Copyright Statement
The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). This thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use:
• Any use you make of these documents or images must be for research or private study purposes only, and you may not make them available to any other person.
• Authors control the copyright of their thesis. You will recognise the author's right to be identified as the author of this thesis, and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate.
• You will obtain the author's permission before publishing any material from their thesis.
To request permissions please use the Feedback form on our webpage.
http://researchspace.auckland.ac.nz/feedback
General copyright and disclaimer
In addition to the above conditions, authors give their consent for the digital copy of their work to be used subject to the conditions specified on the Library Thesis Consent Form
SOMR E!?FTTS 02" P YYLLOV! MOSAIC WXDS I ~ T I O N ON NUCLRIC A C I D P@X'ABOLISM
IN
BRASSICA -P?TKINT!XSXS R U P R oJ T . Randlee, M. A g . Sc
.
( ~ d e l a i d e ) Department of Cell BiologgUnlvereity
of
Auakland.Thesls submLtted t o the University of Auoklmcl
for
the degree of Doctor of PMlosoghyDeaember, l968.
I 1 . I I ~ ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ T Y @f , s C C ~ C A ~ . L . ? ~ -
I I,- " '
.,
*.t -2:'q r c x 0 G Y THESIS
4994 - bS
%N a w
4 '7
L -
7.3 ..>
P-.
\;
cf?
i,, A. r:Growth of W w t d plants Smpl* procedure
(i) F i e a y ~ t a m i c a l l y Fnfsated leaf.
(ii) Led sharing mosaic.
(iii) Light rdcroaaopy.
Radiochenriaal r n e t h ~ d s - ~ ~ ~ and 3 5 ~ Isolatim
of
chloroplasts and nnaleiAsaay of riboeomes and virus on aueraee density gradients Extraction of total nucleic acids
flucleic acid f r a o t i o n a t l m an methylated albuadn aolunsls Purifiuatf of DRA
Preparation of DEA from organelles CsCl equilibrium density &iente
b c l e o t i d s composition of 3 2 ~ labelled
M A
PolyacrglmAde gel eleotrophoresisFatimations of t a t 8 1 leaf ribmucleaae activity
CAAPPER 111. CHI\RACTmJ:STICS OF mE FIRST SYSTEYICALLII U93PMm:
LEAF
22 7. Growthof
thofirst
aysteadcally infeoted leaf(i) Rate of expansion.
(ii) Fresh and dry weifbt.
(u) Leaf thiolmeas.
(iv) Cell nnmber and sice.
2.
Time
course of virus Inorease3.
Changes in ohloroplaate(i)
Chloroplaets s i t u .(ii) Isolated chloroplast 8.
(i) Growth of the leaf.
(ii) The first systemically infected leaf a s an axper5rnental system.
ml!8
m.
W W SIR
.WCLXIC ACIDS, RIBOSO??!% hFII) POL=@3Q?%SI??
T)f3;: FIRST SPSTmCALLYxrmx?I?ED
XrEA7"37
I '1. Rucleio aaide
37
(i) T o t a l
nucleic
acids.38
.' (ii) llucleio aoids separatedan
MAX ooluma.39'
(a)
Lanr
moleoular w e i g h tRHA
(~RIPA).39
'(b) DXA. A0
(c)
a&
moleuular weightM A
(wA). 44 (d) Interrelatimahipa betwean mcleio mid c b a a e s . 432. Ribosmee 42
(i)
Propertiee of r i b a s o d fractions isolatsd fromsucruse denrsity gradientrs, 42
(ii) Time c m e e of changes
in
the ribosome contentof
healthy an& M e c t e d leaves, 43 (a) Riboames axtraoted in Ma-B&-SR buffer.
43
(b) Ribosome8 extracted in the presence ofT r i t o n X-?OO.
( c ) RLboaomee extracted
in
the preaenoe ofpanareati c ribonnolease.
4
(w) Ribosomes in excised healthy and infected leaf tieme.
A5
(a) Discs
floated for 4
hours.6
(b) Leavea sxoised 3 days after the time of j~noculationm
(ir) Rate of incmporaticm of 3 2 ~ into ribos-s. 47
3. Time
aburse of cbmgea in polyribasamea during e s r l yvf rus replica$lcln 49
(i) The polyribosome content of -ding h e d t w snd
first systemically inTeotei! havea.
15.9
(ii) lncozporaticm of S 2 ~ into polyribosomea. 51
4. Dieuueaion 52
CRAJ?TFB V. A SPXRCR
FOR
!!TISO-SPECIFIC POLYPXBOSOP'?X D I R I l J GEARLY
VIRUS S'YFTKESLS 62
1. Procedures f o r extracting an& preserving polyribosomee
(i)
h c t i o n a t i a non
sucrose density gradfenta.(ii) ESctr~ction and ppreaervation of polyribasoma.
2. Factora affecting polyribosome levels and r i r a s ayntheais (I) Wfeot of cutting and floating leaf dfaes.
( l i ) Xffect
of
darkness.(a) mciaed leaf discs.
(b) m o l e plants.
(tii)
Eff eat of actinoqyoin D(m)
an polpibosame p?.itms.(ir) Effect of NvD on the incorporation of 333? in dieas.
3.
Virus induced uhanges in [email protected]in
AMD-treatedleaf d2scs.
69
(i)
3 5 ~
labelled leaf d i s c s . 70 (a) Distribution of TCA insoluble3 5 ~
in @ & i d s . 70(ii) 3 2 ~ labelled leaf discs. 71
(a) Distribution of TCA insoluble 3 2 ~ in gradients. 71 (b) Contamination of f r a c t i a e d t h h o l e v i r u s . 72
(iii) Isolation of nucleic actd.da from polyribosmes.
74
(a) Fk~ctlonation falloaing trmtmsnt rr~th DTA. 76 (b) Fractionation f o l l o r i n ~ Rnase treatment.
77
(d) Polyt~orylamide gel elsatrophoreaia. 78 4. Virus induoed ahanma in polyribosomes from whole leares
83
5. Discussion 84
CHAPTER
VI.
FE?7 DDA 03' CKIlmE CABBAGE ANDITS
PRO-FEJ?TIESSYSTDTCALLY 1-ED 3Jbl.F 92
1 Some properties of the DNA iaolated from Chinese aabb-
93
\
(i) &traction of
DM. 93 '
(ii)
DNA components in CsCl equilibrium gradients. 95(ti9
bsociatian ofD M
with c h l o r ~ l ~ s t ~ ~ 2. T h e course of 3 2 ~ incorporation i n t o the nucleic acidsof dark green and yellow tieme of leaf showing mosaic 3. Amounts af 3 2 ~ incorporated F n t o the BnA of dark green t ? r
h e d t b tissue compared with infected t i e m e
(ti) Specific r a i o a c t i r i t y of naj w EUXI m i n o r components
of DIIA.
(a) D a r k p e e n and yellow t i a s a e in moasic leaf up %a 14 om long,
(b) Realtby leaf compared with roa-e first ,s,vstemfenlly i n f e o f d leaf.
4 Isolation of a r g m e l l e ~
(i) Some properties of the
T,
M andA
fraotions frmemlc p e e n or h e a l t v tinsue and yellow tisaue.
(a) Composition of
T,
)I and 1P f h c t i o ~ ~ s . (b) Protein pattern8 easoeiated d t hT
and Nfractions.
( c ) Absenoe o f TYBV A o m cell organelles.
(ii)
Incorporation of 3 2 ~ i n t o the DlOA ofT,
M andR
f r ~ c t f ons.(a) Aealtby leaf.
(b) Dark e e a n and yellow tissue of mossier l e d .
(id DRA
oomponents in theT,
M and 19 fraations of heabt%y and -f ectsd leaves.1. T o t a l Mane m t i v i t r (i) Method of assay.
(11) A c t i v i t p d t m b g %he growth o f healthy nnd first 8ystemicall;y infeefed leaves,
(Fii] Activity in
TY!fl infected leaves sholrlng; moaaio.2. Separation and assay of PXase ieozymes
(A) Development of a technique for as- isozpes.
(ii) Change6
in
Rhse iao?ymes in leaves systemically inTected wtth !ITrnT,(w) ChRnges in -Waae iao.ryl~es in leaf eyetemically inlecterl n i t h txmiip n o s d c virus (%I:;).
(iv) IOJaae isomas in !IT397 inoculated leaf.
3.
Associstian o f RlTase activitg with cell fraations ( i ) T o t a l RNase sotivity of chloraplasta md nuclei.(ii) RRm9 iaozymes aseaciatted with cell f ~ i c t i ~ n s . 4. Acid 2 h a s ~ h a t ~ s s activttr
5. Disaussim
C3lGTER VXII. PROBLmS ASSOCIATED KPFR STUDSIB OF TrRUS-INDUCED C M E B
IN
TEE HOST PLANTI am
indebted to Profesam R.E.F. Matthem f o r supervision, &dance and helpful discuesfon t h d u ~ h o a t the course of t h i a work.f
@ a t e M & v aclmorledge the encmragement and advice of other members of the Depact- ment of Cell Biology, and rrf.sh to thank in particular the following people far seaistance d t h aspectsof
this workrDr.
S o SalUvantfor
eleotron nicroecov, and in partioulat the ~ e ~ o a r a t i o n of chloraplaat DAA specimens) 1%. R. VaMyama f a r a a z r y b g out mch of thethin
seotioning and photcmfmosco~;
Bk.
J.J. F i e l d sfor
photo@aphJta aemicae and assietanoe Fn the ohatocowinng of figures;I ! x .
C. JF/hAttinghamfor
glass-house semices; Dr. P.L.Bergquist for p r d . & b g _E. a o q ' 4 ~ - a m ~ # Pk. MeV. Barridge for p r a v i d w yesat 8FRAo ?hRnks are a l s o due t o mmbtrrs
of staff of the D.S.I.R., and in particular to Dr. R.L. BielasM and
Dr.
M.S. Reid for: inertmotion in the use of ver.f;iual flat-aheet pol$- ucrylemide gel electro-ihmeais,Dr.
P.R. for m i d i r i g tprnip moatdo vim8 i n d w n , and to b. G.B. Pettxmen f o r camylng out the CsCl equ5Ubrian C e n a i t y gradient centrifuaation of early DNA preparatim8 in the k n m i c a l ultracentrifuge 81: Paherston Rorth.I
am g r s t e h t l for the help of q y d f e in the preyxation o f Figwes, and thank Miss A.Thompson for t y ? b g services,
I
acrhorrldge with t h e the finnnctal saaistance gained from a H w Zealad Post~ar?l,uate Saholarahip.snn3qnarr
i. Some changes induced in Chinese cabbage nuclei0 aoid metabolism by infeotion with turnip yellow mosaic Pima ( T P ~ W ) have been examined
in
the first leaf t o develop systamia symptoms. Thia leaf was used in an attempt t o avoid w a u n d f n g effects, and its charactariatius have been defined t o allow infection-induced changes t o be related t o the stagsof l e a f development, the time course oP infeatl.cn and v i r u a inaresse, and the onset of microscopio Rnd maaroscopic symptom and stunting effeots.
In
some expeflments, where effeets at a late stage of infeation rere studied, leaves showing massic p p t o m a were used.2. In healthy leaveer which w e r e comparable with f i r a t ~ s t e d o s l l j
infected leaves, the extr~atcrbillty of 68s a& 83s rfbosomee deckhied during expxpanaion, appsrentv ,va a result of inoreaasd binding to
manbranas by eome ribonnolease sensitive meabniam.
In
infeated leaves, a sharp r i s e was o b s e r ~ e d in the amounts of ribosclnnes erhaeted j u s t before virus could be detected, and concentrations remained higherthan in healthy leaves during the period of active v i r u s replieation.
Thle
infection-induced rise i a attributed t o t (i) the increaeed synthesis of ribosmea, and (ii) t o the increaeed axtrnotability of rib osomea.
3.
No virus-induced changes could be observed in polyribosumes up t o the time when virus was f i r s t detecrted. %en host polyribosornee weresuppressed by excising leaf tinsue and treating with actinamyoin
D,
infeat ion-apeoif i c 32~-labelled 50-608 and 9 60-21 2s oomponsnts were
isolated at 6-7 days after the time of inomlation, and R high
malacular weight
FTA
VBR isolated from then on 2$ poly8,crylamide e l s e An infeotirm-opeaif5.0 xdioaotive ??Qe aampamt was ale0 iaaletled.from 3 2 ~ - l ~ b c l l e d intaat i d e a t e d leaf treated with aatinomgcin
D.
4.
In
healthy lesves, the eontent of t o t a lrmcleio
aoids, mdlow
moleuulax w e i g h t RWA,DFA
and high maleau3.ar weight FXA per ctell. did not appear t o o m markedly f r o m the latter afa~pae of the aell I d i v i s i o n phase of l e d dweloplaent to the time when leaves r m e fnlljr expanded. Canteat per Leaf inoreased until cell d i v i s i o n aeescd thenremainsd, relatively cmatant. Conaenfration f e l l aa the leaf exr~yliaed.
I
Chmges induaed i?;v infection w e r e s m d ! l , bnt resalts were incancl~rsive beaauee of high v~~Aah1.lliw. I
5. Chineso cabbage D3A has n m j o r oanyonen*
( y
7.696)s and a minor oomponent(p
= 1.703) nMah appenrs t o be n nnclear aat ellif eDAA.
30chloroplast DNA satellite has been obeer~ed in C s C l equilibrium dmai*
1
padietlta, &though electron microscopic e x a m t i o n 2 m ~ ahom that
DHA
is associated with ohloroplasts. The yellow areaa of leavee aver 91crm
long shoring mosaio ls~nnptonur, and old f i r a t systemically infected leatea, inoorporated more 3 2 ~ i n t o DHA thm did idomppacable dark gresll or healthy tissue.In
emller beeves s h m h g mosaio, the differenae was e m U . e r and more variable. Attemyte, t o deterndns the intraaellular s i t e of higher 3 2 ~ h a r p r e t i o n i n t oD M
have given inconclasLvtve results.6.
An
electrophoretic method haa been dweloped f o r carrying aut rapid and semiquantitative essays of ribonuclease ieozyme aatipity in crudewere detected. 3.n Chiaeee c a b b w leavea, pad d 1 were fmt! at *M~hesf
~ ( ~ f t v i t y f.n the 705,000 F: e,v*op3a~mic oupemztent;, V m r l5ff;le ~ o t i v j l t ~ r
was
Neb
dur- the emQr @%ages of leG m d h , htat declined to a1
v % r 3 a d u undeteo),~b?.e level rrhm le@h exseedd.
?O
cg. RFTcaseeI
lsnd 11 ahowed no mc&ed. change5 %n ~ c t i v i w d t h tb.c.7.
33 leave8 q y ~ t e m f c ~ ~ tnfected d-th !?'YW, the PXaae Isozyme yattena m a id-entlaal t o +hnt of healthy 3-eavesmil
after v h ~ s I?ad be@- t o inme~ats rapidly. P ~ R , E ~ 111 then show&?- rerlevd- atrow sqt5dtg, ELad J.nsalses 1 and 11 alea a h m d a 9rr(R11! $~creanc 3m activity. ?% nm iaoz.ymas w e r e obeemwt- j31 qyatevdcal1,y infect &!! leayea.8. S+mtemia infmtim *ath f ~ ~ o ~ 9 . l ~ ~ v F N n p (WV) c ~ s d c h m : ~ s in ieazyme p s t t e m e very ~kn12l.15~~ t o thoae obsemred in leave8 a y ~ t e m l c a l l y infeotecl d t h !TYFT. Leaves w-ed by rubbin6 with CarbontnC!um d o n e shored increased FVaae
fIX
activity. Leaves mecheniaally inoculated with TTT retained high R b ~ e XI1 aotivity for R lonmr time than rubbed control leaves, an& the level m\s compere.ble with t h s tin
s y s t e n i c a l b fnfeotd lenves of the same size. Thua, the x t e e in. P?Sase 111 activity appears to be a non-x-rpecific p5enomman a~eoaiateit with increassd. PFA synthesris.