of Sowing11
12
14 15
16
17
18
3. Requirements for Seedl
ing Survival and Growth 3.1 So
il t~oisture
3.2 Li
ght3.3 Soil TemperatUTe
3. 4 Light Temperature Interactions
3.5 Soil Fertility 3.6
Hind
3 .7 Time
of Sowjng4.
Requirementsfor
}fodulation 4.1 No
dulation Process4.2
RhizobitunSp
ecicifity4. 3 Level of Innoculum 4.LJ.
Rhjzobium
Toxicity4.5 Seed Pelleting
(E) Types of
Establi
shmentProcedures
(F)Plant Population and Yield
1.
Genera l Theory
2. Lucerne Yield/
Population Studies
(G) Competition
1.
Intraspecific CoJ11pet i tion
2.Inter
specific Competition
(H)Insect Pests
1.
GrRss grub
2.
Lucerne Stem
Nematode 3. White frin
gedWeevil 4. Lucerne Flea
5. Red Legged Ear th ~
ite6 .
SandDune Weevil
(I) LucerneD
iseases
1. Introduction 2. Pythi
um
Species 3.
Fusarium Species4.
Common Leaf SpotChapter II
?J'aterials an
dM
ethods (A) FieldExperiment
1 • Objective
2. Site Selection and Description
3.
Experimental Design4•
Site Preparation20
21
22 23 24 25
26
29
31
32
33 31135
39
41
44
5.
Seed Preparation 6. Sowing of Seed7.
Lucerne Growth Measurements 8. Climate and Soi l !leasurements8.1
:find-SpeedR.2
Rainfall8-3 Water Table Depth
8.4
Soil J,'oistu:reR . 5
Soil Temperature 8.6 Soil 0rr::anic ratter8. 7 Soil Nutrient a"1d pH Tests (B) Glasshouse Experiment
1. Ob,jective
2. Soil Preparation
3.
Lucerne Growth4.
Experimental Design5.
Larval Population6. Soi 1 fftoisture
7.
Bxperimental Peasurements (C) Statistical Methods1. Field Experiment
1.1 Climate and Soil Measurements 1. 2 Lucerne Growt}, Veasurements 2. Glasshouse Experiment
3.
Ger.eral Chapter III Results(A) Field Experiment
1. Climate and Soil Measurements 2. Lucerne Growth ~easurements (B) Glasshouse Experiment
Chapter IV Discussion (A) Field Experiment
1. Climate Factors 1. 1 Wind-Speed 1.2 Rainfall 2. Soil Factors
2.1 Water Table
2.2 Soil -r.~oisture Tension
2.3
Soil Organic Vatter2.4
Soil Nutrient and pH Tests45 46 49
53
54
55 56 57
60
67 77 84
85
88
3.
Lucerne Growth F'actors3.
1 Phase I3.
2 Phase II3• 3
Phgse III (B) Glasshouse Experiment(C) General Discussion and Practical Implications
Appendices
J3ibliocrapr:y
90 92
101 106
108
125
Lim' OF FIGURES
I.1 Fhysiot;raphic map of the 1fanawatu/Rangi tikei sand cotmtry
showing dune phases ( Cowie ct al, 1967) 10 III.1 Hind-speed: ~-!eekly averages J1';:i,y, 1973 to April, 1974 61 III.2 1'ean monthly i-,e.ter tab]e depths: (cm. lielow soil surface)
J.'ay, 1973 to September, 1973.
III.3 J,1ean monthly water table depths: (cm. below soil surface) October, 1973 to ].'arch, 1974.
III.4. Soil moisture tension at 5cm. depth:
T-'.v,
1973 to l\u13ust,197 3.
III.5 Soil moisture tension at 10cm. depth: September, 1973 to April, 1974.
III .6 Soi 1 rioi sture tension at 30cm. depth: September, 197 3 to April, 1974•
JJI.
7
l1~enn number of lucerne plants per square metre at each position plotted aGainst time after sowine.IIIo8 Eem1 number of lucerne plants per square metre in e<'lch position plotted against time after sowing.
62
65
66
69
70
LIST OF PLATES
1. General view of experimental site and surrounds (
19. 8. 73)
2. Soil profile - Puke Puke black sarid
3.
Soil profile - Intergrade4.
Soil profile - 1,~otuiti sand5.
Lucerne establishment at19.8.73
(Peplicate3) -
view down strips from dune6. lucerne growth in Position I - relatively free of larval damage
( 9.4.74 )
7.
Dessication of lucerne plants at31-3.74 -
view down 2.02cm. sp~cing plot from dune8.
A dessicqted lucerne plant(31.1.74)
9.
View across Position J showing vegetative cover(9.4.74)
10. View across Position JII showing vegetRtive cover - Replicate
3
in foreground(9.4.74)
11. Lucerne pJ.ant with main root severed but demonstrating root re1:;roi-1th
12. Lucerne p1ant with main root partia11y severed - no root regro'l-rth evident
43
91
97
103
LIST OF TABLES
I.1 Growth of Lucerne SeedJ.in,c_;s as Influenced by Soil 't>'oisture ( Cowett and Sprague, 1962)
I. 2 Top Dry Weieht of Lucerne Seedlings Grown at Four Air Temperatures and Three Light Intensities for 45 days
( Gist and !-'ott, 1957)
I. 3 Root Dry Weight of Lucerne Seedlings Grown at Four Air Tempera.tu.res and Three Lir-ht Jntensi ties for 45 days
(Gist and Jiott, 1957)
I.,1 Effect of Witror,en, Phosphorous 2.nd Potassium Levels of 'crowth of Lucerne Seedlings in a Sand Culture ( Cowett
19
21
and Spra~ue, 196 2) 22
I.5 Effects of Pelleting on Nodulation of Lucerne (White,
1966) 27
Ie6 F:ffects of Lime and Seed Pelleting on Nodulntion of Lucerne (1-lhi te, 1966)
JII .1 Soi 1 l'Tutrient and pH Tests
III. 2 Mean Percentage Soi 1 Or{;anic 'Matter III.3 Laboratory Seed Germination Percentage
28 71
JII.4 Significance Levels of Differences between Yeans 72 III.5 Position JTeans and Least Significant Differences 73 III .6 Plant Spacing 1.'eans and Least Sienificant Differences 74
IIIo7
Lucerne Variety Means and Least Significant Differences 75 III.8 Percentage Recovery of Different Categories of LucernePlants after the Second Prodcution Cut 76 III.9 Effect of Position on Recovery of Plants Categorised as
Partially Dessicated
III .10 White fringed Weevi 1 Larval Distribution ( larvae/m2 ) at 19.3.74
III.11 Numbers of Larvae in each weight Range Initially Allocated to Treatments
III.12 Numbers of Larvae in each Weight Range Surviving at end of Experiment
III.13 Significance Levels for Experimental l>~easurements III.14 Percentage Survival of Larvae in each Treatment
III.15 Percentage Total Weight Gain of Larvae in each Treatment III.16 Lucerne Plant f,feasurements for Parallel Study in the
Absence of Larvae
77
80
81
III. 17 Lucerne Plant 1,•ortali ty in each Treatment
III .18 i•ean Root Dry Weight of Surviving Plants in each Treatment
III.19 JJean Top Dry Height of Surviving Plants jn each Treatment
III. 20 ir.ea.n Top/Root Ratio of Survj ving Plants in each Treatment
III. 21 }' ean Life Span of P la.nt s in each Treatment
III e22 J5ean Root flesidu.e Dry Weight of Plants in each
Treatment
82
1
INTRODUCTION.
This study was undertaken to examine some of the factors affecting the establishrlent of lucerne in the J.'anawatu sand countr.v. Lucerne has proved a valuable summer crop in the sand country, yieJding four times the dry matter production of pasture from Yovember to mid-January at "Plock House.
!-Iowever, difficuli ties have been experienced in establishing lucerne stands in this area.
The major limitinr, factors to the establishment and growth of lucerne in the sand country are r,enerally considered to be the la.ck of soil struc- ture resultin~ in wind blow, the low mojsture holding capacity of the soil, and the hif,h surface temperatures which can be experienced due to the tJ1ermal properties of the sand. Fro\-m ( 1973) has recentJy studied the temperature factor and found that lucerne stands sown in the summer months are liable to high seedling mortality because of hieh soil temperatures.
The factors under investiFt8.tion in the present studj' were the effects of different VP..rieties and plant spacings on the establishment and early growth of lucerne on two soil types and an intererade. _From previous work (Cowie et al,
1967)
it was expected that the soil types chosen would demon- strate differences in soi 1 moisture status. The field experiment was designed to study how the three varieties with contrasting root systems ,..,ot1J.d respond to these differences in soil moisture status at different plant spacines.During the course of the field experiment, it became apparent that plant mortality attributable, at least in part, to the activity of white fringed weevil larvae was a major factor affecting the establishment of
luceme in this area. A further experiment under controlled conditions in a glasshouse w;:i.s therefore designed. to study the effect of white fringed weevil larvae and soi l moisture status on the establishment of lucerne.