• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Is there a valid state law

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "Is there a valid state law"

Copied!
2
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Topic 2: Constitutional Interpretation

1. Literalism

2. Historical approach

3. Constitution as a living document 4. Structuralism

Topic 4: Federalism; Federalism in Aus; Inconsistency & Intergovernmental Immunities

Federalism

• Characteristics of Federalism

o Division of powers between central and regional governments o Representation of regional views within the central government o Written Cons

o Independent and impartial umpire – judicial review

• Benefits

o Protection of citizens by checking the concentration of power o Enhanced participation in democracy

o Regional autonomy and diversity o Competitive efficiencies

o Incentives to innovate and experiment o Enhanced debate and scrutiny

• Criticisms

o Too many tiers o Costly system

o Inefficient and excessive bureaucracies o Duplication and overlap

o Gives rise to conflict rather than achievement

• Two doctrines to limit power of Cw;

o State reserved powers

o Implied immunity of instrumentalities

• Money problem Inconsistency

• Section 109

1. Is there a valid Cw law?

2. Is there a head of power the Cw can legislate under?

a. Breaching any express/implied prohibition?

3. Is there a valid state law?

4. Is there an inconsistency between the two?

• Types of inconsistencies;

o Direct o Indirect

o Covering the field Intergovernmental Immunities

• Where Cw laws bind States or State laws bind Cw

(2)

Enigneers – rejected reserved powers doctrine and implied intergovernmental immunities doctrine

o To what extent can Cw bind the States;

Has to have head of power

Melbourne Corporation principle – discriminates against states/ unduly impinges on states capacity to exist as institutional entities

o To what extent can States bind Cw Hendersons Case;

• Has to be law of general application

• State law must extend to the Cw as a matter of construction

• State law cannot be inconsistent w Cw law

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

This is based on the notion that the Cth is a “sovereign power” and a “right to sovereignty subject to extrinsic control is a contradiction”: D’Emden v Pedder Griffith CJ • No longer