(ii)
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Liet of Figures and Plates iv List of Tables
Summary
Statement
Acknowledgements
I. TNTRODUCTION
II" REVTEI{ OF LTTERATURE
1 ) The physiology of 2) The occurrence of
Tri follum"
rclover diseasei in sheep.
Isoflavones in the genus
vi
1
4 9 6 13 13 14
3) Subspecíation in Trifolium subterraneun L
4) Competítion (a) General
(b) In clover
IIT" SEED RESERVES OF 'YARLOOP' SUBTERRANEAN CLOVER TN THE SOIL
1 ) Introduction 2) Methods and
15 17 1g 23
23
Materials (a) (b)
3)
Resulte4)
DiscussionIV.
EXAMINATION OF ALTERNAT]VE SPECIES SUBTERRANEUMcv
iYARLOOPtLevels of seed regerveɡ 0
Pattern of regen-
eration from seed re6erves o
TO TRIT'OLIUM
25 23
28 3o
t2
32
3'
36 59
Introduction
Methods and Materials
Meaeurements
Results (a) 1970 pl-ant populations and dry matter production.
1)
2) 7) 4)
(TIÐ
4) i{esulta (b)
Sccd pro,Juo*l,oar(a)
19?rplaat
popuLatl¡¡nce(d0
't971¡¡t¡tcr
grorùb a¡d¡lcrcf'etrßocr
(c)
1971 dry ostùcr Pro<luotioa¡9I
]Xesu¡eloavr
ÇúÈlPü8r'lIoN Bð'lus6¡t f YARIÆoPÇ AD¡Ð PtËP¡iü cLÛvsa1)
Iatroduotlo¡2ì
l{cÈhod aad l4atcrlal¡t'l
þTs¡¡urcøentrh)
{{e¡ultr Hlr¿t populabioaor;iar!.y ooapctitlon.
f97O dt'¿r
a¡tter
ploduotioarP¡rtltto¡¡ of leef
a¿å ¡teor$ecd ylcl.tlr
1971 dry
ortter
productlonr 5, illcoutot onYI. CüÈiPd8I'ÍIût{ Bllltrd¡iit.I f YA}ll,t.'ljpr À{l$ PUHPLî C¿ÆVtÊ YIi'Ài VAiìT¡r:¡L:ù SriJÐ llAT¿li
1)
I¡troduotlone)
Hcthode and l":ai:orieX.a,)
HceturenenÈa4) Rcault¡ (rl
PL¡nt populatioaar(Þ)
Jry ¡¡¡tÈcr prodrrct,iouç5)
uc.¡cu¡alenvII.
OvÍt¡lÀtt Ðrgûf;s,$iül'¡lfltrI. åt'j'tillÐtrC:Ïi
1)
ilcathsr dete 1955-71e)
Hc¡ntblyratnfrll
!9?O a*dr*?l t) rleily ralnf¡I1 Aprfl
an*å i"ay f9?Tl+) St¡ttablo¡l
il¡taIX.
gIiSI¡IatE:rìAtrÌ¡T(r)
(b) (o)(a) (e)(f)P¡gr
4,4t
t+1
9?
,2
96 56
,r
æ
64 67 6rl 77 81
?o 93 99
99 99
10e
f9e
10.2 104 111 1tB
.t 1g
lrg
1t9
lao
'1?9
( rv)
LTST OF T'IGURES AND PLATES
Figure
t
2 3
9 10
11
12
13
14
15 4 70
5
6
7
I
Dry matter production of rYarloopt 19ZO
Dry matter production of purple clover 19TO
Dry matter production of fyaqloop, (l?4 ptants/nz) + purple clover (18 plants/nt) 19?o
Dry matter production of 'yag1oop, (147 ptants/mz) + purple clover (69 plants/m') lgZo
Dry matter production of ryarloop, (lB3 ptants/nz) + purple clover ( 164 plants/m') lgZo
Dry matter production of tyarJoopt (l4Z ptants/mZ) + purple clover (5j6 plants/m') lgZo
Dry matter production of tyarJoop, (tOB ptants,/mz)
+ purple ct-over (?to pl-ants/n') 19To
Dry matter production of ryarlgop, (69 pl.ants/m?) + purple clover (llï? plants/n') 19To
Seed yíelds of rYarÌoopr and purple.sohrn 19?O
Dry matter production of ryarloopr at three seedrates 1971
Dry patter production of purple clover at three seedrates 1971
Dry matter" production of rYarloopr clover 25% (numbers of seeds
"ortt) rates 1971
75% + purple
at
three seed- production of rYarloopN(numbers of seeds sown)
Page
6g 6g 7o
7t 7t
72
72
Dry matter clover 50%
rates 1971
Dry matter clovey '75%
rates 1971
roduction of tYarloopr
numbers of seeds sown)
50% + purple
at
three seed- 25% + purpleat
three seed-p (
B6 105
105
106
106
107
Dry matter production
of
îyarloopa 12"5% 107clover B?"r% (numbers
of
seed.s sãwn)"l rates
1971+ purple three seed-
Dry matter production (totat) of ryarloo purple clover 25% (numbers of 'seeds sor^¡n seedrates 1971
'75%+
at three
16 p
)
108
(v)
Fi gure
17
1B
1g
Plat e
Dry matter production (totat)ot tYarloopi purple clover 50% (numbers of seeds sown)
s eed rat es
Dry matter prod.uction (totat) of iYarloopr purple clover 75% (numbers of seeds sown)
seedrates 1971
25% +
at three
50% +
at three
Page
108
109
11
37
7t
74 75 76
Dry matter production (totat) of rYarloopt 12"5% + 1O9 purple clover 82"5% (numbers of seeds sown) at three seedrates 1971
1
2 3
A tYarloopr plant
rYarloopr damagerl by clover wilt
General view of Alternative Species Trial following defoliati on
General view of Competition Trial showing water- logging
Competition Trial - pure stands August 24 19?O
Competition Trial - pure stands October 28 1970
Competition Trial - 2.1 plants of purple clover to one of rYarloopr October 28 1970
Competition TriaI -
heads February 1971
purple clover showing seed By
9 Competition Trial - pure stands July 6 1971
8
4
5 6 7
B
10 Purp1e clover damaged by clover wilt
92 117 a
(vi )
LTST OF TABLES No.
Page
16 24 Response of leaf isoflavone content to waterlogging
Soil reserves of seed of Trifolium subterraneum on
5 Seedling emergence from seed reserves
6 .qtternatives to eyarloop0 - plant densities 19?O 7 Alternatíves to rYarloopt - herbage production, sordn
speciesr l9ZO
8 Rtternatives to iyarloopr - herbage production, , volunteer plants, 19TO
9 Afternatives to iyarloopr * seed yields 19TO
'10 Alternatives to rYarloopr - plant densities 19?1
11 Alternatives to tYarloopo - invasion of ryarloopt 1gT1
12 Alternatives to eYarJ-oopr - plant survival to october
197 1
13 Alternatives to rYarloopt - herbage yield sown species November,1921
14 Alternatives to iYarloopi - herbage yieldo volunteer specieso November 1971
15 tYarloop0 v purple clover = treatments 16 0Yarloop! v purple clover - growth patterne 17 eYarloopr v purple clover - ptant densities 19TO
18 rYarloop0 v purple clover - percentages of each species established
tYarloopr v
JuJ-y 197O
1
2
3
4
Kangaroo Island
Soil reserves of seed of Trifolium subterraneum at 26
Kangaroo Isl and Research Centre
Soil ¡eserves of rYarloopr in one
Is1and Research Centre paddock at Kangaroo 27 29 4o
4t
4z
44 46 48 4g
5O
51
5B 59 6S 66
19 purple clover - weight of single plants 68
Noo 20 21
rYarloopr v purple fYarloopr v purple stem October 1970
rYarloop I
stem 0cto
I Yarloop I 1970
24 rYarloopt
(vii
)clover - relative growth clover - fresh weíght of
rates
1970Ieaf and
Page
?B 79
8Z 8Z
B8 Bg 9o
101 103 22 v purple clover - dry weight of leaf and BO
ber 1970
v purple clover - leaf area indices October 82 23
25
26 2?
28
3z
v purple v purple
clover - E eed yields 1970
clover - seed multiplication
clover - aeed in faesces April 1971
clover - hard seed determinations clover - soÍ1 seed reserves June
îYarloop I
rates 19?O
I Yarloop I
t Yarloop i
¡ Yarloop I 1971
v purple v purple v purple
2g rYarloopr v purple clover - winter herbage production 91
1971
30 rYarloopr v purple clover - seed balance sheet and
1971 plant densities 31 îYarloopo
9B
v purple v purple
clover x seedrate - clover x seedrate -
treatments plant densities
I Yarloop i 1971 :
V/AITE INSTITUTE
LIBRARY
(r)
SU i.TT,1ATY
fho
aln of
tho work uee ?a Btudy the problsa of, repLaclngthc
rYarlooproultfvar of i'ritoFpo
aubtemaagqg!o rtth
lcg;uraeo
of
loser oectrogcu cotüentrnil to
evaluatc four cpeelecof th¡
BÇauafrlfollug ¡¡
alternativeato
rliarlooBreSofI r€asrvêa
of
eeodof
cubtofrsnorg alousrïere
meaaur¡d¡t slx
locatl,oaa ÐE ;iengaroo ,[a].aad antlln flvo
pa*l;.toolo ofdfffercnt hlctorloe
enthc
-rcpartsrent of, A6rfeulture Resoarclrüøstre
et
l¡arndtaar Seedof the
rYarlooploultlYar
of¡ubtarreneæ o.!.ovor
r¡ê
preeinnla¡r¡tat all
þut ,)ao atÈ€eÊçaorrea
of
lTarloo¡lf¡etd
æea6ure4lto
Jttly¡f,trr tlte
naln cse¡llsal gcrrninrtlou raa¡ged froæ thraeto
244 gp*"
"e.
l-tf,ff-.rotro€a
{a
aoed FêsËrver rÈre not correlatedsfth raÍnfal}t eoil
fecüona,
d¡tc of flrqt
eou{nggr
datcof
l,¡ltrod¡¡ctloa of, tierl.ooprr s¡adrracrrer of
2år{ g púr"2 io Juty
1}69 estab}iohed 1¿ootYarloopr B1anta pcr 62
ln
Èray 19?O an* îZOG ttrlarloo¡lr planta pcru' tn
t l-íay7ri?1.
Qvsr gt#.'lof
thE açe;i!.in6e onorgod LnAprll
anil t'1ayln
boüb gtar6¡ft
X.e o';¡üoludGdthat
the lutroduotionof
elüernatlveep€ci€s
to
ropleco tYarl"ooprvill
on3.y be auceeeefuLlf
mothodafor
¡roduoing üho re-cat¡blf,ehesnùof
tYarlor:pr fr$E aceurn¡l,etcð geed reaorvsa are rvailablo¡iîour ¡oria!.-oeodl.a6 u,nnucl
-irlfolit¡a
epocloa(&.g@,.
@¡tgIl.,
l¡¡¡þÞgglg 8&d lrlølrfÐürouE) verc 8ouüta ¡
prdciookuttb lsr
sol¡. ¡peaervrcof
r'farloo¡lf eosd an*.i EöuaeÍther
2 Hoei"lyroonthly
or
onceat
the endof
tbesttoiln¡ Ir
übe yoar of(e)
eEtebllshocnt, tiofeilf,rtloa ¡reducos dry nraùtor ¡)F{rr;t¡€tloB
la
g1lepeoLoe¡ but had
ltttlc offeat
oaoeturlty
an'J oeedyletd
(de-fo!,latf.ou oeaaod
at
Èhc one¡tuf flouerlag),
Plror Fogcncretfou of, thcloffi
l¡rcoiaavar largoly rûtributod to
a btËb pr'tportloa of, h¡rd ¡cedr¡t
tho brert<of
thelsalcür
rad rYarloo¡tl d'cnln¡Èodrll plotr ia
tbo eeoundyearr
Ëc6¡ulet ¡:wf.n¡¡ drtrtn*l tl¡o seooqdylator
f,æpr'rvod thc pcrel.¡teacø aar{ aprin¡.t prot$uctfoa of,all
thc aou cpeoloo e.,loï¡ercd vftb n¡u-tlcfoltrtod pì.otor
åIEË83X9-E wæthc aocü produotlre
of
thc asuapccleor ft
roaouütaû f,or over5OÉ
of
the drya¡tter
produût¿on{n
tho f,irsù yoar but bythr
¡nd
of
thE acooad yoarlt
eostrlbutcd ¡bout 1rtl6of
tho totaL dry uaüÈer produotLo¡¡tonpotitios betrcea ti8F1o,¡Df and Trp}*uregq uee ¡tutlleü
ta Cot¡ll in
u¡dafo}l¡üedlsa¡'tle.
Iherolatlvc
prc!¡ortisnc ofa¡Cb opcglee
in
seod nf.cturoe uag tho Alaiu f,eoÈor ,.ietorminin6 tbø oorn¡roeltl.oa of, the re¡ulÈ.¡¡t averCg. {JEte eatablla}rodt the cooporftionof
tbs o*ar;Ìa cÌlnngadlf tÈlo
dr¡r:n¡.; tbe fLraù glrouiog8ôßEsllr
Âlth*ugh the gnonùh habit
af
t,he tuo apecÅoe I'e nar'":etllyrllffcrent¡ thc dirtribr¡tlos of leaf
areavlthin
the oan,;py flaãetctlcr
1¡¡ botþrpoofcar In
¡runo Brarrlt dr:¡ rsrttgr prr) iueti,oala
t?re yûarcf
¡,:ufnß waøaiçtl¡r in
both epeoioa¡ cad 1aalrod eua:pÈo cquel
dr¡ natter
pr+ductioore¡ulted
fr+ø soulng 15 kg por haaf rïrrloopr
and 5 kg pcr haof .&.gury,.
Pl,ots uore Èndlvitlually ¡rared 'lerttry the sun¡¡err Secd
(5)
rreturu.d
la
the facoec wrs fr¡uodto
bc lnporta¿Èla
tharÇgtorratlo¡
of, purplc clsver ln. Èhe otcsad f,oar¡Ðry
nrttcr
produotlousf
rÌ{erluopl J.a tb¡, Eêor,&dvt¡tcr
uan7Aç# higlrer
tbe¡ la thr yrar
of, aeedlng rlrareæ&.ÊfIltES,
grefl¡lalla¡ly
tD boübf,earte frt¡
flndtn6; süüld¡ot
bo erplelncd¡¡d 1¡
oonstdoredto ralr¡nÈ furthel
oxaatnettoartht
Li,nfÈatloaoof
the cethodc u¡edla thit rork
are ,.lt¡-ou6sad¡
Ðoth rYul.on¡l¡ rnd Tlnurrurogì
urrc
drnr6od Þy olovcrrllt
(Kqbatiel,te
oaullvoÎr)
andthlc
m¡ot hrvg h¡d n çsrt.red lnflueaoe oath¡
praotLoe.lol,:alflcracr of
tbotrl,ala.
!r.ÊËjëgg.årFroÞerlof{ ¡nd 3rgågÞgg, ahoyed no cynpÈonc
of th¡
cllce¡ter(4)
gTAfEMENT
Thle theeiE containe no naterial rhlch hee baen
acceptcd
for
the awardof
any othor degrccor
diplonaiu
anyuuívcrsity
and,to
the beetof
my knowledge andbcrioft ft
contafns no materlar prevlouely publlshed orwrlttcn
by anothorpêr'on,
except when due roference ienade Ln the
text of
tha th,asis.PhlliB E" Bcal-e
$)
ACKNOT'ILEDGEMENTS
I an grateful for the opportunity to complete this study
whilst serving as an officer within the Research Centres Branch
of the South Auetralian Department of Agriculture.
Dr. H.V. Chamberlain, Superintendent of Research Centreo, has
givun support and encouragement at all times, and Mr" B"A. Ninnee,
Officer-in-Charge of Kangaroo Island Reeearch Centre, has
willing1y provicled. facilities.
I an grateful for assistance wíth the field work
províded by the staff of the Kangaroo Island Research Centra and in particular thank F[r" Ao Bianchi for the many hours he
epent cutting plote"
I wish to thank Dr" uT.Ii, Silsbury for guidance and
constructive críticlsm throughoqt the preparation of this theeis "
Thanks are also due to Mr. T. Hancock for his assistance with the statistical analyses.