Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for
a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and
private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without
the permission of the Author.
NON-WORK PARTICIPATION & WORK ATI'ITUDES: A TEST OF THE EXPANSION
MODEL OF PERSONAL RESOURCES MEDIATED BY SELF-EFFICACY
A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of
Masters of Arts in Psychology at Massey University
Maurice James Jennings 1994
II
ABSTRACT
.This study attempted to provide support for Marks' ( 1977) 'expansion' model as applied to the work-family relationship. Essentially, the model predicted that participation in the non-work domain would en~jch our personal resources such as time, energy and commitment. It was also hypothesized that these resources would be positively associated with four work attitudes (i.e., organizational commitment, occupational commitment, job satisfaction, and job involvement). Moreover, it was further hypothesized that the resource enrichment - work attitude link would be mediated by self-efficacy. The four work attitudes however, were not correlated with time spent, and involvement m three non-work domains (i.e., parenting, community and recreation/hobby), although the work attitudes were positively correlated with the resource provided by participation in non-work activities. With the failure of self- efficacy to mediate the relationship between resource enrichment and the work attitudes, The overall conclusion therefore, was that the 'expansion' model of the work-family link was not supported. A number of reasons were put forward and discussed, as to why the data failed .to support the hypotheses, this included the identification of several limitations. Suggestions for future research into the work-family relationship were then put forward.
111
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
A very warm and special than ks to my supervisor Dr. Ross Flett, whose encouragement, support and good humour helped me keep things in perspective when I could not. I also wish to express my deepest gratitude to Julienne, for her friendship, love and
,
.
encouragement. I kriow at times I was not easy to get along with.
Thanks also to all the members of the Rotary, Lions, YWCA and the Business Women's Group whose co-operation and assistance made this study possible, and also to my family. fnends and flatmates who have made the last two years enjoyable and worthwhile
IV
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER
Abstract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Acknowledgements,:. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111
Table of Contents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1v
I INTRODUCTION . . . . . .
92 Summary & Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
THE WORK-FAMILY LINKAGE
The Expansion & Scarcity Models of Personal Resources Explaining the Personal Resource-Work attitude Link .. Summary & Conclusions . _ . . . ... .. . . ... . . .. . . 14 16 l 8 213 ATTITUDES . . .
234 Attitude Formation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Attitude Change .. . . _ . _ . . . . 24
Four Principal Work Attitudes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
Organizational Commitment . . . .. .. .. . . Occupational Commitment . . . .. . . .. . . . Job Satisfaction . . . ... . .. .. . . . Job lnvolvement Empirical & theoretical Considerations . . . Non-Work Participation & Work Attitudes . . . . .. . . .. . ... . . 26 28 29 31 32 35 Summary & Conclusions . . . _ . . . . . . . . .. .. . . ... _ 36
SELF-EFFICACY
38 Non-Work Participation, Self-Efficacy & Work Attitudes . . . 41Summary & Conclusions ... . ... . . .. . . 44
5
6
7
8
SUMMARY & RESEARCH GOALS
Hypothesis One & Two . . . . Hypothesis Three . .. .. .. .. . Hypothesis Four .. .. .. . . .
METHOD
Participants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . Measures
Organizational Commitment .
Occupational Commitment . . . .. .. . . . .. . . Job Satisfaction . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . ... . Job Involvement & Time Commitment
Non-Work Lnvolvement Resource Enrichment . . Self-Efficacy
Personal Characteristics Procedure
RESULTS
Hypothesis One to Three
Hypothesis One .. . .. . . .. .. . . . Hypothesis Two
Hypothesis Three . . .. . .. . . ... .. ... . .. . . Hypothesis Four .. . . . .. .. . .
Summary
DISCUSSION
Suggestions for Future Research Limitations . . . .. .
Summary & Conclusion . .. . . . ... .
45 46 47 48
50 50 50 51 51 52 53 54 54 55 56 56
58 65 66 67 69 70 78
79 84 86 88
v
REFERENCES
APPENDICES .... . ... . .... .. .... . .
1 Questionnaire Instructions & Demographic Questions .. . .... . . . 23 4
5 6
78
9
10Organizational Commitment Questionnaire . . . .. . . . Occupational Cornrni"iment Questionnaire .... . . ... .. . Job Satisfaction Questionnaire . . . . . . . . . . .. . . Job lnvolvement Questionnaire . . ... .... .... . . ... . . Non-Work Involvement Questionnaire .. ... .. .. . . . Resource Enrichment Questionnaire
Self-Efficacy Questionnaire .. . ..
lnformation Sheet .... .. . .. ... .. .. . .. . .. . ... . . Consent Form . . . .. ... ... .. . . ... . . .
91
102
102 105 107 108 109 110 111 113 114 116
VI
Vil
FIGURES & TABLES
FIGURES/TABLES
pageFigure 3.1
The Five Steps In Attitude Change . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Figure 4.1
Baron & Kenny's Mediational Model . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Table 7.1
Work Attitude & Self-Efficacy lntercorrelation Matrix 59
Table 7.2
Non-Work Domain lntercorrelation Matrix . . . 61
Table 7.3
Correlations Between Demographic Variables & Work Attitudes,
Self-Efficacy & Non-Work Domain Variables . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63
Table 7.4
Results of the T-Tests Between Sex & Dependent Variables 65
Table 7.5
Correlations Between Time Spent in the
Non-Work Domain & Work Attitudes 67
Table 7.6
Correlations Between Personal lnvolvernent in the
Non-Work Domain & Work Attitudes ... . . . 68
...
Vlll
Table 7.7
Correlations Between Resource Enrichment in the
Non-Work Domain & Work Attitudes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
Table 7.8
Hierarchical Regression Testing the Mediating Effect of Self-Efficacy ,.
on Resource Enrichment & Organizational Commitment . . . . . . . 72
Table 7.9
Hierarchical Regression Testing the Mediating Effect of Self-Efficacy
on Resource Enrichment & Occupational Commitment . . . . . . . . 74
Table 7.10
Hierarchical Regression Testing the Mediating Effect of Self-Efficacy on Resource Enrichment & Job Satisfaction
Table 7.11
Hierarchical Regression Testing the Mediating Effect of Self-Efficacy
76
on Resource Enrichment & Job involvement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77