Potassium iontophoresis as an experimental pain stimulus : its psychophysical characteristics and its utility for investigating the spinal modulation of pain : a thesis presented in partial

(1)

Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for

a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and

private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without

the permission of the Author.

(2)

POTASSIUM IONTOPHORESIS AS AN EXPERIMENTAL PAIN STIMULUS: ITS PSYCHOPHYSICAL

CHARACTERISTICS AND ITS UTILITY FOR

INVESTIGATING THE SPINAL MODULATION OF PAIN

A

Thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Psychology

at Massey University

Steven Albert Humphries

1995

(3)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

I would like to thank my fIrst superviser Professor Nigel Long for his helpful assistance, practical advice and patience; Malcolm Johnson for his help and useful ideas; Dr John Podd for believing in good experimental design; and Dr. Alan Winton for his constant support, and for being enthusiastic about psychology.

I would also like to thank the people who gladly volunteered for the experimental studies.

A special thanks to Andrea who proof-read the draft. Thank you for helping me at the important fmal stage.

And, finally, to my wife Sharon and family who provided love and understanding throughout the research. Your support has helped me bring this thesis to fruition.

11

(4)

ABSTRACT

The present study investigated the psychophysical characteristics of potassium iontophoresis and its suitability as an experimental pain stimulus. Experiment One investigated the optimal duration of the pain stimulus for reliable reporting across repeated trials, and whether the relationship between stimulus and subject response was linear, logarithmic or a power function. Experiment Two determined the optimal inter-stimulus interval (lSI) for reliable pain reporting and evaluated stimulus history effects, both in tenns of session effects and the effects of immediately preceding stimuli. Experiment Three compared potassium iontophoresis with a sodium iontophoresis control.

Linear functions described the stimulus-pain relationship best. No significant differences in the goodness-of-fit coefficients of determination, correlations, or coefficients of variation, were found for the stimulus durations of 1 , 2 and

4

seconds. Significant stimulus history effects were found across a session, with adaptation and enhancement of responding for low and moderate intensity stimuli respectively. The effects of the immediately preceding stimuli were suppression or enhancement of pain response depending on the lSI, the preceding stimulus intensity and the present stimulus intensity. Potassium iontophoresis was a significantly more effective pain stimulus than sodium iontophoresis.

It was concluded that potassium iontophoresis is a convenient and reliable experimental pain stimulus. It can be presented rapidly and repeatedly with minimal loss in consistency of subject pain report. Potassium iontophoresis provides a technique for investigating the neural modulation of pain in the relative absence of inflammation processes and tissue damage.

. The properties of potassium iontophoresis determined in Experiments One, Two and Three indicated that it could be an ideal nociceptive stimulus for a quantitative analysis of some of the spinal modulation mechanisms predicted by the gate control theory of pain. Clinical and experimental support for the gate control theory of pain was overviewed.

111

(5)

According to the gate control theory of pain a peripheral stimulus that activated both small and large-diameter afferent fibres would be perceived as painful, though there would be some reduction in the intensity of the pain due to the inhibitory action of the large fibre activity.

The present study investigated a prediction of gate control theory that there would be a transient increase in pain above that of the background level - a pulse of pain - as the pain stimulus was being

ramped

off due to the large fibre activity at the spinal level falling away more quickly due to the different peripheral conduction velocities of large and small fibres. A further prediction was that the more distant the peripheral stimulus was from the spine the greater the pain pulse would be for any given ramp-off rate. Supraspinal pain modulatory mechanisms were overviewed but excluded as possibly obscuring the predicted pain pulse generated through the ramping off of the peripheral nociceptive stimulus.

Fourteen subjects had the experimental pain stimulus of iontophoretically applied potassium ions (K+) applied to an upper and a lower site on the dominant arm. Each stimulus trial consisted of four seconds of constant pain followed by the stimulus being ramped off. In a threshold detection task a double random staircase method was used to adjust the riunp-off rate.

Subjects were asked to indicate if they could detect a brief pulse of additional pain during this ramp-off phase. Subjects were clearly able to detect a pulse of pain at both sites. The average rate of stimulus ramp-off in order to detect a pain pulse was statistically greater for the upper

arm site

(14.3

J.1.g K+/s), than for the lower-arm site

(9.4

J.1.g K+/s). The average ramp-off time required �o generate a detectable pain pulse was

192

ms and

261

ms for the upper and lower arm sites respectively.

These results were consistent with the predictions of gate control theory and our ramp-off . model. Alternative explanations for the results, including intrinsic differences in nociceptive

responding for different dermatomes and anode break excitation, were considered.

IV

(6)

It was concluded that the detection of a pain pulse during the ^ramping off of a peripheral pain stimulus potentially provides a quantitative measure of the spinal modulation of pain as described by the gate control theory of pain. However, further studies would be required to confirm the causal mechanisms that generate the observed pulse of pain.

v

(7)

CHAPTER 5: EXPERIMENTS ONE TO THREE - GENERAL METHOD 5.0

General method for Experiment One, Two and Three...

31

5.1

^{S ubjects}...

31

5.2

Apparatus ...

.

^.......

.

...

. 31

5.2.1

VAS measure

. . .

^..^...

.

^..

. . . .

^.

.

^.

.

^.

.

^.

.

^.

.

^.

..

^..

. . .

^{... .}

.

^.^.

. .

...

.

^...

..

^..

.

^.

.. 33

5.3

^Procedure^...^.

..

^.

.

^...

.

^.

.

^...

.

^...

.

^..

.

^..

. . . .

^.

...

^.

..

^..

..

^.

. .

^.

.

^.

..

^...

.

^.

. . . .

^.^.

. . . . .

^.

34

5.3.1

Experimental design ^...

.

^...

.

^...

. . . .

^..

.

^...

.

...

. . . 37

5.4

Statistical Analysis ...

.

^{. ..}

.

^...

. .

^{. . .}

.

^.

.

^.^....

38

CHAPTER

6:

EXPERIMENT ONE - STIMULUS DURATION 6.0

Introduction: The effects of stimulus duration on subject responding ^...

. .

^...

. 39

6.1

^Method

.

^.

. . . .

^.

.

^.

.

^.

. ...

.

^.

.. '" . . . .. . . 40

6.2

Results and Discussion ^..

.

^...

.

^.

.

^....

. .

^.

. . . .

^{. .}

.

^.

.

^.

. .

^.

.

^...

. . .

^...

.

^.

. . . .

^.

. .

^.

.

^.

.

^{. .}

.. 41

CHAPTER 7: EXPERIMENT TWO - INTERSTIMULUS INTERVAL 7.0

Introduction: The effects of interstimulus interval on subject responding.. ^.

. . 5 1

7.1. Method...

. . . .. . . .. . . 54

7.2

Results and Discussion

.

^...

. . . .

^.

.

^{. . . .. .}

. . . .

^.

. . .

^.

.

^.

.

^.

.

. ... . . .

.

^.

. .

^{. .}

.

^...

.

^.

.

^..

.

^.

. 55

Vll

. - '

(9)

CHAPTER 8: EXPERIMENT THREE - SODIUM CONTROL

8.0

Introduction: Potassium iontophoresis compared with a sodium control.

. . .. 63

V Ill

8.1

^Method...

64

8.2

Results and Discussion ...

65

CHAPTER 9: GENERAL DISCUSION: EXPERIMENTS ONE, TWO AND THREE 9.0

General discussion of Experiment One, Two and Three ...

69

9.1

Potassium iontophoresis and the requirements for an experimental pain stimulus..

. . .. . . .. . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . .. . . .. . . . .. 69

9.2

The psychophysics of potassium iontophoresis

.

^..

. .

^{... . .}

.

^...^......^...

.

.^..

73

.9.3

The use of potassium iontophoresis to investigate pain mechanisms

.. . . .. 77

CHAPTER 10: OVERVIEW OF THE GATE CONTROL THEORY OF PAIN 1 0.0

Overview of the gate control theory of pain ...

79

10.1

Clinical support for gate control theory... .

. . . . . . . . . . . . .. 82

10.2

Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) ^.

. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. . 83

10.3

Dorsal column stimulation .^...^....^....^..^..^...

.

^.^.^.^..

..

^...^.

.

^...

.

^...

.

^.^.^.

.

^.^.

.

^..

...

^.^...

. 87

lOA Peripheral vibratory stimulation ^.

.

^...^.^....

.

^...

.

^..^.

.

^.

.

^.^.^{. .}

.

^.^.. . . .

.

^.^.

.

^...^.^..^.^.

.

^.^..

88

10.5

Time course for spinal nociceptive processes

.

^.

. .

^..^{. .}^...

.

^.^.^{. . .}

.

^.

.

^..^.

.

^...

.

^.

.

^.^.^..

90

CHAPTER 11: SUPRASPINAL INFLUENCES ON PAIN PROCESSING 1 1 .0

Supraspinal influences on spinal nociceptive processes .^{. . .}

.

^..^.^.

.

^{. .}

. . .

^.

. .

^..

.

^...

. 93

1 1 .1

Descending supraspinal influences.. .

. . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . . . . . . . . 93

1 1 .2

Ascending supraspinal influences ^.....^{. .}....

.

^...^..^.^..^..

.

^...^.^....^.^{. . .}

.

^...

.

^.

.

^.^.

.

^.

95

1 1 .3

Supraspinal controls and gate control theory

..

^.

.

^...

.

^...

.

^..^...^.^...

.

^.

.

^..^.

96

(10)

CHAPTER 12: INVESTIGATION OF GATE CONTROL THEORY USING POTASSIUM IONTOPHORESIS

12.0 Investigation of gate control theory by ramping off a potassium

iontophoretic pain stimulus

^...

..

...

98

12.1 Mathematical simulation model of ramping off a potassium iontophoretic

pain stimulus

^.

.

^...

.

...

.

^....

.

...

. 104 12.2 Assumptions underlying the ramping off of potassium iontophoresis

. . .

106 12.2.1 Assumptions involving sustained nociceptive neural processes . . . 108

CHAPTER 13: EXPERIMENT FOUR - INVESTIGATION OF THE GATE CONTROL THEORY OF PAIN

13.0 Introduction: Investigation of the gate control theory of pain...

III

13.1 Method

. . . .. . .

111 13.2 Results and discussion: Time of ramp -off of nociceptive stimulus

^{. . . .}

.

^{. . .}

.

^{. .}

114 13.3 Results and discussion: Reaction times

to

nociceptive stimulus

. . . .

.

^{. . .}^.^..

. 120

CHAPTER 14: EXPERIMENT FIVE - INVESTIGATION OF GATE CONTROL THEORY WITH A SODIUM CONTROL

14.0 Introduction: Investigation of gate control theory with a sodium

control...

. .. . . .. . ... ... . . ... ... . ... .. . ... .. . . .. .... ... .. . ... . .. . . .. .. 126

1 4.1 Method . . . .... . . .. . . .. . . 1 26 14.2 Results and discussion

.^{. . . .}.^...^{. . .}..

. .

^{. . . . .}

.

^.^.^.^.^{. . . . .}

.

^{. .}

. .

. . . .

.

. . . ..^{. .}

.

^.

.

^.^.

129

CHAPTER 15: GENERAL DISCUSION: EXPERIMENTS FOUR

&

FIVE 15.0 General discussion of Experiment Four and Five

. . . .

.

. . . ..^{. .}

.

^...^.^{. . .}

131 15.1 Conclusions and implications for future re

searc

h

. . . ... . . ..^{. .}..

.

^{. .}

.

. . . 132

IX

(11)

REFERENCES

. . .

135

APPENDIX A: Publication of Experiments One, Two and

Three in

the journal 'Perception

&

Psychophysics' ... ...

^.

.

^{. .}

...

^..

.

^{. . .}

.

^{. .}

173

APPENDIX

B:

Subject consent fonn used in Experiment One ...

^.

.

^.

..

^.

.

^{. . .}

..

^.

....

^{. . . . .}

.

^{. .}

.. 186

APPENDIX C: Subject medical check-list used in Experiment One

^.

.

^...

..

^.

.

^..

.

^...

.

^.

188

APPENDIX

D:

Questionnaire used in Experiment One... ... 190

x

(12)

Figure

1:

Figure

2:

Figure 3:

Figure

4:

Figure

5:

Figure

6:

Figure

7:

Figure

8:

Figure

9:

Figure

10:

Figure

11:

LIST OF FIGURES

Depolarization of muscle fibre cell membrane potential as a function

of the log of extracellular K + concentration ^.... . . .... . . ..^{. . . .}.^..^...^...

23

Cross-section of human epidermis showing the iontophoretic transport

of ions across the epidermal barrier ... ...

26

The placement of the anode bowl containing the potassium chloride gel on the volar surface of the subject's arm, with the opposing cathode

silver plate on the dorsal surface of the ^arm

... ... . ... .. ... . ... 32

Visual analogue scale (VAS) - sensory intensity scale...

33

Three-key control panel for moving the cursor on the computer

VDU presented VAS ...

34

VAS pain responses as a function of stimulus intensity. Experiment One. ^.

. . .. 46

The change in ratio scores as a function of lSI, intensity level of the present stimulus, and intensity level of the immediately preceding stimwus in

Experiment Two ... . . . .. . . . ...

59

The linear regression lines for each subject for sodium and potassium

iontophoresis in Experiment Three

... , . . .. . . .. . . .. . ... . . .. . . .. 67

Schematic diagram of the gate control theory of pain mechanisms, as

proposed by Melzack and Wall

(1965)

_.^.._.

.

^...._.^..._.^..._.^....

.

^..._.^..._.^._...^._..^._..^.

80

The rate of applied K+ 'seen' at the spinal level while a peripheral

nociceptive K+stimulus is ramped off over

300

ms

.

^.

.

^..^{. . .}.^{. . . . .}...^{. . . .}..^..

. 103

The rate of applied K+ 'seen' at the spinal level while a peripheral

nociceptive K+stimulus is ramped off over

100

_ms

... 104

Figure

12:

Mathematical simulation of T cell activity in response to peripheral inputs ^.....

105

Figure

13:

Double random staircase threshold detection of the pain pulse for Subject

One and Subject Two

... 116

Figure

14:

Double random staircase threshold detection of the pain pulse averaged

over all subjects ^.......^...^{. .}...^......^....^....^....^..^.....^.....^......

.

^._...^._...^._...^. 1 17

Xl

(13)

LIST OF TABLES

Table

1:

Coefficients of determination (r2) for linear, logarithmic and power

functions for the relationship between iontophoretic potassium stimulus . . .

43

Table

2:

Mean ratio scores, mean VAS responses and Range of VAS means as

a function of stimulus duration. Experiment One ^..

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 49

Table

3:

Coefficient of determination (r2) for linear, logarithmic and power functions for the relationship between iontophoretic potassium stimulus

and pain report on the pain-intensity VAS . Experiment Two

. . . 55

Table

4:

Ratio scores and VAS scores (in brackets) as a function ofISI, session

block and stimulus level. Experiment Two ... . . .

'" . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . 56

Table

5:

Ratio scores and VAS scores (in brackets) as a function of the present and

immediately preceding stimulus pain levels. Experiment Two ^{. . . .}.... . . . ...

58

Table

6:

Coefficients of determination (r2) for linear, logarithmic and power functions for the relationship between iontophoretic potassium stimulus and pain report on the pain-intensity VAS for both the potassium and

sodium groups. ExperiInent Three .. ^.. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . 65 Table

7 :

Average VAS pain response for sodium and potassium iontophoresis.

Experiment Three ^.

. . . 68

Table

8:

Applied stimulus level and the ramp-off rate for the upper and lower

arm sites to produce threshold detection of a pain pulse. Experiment Four ^...

118

Table

9:

Median reaction times to the perceived pain pulse. Experiment Four ... . . . .

122

Table

10:

Ramp rate required to produce a perceptible

pai�

pulse for K+ and Na+

stimulation. Experiment Five .. . . .. . . ... . . .

129

xu

Potassium iontophoresis as an experimental pain stimulus : its psychophysical characteristics and its utility for investigating the spinal modulation of pain : a thesis presented in partial

Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for

INVESTIGATING THE SPINAL MODULATION OF PAIN

ABSTRACT

ramped

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER 5: EXPERIMENTS ONE TO THREE - GENERAL METHOD 5.0

CHAPTER 11: SUPRASPINAL INFLUENCES ON PAIN PROCESSING 1 1 .0

106 12.2.1 Assumptions involving sustained nociceptive neural processes . . . 108

CHAPTER 14: EXPERIMENT FIVE - INVESTIGATION OF GATE CONTROL THEORY WITH A SODIUM CONTROL

REFERENCES

LIST OF FIGURES

LIST OF TABLES