• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

fisheries reef advisory committee (frac)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "fisheries reef advisory committee (frac)"

Copied!
2
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

2-68 Flinders Street PO Box 1370

Townsville Queensland 4810

+ 61 7 4750 0700 Telephone

+ 61 7 4772 6093 Facsimile

[email protected]

www.gbrmpa.gov.au let’s keep it great

A summary document is prepared after each meeting of the Reef Advisory Committee (RAC) to inform other advisory committees serving the Authority, and persons generally (including the public), of business of the RAC. The document forms part of the records of the meeting and so its content is limited to matters raised in the meeting, and, where necessary, background details given to the meeting. Any inquiries should be referred to the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority’s (GBRMPA) Secretariat, or to the appropriate Member.

FISHERIES REEF ADVISORY COMMITTEE (FRAC)

21st Meeting

19 and 20 August 2008 – Townsville

DRAFT SUMMARY DOCUMENT

The 21st meeting of the FRAC was held in Townsville on 19 and 20 August 2008. A summary of the

outcomes of the main items discussed is set out below.

SUSTAINABLE FISHING IN THE GREAT BARRIER REEF MARINE PARK (GBRMP) The Committee supported the development of a Statement of Intent and Guidelines on sustainable fishing in the GBRMP.

Members reviewed a draft Statement which provides for fishing as one of the allowable uses of the Marine Park. The draft Statement describes the range of considerations that the GBRMPA should take into account to ensure that fishing uses of the Marine Park are consistent with the GBRMP Act, while preserving the values of the World Heritage Area.

Members’ comments included:

There is a need to be consistent with the

Intergovernmental Agreement between the Australian and Queensland governments being drafted.

The GBRMPA should consider whether there are legal implications regarding any provisos.

Key Performance Indicators should also be considered.

The draft Statement goes some way towards addressing an industry desire for a statement which says that the GBRMPA does accept fishing at a sustainable level in the GBRMP.

Perhaps an aspirational statement is also appropriate.

There is a challenge in managing cumulative and competing uses.

It was concluded that the Sustainable Fishing Group, in its development of the Statement, should reflect on members’ comments regarding principles, key performance indicators and legal implications in achieving the right balance.

RECOGNISING AND FOSTERING MARINE STEWARDSHIP

The Committee discussed a range of initiatives designed to recognise and foster marine stewardship in

the GBRMP. It also recommended that the GBRMPA conduct a gap analysis and develop an options paper for discussion about marine

stewardship in relation to fishing uses of the Marine Park, including consideration of mechanisms to recognise stewardship by individuals or groups.

The following comments were made by members:

Industry is starting to be proactive in taking a stewardship role.

Stewardship initiatives may be at a sectoral or individual operator level.

There is a desire that governments recognise individuals striving to do the best they can as well as current initiatives by sectors.

One challenge is how to encourage cooperation of typical recreational anglers and reward stewardship in the recreational sector.

There are concerns fisheries in Queensland are not yet ready for accreditation approaches until they meet higher standards in the water: there might be a risk of misbranding.

Commercial operators would be looking for industry-driven approaches and would prefer one set of procedures which meets requirements of all government agencies. There is a need for strong government involvement.

The desire or will to do the right thing in terms of stewardship comes from a sense of custodianship.

Stewardship initiatives provide opportunities to improve relationships.

There is a need to acknowledge best practice and effort. It is about the process of engagement and commitment to improvement.

The Australian Government is heavily involved in the process, though is not taking the lead.

In summary, it was noted that the discussion under this item had brought out some useful common themes. Consideration should be given to developing a mechanism to easily recognise and potentially reward individual fisheries or groups of fishers for improving practices.

(2)

Fisheries Reef Advisory Committee – 21st Meeting Page 2

19 and 20 August 2008 – Summary Document – Final Final Draft: 26/03/09

OUTLOOK REPORT: MANAGEMENT EFFECTIVENESS

The Committee considered progress on the GBR Outlook Report, advised on the effectiveness of existing management measures and rated the outlook for the Great Barrier Reef.

Members were asked to rate management

effectiveness based on nominated statements regarding context, planning, inputs, processes, outputs and outcomes. Some comments received were:

Improved water quality should be delivered within the next 20 years.

Socio-economic information is good though it is limited.

The challenge for management is not to become detached from the fisheries they manage.

We have data sets but need to improve on the interpretation of them.

All questions posed regarding the management effectiveness document were framed in the positive, not the negative. A question rating system of one to five would have been more effective.

Members were also requested to comment on the current status of the GBR ecosystem as well as the prospect in five years and 20 years. Ratings were generally in the good/fair/poor range.

EFFECTS OF TRAWLING, RECOVERY OF TRAWL SITES AND SEABED BIODIVERSITY The Committee reviewed outcomes from a suite of research projects, conducted over the past decade, into the effects of prawn trawling, the recovery of trawl sites, seabed biodiversity mapping and evaluation of management strategies on the Great Barrier Reef by CSIRO and the Australian Institute of Marine Science.

Some comments received were:

There is a direct relationship between the level of information and confidence in a decision.

Pursuing greener catches is about gear technologies.

The reports which accompanied the projects are extremely complex. A short version which is easily interpreted by non-academics should be produced.

There is a need to continue validating the outputs of computer models.

When asked about re-sampling timeframes and future research needs, the researchers advised this would depend upon the question of interest, and emphasised the need to for a conceptual framework.

QUEENSLAND DEPARTMENT OF PRIMARY INDUSTRIES AND FISHERIES (QDPI&F) UPDATE INCLUDING INSHORE FINFISH FISHERY

Members were provided an update on recent QDPI&F issues including the Strategic Plan and fisheries

strategic policy framework. New principles to be

considered in the Fisheries Strategic Policy Framework include knowledge, relationships and partnerships.

Inshore Finfish Fishery

A regional management research project relating to the Inshore Finfish Fishery is proposed to look at resource allocation at a regional level. There is a need to commence the engagement process to clarify co-management and regional management

expectations.

The recommendations from Queensland’s Inshore Management Advisory Committee are confidential, although there is a web summary available. There have been over 6,000 letters regarding the Inshore Finfish Fishery. A lot of letters are now being received regarding the plight of the fishing industry in general.

Members commented that:

There has been a widespread opinion expressed to the QDPI&F not to proceed with formalising the target shark fishery.

The conservation sector stated they are looking for a phasing out of targeted shark fishing. It was stated it may be difficult to separate out shark because other inshore species are caught with them.

Tropical Rock Lobster (TRL)

This has been an interesting and challenging sector to manage. A meeting in December identified that the sector would move to a Total Allowable Catch (TAC) system. There has been a voluntary industry agreement to close the fishery at midnight on 5 September 2008.

It was commented that fishing efficiency and the level of sophistication in the TRL industry is very high. Because there are very few players, their agreement will work.

NEXT MEETING

The next meeting is proposed for February/March 2009.

CURRENT MEMBERSHIP OF THE COMMITTEE

Mr David Bateman AM ... Recreational Fishing Mr Craig Bohm ... Conservation Mr Wayne Butcher ... Indigenous Mr Kevin Chard ... Spear fishing Mr James Gillespie . Qld Dept Primary Industries and Fisheries Mr Bob Grimley ... Qld Boating and Fisheries Patrol Mr Nick Heath ... Conservation Mr Stephen Jeston ... Fishing Guide Mr Ray Joyce ... Charter Fishing Mr Andrew McNee ... Dept of the Environment, Water,

Heritage and the Arts Mr Lyle Squire Jnr ... Commercial Dive-based Fishing Ms Diane Tarte ... Independent Chairman Mr Bruce Wallner ... GBRMPA Mr Gary Wicks ... Commercial Fishing Dr David Williams ... Scientific Community To Be Appointed ... Qld Environmental Protection Agency

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

CONSERVATION, BIODIVERSITY AND WORLD HERITAGE REEF ADVISORY COMMITTEE CRAC 14th Meeting 12 and 13 August 2004 – Townsville SUMMARY DOCUMENT NEW GBRMPA ZONING PLAN The

TOURISM AND RECREATION REEF ADVISORY COMMITTEE TRRAC 3rd Meeting 31 August and 1 September 2000 – Cairns SUMMARY DOCUMENT No Summary Document was issued; however, the following

With regard to artificial reefs, members: • Queried the need for artificial reefs in the Marine Park given thousands of kilometres of natural reef are available on the GBR, and the

WATER QUALITY AND COASTAL DEVELOPMENT REEF ADVISORY COMMITTEE WRAC 21st Meeting 26 and 27 July 2007 – Townsville SUMMARY DOCUMENT The twenty-first meeting of the WRAC was held

Tourism and Recreation Reef Advisory Committee – 24th Meeting Page 2 20 and 21 June 2007 – Summary Document – Final Date: 24/10/07 INDUSTRY SUSTAINABILITY In considering issues

Catchment and Coastal Reef Advisory Committee – 3rd Meeting Page 2 13 April 2011 – Summary Document – Final Date: 05/10/11 DEVELOPMENT OF THE OUTLOOK FOR GREAT BARRIER REEF COASTAL

Tourism and Recreation Reef Advisory Committee – 28th Meeting Page 2 5 and 6 November 2008 – Summary Document – Final Date: 02/04/09 RESPONSE TO CLIMATE CHANGE The Committee noted

Indigenous Reef Advisory Committee – 5th Meeting Page 2 16 and 17 November 2011 – Summary Document – Final Date: 24/07/12 The IRAC recommended to the GBRMPA that it would be useful