Effect of application of prilled urea and urea super granules on chickpea plant height. Effect of application of prilled urea and urea super granules on plani' chickpea branches. Effect of application of prilled urea and urea super granules on dry matter content of chickpea plant, Table 4.
Effect of application of prilled urea and super granular urea on relative growth rate of chickpea. Effect of application of prilled urea and super granular urea on yield contributing traits and yield of chickpea. The effect of using prilled urea and urea super 50 granules on the mass of 1000 chickpea seeds.
Effect of application of prilled urea and urea super 52 granules on biological yield of chickpea. Research works related to application of prilled urea and urea supergranules are very limited in Bangladesh context. He reported that the application of 20 kg N hi' the highest green pod yield (1.72 t haj.
Vadavia a at (1991) found that the number of pods plant'' chickpea increased after application of 20 kg N had and 40 kg P hi'. Application of 20 kg N ha" increased grain yield of chickpea reported by Subba Rao et at. Urea super grains (USC) produced significantly higher number of panicles, m 2 and grains panicle4 than split application of prilled urea.
Branches plant'
Data were recorded as the mean of 10 plants randomly selected from the inner rows of each plot that were previously labeled. The height was measured from the ground level to the tip of the plant using a meter scale. W = Total dry weight on previous sampling date (time T1) W2 = Total dry weight on current sampling date (time T2) T1 = Date of previous sampling.
Yield contributing characters and yield of chickpea .1 Days from sowing to harvest
- Seeds pod'
- Weight of 1000 seeds
- Seed yield hectare'
- Biological yield hectare4
One thousand cleaned, dried seeds were counted and weighed from each crop sample using a digital electric balance and weight was expressed in grams (g). The seeds collected from 3 in2 (3 mx I m) square meter area of each plot were properly sun dried. The stove collected from 3 m2 (3 mx 1 m) square meter area of each plot is properly sun dried.
The data obtained for various parameters were statistically analyzed to find the significant difference with the indicative performance of ground urea and urea supergranules when used in chickpea cultivation. Mean values of all characters were calculated and analysis of variance was performed with 'F' test (ratio of variance). The significance of the difference between treatment means was assessed by Duncan's Multiple Range Test (DMRT) at the 5% probability level (Gomez and Gomez, 1984).
The experiment was conducted to study the indication performance of prilled urea and urea supergranules while using them in chickpea cultivation. Data on different crop growth characters, yield bearing characters and yield of chickpeas were recorded and found significant differences between the recorded characters. The analyzes of variance (ANOVA) of the data on different parameters are presented in Appendix hi-Vu.
Crop growth characters of chickpea .1 Plant height
Crop growth rate
Relative growth rate
Effect of application of prilled urea and urea supergranules on growth rate of chickpea. In one column, means with similar letters are statistically similar and means with dissimilar letter(s) differ significantly according to a 0.05 probability level emitting Prilkd urea (PU). T= USC placed 10 cm apart (avoid three rows) Fr USG placed 20 cm apart (avoid three rows) T11'= USC placed 30 cm apart (avoid three rows) USC placed 40 cm apart (avoid three rows) .
USC placed 10cm apart (avoid one row) T= USC placed 20cm apart (avoid one row) T= USC placed 30cm apart (avoid one row).
Yield contributing characters and yield of chickpea .1 Days from sowing to harvest
Pods planC1
Seeds pod"
Effect of application of prilled urea and super granular urea on yield contributing traits and yield of chickpea. Tr USC placed at a distance of 10 cm (avoid three rows) T = USC placed at a distance of 20 cm (avoid three rows) i,= USC placed at a distance of 30 cm (avoid three rows). The weight of 1000 seeds showed a statistically significant variation due to the use of prilled urea and urea super granules (Appendix Vii).
Akter (2010) reported that 1000 seed weight was highest when USG was applied as basal dose and lowest when USG was applied at 25 DAS in mustard. Vadavia ci in (1991) found that seed weight increased after application of 20 kg N ha and 40 kg P ha1 chickpea. Statistically significant variation was recorded for seed yield per hectare of chickpea due to the application of ground urea and urea supergranules (Appendix VII).
The maximum yield was harvested due to maximum pod plani'. seed pods', which had greater number of seeds and highest 1000 grain weight. 2004) reported that application of fertilizer significantly increased yield and maximum seed yield was obtained when 30 kg N ha1 was applied. 1984) reported that application of nitrogenous fertilizers helps to increase yield. 1991) reported that an adequate supply of nitrogen is essential for vegetative growth and desirable yield of pulse crop. The placement of USG at 8-10 cm depth of the soil can save 30% nitrogen than prilled urea, increases nutrient absorption, improves soil health and ultimately increases crop yield (Singh er at, 1993; Singh and Singh, 1986).
Stover yield hectare1 of chickpea varied significantly due to the application of prilled urea and urea supergranules (Appendix VII). Srinivas et al (2002) observed that stover yield increased with increasing amounts of N up to 40 kg hi'. Application of prilled urea and urea super granules showed statistically significant variation for biological yield hectare&' of chickpea (Appendix VII).
2002) found that poacher yield increased with increasing amounts of N up to 40 kg. Vadavia et al. (1991) found that the application of 20 kg hi' N and 40 P hi' significantly increased chickpea straw yield.
Harvest index
The effect of applying ground urea and urea supergranules on the days from sowing to harvesting of chickpeas (Sx = 2.272). Effect of different levels of supergranular urea on growth and yield of three varieties of boro rice. Effect of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizers on yield and plant characters of cowpea (Vigna radiaza) under late sowing conditions of Kasmir valley.
Effect of nitrogen on dry matter and nutrient accumulation pattern in wheat (Triticum aestivurn) under different sowing dates. Effect of seed inoculation and different fertilizer levels on growth and yield of mung bean (Vigna stang/ala L.). Effect of graded levels of nitrogen and phosphorus on growth, yield and economics of summer mungbean.
Effect of different forms of urea and nitrogen levels on yield and nitrogen uptake of rice. Effect of foliar feeding on NPK uptake, yield attributes and yield of greengram (Vigna radiata L.) (Jrop. Effect of modified urea materials and their application methods on dry matter production, yield grain and nitrogen uptake in rice.
Effect of prilled urea and modified urea materials on yield and quality of geranium (Pelargonium graveolens L. Effect of different levels of nitrogen and form of urea on growth and yield of swamp rice. Effect of seed inoculation with Rhizobium and NP fertilizers on gram yield level.
Effect of different combinations of inorganic nutrients and farmyard manure on the sustainability of a rice-wheat-mungbean cropping system. Effect of modified urea materials on rain-fed lowland transplanted rice and their residual effect on subsequent wheat crop. Effect of rates and sources of nitrogen application on yield and nutrient uptake of citronella java.
The effect of Urea super granules as a nitrogen source on the growth and yield of tomatoes. Effect of granulated lbrms fertilizer application methods on growth, nutrient uptake and yield of paddy rice.