• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Principles of Business Law Notes BLAW10001

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2025

Membagikan "Principles of Business Law Notes BLAW10001"

Copied!
4
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Principles of Business Law Notes BLAW10001

Lecture 1: Nature and Function of Law

• Rules of conduct recognised and enforced by state

• Purpose to achieve justice (fair outcome)

• Developed through:

o State enforcing originally non-legal rules o State developing new regulation

• Classified to allow laws to be manageable and orderly

• Rules of conduct not recognised and enforced by state but rather by moral/religious beliefs, nature or custom

• Works well in small groups but break down in large groups

• Moral and religious beliefs

• Nature

• Custom

o Long usage, peer pressure or convenience

• Elected legislatures (develop legislation) o Commonwealth

o States/ Territories o Local councils

• Courts (develop common law)

• Area of law related to business activities

• Civil Law: Creation and enforcement of private legal rights and duties between individuals

• Contract Law: Private agreements that give rise to legally enforceable rights and duties

• Consumer Protection Law: Legal protections for consumers in dealings with suppliers of goods and services

• Tort Law: Liability for harm wrongfully caused by one person to another or to property

• Agency Law: Use of representative to acquire or discharge legal rights or duties

• Property Law: Acquisition and transfer of private rights in goods and land

• Allows people to plan for future with reasonable certainty

• Lays down rights, duties and powers of members of different classes and groups

• Regulates behaviour by permitting, encouraging, forbidding or discouraging particular activities

• Controls use of force and forbids unauthorised violence

• Creates rights and duties that can be enforced and provides remedies when rights are interfered with or when duties aren’t discharged

(2)

Lecture 4: Contract Formation: Creating Legally Binding Contracts

• Legally enforceable agreement between two or more parties

• Creates legal obligations consisting of rights and duties o Discharged by performance

• Failure to perform contract results in a breach of contract o Basis for compensation or action to enforce agreement

• People tend to fulfil contracts due to convenience and to avoid lawsuits allowing parties to rely on agreements for planning

• Principles of contract formation determined by courts

• Capacity

• Agreement with sufficient certainty for all terms needed for workable transaction o Offer and acceptance

• Intention to be legally binding

o Objective approach is taken where court asks if reasonable person would see agreement as intended to be binding

• Consideration

o Both parties receive a benefit

• Contract can only be made by persons with capacity to acquire legal rights and take on legal responsibilities

• Adults of sound mind and artificial persons such as corporations have capacity

• Minors may be bound to pay a reasonable price for goods acquired pursuant to contracts o Necessities

§ Food and transport

o Agreements substantially to their benefit

§ Employment contracts

• Persons with mental disability or are intoxicated etc are bound by agreements reached in lucid periods, but not otherwise

• Minors can avoid contract with continuing obligations before reaching 18 or short time afterwards otherwise they have decided to continue with it so it becomes a permanent enforceable agreement

• Right to enforce contractual obligations

• Contractual obligations only exist between those who have agreed to undertake them (parties to contract)

o Third parties can’t intervene and claim on behalf of someone else o Courts only want to bind people to things they have agreed to

Facts

• Builder owed money to P but was unable to pay

• E and builder agreed builder would work for E and E would discharge builder’s debt by paying P

• E didn’t discharge builder’s debt to pay P Decision

• P wasn’t a party to agreement between E and building so he can’t claim against E

(3)

Lecture 8: Vitiating Factors

• Sometimes equity sets contracts aside

• Vitiated contract is invalid

• If contract is vitiated, parties must be restored to their pre-contractual position, reversing any performance made

o Different from valid contract where plaintiff put into position they would’ve been in if contract was performed

o Must be done within reasonable time

• Duress

• Mistake

• Undue influence

• Unconscionable dealing

• Misleading conduct

• Duress exists when one party uses or threatens illegitimate force to obtain other party’s agreement o Only doing it due to coercion. Not voluntarily

o Includes physical, economic harm and illegal actions over their goods (such as refusing to return goods)

• May be directed at party themselves or to members of their family or people close to them

• If illegitimate force is used to get consent, contract can be set aside

Facts

• A coerced B into buying shares by threatening to murder him

• B took these threats seriously Decision

• Contract vitiated due to duress

• Contract could be set aside

Facts

• H agreed to build ship for NOS for fixed price in USD

• USD depreciated so building ship was no longer profitable

• H said it wouldn’t build ship unless NOS paid higher price

• NOS needed tanker urgently and paid higher price Decision

• Contract vitiated due to duress

• Threat to terminate exploited NOS’s weak bargaining position

• Even though duress was established, contract wasn’t set aside as NOS didn’t exercise right to set aside contract in reasonable time

(4)

Lecture 11: Agency Law

• A principal can authorise agent to act in their place o Corporations can only act through agents

• Law of agency allows agent to represent principle

o Authorised acts carried out representative on behalf of principal has same effect as if done by principal directly

o Rights and obligations arising from transaction undertaken by agent directly accrue to principal

• Person being represented

• Person who acts as the representative

• Person who agent deals on behalf of principal

• Relationship between principal and agent normally contractual

• Agent requires authority to represent principal

• Express authority

• Implied authority

• Apparent authority

o Appears they have given authority compared to express and implied where they have given authority. Same effect

• Principal expressly authorise agent to act on principal’s behalf

• Can be general or specific

• Usually given orally or in writing

• Must be given in writing when:

o Appointing agent to buy or sell land or business o Appointing agent for more than one year

§ Deed must be executed to grant agent requisite authority if must be given in writing

§ Writing requirement is statutory requirement

Facts

• Kapoor formed company called BPP

• K employing FL to work for company

• When FL requested payment, BPP contested K’s authority to bind BPP

• K wasn’t managing director so K didn’t have authority to enter into contracts Decision

• K had no actual authority as there was no evidence company granting him such authority

• K had apparent authority

• Representation made to third party agent had authority to enter transaction

• K had actual authority to manage relevant aspects of company’s business

• FL induced to enter transaction by representation and relied on it

Referensi

Dokumen terkait