• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

MAXIM FLOUTING IN NON – FORMAL DEBATE SHOWS ON INDONESIAN’S TV CHANNELS.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "MAXIM FLOUTING IN NON – FORMAL DEBATE SHOWS ON INDONESIAN’S TV CHANNELS."

Copied!
12
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

MAXIM FLOUTING IN NON – FORMAL DEBATE SHOWS

ON INDONESIAN’S TV CHANNELS

A Thesis

Submitted to the English Applied Linguistics Study Program in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of

Magister Humaniora

By:

RIZAL ABDILLAH HARAHAP Registration Number: 8116111018

ENGLISH APPLIED LINGUISTICS STUDY PROGRAM

POST GRADUATE SCHOOL

(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)

i ABSTRACT

Abdillah Harahap, Rizal. Maxim Flouting In Non – Formal Debate Shows On

Indonesian’s Tv Channels. English Applied Linguistics Study Program. Postgraduate School. State University of Medan. 2016

This research deals with the maxim flouting namely Quantity, Quality, Manner and Relevance occurred in Non – formal debate shows in two Indonesian’s TV Channels namely TV One’s

Debat and Metro TV’s Forum Indonesia. The analysis is centered on the flouting of Maxims

that were flouted by the debate’s panelists based on the side of affirmative, negative and neutral sides and also their reasons. The data were analyzed by using the cooperative principle theory by Grice. A qualitative research design is suitably used in this study to give in – depth description and result of analysis. The findings of the analysis about the maxim flouting occurrences in Indonesian’s TV Channels are: 1) the four maxims namely Quantity, Quality, Manner and Relevance are occur in the the two non – formal debate show both in TV One and Metro TV, while the most maxim flouting in both non – formal debate shows is the maxim of manner which was flouted by the affirmative side in TV One’s Debat, and the by the negative

side in Metro TV’s Forum Indonesia. the maxim flouting of Manner were flouted by the

(6)

ii ABSTRAK

Abdillah Harahap, Rizal. Maxim Flouting In Non – Formal Debate Shows On

Indonesian’s Tv Channels. Program Studi Linguistik Terapan Bahasa Inggris. Sekolah Pascasarjana. Universitas Negeri Medan. 2016

(7)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Bismillahirrahmaanirrahiim

First and Foremost, the writer would like to express his greatest gratitude to Allah SWT,

the Almighty that has given him the ability, health and safety to finish his thesis. May peace and

blessing of Allah SWT be upon Prophet Muhammad SAW who introduced us Islam as the way

to bring greatness to the world.

Foremost, the writer would like to express his sincere gratitude to his advisors, Prof. Dr.

Sumarsih, M.Pd. and Prof. Dr. Busmin Gurning, M.Pd. for the support and guidance to finish

this thesis; for their assistance, advices, time and immense knowledge given to the writer.

Moreover the writer would like to express his tanks to the examiners, Prof. Dr. Berlin Sibarani,

M.Pd, Dr.Anni Holila Pulungan, M.Hum and Dr. Didik Santoso, M.Pd. for their suggestions,

comments and questions for the thesis improvement.

The writer would also like to express his gratitude to Dr. Rahmad Husein, M.Ed as the

head of English Applied Linguistics Study Program and Dr. Anni Holila Pulungan, M.Hum. as

the secretary of English Applied Linguistics Study Program who assisted him in processing the

administration requirements during the process of his studies in the Postgraduate School of the

State University of Medan, and not to forget special thanks to all lecturers of the English

Applied Linguistics Study Program who have given their valuable knowledge to him in their

lectures.

Sincere gratitude are expressed to his parents, Muchlis Harahap and Tuty Nasution, and

(8)

encouraging the writer to finish what he has started, for being the reasons of this Thesis

accomplishment. For being an example of what patience and love are for a child like the writer.

The writer would also like to express his gratitude to his beloved partners, best friends

the crew of Pixel Dash, Salnath, Iman and Yanagi for their never ending – encouragement,

support, love, and wishes towards the writer. For the crew of DFC, Yudi, Ferry and Gepenk for

being his best friends since 2003, may we grow old together;also for his older brothers Rahmat

Saleh and Ahmad Affandy, for always being there for the writer when he needed supports and

helps. The writer would also like to thank his mentor in art ko Henry, for his patience and

understanding for the writer, Yogei noojin and the Jurung Academy for giving their support

towards the writer. The writer also would like to thank his classmates, English Applied

Linguistics XX – A, Vidya Zati, Erwinsyah, Adib, Hikmah Sudanti, Dyta, and Pak Agus for the

prayer, support, love, laughs, and the wonderful years of friendship.

Those whose names cannot be mentioned one by one, the writer would also like to say

thanks for their help and support. Thanks for everything. May Allah SWT bless us. Amin.

Medan, 9 maret 2017

(9)

iii

CHAPTER II REVIEW OF LITERATURE 2.1 Conversational Maxim……… 13

2.1.1 Non – observed Cooperative Principle ……….. 13

2.1.2 Maxim Flouting ……….……… 14

2.2 Types of maxim flouting ………..… 14

2.2.1 maxim flouting of Quality……….…… 15

2.2.2 maxim flouting of Quantity……… 16

2.2.3 maxim flouting of Manner……….. 16

2.2.4 maxim flouting of Relevance………. 17

2.3 Process of Maxim Flouting ………. 18

2.3.1 The Process of Flouting the Maxim of Quantity…….……… 19

2.3.2 The Process of Flouting the Maxim of Quality……… 20

2.3.3 The Process of Flouting the Maxim of Relevance…….……… 21

2.3.4 The Process of Flouting the Maxim of Manner…….……….. 22

2.4 Reasons for maxim flouting Occurrences……….. 22

2.4.1 Factors Affecting Maxims in Natural Conversation……… 23

2.4.1.1 Particular Topic………... 23

(10)

iv

2.4.1.3 Getting other’s trust……….. 25

2.4.1.4 Showing up the knowledge and avoiding confrontation. 26 2.4.1.5 Avoiding deep evaluation……… 27

2.5 Political Discourse and the Use of Implicature ………. 29

2.6 Journalism Ideology……….. 32

2.6.1 Media ownership and TV Ideology………. 33

2.7. Formal Debate and Non – Formal debate……….……… ……. 38

2.7.1 Formal Debate ……… 38

2.7.2 Non – Formal Debate ……….. 41

2.7.3 Debate in Indonesia and in Indonesia’s Mass Media………. 42

2.7.3.1 TV One and the program “Debat”……….. 44

2.7.3.2 Metro TV and the program “Forum Indonesia”……….. 46

2.8 Relevant Studies………. 48

2.9 Conceptual Framework……….. 51

CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD 3.1 Research Design……… 54

3.2 Data and data source ……….. 55

3.3 Technique of data collection ……….. 56

3.4 Technique of data Analysis………. 56

3.5 Trustworthiness……… 59

CHAPTER IV DATA ANALYSIS, FINDINGS, AND DISCUSSIONS 4.1 Data ………...… 63

4.2 Data analysis………. 63

4.2.1Types of Maxim Flouting in Non – Formal Debate in Different TV Channels……….. 69

4.2.1.1 maxim flouting of Quantity……….. 69

4.2.1.2 maxim flouting of Quality……… 72

4.2.1.3 maxim flouting of Manner……….... 73

4.2.1.4 maxim flouting of Relevance……….. 76

4.2.2 Process of the Maxim Flouting……… 79

4.2.2.1 Maxim Flouting of Quantity………. 79

4.2.2.2. Maxim Flouting of Quality ……… 80

4.2.2.3 Maxim Flouting of Manner ………. 80

(11)

v

4.3.2 Reasons of the Maxim Flouting Occurrences………... 82 4.4 Findings ……….. 90 4.5 Discussions………. 92

CHAPTER V CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

5.1 Conclusions………. 95 5.2 Suggestions ……… 96

(12)

viii

LIST OF APPENDICES

Pages

Appendix 1. Quantity Maxim Flouting Metro TV……….. 101

Appendix 2. Quality Maxim Flouting Metro TV………. 108

Appendix 3. Manner Maxim Flouting Metro TV ………. 111

Appendix 4. Relevance Maxim Flouting Metro TV ……….. 115

Appendix 5. Quantity Maxim Flouting TV One………. 120

Appendix 6. Quality Maxim Flouting TV One……… 127

Appendix 7. Manner Maxim Flouting TV One……… 132

Appendix 8. Relevance Maxim Flouting TV One……….. 140

Appendix 9. Metro TV’s Forum Indonesia scripted video text……….. 144

Referensi

Dokumen terkait