a copy to be downloaded by an individual for the purpose of research and
private study only. The thesis may not be reproduced elsewhere without
the permission of the Author.
The process of scttlencnt and organisation
.::in aNow
Zo2-lanclfrontier
.A thesis
presented inpe.rtial fulfilocnt
oftho rcquirencnts for the D
egree ofMaster
of Arts inHistory at Massey Untvcrsity
by
RAYMOND JOSEPH SHAFFER
Massey University
1973
PREFACE
The object of this i·:ork is summarised in its title: genesis of a bush frontier comr:unHy. Each compon3nt of the title does not merely represent a r:ord, but a concept. "Genesis 11 denotes notions of birth and gror;th, and in th:i.s context it is applied to the
processes and interaction involved in the transition from frontier in 1874 to establishment in 1887. Although "Bush" contains the obvious gE:ographical connot.:>tions associ:.:.ted i7ith th2 Seventy-Mile Bush, during the course of the study i t also assum(:.S an ideological meaning, (iepicting the t;v1)e of settler, his tasks, ~~oals and
aspi:;:.-ations. l'he concept "frontier", \'/l!ich is dealt in detail elsewhere, 1 implies a meaning of pl ace, ~rocess and time.
"Community" in this context points to the process of communiLy formation, containir:;~ the eGsential prereql~isites of belonginc t.o a ci.istinctive communi cy, ·:1i th r2g-ul·u·ised pattcrlls of inte.c".ction, a recoc:i:i seci sy3 "er.; of authori '::,r, and a !J~ared net of mu <;ual
t . 2
ext,ec-;;a ions.
This i3 ;:.. social ::i:::;tory in i.!1e hr.oa:lest s.,nse: th•·
sociolo;_;ical im:,lic-.. t:.oi:s of colTl.!nunit,y :;:co-::Lll 2:re set vrithir! a poli1,ical, ecor1or1jc, o•.,JminjsLra',i1.1e, leg:~l q:~,! cultural context, provicling the st:.i.dy ·1:ith a suitable frame·.-:ork it1" order to rea:::;sc11ble the conum..rnitJ1S hi.::;tory. In bri8f, Lhis e .f'a;) aitempts to analyse the dynamics and mec'.1anics of the compl.Jx pa!. terns, processes and interaction involved j n il1e settlement of a rmsh frontier community, tracin_s its development fror'1 infancy through to late adolescence and early maturity.
Such a study prest-nt:3 hypothetical, methodological-conceptual and contextual demands. The hypothetical requirements entail a
1. See 1-4 belon.
2. 1'!.R. Burch J!:, "The Hature of Community" in John Forster, (ed.), Social Process in Nerr Zealand (Auckland, 1969), 85.
more precise definition of the concept "frontier" from the American to the New Zee,land situation. fl research exercise of this nature provides an opportunity to test several working hypothesis suggested in Oliver's lecture Tm1ards a New History?3 (1969) and Coleman's article "The New Zealand Frontier and the Turner Thesis" (1955), 4 centred on the nature, character, process ancl timing of the New Zealand frontier, 11a.king conparisons with ove:rs<::as frontiers. The metholodological-conceptual demands involve the ap}lication of sociological conceptual analysis and geographical methodology to a historical problem, providing a wider basis to study the dynamic evolution of a bush frontier community within an individual, local, regional and national framework as nell as reducing the risks of overgeneralisation, particularly concerning definition of the concepts "settler" and "frontier". 5
Contextual demands are also evident on various levels. fl part from making useful COEi)srisons ,.,i th extra-Nen Zealanrl history, this essay provides a solid local base upon which to formulate
genen:lisations concerning New Zealand history as a whole, especially in the field of state-frontier interaction. Associated with this is the study's relevance to the evolution of bush frontier communities. Before Arnold's pioneering work, secondary source material on bush settlement rras confined to a few articles by Franklin, Heerdegen and Petersen. 6 Arnold h;J.s now made substantial provision for a suitable
3, ~i.H. Oliver, Tomuds a Ne"\7 History? (Hacken Lecture, 1969) (Dunedin, 197·1 •
4. Peter J. Coleman, "The New Zealand Frontier and the Turner Thesis", in Pacific Historical Review, yol.24 ( 1958), 221-37. 5. See 1~4 and 65 below.
6. See Rollo D. Arnold, "The Opening of the Great Bush, 1869-1881:
.A Social History of Bush Settlements of Taranaki, Hawke's Bay and Wellington" (Ph.D. thesis, Victoria University, 1971);
S.IL Franklin7 "The Village in the Bush", in Forster, Social Process, 102-43 i Richard G. Heerdegen, "Land for the Landless", .in New Zealand Geographer, Vol.23 (llpril, 1967)i 34-49;
G.C. Petersen, "Pioneering the North Island Bush", in R.H.
Watters (ed.), Land and Society in New Zealand (i'lellington, 1965), 66-79.
base from which to study bush settlement. But at the local level secondary source material is limited to anniversary booklets: no comprehensive secondary source on 17oodville exists. This research exercise attempts to fill a marked void in the story of bush
settlement,7 complementing the \70rks of Arnold, Heerdegen and Gordon.8
But research in t11is c:1.rea ·:ras not all plain sailing: problems concerned with methodology arose directly out of the mi,ture of the demands and source materials. First, the nature of dem2.nds posed certain difficulties concerning organisation, sel :ctivity, continuity and control of material. A social history, by its very nature, covers a broad spectrum, and this created the danger oi' treating the material in a superficial manner.
A
good example of this was the handlin&, of the profusion of voluntary associations. Selectivity was rigidly enforced by choosing only a few examples to illustrate a central theme.One of the major sp8cific problems concerned the definition of rfoodville's boundaries. l~rontier borders a:LE: marked by great confusion and c:unbigui ty. Provincial demarcations are simple:
Woodville being at the south-western most e:tremity of Hawke's Bay
7. As evidenced by the noticeable lack of references and blatant inaccuracies concerning Woodville in secondary accounts. See Errol Braithwaite, The Companion Guide to the North Island of New Zealand (Auckland5 1970), 280:
Woodville was established by Scandinavian immigrants, sturdy Danes and Swedes who passed through 1he Seventy- · Mile Bush from the north-east • • . • You can almost trace their passage to the east of ;.foodville on the farm mail boxes! names like Svensen, Anderson, Sorenson ..• Obviously Braithwaite is confusing '.loodville with the Dannevirke
cultural periphery; c.f .8-10 below. See also A.H.
McLintock (ed.) An Encyclopedia of New Zealand (Wellington, 1966) Vol.3, 682; which claims "The first settlers arrived from
Southern Hawke' s Bay in 1862. By 1870 a township had emerged on an old route between the Manavratu and Hawke's Bay districts". c.f.11-12 below.
8. L(eslie). G(eoffrey) Gordon, "Immigration into Hawke's Bay, 1858-1876" (M.A. Thesis, Victoria University, 1965).
borders the ~ellington provicincial district. On the local level hm78ver, the fluctuating nature of ·.-ioodville' s boundaries makes political delimitation difficult. Boundary changes occurred v;hen 1:"iood-v-ille was constitu.ted a Highvray :District in 1878, a Town District
in 1884, and a Borough ir.. 1887. But these lines vrere greatly
complicated by the competing attempts to ~tabilise boundaries behreen local goverru:ient bodies and the ')c.-:..ipawa County Council. Apart from further )Oli ti cal demo,rcations, such EcS electoral boundaries,
rloodville -_·1as also a Licensing District e.11d a Resident Magistrate District. On top of this several indefinr..!.ble bounrtaries existed. Concentri c zones of front ier activity, external business and social affiliations, the influence of sta;te a~~encies, the natural cent·.ce of gravity at Napier, trade and communication patterns, ond the
penetration of a small farmer ideology _provided added Qillbiguity, The most efficient -rn,y to delimit -.food ville' s boundaries nas through a map and accompanyin;~; appendix displaying the physical features
which delimit '.food.ville as s. compact r0gic~1 (:i?itrure 1 and Appendix 11),
'I'he use of sociol o[;'ical concepts r:c.,y p:c0;s·mt IH'OlJlems of under- and over-conceptualisat:'con of ideas. Provision has been made, either in the; toxt or footnotes, to pr,·wide an accurate application and defin-Ltion of the concepts u::>ed.
The nature of the source rnateri~ls also presented }roblems. Because of the death of ccrly inhabi ta:1ts it r;as difficul t to provide an a1..:curate account oftho origins and movements of the original settl ers, thus forcing t he researcher to speculate. The available information ··:ras sr:atter2d in four separate localities (in order of importance): Wellingt on, Napi er, '.foodville and Palmerston North, with the bulk of tLe mat erial being located at r.7ellington.
ii.part from problems of distance, the source material vras unbalanced, Between 1874 and 1883 the information was very patchy and required an eclectic synthesis of external nevrnpaper correspondents' reports, archival material, memoirs and maps. But from 1883 the ~oodville
Examiner supplied an overabundance of material: a balance had to be achieved, The compilation of statistical information also posed difficulties. Before 1891, statistical breakdown of
information in official publications was limited to population, sheep returns, court records and school attendance. In some
instances the 1891 Census, although outside the bounds of the study, was used to provide an impression to offset partially this
limitation,
But the researcher cannot underestimate the utility of the existing sources. Ncnspapers, particularly the Uoodville Examiner, supplemented. by the Hawke' s Bay Herald, The He-.: Zealru1d Hail and the
·,faiparra Hail, providecl a valuable resourcC). In the \7oodville Examiner, local advertisements were important in supplying
informa,tion on local and outside business interests, the type of and relative demand for various services and 13oods, price indices,
indicators of pace, relative \"/ealth and institutional grQ\7th of the community, 12,nd sales, official announcenents, entertaimncmts and meetings. Apart from the 2di torials (which were inportant
refl0ctions as ·:rell as creators of local opinion), ;:sossip and correspondence colurinG; the newspaper also provided reports on el ection speeches, road bo8.rd meetings
anu
!:'esident ma,::;istr;::,te court sittin_gs. The supplenentary nt:!nsp2,pers often served ;:~s a balance to the '."ioodville E~an1iner, p2rticularly concerning the controversy over the siting of the ·::oodvillo railway station in 1885.Official sources \'1ere very helpful to confirm and resolve conflicting nev1Spaper :ceports.
House of Representatives, Statistics of the Colony of New Zealand, The Hawke' s Bay Gazettes, and
JJ:i.e
New Zealand Gazettes_, throughpersistent cross-referencing, provided valuable information concerning the impact and interaction of the state on the frontier.
material and memoirs played the role of t:;ap-fillers.
Archival
Secondary source material, although linited, nas useful in building up a framework of the study. Oliver's lecture on Towards a New History? and his Challenge and Resuonse,9 helped to formulate
9.
W.H. Oliver and Jane I.!. Thomson, Challenge and Response, a study of the development of the Gisborne and East Coast Region.( Gisborne, 1971).
a working hypothesis as rrell as providing a suitable methodologi cal substructure. This base nas largely 2.ssistod by two American works, Boor st in 1 s 'l'he Americans: 2 The National Experience and
Billington's America's Frontier Herita.ge. 1
°
For the provision of a contextual base 1 J1rnold 1s1 Franklin's a.11d Gordon's i·.rorks were the greatest assets.Acknowl ed,c;ern8nt s
I wish to extend ny sincere thanks to the following individuals and institutions who so willingly p::'.'ovided ~ssistance in the
rc;search of thi s essay: Mr R.:D. Arnold, of the Education :JepartBent at Victoria University and especially _ r L.G. Gordon of Papakurua High School, for valuable reference su[;gestions; ttc P .J. Gibbons of Waikato University for his valuable verbal contributions
concerning extra-Nen Zealand refcrencos 9 net~10clology and analysis;
Professor G. S. Fraser of the Sociology JeL:ic.rtuent at l'~assey
University for his c;.ssistance in clarifyin6· the conc0ptual analysis in the initial draft, ':1ho also reminded me th2.t the bridge between history and socioloe;y, although not inpasso.ble, for a (Jerson with a meagre sociological background Fas not an c;~1s,y one to cross; the
staff of the Alexander 'l'u:cnbull, General J1sscmbl,y, Massey University and Palr:i.erston North Librarios, as Vlell as those peopl e who assi sted associated 1·1i th National ..'1rchi ves 9 the ':'lood-rille Pioneer M:useum, the Woodville County Council and the HE~uke 1 s Bay l1rt Gallery and Musewn; Mr J. Jamieson of 1.7oodville and Mr J. Munro, Jhrector of the Hawkc's Bay Art Gallery e.nd Museun1, for their valuable assistance with the photographs reproduced in this thesis; lastly Professor YI .H. Oliver, my supervisor for the time and patience he put into the painstaking reading of the essay drafts.
10. Daniel J. Boorstin, The Ameri cans Volume T~o The National Experience (
? 1969) ,
and Ray Allerl"Billington, America's Frontier Heritage (New York919 66).
PREFACE
LIST
OF T/1BLES
LISTOF FIGURES
LISTOF PLATES
TABLE OF ABBREVIATIONS INTRODUCTION
General Hypothesis
The concepts 'front ier' and
'establishment' Organisat ion
CH:lPl'ER
ITHE FRONTIER I. The Physical Setting II. The
Opening
III. Small
Fa:~TlAssociations IV. Pattern of Settlement
CFMTER II INTERACTION AND I
NTEGR1\TIONPART I: THE STATE
Land Sett lement Local Reaction
The Utilisation of state agencies PART II: INST ANT COHIVITJNITY
(a) Local officiP.l organisations
(b) Social Institutions and V
oluntaryassociations
(c)
Macro
-micro agents ofidentity
(d)Bush- farmer ideology and social
stratification (e)
( f)
Economic momentllill and spatial organisation
Frontier momentum
Conclusion
CHAPTZR III ESTABLISHMENT: 1887
APPENDIX A
SOURCES
Definition of Woodville' s Highway
District, Town
Districtand
Licen
sing
Districtboundaries
page
i
vii viii
ix x1
6
23
62 70
71
T11BLE II
TliBLE III
TABLE IV
TABLE VI
TABLE VII
TABLE VIII
TABLE IX
TABLE X
TABLE XI
LIST OF Ti\BLES
PoJulation a.ncl Sex Structure 1878 and 1881
The lip)lication of Land LGgislation on the llooc~villG Frontier between
1874-1887
:J.esident l:IagistratG Court Convictions 1883-1887
The amount of State and Local Government expenditure 1877-1887
lmctlysis of Street N2.Bos in -.7ooc1ville Borough
Sheep returns and size of flocks by various ovmers 1879-1887
Popul~tion, Jwellings and uste~ble
Properties 1877-1887
School Attendance 1879-1885
l1ge-Sex Structure 1891,
%
of total populationUoodvillG Riding's Poimlation Jensity and SGX Structure 1886
Numerical Strength of the predo~inant
religious organisations 1891
Pe.ge
21
26
37
39
55
59
60
60
66
FIGURE 1
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 3
FIGURE
4
FIGURE
5
FIGURE 6
FIGURE
7
FIGURE 8
LIST OF FIGURES
Woodville's Physical Components
Blocks available for Special Settlement 1872
Proposed Special Settlements 1872
Woodville Survey District 1085
Tormship of Woodville 187
4
Woodville Small Farm Association ·1s76
1rhe School as an example of a social system
Diagre.rnatic represent.~tion of Vfoodville1s spatially organised hinterland, composed of integrated-
symbiotic components
following page
7
9
9
11
12
13
42
PLATE 1
PLAT E 2
PL.ATE 3
PL.ATE 4
PLATE 5
PL.ATE 6
PL.ATE 7
PLATE 8
PLATE 9
PLATE
10LIS'I1 OF PL.ATES
Corner of tfde'.ln and Vogel Streets c.1872.
Punt over the Nanawatu in the Upper Gor3e c.1871-2.
Gorge Village c.1876
Woodville c.1878.
An Early Stock Sale.
Woodville during the early 18801s,
Co;nmercial Nucleus 1. 1886
Conrnercial Nucleus 2. 1886
Features of Establishment: The Kunoroa periphery 1887.
Features of Establishment: A settler's homestead c.1886.
following page
8
11
11
11
56
57
57
il.JHlt
HB
HBC
HBG
HEH
NZG
NZM
NZS p·i
1:1E adv.
'";tM
TABLE OF LBBl"IBVIATIONS
A1;\1endices to JoL1rnal of th2 House of heprssentatives
Ifawke' s I3P..y J1rchives (held at "National
; .. rchi vos, ~-.-ellinGton)
Hmvke' s Be.,y Provincial Council's Votes ancl Proccc-dings
Hawke's B8.y Provincial G8.zettes
Hawke' s Bay Heral cl
!·Tew Z'28.land Gazette
Nm1 Zealend Nail
Statistics of the Colonx__s:J Neu Zealand
ParliE!Dentary Jebates
·:rood ville Examiner ( adverhsements)
lfaipawa Mail