• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

participatory research A action approach Reducing occupational among registered stress nurses in very remoteAustralia: Collegian

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "participatory research A action approach Reducing occupational among registered stress nurses in very remoteAustralia: Collegian"

Copied!
11
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

ContentslistsavailableatScienceDirect

Collegian

jou rn a l h om e p a g e :w w w . e l s e v i e r . c o m / l o c a t e / c o l l

Reducing occupational stress among registered nurses in very remote Australia: A participatory action research approach

Sue Lenthall

a,∗

, John Wakerman

b

, Maureen F. Dollard

c

, Sandra Dunn

d

, Sabina Knight

e

, Tessa Opie

c

, Greg Rickard

f

, Martha MacLeod

g

aFlindersNorthernTerritory,FlindersUniversity,POBox433,KatherineNT0851,Australia

bFlindersNorthernTerritory,POBoxU362,CharlesDarwinUniversity,Casuarina,NT0815,Australia

cCentreforAppliedPsychologicalResearch,UniversityofSouthAustralia,CityEastCampus,Adelaide,SA5000,Australia

dCharlesDarwinUniversity,Casuarina,NT0909,Australia

eMtIsaCentreforRuralandRemoteHealth,JamesCookUniversity,MountIsa,QLD4825,Australia

fUniversityofTasmania,DirectorRozelleCampus,SydneyUniversityofTasmania,CornerChurch&GloverSt,LilyfieldNSW2040,LockedBag5052, Alexandria,NSW2015,Australia

gUniversityofNorthernBritishColumbia,3333UniversityWay,PrinceGeorge,BCV2N4Z9,Canada

a r t i c l e i n f o

Articlehistory:

Received18August2016

Receivedinrevisedform13April2017 Accepted27April2017

Keywords:

Remoteareanurses Occupationalhealth Stress

Jobdemand/resources

a b s t r a c t

Background:NursesinveryremoteareasofAustralia(RANs),workincomplexandisolatedsettingsfor whichtheyareofteninadequatelyprepared,andstresslevelsarehigh.Thispaper,basedonthe‘Back fromtheedge’project,evaluatesthedevelopmentandimplementationofaninterventiontoreduceand preventtheimpactofoccupationalstressintheRANworkforceintheNorthernterritory.

Methods:Themethodsinvolvedacombinedparticipatoryactionresearch/organisationaldevelopment model,involvingsevensteps,todevelopandimplementsystemchangeswithinthe(then)NorthernTer- ritoryDepartmentofHealthandFamilies(NTDH&F).Thedevelopment,implementationandevaluation wasinformedviainformationfromparticipantscollectedduringworkshopsandinterviews.Preandpost surveyswereundertakentoevaluatethestudy.

Results:Occupationalstressinterventionsdevelopedbytheworkgroupswerecategorisedintofourmain groups:(1)remotecontext,(2)workloadandscopeofpractice,(3)poormanagement,and(4)violence andsafetyconcerns.Themaininterventionscentredonpromotingawelleducated,stableworkforce.

Therewereveryfewmeasurablechangesasaresultoftheinterventionsasmanywerenotabletobe implementedinthetimeperiodofthestudy,butimplementationiscontinuing.

Conclusion:Whiletheoutcomeevaluationsshowedfeweffects,thestudythroughconsensusapproaches, providesablueprintforreducingstressamongremoteareanursesandevidencewhichshouldinform policyandpracticewithrespecttoservicedeliveryinremoteareas.

©2017AustralianCollegeofNursingLtd.PublishedbyElsevierLtd.Thisisanopenaccessarticle undertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

1. Background

Remoteareapracticeischaracterisedbygeographical, social andprofessionalisolation-servicingasmall,dispersedandhighly mobilepopulationwith, high morbidityand mortality,climatic extremes,anextendedpracticerole,amultidisciplinaryapproach andcross-culturalissuesaffectingeverydaylife(Wakerman2004).

NurseswhoworkinremoteareasinAustraliaarecalledremote areanursesor‘RANs’,andaredefinedas

Correspondingauthor.

E-mailaddress:Sue.Lenthall@flinders.edu.au(S.Lenthall).

...specialistpractitionersthatprovideandco-ordinateadiverse range of health care services for remote, disadvantaged or isolatedpopulationswithinAustraliaandherTerritoriesand undertakeappropriateeducationalpreparationfortheirprac- tice(CRANA2003).

Nursesworkinginveryremoteareas,asdefinedbytheAccessi- bility/RemotenessIndexofAustralia(ARIA+)(AIHW,2004),arethe mainstayofhealthservicesintheseregions(Lenthall,Wakerman, Dollardetal.,2011).Theyworkincomplexandisolatedsettings thatareoftencrosscultural,andforwhichtheyareusuallyinad- equately prepared(Lenthall,Wakerman, Opie,M.Dollard etal., 2011).

Discussions between different health, professional and uni- versitygroups intheNorthernTerritoryidentified occupational

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2017.04.007

1322-7696/©2017AustralianCollegeofNursingLtd.PublishedbyElsevierLtd.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBY-NC-NDlicense(http://creativecommons.org/

licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

(2)

stressamongRANsasaproblem.In2008,the,NorthernTerritory DepartmentofHealthandFamilies(NTDH&F),CouncilofRemote AreaNursesofAustraliaplus(CRANAplus),CommonwealthHealth Department,OfficeofAboriginalandTorresStraitIslanderHealth, KatherineWestHealthBoard,CentreforRemoteHealth,Flinders UniversityandUniversityofNorthernBritishColombia,Canada, agreedtobepartnersonasuccessfulAustralianResearchCouncil Linkagegrant,‘Backfromtheedge:reducingoccupationalstress amongRANsintheNorthernTerritory’.Theensuingstudyaimed todescribestressors,measurelevelsofoccupationalstressinRANs, anddevelop,implement andevaluateinterventionsthatreduce andpreventtheimpactofoccupationalstressintheremotearea nursingworkplace.Thefirstpartofthestudy,describedstressors andmeasuredlevelsofoccupationalstressinRANsviaasurveyto allregisterednursesinveryremoteAustralia(Opie,Dollardetal., 2010).Giventhehighdemandandunderresourcedenvironment, anextended Job Demands-Resources (JD-R) model (Demerouti, Bakker,Nachreiner,&Schaufeli,2001)wasadoptedtoexamine stressamongRANs.Themodelproposesthatworkerwell-being isaffectedby a numberof variables thatcan becategorisedas eitherjobdemandsorjobresources.Jobdemandsbecomestress- orswhentheemployeeisrequiredtoexpendconsiderableeffort inordertomeetthem,withpossibleoutcomessuchaspsycholog- icaldistressandemotionalexhaustion.Incontrast,jobresources serveamotivationalfunctionandmayleadtopositiveworkout- comes,suchasworkengagementandjobsatisfaction(Opie,Dollard etal.,2010).Additionallyourmodelproposedanumberofsystem capacityfactorsthatcouldinfluencedemandsandresources,such astheclimateforworkerpsychologicalhealth(i.e.,psychosocial safetyclimate,Dollard&Karasek,2010),flexible/adaptableculture (Lenthall,Wakerman,Opie,M.F.Dollardetal.,2011),consultation

&preparation(Lenthall,Wakerman,Dollardetal.,2011),andcom- municationsystems(Lenthall,Wakerman,Dollardetal.,2011).

The results of the first survey confirmed that RANs suffer highlevelsofoccupationalstressandemotionalexhaustion(Opie, Dollardetal.,2010).However,RANsalsoreportedhighlevelsof workengagementandmoderatelevelsofjobsatisfaction.Thejob demandsmoststronglyassociatedwithincreasedlevelsofoccupa- tionalstress,asassessedbyemotionalexhaustionandsymptomsof post-traumaticstressdisorder(PTSD),were:emotionaldemands, responsibilitiesandexpectations,socialissues,workload,staffing issues,poormanagement,isolation,safetyconcerns,violence,the remote context, culture shock, difficultieswith equipment and infrastructure,andlackofsupport(Opieetal.,2009).Thispaper presentstheresultsofthesecondpartofthisstudy,namelydevel- oping,implementingandevaluatinginterventionsthatpotentially reduceandpreventtheimpactofoccupationalstressintheremote areanursingworkforceintheNorthernTerritory.

1.1. Occupationalstressinterventions

Occupationalstressinterventions maybecategorisedbythe type and level of application. Primary interventions are aimed atreducing exposuretopsychologicallyharmfulworkingcondi- tions;secondary,orstressmanagement,interventionsareaimedto enablepeopletouseskillstodealwithpotentiallyharmfulwork- ingconditions;andtertiaryinterventionsareaimedtotreatpeople whohavebeenharmedinsomewaybyworkrelatedstress(Keegel etal.,2007;Lamontagne,Keegel,Louie,Ostry,&Landsbergis,2007).

Interventionsmayalsobecategorisedaccordingtotheirtarget:

individual, group, or the organisation (Cox, Karanika, Griffiths,

&Houdmont,2007;Bergerman,Corabian,&Harstall,2009;Giga, Cooper,&Faragher,2003;Karanikaetal.,2007,).Mostinterventions intheliteraturehaveaimedattheindividuallevel(Coxetal.,2007).

A meta-analysis to determine the effectiveness of stress man- agementinterventionsfoundthatrelaxationinterventionswere

mostfrequentlyused,whileorganisationalinterventions,although describedaspotentiallythemosteffective,continuedtobescarce (Richardson&Rothstein2008).Ratherthantargettheindividual ortheteam,the‘BackfromtheEdge’projectaimedtodevelop primary,secondaryandtertiaryoccupationalstressinterventions, sincecomprehensiveapproachesaremosteffective(Lamontagne etal.,2007).

1.2. Interventionframework

Thisintervention aspectof thestudyis based ontheaction researchmodel ofplannedchange,which involvesboth partic- ipatory action research(M.F.Dollard, le Blanc, &Cotton, 2008) andorganisationaldevelopment.Participatoryactionresearchisa collective,self-reflectiveinquirythatresearchersandparticipants undertaketogethersotheycanunderstandandimproveuponthe practicesin whichtheyparticipate,andthesituationsin which theyfindthemselves(Baum,MacDougall,&Smith,2006).Organ- isationaldevelopmentis‘theprocessofincreasingorganisational effectivenessandfacilitatingpersonalandorganisationalchange throughtheuseofinterventionsdrivenbysocialandbehavioural scienceknowledge’(Anderson2010;p3).Thecombinedparticipa- toryactionresearch/organisationaldevelopment(PAR/OD)model, anadaptationofCummingsmodel,(Cummings&Worley,2008) wasadoptedtodevelopand implementsystemchangeswithin theNTDH&F.Itinvolvedseven‘steps’,withstepsfourtosixbeing repeatedinacyclicalframework(Fig.1).Thismodelwaspartic- ularly pertinentasthis wasan attempttoeffectorganisational change through the harnessing of necessary management and front-linestaffcommitmentandsolutions.InlinewithPARprin- ciples,itattemptedtoaddresspowerrelationshipsbyadoptinga bottomupapproachaimedtoformapartnershipwithparticipants (Dollardetal.,2008).Problemsolvingandenquirywasencouraged anddialoguewasusedtocriticallyexaminerealityandtrytoreach agreementonasharedreality.

1.3. Ethicsapproval

EthicsapprovalwasgrantedbytheCentralAustralianHuman ResearchEthicsCommittee,theTopEndHumanResearchEthics Committeeandtwouniversityresearchethicscommittees.

2. Methods

ThetargetpopulationwereRANsinveryremoteareasinthe NorthernTerritory.Dataonpossibleoccupationalstressinterven- tionsandprocessevaluationswasgatheredthroughworkgroups ofRANsandhealthcentremanagersworkinginremoteAborig- inalcommunitiesinCentralAustraliaandintheTopEndofthe NorthernTerritory.Thesegroups,werefacilitatedbytheleadinves- tigator,generallymetforawholeday,threetimesinthePAR/OD cycledescribedabove.InformationfromthefirstBFTEsurveywere presentedandthendiscussedbytheworkgroups.Theworkgroups thenproposednumerouspossibleinterventions.Participationat alllevelsof theNTDH&Fwasakey strategyintheintervention andtheproposedinterventionswerethenfurtherdeveloped in workshopswithimplementationcommitteescomprisingmiddle managersinCentralAustraliaandintheTopEnd.Someinterven- tionswereimplementedatthemiddlemanagementlevel;others werereferredtothehighlevelreferencegroup.Thisgroupwas createdtoensuretherewascapacityandcommitmenttoimple- mentthedeveloped occupationalstressinterventions.The high levelreferencegroupcomprisedrepresentativesfromtheNTDH&F, theAboriginalMedicalServicesAllianceoftheNorthernTerritory;

theAustralianNursingFederation;theOfficeofAboriginalandTor- resStraitIslanderHealth;andtheCouncilofRemoteAreaNursesof

(3)

Fig.1. TheParticipatoryActionResearch/OrganisationalDevelopmentModel.

Australiaplus(CRANAplus).Othermembersoftheresearchteamon thegroupincludedtheDirectoroftheCentreforRemoteHealthand thefirstauthorofthispaper.Theaimsandobjectives,partnerroles andcontributions,andthestudydesignwereagreedatthebegin- ningofthestudy.Threeactionresearchcycleswereconductedover a12-monthperiod.

T-testswereusedtoevaluatetheimpactoftheoccupational stressinterventions,basedonmeansandstandarddeviationsof measuresusedinsurveyone(pre-interventions)andsurveytwo (post-interventions).Pre-andpost-measuresintheintervention groups,theTopEndandCAintheNorthernTerritoryandcontrol group(allotherAustralianstates)werecomparedtodeterminethe following.

•Improvementintotalsystemcapacityincludingthesubscales, responsesofwhichcorrespondedtoa5pointscalerangingfrom (0)stronglydisagreeto(4)stronglyagree,of:-

flexible/adaptableculture(Lenthall,Wakerman,Dollardetal., 2011),whichincludeditemssuch‘myorganisationprogresses effectivelythroughchangeandchallenges’;

consultation & preparation (Lenthall, Wakerman, Dollard etal.,2011),whichincludeditemssuchas‘IfeelIwasade- quatelyinformedabouttheconditionsofhealthcareintheir workplacepriortotakingthisposition;

psychosocialsafetyclimate(Dollard&Bakker,2010;Dollard&

Karasek,2010)whichincludeditemssuchas‘inmyorganisa- tion,seniormanagementshowsupportforstressprevention throughinvolvementandcommitment;

communication(Lenthall, Wakerman, Dollard etal., 2011), whichincludeditemssuchas‘IreceivetheinformationIneed fromcolleaguesandmanagerstoperformmyjobeffectively.

•Improvementinpositiveoutcomesof:

•work engagement, Utrecht Work Engagement Scale9, (Schaufeli&Bakker,2003)withitemssuchas‘Iamenthusiastic aboutmyjob’,andasksrespondentstoindicatethefrequency withwhichtheyexperiencesuchfeelings,ona7-pointscale rangingfrom0(never)to6(everyday);and

•job satisfaction, a single item asking respondents, ‘Taking everything into consideration, how do you feel about your job?’ responses corresponded with a 7-point scale, rang- ingfrom(0)extremelydissatisfied to(6)extremely satisfied (Opie,Dollardetal.,2010).

•Increaseinjobresources,including:-

•supervisionandsocialsupportsubscalesfromtheJobContent Questionnaire(JCQ)(Karaseketal.,1998),whichincludeditems suchas‘mysupervisorisconcernedaboutthewelfareofthose underhim/her’,and‘peopleIworkwitharehelpfulingetting thejobdone’, responsescorrespondedwitha5-pointscale, rangingfrom0(stronglydisagree)to4(stronglyagree);

•opportunityforprofessionaldevelopment,basedonthework ofAikenandPatrician(2000)andincludeditemssuchas‘there areactive in-service/continuingeducationprogramsforme’

withresponsesrangingfrom0(stronglydisagree)to4(strongly agree).

•jobcontrolandpossibilitiesfordevelopment,fromtheCopen- hagen Psychosocial Questionnaire (COPSOQ), (Kristensen, 2000),includedsuchitemsasItemsas,suchas‘Icandecide when totake a break’ for jobcontrol and ‘does your work requireyoutotakeinitiative?’withresponses,corresponding witha5-pointscale,rangingfrom0(toalargeextent)to4(toa verysmallextent).

•Decreaseinnegativeoutcomesof:-

(4)

•psychologicaldistress,measuredbytheGeneralHealthQues- tionnaire12 (GHQ12)(Goldberg and Williams, 1991), which includesitemsssuchas,‘haveyourecentlylostmuchsleep overworry?’responsescorrespondedtoa4-pointscaleranging from1(notatall)to4(muchmorethanusual);

•emotional exhaustion subscale from the Maslach Burnout Inventory(Jacksonetal.,1996;Maslach,Jackson,&Leiter,1996), whichincludesitemssuchas‘Ifeelemotionallydrainedfrom mywork’,withresponsescorrespondingwitha7-pointscale rangingfrom0(never)to6(everyday);and

•symptomsofposttraumaticstress,PostTraumaticStressDis- orderChecklistPCL(Weathersetal.,1993),whichprovidesa listof17fundamentalsymptomsofPTSDwhichareclustered intothreemainsymptomcategories,includingre-experiencing symptoms(e.g.nightmaresorflashbacks),hyperarousalsymp- toms(e.g.easilystartled),andavoidanceandpsychicnumbing symptoms(e.g.tryingtoavoidactivities,placesorpeople).It asks respondentstorate“ifandhow”theyhavebeenboth- eredbyanyofthelisted“reactions”(symptoms)overthepast month, in relationtoatraumatic experienceorevent,with responsescorrespondingwitha5-pointscalerangingfrom(1) notatallto(5)extremely.

•Decreaseindecreaseinjobdemands−measuredbythefollowing

•Witnessedviolenceandpersonalviolence,wherebothasked respondentshowoftentheyhadexperienceddifferentman- ifestationsofworkplaceviolenceinthepreceding12months, withresponsescorrespondedwitha4-pointscalerangingfrom (0)neverto(4)fourtimesormore,(Opie,Lenthalletal.,2010).

•Emotionaldemands,usingtheemotionaldemandssubscaleof theCOPSOQ(Kristensen,2000)whichincludeditemssuchas

‘doesyourworkputyouinemotionallydemandingsituations’

withresponsescorrespondingtoafivepointscalerangingfrom (0)veryrarely/neverto(4)veryoften/always.

•ThroughtheRANSpecificStressScale,whichwasdevelopedby afocusgroupattheCouncilofRemoteAreaNursesofAustralia (CRANA)conferencein2007andfurtherrefinedusingaDel- phitechniqueinvolvingrepeatedconsultationwithapanelof experts.Thereweretwelvegroupsofidentified stressorsall correspondingtoa7-pointscale,rangingfrom(0)neverto(6) everyday,including:-

1)poormanagement,withmanagementbeingdefinedastheper- sonwhohasmanagementauthority overtheirposition,for example,themanagerintheRegionalCentre/Townforremote areanurses,itemsincluded‘howoftendoesyourmanagerfail toaddressissuesraisedconcerningcolleagues’;

2)staffingdifficulties,itemsincluded‘howoftendoyouexperi- enceinadequatestaffinglevels;

3)on-call,itemsincluded‘howoftenareyouon-call24haday;

4)workload,items included ‘howoften do you perceive your workloadasunmanageable;

5)responsibilitiesandexpectations,itemsincluded,‘howoften dotheresponsibilitiesofthehealthserviceexceedthecapacity ofstaff’;

6)safetyconcerns,itemsincluded‘howoftendoyoufeelcon- cernedaboutyourpersonalsafety;

7)socialIssues,itemsincludedhowoftendoyouexperiencedif- ficultyinitiatingormaintainingsocialinteraction

8)isolation,itemsincluded,‘howoftendoyoufeelisolatedfamily andfriends’;

9)inter-culturalfactors,itemsincluded‘howoftendoyouexperi- enceconflictbetweenwesternnursingpracticesandprevailing culturalpractices’;

10)cultureshock,itemsincluded‘howoftendoyouexperience uneasinessaboutlivingorworkinginadifferentculture’;

11)lackofsupport,itemsincluded‘howoftendoyouexperience adequatementorsupport’;

12)infrastructureandequipmentdifficulties,itemsincluded‘how oftendoyouexperiencedifficultieswithequipment’.

DatawereanalysedusingtheStatisticalPackagefortheSocial Sciences(SPSS)forWindows,version16.

Processevaluationswereconductedatworkshopsandcommit- teemeetingstogaugetheeffectivenessoftheinterventionprocess.

Informationpertainingtotheprocesswasalsocollectedthrough minutesof meetings, observationsof workshops andmeetings, adiaryofmeetings,aswellasinterviewswithkeyrespondents, includingtwo members of thehigh level referencegroup, two membersoftheTopEndimplementationgroupandthreemembers oftheCAimplementationgroup.

One section of survey two, adapted from evaluation of the Victorian Workforce Authority, (Victorian Workforce Authority, 2006)askedparticipantsabouttheirlevelsofengagementinthe project,levelsoftrust,andlinemanagerattitudesandactions.

3. Results

3.1. Occupationalstressinterventions

OccupationalStressInterventionsdevelopedbytheworkgroups were organised intofour main categories following analysis of commonthemes:(1)remotecontext,(2)workloadandscopeof practice,(3)poormanagement,and(4)violenceandsafetycon- cerns.ThespecificinterventionsarelistedinTable1.

3.1.1. Remotecontext

The remote context impacts on all of the job demands, and a number, including emotional demands, social issues, staffingissues,interculturalfactors,isolationanddifficultieswith equipmentand infrastructureare intrinsicallylinked.Nearlyall participantsin theworkgroups agreed that working in remote communitieswasmoreemotionallydemandingthanmostother jobs they had previously undertaken. Some elements of emo- tionaldemands,suchasthepoorhealthofAboriginalpeoples,the frequencyofemergencies,andtheregularityofapre-existingrela- tionshiporassociationbetweentheRANandclientcouldnotbe changedbyoccupationalstressinterventionsinthescopeofthis project.However,manyoftheinterventionsdevelopedtoaddress otherareas,suchasimprovededucationandsupport,couldassist RANstocopewiththesedemands.

RANs found social issues such as establishing professional boundaries,findingtimetounwind,initiatingormaintainingsocial interaction, and maintaining personal relationships, difficult to manage.Themaininterventionaimedtoimprovesocialsupport andinteractionwastointroduceinternetconnectionsinallRANs’

accommodation.

SomeRANsreportedthatstaffingissueshadamajorimpacton stresslevels.Theyalsoreportedalackofreliefstaff.ManyRANsand healthcentremanagersreportedbeingtiredofcontinuallyorien- tatingnewstaff.TherewasalsoconcernexpressedbysomeRANs aboutthecapabilitiesofshort-termstaffandthelackofcontinuity ofcare.Toaddressthelackofreliefstaff,RANsproposedtoidentify thenumberofreliefpositionsrequired,andincreasethenumber ofrelieversandestablishapermanentreliefpool.

MostRANsreportedfacinga range of challenges relatingto cross-cultural environments.These included differences in lan- guage,socialnormsand genderroles,disparityinreligiousand spiritual practices, and contestedvalues and beliefs relating to healthandillness.Therewasconsiderablediscussionaboutfeeling caughtbetweenwesternnursingpracticesandprevailingcultural

(5)

Table1

Summaryofoccupationalstressinterventions.

ProposedIntervention ImplementedbyJan2015yes/no

Remotecontext Emotionaldemands

ImproveeducationandorientationofRANs Yes,exceptforagencystaff

Reduceorientationburnout Highstaffturnoverhaspreventedthisfrom

happening Socialissues

Introduceinternetconnectioninallaccommodation No

Staffingissues

Extrapositionscreatedtoreducesinglenurseposts Yes

Increasepermanentreliefstaff No

IncreasenumberofRANs Therehasbeensomeincrease

IncreaseofAboriginalstaffemployed AnumberofadditionalAboriginalcommunity

workershavebeenemployed Increaseemploymentandtrainingofancillarystaffincludingadmin,cleanersanddrivers Yes

Increasereliefstaffbyincreasingowncasualpool No

Identifyreliefpositionnumbers No

AdvertisingRANcampaigninAliceSprings No

Inter-culturalfactors

IncreaseorientationandeducationofRANsonculturalissues Yes

Isolation

Internetconnectioninallaccommodation No

Equipmentandinfrastructure

Improvemanagementbyemployinganequipmentmanager Yes

Improvefeedbackaboutminornewworksbyintroducingfeedbacksystem Yes

Improveabilityofclinicstopurchaseminoritemseasilybyintroducingcreditcards Yes Ensurepromptevacuationsbyretenderofair-medicalcontract(topend) Yes

Introducetrackingsystemforrepairs No

Ensureloanequipmentsamestandardasclinicequipment No

Investigatetravellingteamsofplumberandelectrician No

Areaservicemanagerstoreviewsystemofrepairsforeacharea No

Increasenumberofvehiclestoensureeverycommunityhastwo Ongoingduetofundingimplications

Introducestandardfitoutofambulances(TopEnd) No

Increaseaccommodation No

Lobbyforadditionalaccommodation On-going

Increasecleanlinessofclinicsandaccommodationwithamajorcleanonceayearbyvisitingteams No RANs,visitorstopayabondorchargedacleaningfeeifaccommodationleftinunacceptablecondition No

Healthcentremanagerstomonitorconditionofaccommodation No

WorkloadandResponsibilitiesandexpectations Responsibilitiesandexpectations

IntroducecareerpathwayforRANs,allowingsometobelearners Yes,Level3positionsestablished Strengthenpathwaysprogram(educationprogramforRANS)orcreateanewprogram No

Establishasteeringgrouptodrivethestrengtheningprogram No

Introducemoreon-siteeducation No

Employadditionalremoteeducators Yes

IncreasenumberofRANshavingaperiodofonetoseveralweeksinRoyalDarwinHospitalforupskilling (TopEnd)

No EnsureappropriateorientationofallRANsandreduceorientationburnoutamongstaffby:

-introducingbuddyingsystemforallnewRANs(whenpossible) No

-investigatingonlinemodulesthroughAustralianNursingFederation(ANF),RemoteAreaHealthCorp (RAHC),CentreforRemoteHealth(CRH),CRANAplus

Yes

-investigatingthepossibilityofavirtualclinic Investigatedbutnofundingavailable

-developorientationinformationforRemoteHealthwebsite Yes

-redeveloporientationpackage yes

Workload

Increasecoordinationofvisitingteamstoreduceworkload Yes

IncreasetrainingonNTDH&Felectronicsystemstoreduceworkloadonfillinginforms Yes Increaseemploymentandtrainingofancillarystaffincludingadministration,cleanersanddrivers No

IncreasenumberofRANs Increasing

Support

Improveorientationandeducation Yes,exceptforagencystaff

Increasenumberofremoteeducators Yes

On-call

Increasestaffnumberstoreducethefrequencyofon-callforallstaffmembers Gradual Management

Establisheducationrequirementsformanagers,linkedtocareerpathway No

Healthcentremanagerstoundertakegraduatestudy No

Createscholarshipsx5offeredtohealthcentremanagers No

Increaseinformationfromexitinterviewsreceivedbymanagementteam No

IncreasethenumberofRANscompletingexitinterviews No

Introducefeedbacksystemformanagementbydistributingemployeeopinionsurvey No Violenceandsafetyconcerns

Workplaceviolence

Improveon-callsystems Yes

Improveunderstandingandreportingofvicarioustrauma,PTSDforhealthcentremanagersandRANsby providingeducation

No

(6)

Table1(Continued) Safetyconcerns

AreaservicemanagerstoundertakeareviewofsecurityandreporttoOH&S No Reintroducemanagingaggressionandriskmanagementaspartoforientation Yes Improvesafetywhileon-callby:

-installationofphonesystemsinallclinics Ongoing

-ImproveOH&SbyintroducingOH&Scommittee,withaseniormanageroncommittee No

-IntroduceRiskManinreportingofcriticalincidents Yes

-Increaseuseofescortsforon-callatnight No

HLRG,highlevelreferencegroup;RANs,remoteareanurses;ANF,AustralianNursingFederation;RAHC,RemoteAreaHealthCorp;CRH,CentreforRemoteHealth;CRANAplus, CouncilofRemoteAreaNursesofAustraliaplus;DoH&F,DepartmentofHealthandFamilies;OH&S,occupationalhealthandsafety;PTSD,post-traumaticstressdisorder;

TE,TopEnd.

practices.Theinterventionssuggestedwereincreasedorientation andeducationofRANsonculturalissues.

Thedifficultieswithinfrastructureandequipmentandinpar- ticular,withmaintenance,causedagreatdealoffrustrationamong RANsandhealthcentremanagers.Thevastdistancescontributed greatlytothedifficultiesandexpenseingettingequipmentand infrastructurerepaired.Toimprovethemanagementofequipment, RANsproposedtoemployanequipmentmanager,tointroducea trackingsystemforrepairs,andtomakeloanequipmentthesame standardandmodelasclinicequipment.RANsalsorecommended thatallhealthcentreshaveaminimumoftwovehicles.Thelack ofaccommodationinmanycommunitieswasidentifiedaslimiting thenumberofon-sitestaff,visitingteamsandtheabilityofhealth centrestotakestudents.Itwasalsoagreedthataccommodation neededtobeincreased.

3.1.2. Workloadandscopeofpractice

Thenatureofnursingpracticeinremoteareasisuniqueand hasimplicationsforthelevelofresponsibilitiesandexpectations ofthecommunityandtheemployers,workload,difficultieswith support,andtheon-callthatRANsarerequiredtodo.Therewas acommonlyheldviewamongRANsthattheremotecommuni- tiesandhealthserviceshaveunrealisticexpectationsthatcannot bemet.Thisisoftenexacerbatedbytheadvanced practicerole thatRANsarerequiredtoperformwithoutadequateprofessional preparation.

Theseresponsibilitiesandexpectationswerelinkedtothelack oforientationandinadequateeducationfor theadvanced prac- ticerolesrequiredinremotecommunities.Suggestedinterventions includedtheintroductionofmoreon-siteeducatorsandencour- aging RANs to have a training period in the local hospital for up-skilling.

Lackoforientationwasakeyissuerelatedtoresponsibilitiesand expectations.Only65%ofRANsintheNTreceivedanorientationto theirposition,andforthosethatdid,lessthanhalfthoughtitwas adequate(Lenthall,Wakerman,Dollardetal.,2011).The‘frontline’

natureofremoteareahealthworkandthelackofresidentmed- icalandalliedhealthpractitionersdictatethatnursesaresubject togreaterworkloads(Lenthall,Wakerman, Dollardetal.,2011).

Nearlyallworkshopparticipantsreportedfeeling overwhelmed bythe volume ofwork theywere expectedto do. Participants reportedthattheon-callrequirementsandthefrequentturnover ofstaffexacerbatedthissituation.Themaininterventionincluded increasedstaff,inparticularincreasedAboriginalstaff,inallareas oftheremotehealthservice.

AnothermajorworkloadissueidentifiedbyRANsand health centremanagerworkgroupswastheworkloadcreatedby“flyin/fly out”visitingteams.Remotecommunitiesmaybeservedbyspe- cialistoutreachteamssuchascardiologyandobstetrics,aswell asvisitingteamssuchasmidwifery,childhealth,rheumaticheart diseaseandexternalorganisationssuchastheFredHollowsFoun- dation.Therewas little coordination ofteam visits, withsome arrivingwithoutnoticeandtwoormorearrivingatthesametime.

Workgroupssuggestedthatvisitingteams:(1)bepartofthe expansionoftheclinicteam;(2)workwiththeclinicteamonmat- tersthattheclinicteamidentify;(3)scheduleasetnumberofvisits peryear;(4)donotjointhedoctor’scharterplanevisitasthedoc- tor’sclinicisalreadybusy;(5)askhealthcentremanagerswhenisa convenienttimetovisit;(6)donotbringadditionalpeoplewithout checkingwiththehealthcentremanagers;(7)haveprotocolsfor visitingteamsestablishedineachdistrict;and(8)havecalendars thathavebeennegotiatedsenttothehealthcentremanagersfor agreement.

3.1.3. Poormanagement

RANsandhealthcentremanagersidentifiedpoormanagement asakeyissue.NearlyallRANsreporteddifficultieswithmiddle orseniormanagement.Manyfeltunsupportedbymanagersand theyfeltthatsomemanagershadapoorunderstandingoftheir roles as RANs.They perceivedthat this wasworse the further managerswerefromthe‘grassroots’.Membersoftheimplemen- tationcommitteeandthehighlevelreferencegroupassessedthat attimesthecomplaintsaboutmanagementwerenotlegitimate.

Theyperceivedthatmanagementwasaneasytargetforunhappy RANs.However, all participantsagreed that educationrequire- mentsshouldbeestablishedformanagers,andtheserequirements shouldbelinkedtocareerpathways.

3.1.4. Violenceandsafetyconcerns

Violenceandsafetyconcernswerestronglylinked.Manyofthe safetyconcernswererelatedtoviolencewithinthecommunityor towardsRANs.Intheworkgroupsthereweremarkeddifferencesin participants’concernsaboutworkplaceviolence.Whilesome,par- ticularlythosewhohadexperiencedpersonalviolence,werevery concerned,othersdidnotconsiderworkplaceviolenceanissue atall.Interventionsincludedreducingsinglenurseclinics,intro- ducingon-callphonesystemsandincreasingtheuseofdriverson call-outsafterhours.Itwasalsoagreedtoimproveunderstand- ingandreportingofviolentincidentsbyprovidinghealthcentre managersandRANswitheducationonvicarioustraumaandpost- traumaticstressdisorder.

3.2. Priorities

The workgroups and implementation committee in Central AustraliaandtheTopEndwereaskedtoprioritisetheoccupational stressinterventions.InCentralAustralia,thefivehighestpriorities inorderwere:(1)permanentreliefstaff;(2)improvededucationof RANs,includingadequateorientationforallstaff;(3)aminimum oftwovehiclesateachcommunity;(4)employmentofanequip- mentmanager;and(5)increasedstaff,especiallyAboriginalstaffat cliniclevel.TheTopEndworkgroupsandimplementationcommit- teeagreedonsixpriorities:(1)adequatestaff;(2)asecondvehicle in each community withstandard basicfit outof ambulances;

(3)increasedRANaccommodation;(4)increasedpermanentrelief

(7)

pool;(5)improvededucationforRANs;and(6)internetaccessin allaccommodation.

3.3. Implementationofoccupationalstressinterventions

Someinterventionswereimplemented, howevermanywere not.ThesearesummarisedinTable1.

3.4. Evaluation

3.4.1. Processevaluation

Feedback provided in thepost-workshop evaluationsurveys wasmainlypositive.ParticipantsfoundtheRANandhealthcen- tremanagerworkgroupsandimplementationcommitteemeetings generallyinterestingandengaging,thefacilitatorseffective,and participantsthoughtthattheirinputwasvalued.Incontrast,the resultsfrom the process evaluation obtainedfrom survey two, completedsomemonthsaftertheendofthePAR/organisational developmentprocess,werefarlesspositive.Themajority26of37 respondents(71%)feltthatlittleornotrusthadbeenbuiltduring theprocess,and29of37(79%)respondentsthattheactionplans oftheinterventionshadnotbeensubstantially.

3.4.2. Outcomeevaluation

Therewasasignificantimprovementindifficultieswithinfras- tructureandequipmentintheTopEnd.Therewasanimprovement inlackofsupportinCA,howevertherewasalsoanimprovement insupportinthecontrolgroup.Therewerenoothersignificant improvementsamongtheothervariables(SeeTable2).

Therewerealsonoimprovementsovertheprevious12months intheareasofworkload,education,staffreliefandmanagement forCAorfortheTopEnd(seeTable3).

4. Discussion

Numerouspractical and thoughtful interventionsrelating to staffing,training,safetyandimprovinginfrastructureandequip- mentwereidentified.Theemphasisassuggestedbytheliterature focusedondeveloping primary, secondary andtertiary occupa- tionalstressinterventions.However,theimplementationofmany oftheseinterventionsprovedtobeextremelydifficult.Therewere fivemain reasonsidentified by theresearchteam for thenon- implementation.Firstly,therewereanumberofcontextualissues thatwereimpossibletoinfluenceorovercome.Thehighturnoverof RANsandthedifficultyinrecruitmentofRANsresultsinavicious cycle.Itisdifficulttoreduceoccupationalstressandimplement manyoftheinterventionswithsuchanunstableworkforce.Second, therewasalackoffundingtoresourcetheimplementationofinter- ventions.Whilstservicepartnerscontributedincashandinkindto thestudy,therewasnoadditionalfundingbytheserviceprovider toimplementtherecommendedinterventions.Third,lowerstan- dardsofequipmentandinfrastructureinremotecommunitiesare oftenacceptedbyhealthservices,staffandcommunitymembers.

Maintenance of buildings and equipment wasoften below the acceptablenationalstandardsinremotecommunities.

Fourth,therewereinteragencycomplexities.Someofthebuild- ingsandaccommodationareownedbydepartmentsotherthanthe NTDH&Fandotherdepartmentshaveauthorityovervariouspieces ofequipment.Implementingsomeoftheinterventionsrequired agreementbymultipledepartmentsandprovedextremelycom- plex.Lastly,theimplementationperiodof12monthswasprobably tooshorttoimplementmanyoftheinterventions.Itisimportant tonotethatimplementationhascontinuedaftertheendofthe studyanditishopedmoreoccupationalstressinterventionswill beimplementedinthefuture.

ViolenceandsafetyofRANsremainsamajorissue.Thiswas tragicallyhighlightedbythemurderofaRANinSouthAustralia atEaster2016.ThedeathhaspromptedmanyRANsandorganisa- tionstoexaminetheirsafetypractices.Inparticulartherehasbeena strongmovementtolimitRANsattendingcalloutsatnightontheir own,consistent,sadly,withthe‘BackfromtheEdge’studyfind- ingsandrecommendations.TheNTDepartmentofHealthreporton remoteareanursesafety(NorthernTerritoryDepartmentofHealth, 2016),frequentlycitedpapersfromtheBFTEstudyandrecommen- dationsthatwerenotpreviouslyimplementedincluding;

•thatafterhourscall-outsinremotecommunitiesareundertaken byateamoftwopeople(Recommendation1a);

•minimumorientationrequirementsaremandatedforallremote PrimaryHealthCarestaff(Recommendation5a);

•considerationisgiventoprovidingstandardisedinternetaccess innurseshousestofacilitateaccesstoon-lineresourcesincluding procedures,protocolsandlearningmodules(Recommendation 5c);

•re-introductionofarelievingstaffpool(Recommendation6);

•strengthen‘BackonTrack’,Indigenousemploymentinitiatives acrossallemploymentcategories forAboriginal staff(Recom- mendation8)(NorthernTerritoryDepartmentofHealth,2016).

Itisexpectedthattheimplementationofmanyoftheoccupa- tionalstressinterventions,willbeongoingforsomeyears.

5. Limitations

Priortoandduringtheresearchperiod,therewasconsiderable turmoilwithinremoteAboriginalcommunitiesandhealthservices intheNT.Therewasagreatdealofpoliticalactionincludingthe AustralianGovernmentInterventionintotheNT,acontroversial package ofchangestowelfareprovision,lawenforcement,land tenureandothermeasures,introducedbytheAustralianfederal governmentunderJohnHoward,beginningin2007andcontinuing throughouttheproject.In2009,whentheworkgroupsofRANsand healthcentremanagerswerebeingconducted,therewasanout- breakofH1N1influenza(humanswineflu).Considerableresources withintheNTDH&Fwereredirectedtomanagingthisoutbreak.

ThisgreatlyincreasedtheworkloadofRANs,healthcentreman- agers,and managerswithinthehealthdepartmentandmadeit moredifficultforsomeunitstoattendtheworkshops.

6. Conclusions

The‘Backfromtheedge:reducingoccupationalstressamong RANsintheNorthernTerritory’studyusedanadaptedPAR/OD modeltodevelopandimplementoccupationalstressinterventions.

Theprocessevaluationsoftheworkshopswereverypositivebut theoutcomeevaluationsshowedlowimplementationofinterven- tionsandlow impactonsourcesand outcomesofoccupational stress.Nevertheless,thenewknowledgecreatedbythestudyis useful.Theissuesrelatingtocreatingastable,well-educatedand well-managedworkforcewiththephysicalresourcesrequiredto fulfilachallengingjobremainoutstandingandwillnotgoaway withoutfurtherintervention.

Thenewknowledgegeneratedinthisstudyshouldinformpol- icyandpracticewithrespecttoservicedeliveryinremoteareas.

Thereareimplicationsinregardtoservicemodels.Theseneedtobe adequatelyresourced,staffbetterpreparedandservices,especially visitingservices,betterco-ordinated.Tomaximiseeffectiveness, thereneedstobegreaterinterdepartmentalco-ordinationorratio- nalisationinordertoensurethetimelymaintenanceofessential equipmentandinfrastructure.

(8)

Table2

NTsamplesandcontrolgroupoutcomemeasures.

TopEnd CA Control(otherRNsinvremote

communitiesoutsidetheNT

Survey1 Survey2 Survey1 Survey2 Survey1 Survey2

Systemcapacity Totalsystemcapacity

Number 32 43 30 25 59 83

Mean 26.13 24.63 22.23 22.52 25.61 25.12

SD 7.49 9.63 8.27 6.97 9.29 9.12

Sig. p=0.81n/s p=0.41n/s p=0.66n/s

Flexibleandadaptableculture,Subscaleofsystemcapacity

Number 35 60 27 26 61 89

Mean 5.09 4.6 4.19 4.08 4.72 4.31

SD 1.77 1.65 1.78 1.65 2.00 2.12

Sig. p=0.18n/s p=0.35n/s p=0.68n/s

Consultationandpreparation,Subscaleofsystemcapacity

Number 34 44 26 26 61 84

Mean 8.82 8.91 7.73 8.50 9.11 8.90

SD 2.68 3.48 3.04 2.45 3.05 3.58

Sig. p=0.94n/s p=0.15n/s p=0.90n/s

Communication,Subscaleofsystemcapacity

Number 35 57 27 27 63 89

Mean 4.14 4.42 3.70 4.07 3.98 4.04

SD 1.96 1.86 1.92 1.86 1.96 1.92

Sig. p=0.36n/s p=0.44n/s p=0.43n/s

Psychosocialsafetyclimate,Subscaleofsystemcapacity

Number 33 45 31 27 62 88

Mean 12.09 11.27 10.71 9.78 12.02 12.15

SD 3.52 4.21 3.68 2.89 3.70 3.87

Sig. p=0.83n/s p=0.11n/s p=0.64n/s

Positiveoutcomes Workengagement

Number 33 55 27 26 60 88

Mean 4.61 4.54 4.42 4.56 4.35 4.41

SD 1.07 1.03 1.24 0.98 1.22 1.18

Sig. p=0.76n/s p=0.65n/s p=0.77n/s

Jobsatisfaction

Number 35 53 27 26 61 85

Mean 4.29 4.02 4.26 4.31 4.16 4.19

SD 1.07 1.41 1.40 1.26 0.97 1.16

Sig. p=0.34n/s p=0.89n/s p=0.87n/s

Jobresources Supervision

Number 34 57 26 26 63 87

Mean 11.62 10.79 9.38 9.38 9.03 9.47

SD 3.59 4.13 3.32 5.05 3.94 4.66

Sig. p=0.33n/s Nodifference p=0.92n/s

Opportunitiesforprofessionaldevelopment

Number 34 57 27 27 63 89

Mean 9.29 9.25 9.56 8.70 8.41 8.13

SD 3.09 3.62 3.79 3.21 4.30 4.03

Sig. p=0.83n/s p=0.64n/s p=0.92n/s

Jobcontrol

Number 33 52 23 25 61 88

Mean 21.55 24.19 24.83 23.76 21.05 22.82

SD 8.07 8.31 9.25 9.12 8.20 8.47

Sig. p=0.15n/s p=0.47n/s p=n/s

Negativeoutcomes Psychologicaldistress,GHQ

Number 34 57 27 26 62 88

Mean 13.58 13.12 11.56 12.58 12.08 11.56

SD 7.08 6.94 5.27 6.23 5.31 5.10

Sig. p=0.81n/s p=0.52n/s p=0.54n/s

Emotionalexhaustion

Number 33 62 29 27 63 88

Mean 20.82 20.01 25.33 20.59 21.42 20.11

SD 14.02 12.76 14.66 11.97 12.62 12.13

Sig. p=0.78n/s p=0.19n/s p=0.60n/s

PTSDSymptoms,Posttraumaticstressdisorderchecklist(PCL)

Number 34 56 26 27 60 87

Mean 10.41 11.34 11.19 9.89 10.72 9.77

SD 11.74 12.17 10.54 11.00 10.71 12.01

Sig. p=0.72n/s p=0.66n/s p=0.62n/s

RANStressScale WitnessedViolence

Number 33 55 27 27 60 86

Mean 11.64 14.75 9.63 10.93 9.77 9.88

SD 6.10 8.91 6.81 5.87 6.44 6.33

Sig. p=0.98n/s p=0.23n/s p=0.44n/s

PersonalViolence

Number 34 53 27 26 60 88

Mean 5.85 7.15 5.44 5.81 5.95 6.38

SD 4.55 5.31 4.49 4.35 4.98 5.16

(9)

Table2(Continued)

TopEnd CA Control(otherRNsinvremote

communitiesoutsidetheNT

Survey1 Survey2 Survey1 Survey2 Survey1 Survey2

Sig. p=0.24n/s p=0.44n/s p=0.61n/s

Emotionaldemands

Number 34 57 27 27 63 89

Mean 8.32 7.88 7.78 7.63 7.19 7.01

SD 2.04 3.02 3.25 2.63 2.79 2.66

Sig. p=0.45n/s p=0.14n/s p=0.69n/s

Poormanagement

Number 34 43 24 24 57 86

Mean 13.32 16.05 14.67 16.50 14.77 15.74

SD 9.86 11.63 10.60 10.09 10.75 12.46

Sig. p=0.28n/s p=0.54n/s p=0.34n/s

Staffingdifficulties

Number 35 44 26 26 60 86

Mean 13.03 13.27 11.77 12.38 8.55 11.92

SD 6.61 7.44 7.24 6.71 6.41 9.23

Sig. p=0.76n/s p=0.35n/s p=0.016*

On-call

Number 35 45 27 26 60 85

Mean 15.63 17.69 18.19 17.73 16.93 18.47

SD 4.26 6.44 3.10 7.81 8.21 7.12

Sig. p=0.11n/s p=1n/s p=0.75n/s

Workload

Number 35 45 26 27 61 89

Mean 21.54 20.76 22.00 19.37 18.54 17.63

SD 5.39 6.82 5.96 7.76 7.21 6.18

Sig. p=0.58n/s p=0.16n/s p=0.41n/s

ResponsibilitiesandExpectations

Number 35 45 27 26 60 85

Mean 25.11 25.69 21.78 22.08 23.92 21.93

SD 9.50 12.59 11.56 10.33 11.55 11.81

Sig. p=0.97n/s p=0.29n/s p=0.46n/s

Safetyconcerns

Number 35 44 27 26 63 88

Mean 9.23 11.59 9.22 9.12 10.81 10.68

SD 7.20 8.65 7.38 6.41 8.69 7.52

Sig. p=0.199n/s p=0.24n/s p=0.11n/s

Socialissues

Number 35 44 27 27 63 87

Mean 9.37 8.48 9.37 10.11 10.52 9.02

SD 6.20 6.56 5.20 5.67 6.43 6.16

Sig. p=0.54n/s p=0.67n/s p=0.15n/s

Isolation

Number 35 45 27 27 63 88

Mean 9.14 10.69 11.07 11.15 10.84 12.08

SD 5.87 6.24 6.20 6.35 6.18 6.59

Sig. p=0.26n/s p=0.55n/s p=0.25n/s

Interculturalfactors

Number 35 45 26 27 62 89

Mean 10.86 10.33 12.27 10.19 7.24 8.36

SD 4.09 5.70 6.00 5.02 6.34 6.38

Sig. p=0.98n/s p=0.18n/s p=0.29n/s

Cultureshock

Number 35 45 26 27 62 89

Mean 8.03 6.56 10.35 7.41 6.58 6.27

SD 5.47 6.23 7.41 6.01 6.99 6.65

Sig. p=0.27n/s p=0.12n/s p=0.33n/s

LackofSupport

Number 33 44 26 27 63 88

Mean 15.94 13.64 17.50 12.22 17.54 13.51

SD 6.87 6.97 6.59 5.33 6.49 7.52

Sig. p=0.15n/s p=0.0023** p=0.0008**

Infrastructureandequipmentdifficulties

Number 35 45 27 26 59 88

Mean 20.66 25.58 25.07 22.15 17.90 19.20

SD 8.33 11.28 8.53 8.53 9.14 11.06

Sig. p=0.034* p=0.22n/s p=0.46n/s

n/s,notsignificant,*significant,**highlysignificant.

CA,CentralAustralia.

Highernumbers=higherlevels.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait