Copyright Statement
The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). This thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use:
• Any use you make of these documents or images must be for research or private study purposes only, and you may not make them available to any other person.
• Authors control the copyright of their thesis. You will recognise the author's right to be identified as the author of this thesis, and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate.
• You will obtain the author's permission before publishing any material from their thesis.
To request permissions please use the Feedback form on our webpage.
http://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/feedback
General copyright and disclaimer
In addition to the above conditions, authors give their consent for the digital copy of their work to be used subject to the conditions specified on the Library Thesis Consent Form
Science in the Social Sphere: Weather-Modification and Public Response Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/2292/575 Authors: Matthewman, Steven David Issue Date: 1999
;Scie,nce in the Social Sphere:
\Meather*Modjfi eation and Public Response
$teveir David Matthevrman
Athesis
submitredin
frxlfiin@'tof
therequire_meoh for the-degree of DoortrorateofFhilosophy
The
Univerc(y
ofAucklmd
19W
Abstract
This thesis is organised around two questions: how do we explain planned weather- modification's shifting scientific status, and how do we explain public opposition to weather-modification programmes?
The last four
decades have seen weather- modification oscillatewildly
between pseudo-science, orthodox science, and now apparently, bad science. Paradoxically, widespread private scientific scepticism towards weather-modification has been matchedby
wholesale public beliefin
its efficacy.Weather-modifiers have been accused of causing drought instead of creating rain,
of
ruining harvests rather than encouraging cultivated wealth. Public groups have objected to this most social science on aesthetic, cultural, economic, environmental, legal and theological grounds.
Far from being an interesting aside in meteorological history, weather-modification lurks perpetually on the policy horizon. To therefore ignore the circumstances under which weather-modification was fnst legitimised is foolish, since the recurrence ofthese material conditions could reinstate its scientific position despite scanty evidence of its efficacy. Not only is the current practice of weather-modification a waste of time and money, it postpones pressing decisions regarding water allocation and conservation, and
it annoys a lot of people in the process.
In
thefinal
analysis, attempts at weather-modification illustrate many key issues surrounding the relationships between and among science, technology and society, for the weather-modification story tells us important things about the problems that arise when thereis no time
lag betweena
supposed breakthrough andits
subsequant application, the difficulties which scientists encounter when workingin
politically charged atmospheres, and the problems that follow when such work intrudes upon the public domain.Acknowledgements
for
Jessica, Sophie, Caitlin and EmmaI would like to express my sincere gratitude to my supervisors, Professors lan Carter and Geoff Austin,
of
the Departrnentsof
Sociology and Physics respectively,for
their guidance, support and assistance throughout this project. This thesis could not have taken place withoutthem.
Despite the isolation imposed by thesis writing, and the intellectual and financial challenges which accompany it, I do not regret ernbarking upona programme ofdoctoral research. The academic rigour and the sense ofhumour ofboth of my supervisors made a difficult process so much easier. Many thanks.
In
some respects supervisors haveto
helpyou.
There are other people under no obligation to assist you who still chooseto.
For this reason I offer profound and heart- felt thanks to the following people: Mr Garry Tee of the Deparfment of Mathematics, and Dr Ravi Arvind Palat and Associate-Professor Nick Perry of the Departmentof
Sociology at The University of Auckland.
All
of these people lent time, effort and resources. Hopefully some day Iwill
be able to repay them. Likewise, thanls go to Dr George Greenof
the Water Research Commission, Pretoria, Neville Beetonat
The Lowvelder,Nelspruit, and the late Dr Graeme Mather of CloudQuest (Pty), Nelspruit, South Africa. Research in the Republic of South Africa would have been impoverished,if
not impossible, wereit
not for their generous contributions.I
would also like to record my appreciation of Professor Daniel R. Headrick and Jean-Louis Brodu. I thank Professor Headrick of Roosevelt University, Chicago, the United States of America, for commenting upon a draft of Chapter2. I
thank Jean-Louis, doctoral student at the Laboratoire d'anthropologie visuelle et sonore du monde contemporain, Universiti Paris for commenting upon a draft of Chapter 6. ln addition, I thank our Departmental Technician, Justin Leef, for valuable computer assistance throughout my time as a graduate student, and I thank our former Departmental Manager, Gaynor van Beurden, for her assistance in formatting this thesis upon its completion, and for her help and her friendship throughout its composition.Finally,
I
would like to thank myfamily. I
acknowledge the emotional and financial support of my parents Dot and Dave Matthewman, and my parents-in-law, Nan and Mike Gardner, Particular thanks go to Nan Gardner, without whom this finaldifficult
year would not have been possible. I thank my wife Jessica, and my daughters Sophie, Caitlin and Emma for their love and patience. I offer my love and this thesis in return.
ul
Table of Contents
Abstract
Acknowledgements
chapter l: Histories of Meteorology
andweather-Modification
IMeteorology:
TheliteratureReviewed ...
IMeteorologyasScience ...1
Meteorologyasldeology? ....7
MeteorologyasTechnology
.... ...11
Synopsis ...
14Weather-Modification: The Literature
Reviewed
. ..
15WhyStudyPlannedWeather-Modificarion? ...
Zl From Pluviculture to Precipitation-Augmentation: Striking theSpark
. . . ..
22Synopsis ....24
Chapter
2:Science and Society in the Nineteenth Century O:
Climatology
andthe Colonial Impulse
. .. ... ..
zsIntroduction ...25
ScienceintheNineteenthCentury ,...26
Classical Climatology into the Enlightenment: Climate Makes the
Man
. ,.
30 Our WeatherA.{ationalism: The Civilized TemperateClimate
. . . ..
37 TheirWeather/Racism:TheUncivilizedTropicalClimate ...44
The European Body in the Colonies; The Emergence of
PropagandisticClimatology... ...
52New Zealand and North
America
. ..
55Scientific Climatology and the
Colonies
. . ..
60Synopsis ...
65Science and Society in
theNineteenth Century (II):
Chapter
3:Weather-Modification
Introduction: Man Makes the Climate Climatology and the Colonial Impulse
(II)
. .The Civil Climates of North America
Modern Improvements: Rainmaking as Technology . . .
Destiny and Cultivation: Agricultrue rs Pluviculture . . . .
Destination Civilization: eflling in at Kansas, Nebraska, the Dakotas and Montana Artificial Rainmaking
Chapter
4:In the Company of Newton and Cuvier: James Pollard Espy
(HisCompetitors)andRainrnaking ...
97Synopsis
106Science
andWeather-Modification in the Twentieth Century (I):
Whig History
andCritique
110Introduction
Il0
ThePluviculturalists'LastPost .... ll0
Weather:WordsandDeeds ...114
Discussing Mother Goose with Professor Einstein:
Weather-Modifi cation's All-American Story . Literature
Other Forms of Weather-Modification: Fog Dispersion, Hail Reduction and Lightning Suppression . . . .
Laboratory, Military, Mainstream Meteorology and Society
'Langmuir the Indomitable' Versus 'One of the Greatest Meteorolosists of Our Time' . .
Synopsis ...
68 68 75 78 83 83 87 94
ll6
t20 r24 t25
131 138
Chapter
5: Science andWeather-Modification in the Twentieth Century (II):
An Actor-Network History
Introduction: ( Sub-Aquatic) A ctor-Netrvorks
The Science of Weather-Modification in America: 1946 to the present Insiders Out: Counting Allies and Resources . . . . .
Weather-Modifiers .
Consumers The Military
Water Flows Uphill to Money: The Bureau of Reclamation . . . Clouds
Out of the Onery. From Order ts Chaos; The Evaluations of the Scientific Community
.
164From Callon to Cold War and
Drought
. . ..
l7ZGeneral Historical Conditions: The Cold War .
.
..
l7ZGeneral Arnospheric Conditions: The Role of
Drought
..
l7SFujimura and "Doable"
Science
. ..
177Synopsis .... l7g
Introduction: Nothing but Conflict and Ill
Will
. .. l8l
WeatherPanic
. ....
185ColoradoGusher ,..186
A Gallic Panic Follows Hysteria in
Ahneria
. . . . ..
188ScapegoatsintheMaking
.... ....192
The Iberian Influence: Hard Tornatoes por las Multinacionales,
HardTimesporlosCampesinos.. ...
195TheFrenchFolkTradition... ...198
The PhantomPlane and the
Panic
..
201Synopsis:
Society,theFinalFrontier ...204
Studying Science in the Social ..
. ..
206Introduction ...206
Diffusion Theory and the Discovery of
Society
. ..
ZO7Fears, Doubts, and Superstitions: Diagnosing weather-Modification's opponents . . . .
.
zog Who Owns the Clouds over FulronCounty?
. . ..
210 The Poverty of Diffusion Theory: Coloradan Sociology and the Making of theBadWeatherCitizen ,...21s
The End of the Golden
Wearher
. ..
226The Rapid City Flood and its Anri-Science
Alluvium
. . . ..
Z3O Instrumental Rationality and Rainrnaking: The Eclipse ofSeason?
. . . . ..
234Synopsis
....240
I4l
l4l
145 147 147
r52
153 156
l6l
Chapter 6: Society
andWeather-Modification in the Twentieth Century (I):
North America
andWestern Europe l8l
Chapter
7:Chapter
8:Society
andWeather-Modification in the Twentieth Century flI):
The South African Reception
Introduction
South Africa's Water Problem
The History of Scientifrc Weather-Modification in South Africa Hail Suppression: 1971-1981 . .
Precipitation-Augmentation: I 981 Onwards Of Clouds and Calvin: Religious Cornplaints Environmental Opposition to Weather-Modifi cation Black Opposition . .
Red-Ons-Re€n (Save Our Rain) The Rain Trust .
Would the Mystery'oDerde Mag" Please Contact Major Botha on Nelspruit 27120 .
Synopsis
242
242 243 2M 245 248 252 253 255 258 260 262 264
Conclusions ...
Why Does Weather-Modification Have Such a Precarious Scientific Status?
How Dow We Explain Public Opposition to Weather-Modification?
Bibliography .. ...
278267 268 271
vt
Figure 1:
Figure 2:
Figure 3:
Figure 4:
Figure 5:
Figure 6:
Figure 7:
Figure 8:
Figure 9:
Figure l0:
Figure 1l:
Figure 12:
Figure 13:
Figure 14:
Figure
l5:
Figure
l6:
Figure l7:
Figure 18:
Figure 19:
Figure 20:
Figure
2l:
Figxe22:
Figure 23:
Figure 24:
Figure 25:
Figure 26:
Figure 27:
Figure 28:
Figure 29:
Figure 30:
Figure
3l;
Table of Figures
The"Classical"EurocentricTrajectory.. ...
8GentlemenScientists ..,...27
The World's Climatic Zones, 5ft Century
BC
..
. .. 3l
Globallncidenceoflslam ...45
Dry Climates of the
World
..
46AdvertisementforColonialClothing ...50
InternationalMigrations,
1820-1910 ...
55Problematization: Actors cannot Attain what They want by Themselves . . . .
.
143The Devices of "Interessement" or How The Allies are Locked into place . . . .
. lM
Problematization: Actors Cannot Attain what They want by Themselves . . . .
.
146The Devices of "Interessement" or How The Allies are Locked into place . . . .
.
146Hole Cut in Cloud Deck by Cloud
Seeding
147OvalPattemMadeinCloudsbyDrylceSeeding ...
148Regions Where Clouds Were Seeded (US), 1948
-
1964.
153The hon Cage of Meteorology: Rationalization of the
Weather
164'I
Wonderif
it's Their's orOurs' .
166Number of Seeded Cases Needed to Identify a Seeding Factor at Various
Significance
Levels l7l
Thaw in the Cold
War .
174Aligrung Levels of
work
organization to construct Doableproblems
l7BWAGishTechnocracy
....
lg4The New Commercial
Indushry
lg6Gallic Panic
. l9l
Categorization and distribution of Adopters of lnnovation . . .
.
..
217Federal SupportofWeather-ModificationResearch, 1963
-
1985.
. . . ..
233'Frankly, I Don't Like the Look of the
Weather...'
. . . ..
237'Front Porch
Forecasters' .
237Insti tutional Framework Governin g South African precipitati on- AugmentationProgrammes . . . .
Hambra!
'Little
Bear to Plane. Start Seeding' . . . .'SaysWho?'...
Shooting the Cloud Seeders: 'Di6 Verpesting Sal Ek Nog Aflcry'
251 256 258 260 265
vii
The history of meteorology has had less attention,
I
imagine, than scientific discipline of comparable scope.W.E. Knowles Middleton,
A
History of the Theories of Rain and Precipitation.that
of
any other Other Formsof
Within this century meteorology has emerged as one of the most active and important branches of the physical sciences .... Yet, notwithstanding the increased interest in the history of meteorology, very little was written about it, and most of the work was done during the first quarter of this centu4/.
H. Howard Frisinger, The History of Meteorologt: To i800.
Historians of science have showed little interest in meteorology.
Jim Burton, 'Robert Fitzroy and the Early History of the Meteorological
office.'
Meteorology ... has been overlooked by historians, perhaps because ofits relatively low prestige as an "appliedn'branch ofphysics.
James
Rodger Fleming, Meteorologt in america, I814-1874:
Theoretical, Observational, and Institutional Horizons.History
of
meteorology science.Frederick Lee Nebeker.
has until recent$ been a neglected branch
of
the historyof
The 2 0t h- C e n tury Transf,o rmati on of M et eo r o I o
gt.
Meteorology and oceanography are ... problematic disciplines that have been ignored except by specialists.
Peter J. Bowler, The Norton History of the Environmental Sciences.
vlu