• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

LAW2394  –  Criminal  Law  Notes    Contents  1.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2025

Membagikan "LAW2394  –  Criminal  Law  Notes    Contents  1."

Copied!
6
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

LAW2394  –  Criminal  Law  Notes    

Contents  

1. Introduction  &  classification  of  offences  

• What  is  a  crime?  

• Justification  for  criminalisation  

• The  aims  of  the  criminal  law   o Retribution  

o Deterrence   o Reformation  

• Sources  of  Criminal  Law   o Common  Law   o Legislation  

• The  elements  of  an  offence  

• Who  can  commit  crimes  

• Classification  of  Offences  

• Court  Hierarchy  

• Deciders  of  Facts    

2. Process  to  compel  appearance,  preliminary  examination  &  trial  of   indictable  offences  

• All   3. Bail  

• N/A   4. Murder  

• Coke’s  definition,  elements:  

§ Sound  memory  

§ Age  of  discretion    

§ Unlawfully  

§ Kills  

§ Reasonable  creature    

§ Malice  aforethought    

§ Death,  year  and  a  day  

• Elements  –  deeper  explanation  

• Actus  Reus  

§ Voluntariness  

§ Causation  

• Tests  for  causation  ,incl.  ‘but  for’  

White  case  (poison  apple)  

Hallet  (beach)  

Royall  (exiting  window)  (seminal  case  in  Vic)  

• Novus  Actus  Intervenus   o Act  of  God  

o Act  of  third  party   o Act  of  victim  

§ Blaue  (Jehovah’s  Witness,  eggshell  skull)  case   o Examples  

• Mens  Rea  

§ 4  possible  mental  states  

(2)

§ Transferred  Malice  

§ Recklessness:  Probable  v  Possible  

Crabbe  (road  train)  case  

§ Express  Malice  

• Statutory  Murder  

§ Constructive  Malice  

• In  the  furtherance  of  a  crime  of  violence   o Armed  robbery  

o Aggravated  burglary  

§ Example    

5. Manslaughter  

• Common  elements  of  murder  +  manslaughter  

• Murder  v  Manslaughter  

• Voluntary  manslaughter   o Survivor  of  suicide  pact   o Infanticide  

o Provocation  (abolished)  

o Defensive  Homicide  (abolished)  

§ Heather  Osland  case  (killed  husband  with  son)  

• Involuntary  manslaughter   o Murder  v  manslaughter  

o Wilson  (punched  drunk  walking)  case  

• Unlawful  and  Dangerous  Act  Manslaughter  

• Determining  unlawful  and  dangerous  act  manslaughter   o Unlawful  

o Michelle  Nguyen  case  

• Dangerousness  

o Reasonable  person  

• Coward’s  punch  laws  

• Mandatory  minimum  for  manslaughter  types   o Burns  case  

o Stynes  (prostitute)  case  

• Criminal  Negligence  manslaughter   o Elements  

o Act  v  Omission   o Standard  of  care  

§ Nydam  (fire  at  hairdressers)  case   o Stone  &  Dobson  (anorexic  housemate)  case   o Taktak  case  (took  girl  to  apartment)  case   o Reasonable  person  

o Kerry  Whacker  (Chinese  people  smuggling  in  cargo)  case   o Culpable  driving  

o Examples    

6. Assault  

• Addressing  assault  in  an  exam  

• Common  Law  (yes)  and  Statute  (yes)  

• Definition  

(3)

Fagan  (driving  over  policeman’s  foot)  case  

• Assault  v  Battery  

• Common  Law  and  Statute  

• Assault  charges  

• Force  /  threat  of  force  

• Actus  reus  

• Elements  –  force  applied  assault  

• Elements  –  apprehension  of  force  

• Lawful  excuse  

• Threat  of  violence  /  overt  act   o Threat  

o Conditional  threats  

o Apprehension  of  physical  force    

7. Sexual  Offences  

• Strategies  for  Exam  

• Offences   o Rape  

o Sexual  Penetration  of  a  child     o Sexual  Assault  

o Indecent  Act  with  a  child     o Incest    

o Procuring/Grooming     o Child  Pornography  offences   o Prostitution    

o Human  Trafficking/  Sexual  Servitude    

• Common  Law  

• Rape  in  Marriage  

• Requirements  for  rape  at  common  law  

Crimes  Act  

o Actus  Reus  under  Crimes  Act   o Mens  Rea  under  Crimes  Act  

• Reasonable  Belief  

• What  is  sexual  penetration?  

• Consent  

o Jury  Directions  Act   o Capacity  to  Consent   o Consent  by  Conduct   o Consent  by  Threats   o Consent  by  Fraud   o Consent  /  Fraud    

8. Defences  

• Self-­‐Defence  

o Zecevic  case   o Subjective  test   o Objective  test  

• Pre-­‐emptive  strike  

• Imminence  of  harm  

(4)

• Defensive  homicide  

• Crimes  Act  –  Family  Violence   o Example  

• Duress  

o Subjective  test   o Objective  test   o Threat:  

§ Present  or  future  threat  

§ Nature  of  the  threat  

§ Reasonable  opportunity  of  avoiding  the  threat   o Limits  to  the  defence  

o Accomplices  

o Criminal  enterprises  

• Necessity  

o Duress  v  necessity  

§ Subjective  test  

§ Objective  test   o Necessary  response   o Irreparable  Evil  

o Situation  of  imminent  peril   o Common  Law  v  Statute   o Statutory  Defence   o Limits  

o Example    

9. Theft  

• Common  Law?  No.  

• Statute?  Yes,  s.  74  Crimes  Act.  

• Elements  

• In  brief:  

o Actus  Reus:  

§ Appropriates  

§ Property  

§ Belonging  to  another   o Mens  Rea  

§ Intention  to  permanently  deprive  

§ Dishonest  state  of  mind  

• Actus  Reus  

o Choses  in  Action   o Belonging  to  Another   o Possession  or  control  

• Fiduciary  Ownership/Obligations  

• ‘On  account  of’  

• Ownership  transferred  by  mistake  –  s.  73(10)   o Transfer  as  the  result  of  deception   o Mistake  (D  realises  at  the  time)   o Mistake  (D  realises  after)  

• Appropriation  

o Consent  to  appropriation  

(5)

• When  is  theft  complete?  

• Mens  Rea  

o Conditional  Intention   o Dishonesty  

10. Other  property  offences  

• Robbery  

o Elements   o Armed  Robbery  

• Burglary  

• Aggravated  Burglary  

• Blackmail    

11. Attempts  

• Common  Law?  No  

• Statute?  Yes  

• Crimes  Act  Provisions  

• Mens  Rea  

• Actus  Reus  

• When  conduct  is  sufficient  for  an  attempt  

• Tests:  

o The  “last  act  test”  Eagleton   o The  “proximity  rule”  

o  “Part  of  a  series  of  acts”  

• Withdrawal  

• Impossibility  

• Two-­‐stage  inquiry  

• Standalone  offences    

12. Complicity  

• Common  law?  No,  only  historically.  

• Statute?  Yes.  (s.  323,  324  Crimes  Act)  

• Elements  

• Legislation:  

o S.  323   o S.  324  

§ S.  324A  

§ S.  324B  

§ S.  324C  

• Innocent  Agent  

• Withdrawal  

• Intentionally  Assisting,  Encouraging,  or  Directing   o Mens  Rea  

o Actus  Reus    

• Mere  Presence?  

• S.  323(B)  and  (D)  

• Important  Cases  on  Complicity  

o White  and  Ridley  (innocent  agent  and  withdrawing  from  an   offence)  

(6)

o Osland  –  principal  offenders  and  ‘inconsistant  verdicts’    

o Lam  –  mere  presense  is  rarely  enough    

o Georgianni  –  must  be  aware  of  the  essential  circs  that  make  up  the   case.    

13.  IRAC  Examples    

       

1. Introduction  &  classification  of  offences   What  is  a  crime?  

The  criminal  law  is  not  concerned  with  private  rights  –  although  any   infringement  of  those  rights  may  be  taken  into  account  in  sentencing.  

 

A  crime  is  regarded  as  a  wrong  committed  against  the  community  or  the  state:  it   is  a  public  wrong.  

 

Infringement  of  individual  or  private  rights  may  be  rectified  under  the   appropriate  private  laws,  e.g.  the  law  of  contract  or  the  law  of  torts.  

 

So  in  the  situation  of  an  assault,  the  offender  will  be  dealt  with  under  the   criminal  law  but  his  or  her  victim  may  be  able  to  recover  compensation  or   damages  in  a  civil  action.  

 

Definition  of  a  crime:  

…[A]  legal  wrong  that  can  be  followed  by  criminal  proceedings  which  may   result  in  punishment  

-­‐  Professor  Glanville  Williams  in  Textbook  of  Criminal  Law,  2nd  ed,   Steven  and  Sons,  1983,  p.  27  

 

Essentially,  a  crime  is  an  illegal  act  that  may  be  punished    

Some  acts  are  crimes  because  the  individual  has  chosen  to  act  in  a  particular   way,  either  intending  or  being  aware  of  the  likely  consequences.  For  example,  if   you  deliberately  drop  a  heavy  object  from  the  second  story  of  an  office  building,   arguably  you  would  be  aware  that  the  object  could  potentially  strike  another   person.  In  these  cases,  the  prosecution  would  have  to  prove  your  act  was   intentional,  reckless  or  negligent.  

 

Other  crimes  simply  require  you  to  commit  the  act.  These  are  crimes  of  strict  or   absolute  liability.  E.g.  speeding  while  driving  >  police  do  not  have  to  prove  intent   or  state  of  mind.  

 

Justification  for  criminalisation  

-­‐ Prevention  of  harm  (e.g.  seatbelts,  mobile  phones  while  driving)   -­‐ Morality  (e.g.  historically:  homosexuality)  

Referensi

Dokumen terkait