Week 10 Using Treaties and Agreements in Business Strategy and Dispute Resolution
BATNA - Best Alternative to a Negotiated Agreement
most advantageous course of action if negotiations fail and agreement cannot be reached
party shouldn't accept worse situation than its BATNA
BATNA is not a safety net but your point of leverage Dispute Resolution Methods: Principles of fair and effective
Legitimacy - process: Dispute resolution system be product of consent (negotiated agreement) between parties whose interest at stake
Legitimacy - substance: features dispute resolution system be objectively fair
Scope: dispute resolution system must be able to cover full range of issues Dispute Resolution Methods
Negotiation
Conciliation
Mediation
Expert determination
Arbitration
Litigation Negotiation
DR between only parties involved
Casual: conversations, emails, texts, phone
Formal: meetings, documentation, presentations
Written Resolution Mediation
introducing respected, neutral, uninvolved person to help everyone reach mutually acceptable decision
- mediator DOES NOT decide, parties decide - mediation may not resolve dispute, only facilitate
voluntary for parties to accept
resolution is binding, but process is not (no such thing binding mediation)
you set the rules
parties must agree to mediate, and must select a mediator
an agreement may define mediation terms, procedures, maybe even the mediator
select mediator whom comfortable with and believe will be credible with other parties
MEDIATION PROCESS
parties give mediator information to understand dispute
mediator meet with individual parties, or call all parties together
after sufficient exchange of info., mediator breaks parties apart and begins shuttle diplomacy (negotiation by mediator between 2 or more parties reluctant to hold direct discussions)
make mediator work not just shuffle back and forth Techniques of Negotiation/Mediation
separate people from problem
result be based on objective criteria
focus on interest not positions
generate variety of possibilities Expert Determination
contractual process
expert in field of dispute
expert selection defined in agreement
may conduct hearings or decide 'on the papers'
determination is binding unless agree otherwise
expert not an arbitrator, process not arbitration
be fair and independent and impartial between parties Variant = Baseball Determination
each party submits view on appropriate outcome
role of expert not to determine outcome but simply say, which is more preferable - then that outcome prevails
Arbitration
submission of a dispute to 1 or more impartial persons for a final binding decision, known as an "award"
awards are in writing and generally final and binding on parties in the case
always an option if parties voluntarily agree
variety of arbitration providers
you "choose" your judge
must be independent and unrelated
consider expediency (usefulness) of single arbitrator vs. combined wisdom of a 3 party panel…
All content in full notes version