Copyright is owned by the Author of the thesis. Permission is given for
a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and
private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without
the permission of the Author.
THE 'BATTLE' BETWEEN SCIENCE AND RELIGION OVER EVOLUTION IN NINETEENTH CENTURY
NEW ZEALAND
A thesis presented in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in History at Massey University
JOHN STENHOUSE 1985
l..t (a)
(b)
(c)
2. *
*
The Library
MASSEY UNIVERSITY g�'<re
perm1ss1on
for mythesis
, entitledto
be made available to readers inthe Library under the
conditions d€terminedby
the Lihrariai:l..I agree to
my thesis,
if askedfor by
anotherinstitut.i.o�
:;n"ay
on temporary
loanunder
conditions determinedby
the Librarian.I also agree
that my thesis
may hecopied wr Library
US€.I do not wish my thesis, entitled
.�.tr�
..
.. �JMtk/ ...
... �h .
.. $.���
... M!!:
.. &tffl.ih
..
.. ()l.lrt: .
... � ��
... Ji .
... N�
....� .
... N.¥. ... �/ ...
.
to be made available to readers or to be sent to other institutions without my written consent within the next two years.
Signed ...
.
.@..� ...
.Date .
.
..
..%..�� ... �9.� ... .
Strike out the sentence or phrase which does not apply.
Massey University Palmerston North, N.Z.
The copyright of this thesis belongs to the author. Readers must sign their name m the space below to show that they recognise this. They are asked to add their permanent address.
Name and Address Da
t
eAbstract
This thesis descr ibes and ana l yses the New Zea l and response to the Darwinian theory of evo l ution in the second ha l f of the nineteenth century. Traditional accounts , using a distorted v ersion of the
Hu x l ey-Wi l berforce debate as the ir mod e l , ha v e been tr iumpha l i st , pos iti v istic , and mi l itaristic. The b l oody 'batt l e' between science and r e l ig ion , accord ing to the se rece i v ed v iews , resu l ted in the ov erwhe lming v ictory of science , truth , and progress o v er r e l i gion , ignorance , and superstition. This mod e l i s inapp l i cab l e in the New Zea l and context. Generations of reconci l ing Genesis with geo l ogy had prepared the Chr istian mind we l l for coming to terms with scientific disco v eries , and adjusting interpretations o f Scripture accord ing l y.
After an initi a l per iod of caution and d e l iber ation , churchmen within the major denominations came to terms with �io logica l e v o l ution as read i l y as they had earl ier accepted the findings of geo l ogy and p a l aeonto l ogy. By the 1 8 80's e v o l ution became acceptab l e to most educated Chr istians. Scientists too,quick l y accepted bio l ogical
evo l ution but remained r e l i gious b e l i e v er s , and in many cases d e v out , practising Chr istians. Their r e l igious v i ew of nature was reinforced rather than destroyed by Darwin. The handfu l of freethinkers who proc l aimed that Science had supp l anted Chri stianity a l so be l i e the positiv ist mode l , for e v o l ution became for them a surrogate r e l i gious faith. Sc ience did effecti v e l y become secu l ari zed by the beginning of the twentieth centur y, but this was the work o f devout scientists who wanted to pre v ent r e l i gious contro v ersy from constant l y ho l d ing back
the progress of biol ogy. The 'batt l e' between science and r e l i gion o v er e v o l ution cu lminating in the fina l and deci s i v e triumph of science was a myth.
ii
Preface
I wou ld l ike to record my thanks to a l l those who ha v e been so he l pfu l o v er the l ast three years. Dr Peter Lineham has been a l l that I cou ld ask of a chief supe r v isor , and mor e . His nev er-fai l ing
enthusiasm, constant he l p with sources , insightfu l criticism and
sympathetic coun s e l hav e put me permanen t l y in his debt. I am gr atefu l to a l l the members of the M assey Uni v ersity Department o f History who ha v e prov ided such a stimu l ating and congen i a l atmosphere to wor k in.
Dr Kerry Howe has been a v er y fr iend l y and approachab l e assistant superv isor. He has constan t l y h e l ped me to keep the 'magnum opu s ' in a hea l thy perspect i v e ! Thanks to Professor W.H. O l i v er for h e l p ing to super v ise the initial stages of the the s i s . Professor J.C. Da v i s and Dr Dav id Thomson hav e p rov ided v a luab l e comments and cr iticisms. I wou l d l ike a l so to acknowl edge ideas and references from Professor Ian Breward , Professor G.S. Parsonson , Professor M .P.K. Sorrenson ,
Professor George M arsden , Sir Char l es F l eming , Roger Chapman , Phi l i p F l eming , and my father , Dr Dav id Stenhous e , who has pro v ed adept at c l ari fying com p l e x zoo logical and phi l osophical i ssues o v er the phone.
Speci a l thanks to my brother Da v i d who was a great he l p in the fin a l stages .
I must a l so mention the l ibraries which h a v e been consu lted , in particu l ar : the A l exander Turnbu l l Library, the We l l ington Uni v ers ity Librar y, The M assey Uni v er s i ty Library , the Pa lmerston North Pub l ic Library , the Canterbury Pub l ic Library, the M ethod ist Church Archi v es ( Christchurch); the Hocken Library, the Dunedin Pub l ic Librar y , the Knox Col l ege Library , the Auckl and Institute and Museum Librar y , the St. Johns Co l l ege Library, the Leys Institute Library (Auck l and) , the
i ii
Auck l and Publ ic Library, the New Zea l and Baptist Co l l ege Librar y , and the Cambridge Uni v ersity Library. A number o f l ibrarians and
archi v ists deser v e specia l mention : Dav id M acDona l d of the Hocken Librar y , M arcia Baker ( M ethod ist Church Arch i v i st) , Kath l een Co l eridge of the V ictori a Uni v er s i ty Library , Ian Thwaites o f the Auckl and
Institute and Museum Library, Jud ith Br ight of the St. Johns Col l ege Library and Peter Gautrey o f the Cambridge Uni v ersity Library.
Fina l l y I wou l d l ike to thank a l l those who have made the l ast thre e years so mar v e l l ous : especia l l y my own fami l y , John and Ji l l McLel l an , the members of Hokowhitu Baptist Church , the l ad ies at M anawatu S t , and my f l atmates - A l eck, Ste v e , Mark, and Pau l - who hav e t o l erated my enthusiasms with extraord inary good humour , in the know l edge , I suspect , that in my case they were witnessing a c l a s s i c Darwinian case of r e v ersion to the ancestr a l type.
iY
CONTENTS
Page
Abstract i i
Preface i i i
Contents V
Abbreviations v i
I ntroduction
1 . Science and Religion Before the Origin 1 0
2 . The 1 860' s : The Phony vlar? 34
3 . The 1 870' s : Trends in Science 82
4 . The 1 870' s : Religious Responses to Evolution 1 25 5. The 1 88 0' s : Freethought , E v o l ution and the Churches 1 66 6 . The 1 890' s : The Secularization o f Science and 2 1 9
the Emergence of Fundamentalism
Conclusion 274
Notes and References 2 8 1
Bibliography 3 1 2
CG DNZB FR JHB JRH LT NZE NZH NZJH NZJS
NZ Meth NZP NZYl ODT TPNZI
AP AR CP Du : Ho i-lTu
wv
Abbreviations Church Gazette
Dictionary of New Zealand Biography Freethought Rev iew
Journal of the Hi story o f Biology Journal of Religious Hi story Lyttelton Times
New Zealand Evangelist New Zealand Herald
New Zealand Journal of Hi s tory New Zealand Journal of S ci ence New Zealand Magazine
New Zealand Method ist New Zealand �resbyterian New Zealand Ylesleyan Otago Daily Times
Transactions and Proceedings of the New Zea l an d Institute
Library Symbols Auckland Public Library
Auckland Institute and Museum Library Canterbury Publ i c Library
Hocken Library , Dun ed i n
Alexander Turnbull Library , Well ington
v i