• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Making Connections - ACER Research Repository

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Making Connections - ACER Research Repository"

Copied!
41
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Primary Connections

(2)

Primary Connections: A new approach to

primary science and to teacher professional learning

Professor Mark W Hackling

Edith Cowan University

(3)

2006 TRIAL

Boosting science learning

Building human capital for a knowledge-based economy

Innovation depends on curiosity, creativity and scientific literacy

Scientific literacy delivers a triple bottom line

(4)

2006 TRIAL

Purpose of primary science education

To provide opportunities for children to know science as:

• a body of knowledge

• a way to know, and

• as a human endeavour

(Draft NSOL, 2006)

(5)

2006 TRIAL

Scientific literacy

Scientific literacy is a high priority for all citizens, helping them

ƒ to be interested in, and understand the world around them,

ƒ to engage in the discourses of and about science,

ƒ to be sceptical and questioning of claims made by others about scientific matters,

ƒ to be able to identify questions, investigate and draw evidence- based conclusions, and

ƒ to make informed decisions about the environment and their own health and well-being.

(Hackling, Goodrum, & Rennie, 2001, p. 7)

(6)

2006 TRIAL

Science is a priority for government

National review of the teaching and learning of science TIMSS and PISA

National assessments of Year 6 scientific literacy Science Education Assessment Resources

Science learning objects ASISTM project

Primary Connections

National Consistency in Curriculum Outcomes – NSOL for Science

(7)

2006 TRIAL

Science is a priority for parents

Parents were asked to rate the importance of subjects for their primary school children

Parents rated Science third in importance after English and Mathematics (ASTEC, 1997)

(8)

2006 TRIAL

Gap between the rhetoric and the status of science in primary schools

40% of teachers indicated their schools were poorly equipped for teaching science

37% of teachers indicated their science budget was inadequate or they had no budget

36% indicated their school had no science coordinator 30% of schools do not report science achievement to

parents

(Hackling & Prain, 2005)

(9)

2006 TRIAL

Concerns about primary science

Teacher confidence

Many primary teachers lack confidence, competence, self-efficacy with science teaching (e.g. Yates &

Goodrum, 1990; Hackling & Prain, 2005)

Concerns about adequacy of pre-service education

(Lawrance & Palmer, 2003) and PCK (Gess-Newsome, 1999)

(10)

2006 TRIAL

Concerns about primary science

Science teaching time

Primary teachers spend less time on Science than all other subjects except LOTE

41 minutes per week spent on Science on average across K-7

2.7% of total weekly teaching time (Angus et al, 2004)

(11)

2006 TRIAL

Concerns about primary science

Student achievement

Less than 60% of Year 6 students in 6 of 8 jurisdictions attained the proficiency standard in the 2003 national assessments of scientific literacy (MCEETYA, 2005)

The science achievement of Australian Year 4 students on the international TIMSS tests has remained static from 1994 to 2002.

Singapore, Taiwan, Japan, Hong Kong, England, USA and Latvia scored significantly higher than Australia (Thomson & Fleming, 2004)

(12)

2006 TRIAL

The chain reaction

Low Low confidence Low Little Low science and self-efficacy science opportunity science

PCK teaching for learning achievement time

(13)

2006 TRIAL

Primary Connections background

Primary Connections:

ƒ aims to improve learning outcomes in science and literacy

ƒ developed by the AAS with the support of all states and territories and funded by the Australian

Government’s DEST

ƒ a professional learning program with curriculum resources

(14)

2006 TRIAL

Key features of the curriculum units

Literacy focuses to develop literacies of science Inquiry and investigative approach

5Es teaching and learning model

Assessment embedded with teaching and learning Cooperative learning strategies

Teacher background information

(15)

2006 TRIAL

Literacies of science

The literacy practices associated with the

interpretation, construction and communication of multimodal science texts comprise the

literacies of science

For example, the conventions used by

scientists to represent drawings, tables of data, graphs, force-arrow diagrams

(16)

2006 TRIAL

Scientific drawing

(17)

2006 TRIAL

A force-arrow diagram

A ball floating in water

(18)

2006 TRIAL

A mutually supportive relationship

Primary Connections units engage students in activities that reflect the mutually supportive relationship between science and literacy.

Measuring and recording observations of broad bean seed germination in a science journal

Creating a labelled diagram to

represent understanding of parts of a germinating broad bean seed

(19)

2006 TRIAL

Primary Connections teaching and learning model

Phase Focus

ENGAGE Engage students and elicit prior knowledge Diagnostic assessment

EXPLORE Provide hands-on experience of the phenomenon

EXPLAIN Develop science explanations for experiences and representations of developing conceptual understanding

Formative assessment

ELABORATE Extend understandings to a new context or make connections to additional concepts through a student-planned investigation

Summative assessment of the investigating outcome

EVALUATE Students re-represent understandings and reflect on their learning journey

Summative assessment of the conceptual outcomes

(20)

2006 TRIAL

The 5 Es

View Questioning Minds Part Three:

The Five Es

(21)

2006 TRIAL

Inquiry model

(22)

2006 TRIAL

Primary Connections organisation:

Stages, years and outcome levels

Primary Connections

stage

Years of schooling Outcome levels*

Early Stage 1 1 <1-1

Stage 1 2-3 1-2

Stage 2 4-5 2-3

Stage 3 6-7 3-4

* Levels are based on the National Scientific Literacy Progress Map

(23)

2006 TRIAL

Primary Connections unit map

Stage E&B E&C L&L N&PM ES 1 Weather On the move

S 1 Water

works

Push-pull power

Material matters

S 2 Spinning in space

Plants in action

All sorts of stuff

S 3 Electric

circuits

Micro

organisms

Build it better

(24)

2006 TRIAL

Award winning quality

Primary Connections has won the 2006 Australian Publishers Association Award for Excellence in

Educational Publishing in the Primary Teaching and Learning category.

Draft, revise, trial in 55 trial schools, feedback, revise, publish – 15 months

(25)

2006 TRIAL

Primary Connections professional learning model

Teacher professional

learning Staged

professional learning workshops

Curriculum resources

Reflection on practice Practice

Principles of learning and teaching

(26)

2006 TRIAL

1. Students are supported and challenged to develop deep levels of thinking

2. Science is linked with students’ lives, perspectives and interests 3. Learning connects with communities and practice beyond the

classroom

4. The learning environment promotes independence, and collaboration

5. Assessment practices are an integral part of teaching and learning

Primary Connections pedagogical

principles

(27)

2006 TRIAL

Professional learning modules

• An introduction to Primary Connections (one day, whole school workshop)

• School coordinators workshop (one day workshop)

• Auditing (90 minute workshop)

• Literacies of science (90 minute workshop)

• Investigating (90 minute workshop)

• Assessment (90 minute workshop) Questioning Minds DVD

Professional learning resources

(28)

2006 TRIAL

Initial teacher education and ongoing professional learning

Initial teacher education

University

science educators Curriculum

resources

Ongoing

professional learning Professional

learning resources

Professional learning facilitators

(29)

2006 TRIAL

2005 Trial of Primary Connections

• 56 schools, 106 teachers and >3000 students

• trial schools from all jurisdictions and sectors, metro, regional and rural schools

• teachers completed 5 + 1 + 1 + 1 days PD

• taught supplied units in Terms 1 and 3

• taught teacher developed units in Term 2

• data gathered by teacher and student questionnaires, case studies, analysis of students’ work samples

(30)

2006 TRIAL

Teachers’ confidence

Teachers’ confidence with nine science and literacy

teaching strategies was assessed on a five point scale.

Mean confidence scores increased significantly (p < .05) from 3.34 /5 at the beginning of the program to 4.04 /5 at the end of Term 2.

(31)

2006 TRIAL

Teachers’ Self-efficacy

(n = 89)

Total self-

efficacy score

Initial survey

(2004)

End of summer

school

Mid Term 1,

2005

End Term 1, 2005

End Term 2, 2005

1-10 0 0 0 0 0

11-20 2 0 0 0 0

21-30 20 10 4 3 1

31-40 50 49 52 54 49

41-50 17 30 33 32 39

Mean total self

efficacy score 35* 38 39 40 41*

S.D. 6.8 5.4 4.5 4.6 4.5

A 10 item self-efficacy scale was assembled using items selected from Riggs and Knochs (1990) Science Teaching Efficacy Belief Instrument * (p.<.05).

(32)

2006 TRIAL

Science teaching time

(n = 89)

Per cent of teachers Minutes of science

taught per week Before (2004) Using PC (2005)

60 minutes or more 33.0 72.7

Between 30 and 60 minutes

39.8 26.1

Less than 30 minutes 23.9 1.4

Rarely taught science 3.4 0

(33)

2006 TRIAL

Time of day when science taught

(n = 89)

Per cent of teachers Time of day when

science taught

Before (2004) Using PC (2005)

Morning 6.8 8.0

Afternoon 69.3 18.2

Morning and afternoon 23.9 73.9

(34)

2006 TRIAL

Teaching practice

96 of 97 teachers said their teaching had improved

Teachers reported an increase in:

• teaching literacies of science

• hands-on activities

• use of diagnostic assessment

(35)

2006 TRIAL

Teachers’ perceptions of students’

response to PC

Students’ response to activities (n = 88) Very

negative

Negative OK Positive Very

positive

1 2 8 31 46

31 46

10 0

0

Very positive Positive

OK Negative

Very negative

Students’ response to learning approach (n = 87)

(36)

2006 TRIAL

Students’ perceptions of PC

(n = 538)

Per cent of cohort with this response

Unit studied Weather N = 132

Push, Pull PowerN = 108

Plants in

Action N = 160

Build it Better N = 138

Have you enjoyed science this term?

Yes 82 63 77 49

Ok 11 27 21 41

No 8 10 2 10

How much have you learned in science this term?

Lots 71 70 68 38

Some 15 23 30 50

Little 14 6 3 12

(37)

2006 TRIAL

Teachers’ perceptions of amount and quality of science learning

Amount of science learning

Less than last term Same as last term Better than last term

1 18 66 (78%)

66 (79%) 17

1

Better than last term Same as last term

Less than last term

Quality of science learning

(38)

2006 TRIAL

Achievement gains

(n = 72)

Achievement level and score

Frequency

Engage lesson Evaluate lesson

1a (1) 11 0

2d (2) 16 3

2c (3) 41 5

2a (4) 3 8

3d (5) 1 15

3c (6) 0 22

3a (7) 0 15

4d (8) 0 4

Mean score 2.54 * 5.51 *

(39)

2006 TRIAL

The chain reaction

Increased Increased Increased Increased Increased science self-efficacy science opportunity science

PCK teaching for learning achievement time

Improved practice

(40)

2006 TRIAL

Boosting science learning in primary schools: What does it take?

Making science a priority

Advocacy from influential champions

Support teachers with professional learning and

curriculum resources that are conceptually sound and demonstrated through research to be effective

National collaboration

(41)

2006 TRIAL

Some useful web sites

Primary Connections

http://www.science.org.au/primaryconnections/

Science Education Assessment Resources http://cms.curriculum.edu.au/sear/

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Comparison profiles of reading, mathematics, and science literacy for 15-year- old students in Year 10 in Australian states, PISA, 2003 Source: OECD, 2004 EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT OF

ACER eNews May 2004 page 1 In this issue: • • • Evaluating Literacy Advance and its effects over five years Research undertaken by ACER for the Catholic Education Commission of

As Edu- cation Minister, she wrote in a ‘Letter of Expectation’ to the Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership AITSL, AITSL’s ‘single biggest priority...will be...to fi

Retrieved from https://www.teachermagazine.com.au/columnists/geoff-masters/shifting-the-focus-of-naplan Shifting the focus of NAPLAN Geoff Masters AO Australian Council for

Supporting national student surveys in India ACER is working with the United Kingdom Department for International Development, Cambridge Education and the National Council of

ASSESSMENT GEMS SERIES The ‘literacy’ idea Ross Turner The ACER Centre for Global Education Monitoring Much of ACER’s assessment work aims to measure levels of student literacy in

According to the VRQA website, ‘Each per- formance summary provides overall results of students and how the school compares with other Victorian government schools, taking into account

4 Teaching numeracy with adults 6 Computerised assessment of writing for VET 8 Return on investment in language, literacy and numeracy training 10 Improving learners’ and