• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Typical Water Quality Analysis (2021-22)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2025

Membagikan "Typical Water Quality Analysis (2021-22)"

Copied!
2
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Typical Water Quality Analysis (2021-22)

Compared with the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines (ADWG)

Page 1 of 2

Measure ADWG Guidelines Water Treatment Plant

Parameter Units Health Aesthetic Bray Park Uki Tyalgum

Physical Characteristics *

- True Colour HU NA 15 0.12 0.30 0.21

- Turbidity NTU NA 5 0.26 0.29 0.51

- Hardness mg CaCO3/L NA 200 53 35 41

- Alkalinity mg CaCO3/L NA NA 58 43 52

- Total Dissolved Solids mg/L NA 600 111 98 83

- pH pH units NA 6.5 – 8.5 7.5 7.8 7.5

Disinfectants **

- Free Chlorine mg/L 5 NA 0.71 0.92 1.29

Disinfection By-products**

- Trihalomethanes mg/L 0.25 NA 0.072 0.074 0.044

Chemical Characteristics**

- Aluminium mg/L NA 0.2 0.008 0.01 <0.01

- Antimony mg/L 0.003 NA <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

- Arsenic mg/L 0.01 NA <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

- Cadmium mg/L 0.002 NA <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

- Calcium mg/L NA NA 16 9 8

- Chloride mg/L NA 250 21 23 14

- Chromium IV mg/L 0.05 NA <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

- Copper mg/L 2 1 0.012 0.002 0.04

- Fluoride mg/L 1.5 NA 1 0.2 0.1

- Iron mg/L NA 0.3 0.006 0.014 <0.01

- Magnesium mg/L NA NA 4.41 3.94 4.98

- Manganese mg/L 0.5 0.1 0.008 0.019 <0.001

- Nickel mg/L 0.02 NA <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

- Lead mg/L 0.01 NA <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

- Sodium mg/L NA 180 15 18 12

- Sulfate mg/L 500 250 3 3 1.5

- Zinc mg/L NA 3 0.007 0.001 0.008

(2)

Typical Water Quality Analysis (2021-22)

Compared with the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines (ADWG)

Page 2 of 2

Microbiological**

- Total Coliforms cfu/100mL na na <1 2 <1

- E. coli cfu/100mL 0 na 0 0 0

− NA - no published guideline

− ADWG refers to the 2011 Australian Drinking Water Guidelines

− ADWG Health refers to a health related guideline value which does not result in any significant risk to the health of the customer over a lifetime of consumption.

− ADWG Aesthetic refers to an aesthetic guideline value that is associated with acceptability of water to the consumer in regard to appearance, taste and odour.

− * Mean based on 2021/2022 year WTP weekly sampling.

− ** Mean based on the 2021/2022 year reticulation routine sampling.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

The first result from the laboratory of Medan (TABLE 4) had shown the microbiological contamination as the reason of the reported deaths, but had not disclosed results about

Page | 66 Analysis of Water Quality Based On Phytoplankton Abundance And Number of Nutrients Deffi Ayu Puspito Sari, Rahma Dewi Hutami, Aqil Azizi, Sirin Fairus From the table

in the river sediments, in the Baynespruit River that exceed water quality guidelines for crops irrigation and ultimately have the potential to affect human health; 2 heavy metals,

Water Quality and Coastal Development Reef Advisory Committee – 13th Meeting Page 2 22 and 23 July 2004 – Summary Document – Final Date: 26/08/04 INTEGRATED MONITORING PROGRAM

Water Quality and Coastal Development Reef Advisory Committee – 18th Meeting Page 2 29 November 2005 – Summary Document – Final Date: 07/11/06 • Concern was expressed at the

Water Quality and Coastal Development Reef Advisory Committee – 17th Meeting Page 2 2 August 2005 – Summary Document – Final Date: 29/11/05 REPORTS ON PROGRESS AND ISSUES Reef

xi | P a g e A Abbreviations ACB Apia Catchment Basin ADB Asian Development Bank ANZECC Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality COD Conductivity

Calculation of Comprehensive Pollution Index: P i=1=1/n ΣPi 2-2 n:8, it refers to the 8 projects for evaluation; According to the value of water quality comprehensive pollution