• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

PREPARATION OF MANUSCRIPT FOR TIEES-98

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "PREPARATION OF MANUSCRIPT FOR TIEES-98"

Copied!
7
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

International Conference on Mechanical, Industrial and Energy Engineering 2018 23-24December, 2018, Khulna, BANGLADESH

ICMIEE18-260

Application of Lean and Six Sigma Tool to Waste Reduction and Productivity Improvement in Footwear Industry

Adhir Chandra Paul,*, Noor-E-Imam, Shakhawath Hossain

Department of Leather Engineering,Khulna University of Engineering & Technology, Khulna-9203,BANGLADESH

ABSTRACT

Footwear sector in one of promising sector in our country as its raw material almost available. As a result we see many footwear industry has been set up in recent decades. This studyassesses the current operational and management practices.

By applying Lean and six sigma tool, green manufacturing holds potential economic benefits including long term process efficiency benefits, cost saving, waste reduction. It also assists to attain the knowledge about different techniques of production improvement and environment related factors. This analysis focuses how environmental wastes are produced and analyses possible solutions in order to reduce cost. In this work, productivity has been improved from 13 pair/worker to 16 pair/worker through reducing standard time. In this competitiveness the present and future will belong to those whom can do both to achieve high productivity. The advantages of lean six sigma (LSS) are reduction in defects, cycle time, work in progress etc. as well as increase in product quality, reliability, customer satisfaction, productivity etc. leading ultimately to excellent business result.

Keywords: Lean, Six Sigma, LSS, Time study and Footwear industry.

1. Introduction:

Economic competition for high quality products has increased. Manufacturers always looking for systematic opportunity to eliminate energy and environmental wastes. Inter-linked and interrelationship among these factors are vital and should be balanced and variable relating to external and internal factors as well as environment related factors. This study also focus on waste producing across the manufacturing processes[1].

With the fast changingeconomic the competition for high quality products has increased. Product variety, high lead time, minimal waste, green manufacturing adds a major impact to manufacturing industries. Thus methods like Enterprise Resource Planning, Business Process Reengineering, and Just in Time (JIT) manufacturing and Lean Management have been developed[2]. Quality Management and Improvement can be defined as the fitness for use or purpose at the most cost-effective level.LSS is statistical measure of the performance of a process and measure the degree to which deviates from required value and then give efforts to improve the operations. [2]The traditional DMAIC Six Sigmaprocess, as it is usually practiced, which is focused on evolutionary and continuous improvement manufacturing or service process development, usually occurs after initial system or product design and development have been largely completed. It starts from an understanding of the customer expectations, needs and Critical to Quality issues (CTQs) before a design can be completed[3].

Applying Lean Six Sigma (LSS) methodology and waste management in the footwear industry leads to many of the improvements demonstrated in othersectors- reduction of raw material use, and increasing reuse and recycling on site respecting Bangladesh. Such improvements in environmental

performance produce a directly beneficial effect on the profitability of business.

This work can be used to minimize work content as well as waste that also makes sense from a business perspective. In order to produce product like footwear resources in form of man, machine, materials, capital and others equipment are required. The more effective use of resources is ensured the more goods will be produced. By effective and effluent use of resources the economic system can attain self-sustain growth.

Productivity improvement is not only just doing thinks better but also doing the right things better. The right things or more specially factors influencing productivity is the prime concern for the productivity manner.Here, it was shown the improvement of productivity by reducing standard time through time study.

2. Method:

Fig.01: Overview of the study 2.1 Lean six sigma:

Lean Six Sigma is amethodology that relies on a collaborative team effort to improve performance by systematically removing waste; combining Lean

Selection the plant

Making process chart

Obtain & record regarding method

job operation working condition

Measuring time duration and the rating Select the

job to be timed Making the chart

observed time into basic time

Determining relaxation, allowance

and standard time

Make standard time chart

Result analysis and

comparison

(2)

manufacturing and six sigma to eliminate the eight kinds of waste (muda): Time, Inventory, Motion, Waiting, Over production, Over processing, Defects, and Skills. Lean six sigma project comprise aspect of leans waste eliminations.

Lean six sigma utilizes the DMAIC phase similar to that of six sigma.

2.2Work Study:

Work study can be defined as techniques that analysis the elements of a specific process carefully to eliminate unnecessary operations & to determine better method for these operation. Employees are trained to follow standard method. Equipment’s & working conditions are also standardized.Work study can be divided into the following two compositions: [6]

 Method study (Method design stage)

 Work measurement (Standard time setting phase)

2.3 Method Study:

The purpose of is to analyses the element of a given work i.e. raw materials process, machinery, operating sequences & layout & to plan better working method &

operating system. [6]

2.3.1 Operation analysis, Motion analysis & example of application:

Operation analysisemphasis improvement in various lands of working operations performed by individual or several operations. [6]

2.4Production Process Analysis:

Production process analysis primarily includes two types of analytical method:

 Process analysis

 Man process analysis

Production Process analysis is an analytical method applicable to various objectives & used to record &

analysis specific process. This method includes five kinds of symbols denoting operation inspection transportation delay & storage to illustrate the various processes which appear during the course of production.

It is used to investigate the structure of overall processing systems and used to determine improvement.

Production Process Chart:

Outline process chart (Simple Type)

 Simple type

 Assembly type

 Disassembly type

Flow Process Chart (Detail Type)

 Simple type

 Assembly type

 Disassembly type

The outline process chart is used to obtain a board understanding conditions. This is a short duration procedure performed through quick observation of workplaces in need of improvement. Only operation &

inspection symbols are used at this stage. [6] [8]

2.5Work Measurement:

Work measurement is also known as “Time study”.

Work measurement is absolutely essential for both the planning and control of operations. Without this we cannot determine the capacity of facilities or it’s possible to quote delivery dates or costs. Calculate

proper working time for each optimum working thing system & to supervise output etc.The application of thistechniques designed to establish the time for a qualified worker to carry out a specific job at a defined level of performance. [6]

2.5.1 Time study:

Time study for recording thetimes and rates of working for the elements of specified job carried out under specified conditionsand for analysis the data so as to determine the time necessary for carrying out the job at the defined level of performance. [6] [11]

Steps in making time study- [6]

1. Select the work to be studied.

2. Obtain and record all the information available about the job, the operation, working conditions to affect the time study work.

3. Breakdown the operation into element.

4. Measuring the time by means of stop watch, taken by operator to perform each element of operation.

5. At the same time assess the worker effective speed of work called performance rating.

6. Adjust the observed time by rating factor to obtain normal time.

7. Add suitable allowance to compensate for fatigue, personal needs, contingencies etc.

8. Compute allowed time the entire job by standard time.

9. Make a detailed job description describing the method for which the standard time is established.

10. Test and review standards where necessary.

Normal time = Observed time × Performance Rating (%) / 100

Basic Time = Cycle time (operation average time) × Performance rating

Standard time = Basic time + 15% relaxation allowance + 3% contingency

allowance [6]

2.5.2 Step in time study:

Fig. 02: Flow chart of time study Select

The job to be timed

Obtain & Record Detail regarding method, job,

operations, and working conditions.

Define Break the job into

element Measure

Time duration of each element and the rating Extend

Observed time into

basic time

Determine Relaxation &

personal allowance

Compute Standard time

for operation

(3)

2.5.3 Observe time: The time taken to perform anelement or combination of elements obtain by means of direct measurement. [6]

2.5.4 Selected time:The time chosen as beingrepresentative of a group of times for an elements or group of elements by calculating means, median or mode. [6]

2.5.5 Rating:

Rating is the assessment of the worker’s rate of working relative to the observer’s concept of the corresponding to the pace. [6]

Rating Scale Description

0 No activity

50 Very slow, clumsy, half sleep with no interest in job

75

Steady, deliberate, unhurried performance, looks slow but time is not being intentionally wasted while under observation.

100 Brisk, business like performance, as of an average qualified worker on piece work. It is standard rate.

2.5.6 Relaxation allowance:

Relaxation allowance is an addition to basic time intended to provide the worker with the opportunity to recover from physiological and psychological effects of caring out specified work under specified conditions.[6]

Generally relaxation allowance is about 15% of basic time.

2.5.7 Contingency Allowance:

Contingency allowance is a small allowance of time that may be included in a standard time to meet legitimate and expected items of work on delays, the precise measurement of which is uneconomicalbecause of their infrequent or irregular occurrence. Contingency allowance is 3% of basic time. [6]

2.6 Selection of operators to observe:

When the purpose of the study is to established standards, it is advisable to workers of medium or high skilled level in order to facilitate rating & file suspicious of other workers towards the standard time that is established. When improvement is the aim, it is best to select skilled workers with diligent personalities, in order to facilitate further improvement. [6]

2.6.1Efficiency:

Efficiency = Present output / Standard output

Efficiency = Minutes output / Minutes input

Increasing Efficiency = [(the efficiency of proposed line- present efficiency) / Present Efficiency] × 100

% of work content reduction per pair = [(present work content / pair - proposed work content/pair)/ Present work content / pair] × 100

Increasing Productivity (at 100% capacity) = [(Proposed standard output – Existing standard output) / Existing Standard output] × 100 [6]

3. Methodology:

3.1 Plant selection:

First, a suitable plant was selected for our thesis work.

Thesis study was occurred at Bata Shoe Company (BD) Ltd. and its subsidiary Anonna footwear and FB Footwear Ltd. Dhaka, Bangladesh.

3.2 Time Study:

After selecting the lasting and finishing line for study, the cycle time into time study form named collected data from present production line was recorded.

3.3 Calculation:

The basic time and standard time of operations was calculated

Basic Time = Cycle time (operation average time) × Performance rating

Standard time = Basic time + Relaxation allowance + Contingency allowance

3.4 Modify the production line:

After calculating existing standard time and exploring, a modified production line was proposed through reducing standard time and man power.

4. Data collection and analysis:

After selecting the lasting and line for study, cycle time was measured by stop watch and recorded as collected data of existing production line as-below:

4.2 Calculations:

Average production of line =500 Total-Worker = 45

Working minutes per worker = 480 minutes (8hours)

Work Minutes per pair = 2120/60 = 35.34

S. N Name of operation

Observed Time (sec)

Average cycle time

(sec)

Standard deviation

Ratin g(sec)

Basic Time (sec)

Std.

Time (sec)

System Man power 1 Last collection &

insole attaching

45 44 46 45 ±1 75 34 40 Manual 4

2 Apply adhesive to insole lasting

210 200 215 206 ±1 75 155 183 Manual 4

3 Mulling 30 33 34 32 ±1 75 24 28 Machine 1

4 Toe lasting 215 220 224 217 ±1 75 163 193 Machine 2

5 Side lasting 70 74 72 71 ±1 75 53 63 Machine 2

6 Heel seat lasting 205 210 200 203 ±1 75 152 180 Machine 2

(4)

7 Conditioning 65 65 65 65 ±1 75 49 58 Machine 2

8 Wrinkle chasing 320 315 318 314 ±1 75 236 278 Machine 2

9 Roughing 325 332 330 326 ±1 80 260 292 Machine 2

10 Upper cleaning &

sole preparation

89 91 97 91 ±1 65 63 75 Manual 2

11 Apply adhesive 52 55 57 54 ±1 75 41 48 Manual 2

12 Drying 45 45 45 45 ±1 70 31 37 Machine 2

13 Attaching sole 120 118 115 116 ±1 75 87 103 Manual 2

14 Sole pressing 62 60 65 62 ±1 75 46 54 Machine 1

15 Cooling 35 35 35 35 ±1 75 26 31 Machine 2

16 Ironing 115 125 130 122 ±1 75 92 108 Machine 1

17 Cleaning 120 140 125 127 ±1 65 83 98 Manual 4

18 Brushing with wax

150 145 155 149 ±1 75 112 132 Machine 2

19 Delasting 38 40 36 38 ±1 85 32 38 Machine 2

20 Inspection 90 95 92 92 ±1 75 69 81 Manual 4

Total 2120 45

Standard output at 100% efficiency = (480 × 45) / 35.34 = 611

Productivity = 611/45 = 13 Pair/worker Efficiency = (500/611) × 100 = 82 % 4.1 Proposed modified line:

After analysed the collected data, a production line has been proposed as below-

4.1.1 Calculation:

According to collected data:

Average production =500 Total Worker = 38

Working minutes per worker = 480 minutes (8hours)

Work Minutes per pair = 1738/60 = 28.96 Standard Output at 100% efficiency = (480×38) / 28.96 = 630

Productivity = 630/38 = 16 Pair/ worker Efficiency = (500 / 630) × 100 = 79%

5. Results and discussion:

Average production of line =500 Total Worker = 45

Working minutes per worker = 480 minutes (8hours)

Work Minutes per pair = 2120/60 = 35.34 Standard Output at 100% efficiency = (480*45) / 35.34 = 611 Productivity = 611/45 = 13 Pair/ worker

Efficiency = (500 / 611) * 100 = 82%

Here at below, the histogram shows the highest time consuming operation roughing and lowest time consuming operation mulling where X axis indicates operations and Y axis indicates standard time (second) according to present production line

Fig. 03: Standard time in various operations of present line

According to modified line:

Average production =500 Total Worker = 38

5.1 Proposed modified line:

S.N Name of Operation Operation/

Cycle time (sec)

Rating Basic Time (sec)

Std.

Time (sec)

System Manpower

1 Last collection & insole attaching

40 65 26 31 Manual 3

2 Apply adhesive to insole lasting

185 65 120 142 Manual 3

3 Mulling 24 65 16 19 Machine 1

4 Toe lasting 200 70 140 165 Machine 2

5 Side lasting 65 70 45 53 Machine 2

6 Heel seat lasting 180 75 135 160 Machine 2

(5)

7 Conditioning 60 65 39 46 Machine 1

8 Wrinkle chasing 280 70 196 231 Machine 2

9 Roughing 300 65 195 230 Machine 2

10 Upper cleaning & sole preparation

80 70 56 65 Manual 2

11 Apply adhesive 50 75 38 45 Manual 2

12 Drying 40 70 28 33 Machine 1

13 Attaching sole 110 75 82 86 Manual 2

14 Sole pressing 60 65 39 46 Machine 1

15 Cooling 35 75 24 28 Machine 2

16 Ironing 110 60 66 78 Machine 1

17 Cleaning 100 60 60 70 Manual 2

18 Brushing with wax 135 65 87 102 Machine 2

19 Delasting 40 70 28 33 Machine 2

20 Inspection 85 75 64 75 Manual 3

Total 1738 38

5.2 Analysis of operation:

Name of the operation Existing line Proposed line

Existing method Std.

time

Suggested method Std.

time

Last collecting & Insole attaching

It has been observed that theworkers waste their time by gossiping and their operation is done by 4 workers.

Two of them attaching insole &

others help them

40

If three workers involve in this operation and carefully done this work then productivity will increase

31

Apply adhesive on insole up to lasting margin

Four workers were doing this operation. Workers were talking adhesive very small amount by brush, so they repetitively take cement & apply to insole. As a result work content was increase

183

For applying cement, if three workers in this operation, take only one time they could able to save the time &

productivity will increase

142

Drying

It has been observed that this operation was done by two workers were waste time by gossiping and wait for work during operation

37

If the operation is done by one worker, time and cost will save & Productivity will increase.

33

Cleaning

During upper marking they were using silver marker. To remove silver marking it was taking more time. Other two workers were waste time to wait for work during operation

98

If they will use proper pencil during marking then this problem solve easily. If two worker done this, then productivity will increase

70

Conditioning

It has been observed that this operation was done by two workers were waste time by gossiping and wait for work during operation

58

There is no need of two worker. If the operation is done by one worker, time and cost will save

46

(6)

&Productivity will increase

Inspection

Four workers were doing this operation. Workers waste their time by gossiping and remain idle

waiting for next pair 81

If three workers involve in this operation and carefully done this work then productivity will increase and reduce cost

75

Figure 4.2: Operations analysis

Working minutes per worker = 480 minutes (8hours)

Work Minutes per pair = 1738/60 = 28.96 Standard Output at 100% efficiency = (480*38) / 28.96 = 630 Productivity = 630/38 = 16 Pair/ worker

Efficiency = (500 / 630) * 100 = 79%

Here at below, the histogram shows the highest time consuming operation wrinkle chasing and lowest time consuming operation cooling where X axis indicates operations and Y axis indicates standard time (second) according to proposed production line. This histogram also indicates the reduction of standard time of various operations.

Hence, Productivity improvement = (16-13) pair/worker = 3 pair/worker

Work content (Minutes) reduction = (82-79) = 3%

Here at fig: 5.2.1 histogram indicates improvement of productivity from 13 pair/worker to 16 pair/worker where Y axis indicates productivity.

At fig 5.2.2, this graph shows how standard time is reducing after modifying the production line where X axis indicates standard time and Y axis indicates operations

Fig. 05: Comparison of productivity between present and modified line

Fig. 06: Comparison of Productivity and standard time between Present and modified line

In proposed modified line Total work content reduction is 3% and worker could be reduced from 45 to 38. So the company can save 7 workers salary per month through proposed line and controlling labourWaste management is very difficult to provide a global image of the costs related to each practice; each country has its own costs and regulations. The environment is getting profit because the industry is generating wastes that can be more easily recycled. . The garbage maybe the raw material of anotherindustry. Sell it to another industry as by Fig. 04:Standard time in various operations in modified

line

(7)

product and get some profits. Avoiding the use of compressed air consume.The major common point is the costs regarding landfilling is the lowest everywhere and it is also environment friendly. In most cases, internal reduction solutions cannot reduce the quantities of waste very much and internal recycling solutions can only be applied in large scale.

6. Conclusion:

Productivity improvement is not only just doing thinks better but also doing the right things better. As a tool we use Lean six sigma to improve productivity and reducing waste.The methodology involves statistical analysis to quantify repeated common cause variations.

Lean Six Sigma becomes a continuous process for quality improvement and cost reduction and developed the capability of reducing problems or issues effecting customer expectations on key business processes. This study also focus on waste producing across the manufacturing processes and act as an improvement and cost reduction process. Applying Lean Six Sigma (LSS) methodology and waste management in the footwear industry leads to many of the improvements demonstrated in other sectors. By going green manufacturers can realize savingsand increased profits beyond wildest imagination. To be productive enterprise must beable to produce efficiently and effectively. To require this Organization must focus in skill upgrading and focus on Lean strategies that involves customers, distributors and manufacturer to reduce cost and quality. By applying Lean and six sigma tool, green manufacturing holds potential economic benefits including long term process efficiency benefits, cost saving, waste reduction. Here, we improve productivity from 13 pair/worker to 16 pair/worker through reducing standard time. In this competitiveness, the present and future will belong to those whom can do both to achieve high productivity. The advantages Of LSS are reduction in defects, cycle time, work in progress etc.

as well as increase in product quality, reliability, customer satisfaction, productivity etc. leading ultimately to excellent business result.

7. Future approach:

After completing this thesis work it can be included for further modification of production line by applying Lean Sigma tool. In this thesis, Productivity has been improved from 13 pair/worker to 16 pair/worker by reducing standard time and man power through time study.Productivity can also be improved by studying analytical estimating and predetermined motion. By continuing the inspection, standard time can be reduced in minimum cycle time as well as increasing productivity

Further study can be done on-

 Reduction of material consumption

 Cost reduction measures on power consumption

 Rework cost calculation

 Line balancing of the other line 8. References:

[1]Syed HasibAkhterFaruqui. (2013), Application of Lean and Six sigma tool to waste reduction in industry, Journal of Cleaner Production, (1-6)

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lean_Six_Sigma [3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Six_Sigma

[4].https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lean_manufacturing [5] Andrea Chiarini, (2014), Sustainable manufacturing-greening processes using specific Lean Production tools: an empiric al observation from European motorcycle component manufacturers, Journal of Cleaner Production 85 (2014) 226-233 [6] MartandTelsang (2011) - “Industrial Engineering and Production Management”, S.

Chand, Ramnagar, New Delhi.

[7] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Production theory [8] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Production [9] http://www.gdrc.org/sustbiz/green/doc- prod_introduction.html

[10] Fourteenth Session of the Leather and Leaher Products Industry, Zlin, Czech Republic (13-15 December 2000)

[11]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_and_motion_study

#Time_study

[12] http://www.slideshare.net/AdvanceIgroup/defect- reduction-six-sigma-green- belt-project-in-footwear

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

In the following table and figures, the average tensile, flexural and impact strengths of the manufactured composite is compared to the properties of a coir fiber reinforced epoxy

The particulate matter consists of dust, smoke, fumes and fly ash[10].It was found that particulate matter was a major pollutant in the cluster region of brick kilns in Bangladesh when

Tel.: +44 01332 593572 E-mail addresses: [email protected] ICMIEE18-KN04 Engineering the Reliability into Products under Harsh Environments Sabuj Mallik School of Mechanical

Thus the consumer gets to adjust the amount of electricity consumed from grid and any excess electricity after self-consumption that is produced by rooftop solar system or any other

The internal resistance of MCFs with substrate orange potato and grass are respectively 787Ω, 848 Ω and 943Ω.The maximum voltage obtained from the MFCs is respectively 517mV, 454mV and

NOMENCLATURE r t : reference input, degree y : plant response, degree REFERENCES [1] Jae-Nam Kim et al., An Experimental Study of a Single Axis Seesaw Attitude Control Consisting of

4 Wear rates against sliding period at the speed of 0.513 ms-1 with the normal load of 20 N: a in dry condition, b in FW condition and c in SW condition It indicates that the maximum

These limitations can be potentially overcome by designing carriers that perform multiple tasks including encapsulation and controlled release, minimization of immune-clearance,