Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for
a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and
private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without
the permission of the Author.
BIOGEOCliE:UCAL STUDIES OF
NICKEL iu'ID COPPER IN
1'>. thesis prescnte<l in pm·tial fulfiluent of the require:-.JGnts f•lr the degree
of
fioctor
of 21ilosoJhy atMassey University
Michael Hornce Tiuperley
'1 9 71
j_j_
growing on the: Ri•·1ak:a Basic Conpl•;x, !iorth-·:;G:::>t Nelson, No'.:v l82:.land,
were investigated by the applicc.tion oi' st::ctistical techniqw's to biogeochemical data. Particular reference was given to nickel aau copper to evaluate the usefulnes�; of plant analysis as a prospeccing
tool.
Prelininary investit;ations sho·.-.red that serious errors cuuld result frou the filethods of sanpling plants and soil3 ,;, iY� 3<:i<.lpling
procedures were adopted to nininise these errors. In addition, errors arising froB atonic absorption analysis nere found to be significant for some metals.
and
Q
.acu1;;_i
folia as well as their ,;.:· sociotc·dmanganese and potas siwJ. �i'he l)l<m c:.; �·,·sr0 also an::tlys2'l for iron.
These results sho;-;ed that each species ::tccw.mlated diffc;rcn�, but related, amounts of various ueta.l::> and that they distributed these metals in different ways between their leaves and tnigs.
N.truncata and N.fusca which are closely related genetically, accumulated metals to similar detjrees, while N:.menziesii which is not closely related to the other Hothofagus species accLu-Julated metals to differing degrees.
iii
ancl in the soils '.·:ere <JY<'lu-tl.)rl �;;·.- compucin:; correLtti·.:11 coc.,f�icients.
The best correlations for niclwl nere obt':tined for the
H�-��ll_f�
genus although the other 0recics nl�3o showed hit;hly significant cor relations. The -�---- �- 1_:: N othof.:-· ;-us ;_,;e nus 2..lso shc;•1ecl th•.c best correlation for copper.
In vie,, of the r..:.bove results, a nore extensive stuci:;,r of tlw Nothofa__gus genus ;vas carriecl out. n. sucond ::;urvcy '.'12..:._, C.ll'J.: .. �·i:; · e11 in
the
s aee area in which le3.f &C:.!aples of this genus as ilolJ. u.; :;heir associated soils �ere collected. �hile the metal concentrations in the soils collected in this survey compared well to those collected previously' the oetal conc.:.:ntr8. cions ir: th8 plan l; s' in �;enc;.cal' did not sho� good agreeoent.concentrations of the:sc ::ct;::.l.:; :Lt th8 soils. It ·_·;:..5 sl1..:;· .. -:-l �)y
cor:1parison of the trend ;.;urf-?..cOJ --nJ. residual3 th2t. the.: :·ccctl!.:ule.tion of nickel was rleteroined prir.1urily by the concentration of nickel in
the soil, whereas for copper the accunulation by the plant ·.:as a
f
u
nct
ionp
rimarily of the specific requirement of the plant for thisLletal.
Multiple r egression analysis was used to inprove the pr
e
dict
ionof
the copper a
nd nickel concen trations in the soil frol�1 the concen-trations of these metals
inthe leaves
of the Nothofagus spec
ie
s,by
making quantitative allowance for the processes influencing
the·'
iv
acclliilulation
of these metals by
theplants. I
nprovenent
s ofbot··.'leen
25% and 35% were obtclined
ut the9o%
con
fid
en
celevel.
Inter-netal
ratios in the leaveswere c
onsid
ere
d as possible indicators of ni ckeland
copper concentrationsin
thesoil l)ut
theresults
Ylere di scouraging.
Stu
di
es were made ofthe locations and chemical
formsof nickel, copper, zinc and
iron in bothfreeze-dried and
fresh le
avesfrom some trees
growing on the C onplex. i. toi :ic n.bsorpti
on spectrophcto; ;ctrywas used to
measu
re the cC!1ccn:�r ·; �· ')!1S of thL:se Jo!etals
in'uutL
plantextracts and on
the electropl1c-:rcc;:i:-o i'nrl chronatop·"·t·,;�.:l i'E'.:J·;rs usedto
sep
arate t;113 I!letal cor:1plexosin
the ex\;racts. :1:::s;Jli:s incl.ic-·tedthat
the major
partof
th.;nic:�c;l
�;:C8SCo!1t in the L::� '!t�: ·, :· �) aoc containedin
cell orgn.nellos nor "··, s it '.:,ouncl to cull n. i_L;, !m·cexisted as a
posi tivcly
charc;od conplexin
ci thor the cyco�Jl.:csnand / or
the vacuole
. Copper, zinc 2.ndiron
were distributed differ.mtly with varying fractions, depending on tho uetal, existing predci.l:Lnately as anionic coi!!plexes.
It was concluded
the.tthe research
embodied i nthis
thesishad illustrated the application of statistical
techniques to biocc0chowicalstudies, sho;:red that biogcochenical
prospecting fornic.:'.L:l in New
Zealand was feasible and that uethods of total analysis for metals
could be applied to the stu� of microgram amounts of metals in
biological systems.
V ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
���. -�·-
The author would like to thank his supervisors Dr.�.�.Brooks and nr. P.J.Peter son for their valuable advice and assistance during the course of t his project.
To the staff 01' tho eo : mcf;r unit, tLe autlw1· -�:x c011cts ills thanks
for the oany helpful suggr;stic;ls ,J,_;rin - the· wri ti11:�� of ::.�,: c • ::.uter progrru:1nes.
He also nishes t. · thank Mr;; D�-m I·Iansfox·d.
r·or·
tYl•in,_ ·c]L thesisand his v1if8, H8l en, for assistancu with th8 diagr!lllls.
The author is oast crateful to t he Mineral Resources Su;J-
Com.r.,ittee of t he New Zealand Gr:1nts Coicmittee for finance to SUHJOrt t:t·D.s project and also to the fornar Mcintyre ].;ines
(?\f.Z.)
Ltd. i'orassistance ·.vith transpc�rt anJ accJ.i.Iilodation in the field.
TABLB OF CONTENTS
--� ... -.,.._,...,_�·"' ...,.,_...., ______ _
:..BSTRJ�CT ii
.:..CKNCY;iLEDGEMENT S V
Tf.BLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF FIGURES xi
LI3T OF Tf.BLES SECTION I SECTION II
i:....
B.
c.
D.
E.
xiii
Ins trULJents and Che;;ucals.
Sensitivities and Linits of Measurement.
Treatment of Plant Sanples,
i6
21
1. PruliElinary treatoent 21
2. :�shing techni<;lue 21
3.
Loss of rteb .. ls during dry ashing 22 4. Dissolutic:t alld analytical techniqueadoptud 1.�or plant sanples
25
Treatment of Soil Saoples.
1 • 2.
Prelininary tre:;atnent Dissolution procedure
Chenucal and Spectral Interfe rencGs.
26 2(.
F. The J�ccuracy ,,_nd Precision of the Dissolub_on and ;.nalytical Methods for Pla:1ts ''L:�l Soils and the Effec ts of these
G.
?araoeters on Statistical Techniques. 29
1
•3. 2.
Introducti·::·n PrecisiOl'
J�ccuracy
IAeasurenent o£' ) ·il pH.
_)1 ji
3)
H . Statistical Proccclnrus. ��0
SECTION III - PRELHITN1-.RY BIOG:;:::o ,=r;;, Ic:�L SURVEY 41
:. • The Snnpling Grid. h2
B. i�tine ralisation �!i thin the Sanpling Grid. 1:-3
C.
Vegetation Cover. 441
•2.
3.
Introduction
i�e rial l' hotogra phy Ground nurvey
lf-4
4-4 47
vi
vii
P (·� .. �·o.
D. Evo.lUc'l.tion of PL.1, ·, c-.n -, )oil Sa; ;�)lint;
Procedures.
1 . Int:codu.c ci m
2.
Leav>.:;s, t·.:i:'!,0 ::md -�runk woods; ,1_;,-;_! (_I
·:-.J
fr' ),:: di f:t\, n� i'lt ho i bht s .JU
3.
So.i tples fro: ·_ different depths inthe soil 50
E.
F.
SECTION IV
s.
VccriA.ti(ln:J of the r.1etal concuntrat
ions in plants and soils over s�all distances
Discussion and conclusions Sta tisticr.l Treatment of the Data.
1 •
2. Correlation coefficients The r.ed�wed m:ajor axis and craphinc_; techniq
u
esPrelininary Sarapling Survey.
1. Metal concentrations in the leav0s
and. tni..:;s of the sp(;:cies sanpled The relationships between the �etal
concentrations in the plants and
2.
the soil
The
three ?.c;,t_hC2_f�gus
speci
es��u.JOR BIOGEOCHE1;ICJ.L SURVEY
Introduction.
B. The Precisi<m 01 �.;--cll.:::,j_co.l s.nd Biogeoch':-':-:ic:::cl -3o.. :: •lit;.:;.
1 •
2. 3.
Introductirm
Results
Discussion
C. Further Cum,'L�nts · '' the three i•!otilOf:.t ··: .s
D.
... -.� --- --. .... -..') ____ .
Species.
1
•2.
3.
lnt:co<lucU.on
Results Discussion
The Relationships between the Metal Concentrations in the leaves of the Nothofagus Species and the Metal Concentrations in the soil.
1 •
2. 3.
Introduction
Preparation of soil fractions Differences between the metal
concentrations i n the plants and
53 55
57 57 58
69 75
81
!2
•"'; \
..J • f"t') U.•
,.,,, t.J!.I
97 97 97
in the various soil fractions 104 Correlation coefficients 1;etween
the metal concentrat ions in the plants a nd in the various soil
fractions 107
E. The Use of Trend i .. nalysis to Compare and Interpret Uiogeochenical and Geooheuical Data.
1 •
3. 2.
Introduction
Data distributions
The application of trend analysis
to the present study
F. The II:lproved Prediction of Metal Concen
trations in the Soil fror1. the 11'1etal
G.
Concentrations in the Leaf J,sh.
1 •
3. 2.
5-6.
7. 8.
Introduction
i'.ul tiplc rcp·2. :si on :::na.lysi3
The indepec.llcn l:. vr-criro bles seh)ct.:;d for regression analysis
D i stri ":·utionG '.r t:-t-: indop•:ndont variablc;o;
Procedu!'e Results Discussi�n
Conclu��j r•rcs
The E,'fect.·3 o:f.'
Ji)l
Concentra: j,()nS oi'Nickel and Co}per in the 3oil on the Metal Concentrations in the Leaves of
th� No�hc!�� 3pecies.
1. Introd�lction
2.
Inter-netal relationships within the leaves3.
'l'ho influences of high nickel andcopper concentrations in the soil on thu motEtl concentrations in
the
leaves
Thc: influences of high nickel and
copper concentrations in the soil on the ratio<J of the Jletal con
centrations in the leaves
Ratios of the I:letal concentrations in the leaves as indicators of soils containing high c oncentrations of
viii
1 1 0 .; iO i i ; J•i 6
125 125 1 ·�:s
1?7
'') . I . - �J
13:)
13�
139
142
i�-5
copper
150
H.
Essential and Non-essen tial Trace Metals and how their nature affects Biogeochemica l Prospecting Result s.
1
•2. 3.
4.
Introduction
The use of dc<ta distributions The coefficioacs of variation
The relative nccuDulation of a l·lecal as a function nf the total concen
t ration of the ,Jet:-cl in the S 'lil
154 '154 15G
155
1 G1
SECTION
V
11
.•B.
TR.LCE MET;.L COJ'.IPLEXES IN LE...VES
Introduction.
Experimental.
1 •
2.
Saupl� oollectionChe!Jlicals and. Jli.' ssware
ix
. f
., '·' '
.· -··1
I I •
•!71 171 C. Differential Centrifugation of Fresh
Leaves. 17h-
17�'17-1�
1 ..
2.
3.
4.
s.
i'Iethod Proceclurc
.i;nalytic
'i . •o�;bodResults Discuss inn
1 7:J i75 ne
D. Solvent Extracti<;!l of J•JicJcel fre>u Frecz.8-
dried
Leaf
Tissue. ·J ,;o.
, ,0 L;u 1 81I �}3 E.
F.
G.
1 •
....
') . Extractioll prC'��)c�dL<ro"l.nalytic<< . .l Lit;thod
Results Discussion
High-vol tacc: Electrophoresis of tho
soA
l.queous Ethanol Extracts from ?reczo
dried Leaves.
1
• Procedure2.
L l1.illyt
ical ''ethvd3.
Results 4. Discusr.;ionInvcstiga tions of thu Soluble ?1letal Cowplexes in tlw �''resh Leaves of
&_�.
186
1G6 186 187 180
1. Introduction ·J 9G
2.
Electrophoresis of the extract 1)03.
Couparisons with chelates of citricacid and oxalic acid
193
4.
Chrouatographyof
thecoppe r, zinc
and iron complexes 1 94
s;
Partial purification of the extractby Gel filtration 197
6. High-vol tag() electropho resis of the
partially purified extract 200 7. Paper chrn, Htot;r.cophy of the par-l:ially
purified extract 203
C�Dnclusions. 206
SECTION
VIBIBLIOGRJ..PHY
J.PPENDICES
I
Plant species raccr�odII
Frc;quc;ncy '.lic>-�-::-·:l.1.·e<l:iociS of v·:;.rL . le:sX
20;)
2.28
used in ; ·ul-:;ipl:· 1_', ._;r>J�Gi· ·!1
:c..n::Llysis 2)1 Ill
IV
V
VI VII
Correlation cooffici-.:mt progra:-;.: .c
Des
criptio;1 or' the �)rogra;,u·.ceB. Progro.ilL�c listing
8top�1i se regression analysis prot;ri.l:.une
B.
c.
Description of the programne
Sw.�::ar:_,r of the essential procedures involved in each r::ain prograr.Y:e Prograrm:rc listinG
Prograr�ne to conput(; the proba0ili ty of site overlap
� l •
B.
Descripti::m of the proc;ra,� _e Progr2.1:111e listing
Data listing
Publications arisin:; froLl this thesis
'J ·zrJ / _ _) '-·
') 7 I I • .Jo..f-
2�o
)U238 24-1 24-4
251,-
289
r}gu
re No.I - 1
I -
2 I
-3 I
- 4-II
-1 II
- 2III -
1
III -
2
III - 3
III -
4 III
- 5III -
6
Dl -
1
IV -
2
IV
-3
Dl- 4
Path;mys of cnvirnr:.···.0ntal :::ovo:.:ent of trace elc,•ents.
The Geochm1icnl Cycl2.
The Bio�:c:;ocl: _., :ic' .. l ::.:,role.
Gee -logic<:-:.1 ::;k:::tcL . ,a�J of th0 ca �;tc�rn
2
iO
part of North-··:lcst :ielson.
13
Flo>.rchart for plant
and
soil analysis. 25.icpp
a
re
nt concentrat ions due.; t o light
scatter by the folloHing netals: calciw::l, iron, r •. -.::ncsiu,:, alu·::in
i
um, potassi
um and sucli u:.. • •The sarapling
gri(l.
Soil profiles.
Variations of the netal concentrations
35
42
50 xi
in plants and soils over srr1all distances. j�.
Metal c oncentrations in the plants san:pled.
Iso-concentration contours of nickel in b oth the plants and soils.
Iso-cencentration contours of copper in both the 1'� t�t_;!:':-::C�i]'US S!'�P• an·l the soil.
Relationships bcb:oen the data coll�ctod in the March, 1 <;69
and
the Nover:.bcr,61
73
73
1969
sanpling prot:;r.'.: :.;.:es. .�6Concentrations Ol' ;.:etals extracted fro;..1 soils by c old I M r;cl
as a
function or'tine . Ca
lcium
, 1.;agn
csi
tiD, nickel andcopper. 102
Concentrations of metals ext
racted
frora soils by cold 1 M HC l as a function of tine . Potas s ium, chromium and zinc. 102 Trend s urface s and i so-concentration
contours of both the observed data and the pos it ive autocorrelated re s idual s
for nickel in t he plant s and s oi l s .
117EJ._g_u
re
No.IV -
5
IV - 6
IV - 7
IV - 8
V - V -
2
V - 3
V - 4
V -
5
V -
6
V - 7
V -
8
V - 9
Plate I
Plate II
Trend surfaces Dnd i[,l,-c··mccn1:;r3.ti,_.n
contours of bot'1 c:h.: olJ su'vGd cl., ta and
tho
pos:L �ivc3 ··_u·�·.;correl:·i;;,_:d res
idual::; for COJY·<'r in thurlants
and soils.
Concentrations L1 the i'!o
tll.o�
spp.l
eafash
and predic
ted concentrations in the-; soil( 0.10
levGl ofsignificance)
plotterl ag2.inst the obser
v
ed concentrations in the soil for nick
e
l andxii
copper. 1 33
Trend surfaces
(0.05
level of si
gnificance) of
the
observed and predicteddata.
133
Relati
v e
ac
cw!lu
l.'ltion versus to
talsoil concentration. ·iGj
Differontial centrifugation
scheme. 171:
Solvent extractior, scher.te for freeze
dried leaf tissue.
Patterns of
nickel
after elec
troph
oresisat pH 5. 3
of the 8q;� aq UEcl, ut:. ethanolleaf extract.:;.
Patterns of S8J:lc i'i'-'cals 'lftcr
electr0-
phoresis at pH 5. 3 of -Lhc) a��ucous
180
extract
of fresl: :·.c.cutif,;lia le' ve;,.1
� i�-'1....-... --... . .... ,__..-
Chromatogra1)hy il:
,,,�'c2nol/3.cctic aciLl/
water 12:3:5 01' _,-ct"ll c;; -� loxcs isol0.t.::cl by prepara ·(;i VG-Bee" l) ulectr':.,t;hc)re.:,ls. ·i:S
Gel filtrat
io
n of the a.quoous extrac
tof f
r
esh
.:bacutifolia leaves.·190
Patterns of nickel after electrophoresis at pH
5.3
of both t he partially purified aqueous extract of fresh g.acutifolialeaves and nickel cation standards. 201 Chromatography of the partially purified aqueous extract from g.acutifolia leaves.
Patterns of nickel.
204
Chromatography in ethanol/water 8: 2 of
the �acutifolia lea.f extract.
201:.
Aerial photograph showing the topography and vegetation cover in the vicinity
of the sampling grid.
42
Leaves frow the trees sampled.
80
Table No.
---
II
- 1II
- 2II ...
3III-i
III
-2
III
- 3I II
- 4III
- 5III
-6
III
- 7III
-8
III
- 9IV -
1
IV - 2
xj_ii
LIJ:r
OF T .. J5LiS... --- . - ... ·- � .._ . .. . . ... ...
Pr . .·--· ·�.; ... i�0.
Details of th(e analytical cavtbiliti<:;:::
of the method:> uscrl.
Percentage recnverios of 1
0�
G each of n(a icke)
450 l,
0 C cr;>:.}'er J. and .(b 500
and zin)
0 C for c after ashing 12 hours at inthe pros8nco of filter pqper.
24
i.nalysi:> of the st.,�.nd.ard diab.:1se ·,; -
1
32i'·I8tal concontratic>ns in ash of lc;aves, t'Nigs and trunJ: ·.;0od taken fron differcmt
heights up t·.;,' spr,.,cir.lens of
Q_
otl��R[lUSfusca. ji
Total metal concentrations at differ,;nt
depths in the soil.
Mean metal concentrations in the leaves and twigs of tha plants sar.1pled.
!,iean relativu accu..r:ulations of the netals in the le�vos �n� t·1i�s 8f the plants
saapled.
Mean concentra �J.;m:; r:n·l cOl1centnxt:i.on
ranges of calciu ·, ;:,gne:::i.u n.nd
potass illlli in :�111::. clry lcnvos of 1lif'i'·;r :n :.
trees.
Correlc:tj_c:;-; coe;�·;_'ici�.:1�s b;.;t·.;,Jcn tb=:
;:1etal concG!1tratio·,,;j i:·: the pl;-hlrl.s ··.n·l
62
in the soils. 71
Gean Betal concentrations in the leaves of the three l'loth<2f'�s species.
f.-lean relative accuuulations for the f.Lletals in tho leaves of the three i'!othofagus
species
..
77Mean relative accunulations for N
.
truacataand N.menziesii expressed relative to the
val
ue'"sfo
rp. ris�.
79Mean i>1etal concentrations in the plants and soils collected in March, 19 69 and
Novenber, 19 69. Bit-
Correlation coefficients between sauples collected in March, 1969 and November,
1969. 85
Table No.
IV -
3IV
-
4IV
-
5IV
-
6IV
- 7
IV -
8IV
- 9
IV -10
IV -11
IV -1 2 IV -
1 3
IV
-1 4
Mean concentrations of SOLle .1etals in the lee.ve s of the three iJ otho
l'��
species collected in Hoveuber, 1969.
Mean relc1ti ve accUt-:Iulations of some r::etals in tl1o leaves of the three i'lothofa[QJ-� 3pecies collected in March,
xiv
1969, and Nove:1ber, 1969. 90
r/,ean metal concenl;r��tions in the dry leaves -1
the
th1.'0C :l(}_t::;'l
ol�-
r:us s·)ech�s collected in /.:-"L'C!l,·
19 G9,
i'!.nd. iio re;_ ·ber,1969.
Vetlues of Stucllont.:; '1t<� fnr th _, (li.Lferc nee
in the precent·:[:;C:
.,
-:.h;:eit_;hts
and tltcdry leaf concen:�r ·<;:i_<.'.''s of zi:1c --:>nd iro,l, )2
botw-"en ths three; :·'�!;_�:_
?f
·,r:-us species.93 L�af
length in rcL:· c:i.on tl> the r1canrelative ac:cuLtulu.tions of pota�;.:,iun anu manganese in the dr:,r leaves.
,�nalyses of a soil fraction at each
stage o.l' four successive passings through 95
a
400
uesh i.Jrass sieve. 99Mean netal co ncentra tions in the leaf ash of th<-- _I·
�
c-�t)
l�91-'�u
s 0pecies and in thevarious soil fractions. 105
Correlation coefficic.mts between the
;:etal conccmtra
tions
in the leaves andthe metal concentrations in the various soil fractions.
Trend equations derived a t the 0.05 level of significance.
Results of regression analysis.
Correlation coef.Licients for nickel and copper bet··:re::cn the observed con
centrations in tlw soil and both the predicted concontr1�ions in the soil
118 130
and the concontratio.ms in the leaf ash.
·
j 3�-Significant
(�o.w 1)
correlation coeff icients(
r)
beh1ucn the ;:�Gtalconcentrations in the leaves of the
three Nothofar.:;us SfJ;:cies. 'i40
Table No.
IV -15
IV ..
1,IV
-17IV -18
IV
-19IV -20
V
- 1V
-
2V
-
3Corre lation coefficic�ts betueen the metal conccntr&t�ons in the lenf ash and the nickel ;•;ll eo; ·-�·er concentrations
XV
iu the soil
(
-2CJ ::- -;h).
111--:;Correlation coei'f:i.c:iunts licbz :en the inter-metal r&ti8s in thG loqf �3h of the three
_0_ot\�-2�<::22.E\.
:.Jpecie:::> and the nickel an<1 c�l:::,·or c:,
nccmtra tionsin the :::>�·il
(
-1�J.esh).
The evi.llu.a tion ')£' inter-;,:etal ro. Cios in the l eaf a:::>h for indicating
anomalous concentrations of copper in the soil.
Ratios of the geor,etric and arithmetric
!:leans to the r.10dians for various uetals in different pla nt species.
152
157
Coefficients of v�riation for some I:letal concentrations in tLe leaf as h of various plant species and their associated soils. 159
Correlation coe fficients between the relative accunulations ancl the total
metal concentrations in the S(lil.
162
Details of the lec:..f samples used in the study of the netal complexes in
leaves. 172
Percentage distrDJutions of some netals in the fractions c,lJtained by diff.:::rcntial
centrifugation. 177
Percentage distri '.:n_,_tions oi' nickel in
the freeze-dri<Jd l,�·"Vt;S a, ;on,u; the varicus
solvent extract3. I �2