• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

LAW OF EMPLOYMENT - StudentVIP

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2025

Membagikan "LAW OF EMPLOYMENT - StudentVIP"

Copied!
3
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

  1    

LAW OF EMPLOYMENT

 

(2)

  2  

MINIMUM EMPLOYMENT STANDARD

1.  FAIR  WORK  ACT  2009  (CTH)    

The Act is Based On:

• Corporations power – s51(xx) Constitution; AND

• Referral by the states of their power over industrial relations to the Cth under s51(xxxvii) (except for WA, which didn’t succeed power to Cth).

o In WA, only employees who work for a ‘constitutional corporation’ are covered by the Act.

i) What is a Constitutional Corporation?

• Corporations that are foreign corporations & trading & financial corporations former w/in the Cth.

• Unincorporated corporations in states other than WA are covered by the Fair Work Act.

McKinnon:

1. Whether a corporation is a trading corporation will depend on whether trade is a substantial & not merely peripheral activity.

2. Trade does not have to be the predominant activity.

3. ‘Trading’ is given a broad construction & extends beyond buying & selling but includes trade in services.

4. Making a profit is not a prerequisite.

5. It is a q of fact & degree – current activities are important but not the only criteria.

6. Look to the intended purpose of the corporation

ii) Coverage of the FWA:

• All employees in NT, ACT

• All private sector employees in Vic, NSW, Qld, SA and Tas

• All private sector employees in WA who work for a constitutional corporation

• Coverage of public sector employees & local council employees depends on the extent of each state’s referral of power e.g., NSW, Qld have strong state laws covering these employees

• In Victoria, there was a complete referral of power, effective 1 Jan 1997

o Most state public servants may use the unfair dismissals, general protections in the FWA o Many state employees are covered by EBAs made under the Fair Work Act

2.  NATIONAL  EMPLOYMENT  STANDARDS  –  Part  2-­‐2  FWA   i) Eligibility

• The NES minimum standards apply to all national system employees (s61) & any breach by an employer will breach the core obligation in s44 FWA to comply w/ them.

• The NES have effect regardless of the instrument that applies to a particular employee.

• Modern Awards & EBAs cannot exclude the NES & have no effect to the extent that they purport to do so – ss55(1) & 56.

Service:

o Some NES entitlements depend on the length & continuity of an employee’s service w/ an employer i.e., service is the period during which the employee is employed by the employer – s22(1)

o Does not include a period of paid/unpaid unauthorised absence & unpaid leave – s22.

• Although CEOs & Senior Executives will have their own K of employment, they will still be entitled to the NES.

 

A.  MAXIMUM  WEEKLY  HOURS  –  DIV  3  

Ø 38 hours, or more if reasonable

(3)

  3   i) Section 62 FWA:

(1) An employer must not request or require an employee to work more than 38 hours for a full time employee or more than their ordinary hours of work in a week, unless the additional hours are reasonable.

ii) Employee May Refuse to Work Unreasonable Additional Hours – s62(2) FWA:

(3) In determining whether additional hours are reasonable or unreasonable, the following matters must be taken into account:

(a) Any risk to employee health & safety from working the additional hours;

(b) The employee’s personal circumstances, including family responsibilities;

(c) The needs of the workplace or enterprise in which the employee is employed;

(d) Whether the employee is entitled to receive overtime payments, penalty rates or other compensation for, or a level of remuneration that reflects an expectation of, working additional hours;

(e) Any notice given by the employer of any request or requirement to work the additional hours;

(f) Any notice given by the employee of his or her intention to refuse to work the additional hours;

(g) The usual patterns of work in the industry, or the part of an industry, in which the employee works;

(h) The nature of the employee’s role, & the employee’s level of responsibility;

(i) Whether the additional hours are in accordance w/ averaging terms included under s63 in a modern award or enterprise agreement that applies to the employee, or w/ an averaging arrangement agreed to by the employer & employee under s64;

(j) Any other relevant matter.

iii) Hours an Employee Works in a Week Includes – s62(5) FWA:

• Any hours of leave, or absence whether paid or unpaid & are authorised by o (a) The employer; or

o (b) By or under a term or condition of the employee’s employment; or o (c) By or under a Cth, State or Territory law.

iv) Averaging Hours – s63 FWA:

• Modern Award or EBA may include terms providing for the averaging of hours of work over a specified period.

• The average hours for a full time employee must not exceed 38 hours or for a non-full time employee their ordinary hours of work.

• E.g., can work 36 hours one week, & 40 hours the next.

 

B.  REQUESTS  FOR  FLEXIBLE  WORKING  ARRANGEMENTS  –  DIV  4  

Ø By parents, for care of a child, BUT employer may refuse on reasonable business grounds

i) Employee May Request Change in Working Arrangements – s65 FWA:

(1) The employee can request for a change in working arrangements where one of the following circumstances apply.

(1A) The following are the circumstances:

(a) The employee is the parent, or has responsibility for the care, of a child who is of school age or younger;

(b) The employee is a carer (within the meaning of the Carer Recognition Act 2010);

(c) The employee has a disability;

(d) The employee is 55 or older;

(e) The employee is experiencing violence from a member of the employee’s family;

(f) The employee provides care or support to a member of the employee’s immediate family, or a member of the employee’s household, who requires care or support because the member is experiencing violence from the member’s family.

(1b) An employee who is a parent or carer & is returning to work after taking leave in relation to the birth or adoption of a child may request to work part-time .

 

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

5 of 1999 on the prohibition of monopolistic practices and unfair business competition, proving cartel with reasonable restraint can decide whether it is really happening in the cartel,

39 ―When a commissioner of the CCMA is called upon to decide whether dismissal as a sanction is fair in the particular case he or she must not apply the reasonable employer test,

example, where a service or benefit is directly related to biological sex.25 Under the Australian Guidelines, biological factors are not taken into consideration when determining the

discretion whether to certify the class or not, and when the judgment has been made, the court must ensure that the parties perform their duties in accordance with the settlement