セ I@
I
MICROD.l·OLOGY
I
セ@
•
セ@
セ science@
ALERT
-
.. , ,
· - ,
... " ·· _
-=
エᄋセᄋᄋ@ ""
Search
;· Research Journal of Microbiology
Publisher: Academic Journals Inc., USAI
Rt;urchj」Mセイョ。@
otI
MICROOIOLOGYセ@
nline First
Researdl Journal cl MicroOOlogy is a monthly international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publish and disseminate signitlcant research In ttie field of mlaobiology. Scope IX the journal includes: structure and function, blochemlstry, enzymology,
metabolism and its regijation, molecular biology, genetics, plasmids and transposons,
general microbiOlogy, applied microbiology, genetic engineering, VlrrJ.ogy, immunology,
dinic:al mk:robiology, microbial ecology, environmental microbiology, food mia'obiology, moleaJlar systematics, chemical or physical haracter1zation of microbial structures or products, and basic bidogical properties cl O<gantSITIS.
Editor-in-Chief: Sang tie<: Lee
rtlal Puritkatlon of セ」エ・イゥ。ャ@ Chltinue as Blocontrof of leaf 81ight Oisea5e on Oil Palm
.
セ@ セセ@セ@ If! Htf:xt ・。セZ@ Hr・Gセイ・ッ」・G|I@
tiblotk: Resistance and Surviving Percentage of Lactic Acid Bacteria and Bifldobacterium spp.
and,..,
lS1raaJ (fl di text pDE) (Reteren<esJ
• I n " ' ; :J
>latlon and ldentlticatlon of Mid-Gut Bacterial Community of llactrocera dorsalls (Hendel) (Dlptera: phritidae)
arnr '1
lSUilC1) [fulltcx! pDEJ [Refcrencesl
Record Fo1md
•
Navigation
Cl Online First
D Current Issue
D Previous Issues
D Edil:Orial Board
D Submit ii Manuscript
D Guide to Authots
:::i SUbsoibe to E-alerts
•
Indexed In
D 。ウ」QMッ。エセ@
CJ .ESIA
J r«4e c;,n,,i,,c
D eroQIJest
D SCll::lAGQ
D
sco.eus
'l
SCIENCE ALERT
... ,..
1 -,,i.. "·1·-.,. • - QQエᄋセᄋM··_·r
• • セ@ ti ' t .,1' .
. seiirch
Research Journal
of
Microbiology
Publisher: Academic Journals Inc., USA
I
l<.u•arc11 セイョャャ@ or
111CROOtOLOGY
セ@
e!SSN. )l){'X)(·X'IY.<
ーャセBsヲャャG@ 1816-4935
itorial Board
Researdl Journal of Mierobiology is a monthly international peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publish and disseminate si9nifkant research In the field of microbiology. Scope of the journal includes: structure and function, biochemistry, enzymology,
metabolism and its regtAation, molecular biology, genetics, plasmids and transposoos,
general miaobiOlogy, applied microbiology, genetic engineering, virology, immunology,
clinical microbiology, microbial ecology, enviroomental microbiology, food microbiology,
molecular systematics, chemical or physical haractenzation of microbial structures or products, and basic biological properties of organisms.
Editor·ln·Chief: sセセ@
Editor-In-Chief Sana l:iee Lee Executive Managi09 Editor
PubUShing Editor
EGIONAL EDITORS
a!l(j Gu H¥1 o
I. Alxius Salaai
1gd,1 Mohammad Aly
aoo Ray Cb;i1cdtJurj
OJ Bai Singh
m d Rew Gh.,is;w
1hmo1.11 Mohamea fl.·lprMrnec At;;,
mbooo TitDi]S!JpilWr)l
1iath1111 Stubyr;ij
Id Rilnj Ray
1anth1 Abraham N,Brahmhbatt
...
Navigation
•
D Online First
D Current Issue
Q Previous Issues
0 Editorial Board
0 Submit a Manuscript
D Guide to Authors
D Subscnbe to E-aterts
•
Indexed In
D l\SCI-Oatabase
D BIA
[J GoeQe SchQlac
D EmQuest
[J SClMAOO
Sm·o Singh
ASSOCIATE EDITORS
Nahell b G 81 atlaru
[,o!la NNas1r.1lli1
TECHNICAL EDITORS
?'ht?·m;.Qc
aセNNヲA@ :.:.,!l_;;t T
r ..!'!!..!1-"
X.a;ik
セセ@
t.!11-l Mセセ[ZQNNQ」⦅@ l._
LNNゥNゥャAZエNlN⦅セlAN[N@
セ@ mNQGゥMセ@ 1•·lt':
AmaQ'/ Heman Ah:lel Fartao AboelJ.d
\titJICC<i Mohamed Hussc;o Abdqlknatt
セエョイM。@ エエョイッョセBGkc@ R •:1pjOPz""-1.an
4J:;d• l V1qar Khan
R Tbervnozh1
Research
Journal
of M1crob10logy1 2014ISSN 1816·4935 I DOI: 10.3923/jm.2014.
© 2014 Academic Journals Inc.
Partial Purification of Bacterial Chitinase as Biocontrol of Leaf
Blight Disease on Oil Palm
Muhammad Asril, Nisa Rachmania
Mubarik
and Aris Tri
\iVahyu<liDepartment of Biology, FaculLy of Mathematlcti nnd Natmal Sciences, Bogor Agricultural lJn1ver1'\1ty,
Jalan Agatis, Dramaga. Bogar, 16680, Indonesia
Corresponding Author: Nisa Rachmania Muborih, Department of Biology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural
Sciences, Bogor Agricultural University, Jalc111 Agati11, Dramaga, Bogar, 16680, Tndone.'lia 1el !Fax: +6'2-251 ·8622833
ABSTRACT
Clutin is a maJor component of fungi cell wall, mycelia, stalks and ウーッイセ@ which can be
hydrolyzed by chitmase. This study was conducted to measure the ability of chitinase producing li::icteri::i m d1:1f,,'1'ncl mg ch1ti 11 of f 1111g-11 l 1rntl1 ogens such as (1m •11lrtria a//i 11i8 r-rncl
Colletotrich11rn セャオョQQZQーオイゥオᆪ、・ウ N@ tィセウエセ@ pul.hog'f'rts cuusPll ant rac.:h nost> , lr•:tt' liltghL aml roll.mg· on
ml palm leaves. Chit.inase producing QゥセQ」lヲ^ャGゥhL@ ヲS。」ゥャャキセ@ Owringir>n.<:is SJ\ I Ii\ 12 08 1so)ale w<'>rP nsPd
111 this study. SAi IA l2 08 showed maxm1um chitinasP w1t.h spPCific Hd.1v1ty (7.8D6 1 J mg-1 pl'OLP1n)
,,t 60 h mcubat.J.on セャ。クゥイョオュ@ lempernLur•' ;.rnd pH of chitinase adiVlty w01·1> :35°C and 7.0.
respectively. Clutmase was pa1t1ally pu1ified by
30°0
ammonium sulphate prec1p1tat10n couldincrease
2 ::S5 fold
th onthe
specific ad 1 v1LyThl'
ad 1 v1Lyof
partwlly p11nficd clnl 1nase \Vas <•pt1mnlat 45°C and 7.0, r cspect1vdy This ch1lrnase was stable at optimum tcmpcraLure for 180 min
1ncubat10n On sdsMj^a」hセZ@ :.snalys1s, lhF! e11zy111P had n'olt>cuhir wP1ght. nf 107, 102, 82, 6:J f\:1, ·l•'l :11lcl '1-1 kDa from 2y111ob'1 am analysis only 82 k DH prol.Arn band showr>cl ch1trnnsP nctw1ty.
In
t•itrnand detached
lco.f
bioussay showed thaL ch1Li11asP of SAH.A. 12.08 had antagonist act1v1ty andliiocontrol effica(:y t.o C:. rL{fi.nis and
r:.
gloMt::(lof'inidM in oil pnlm 101..tvl'sKey word s: AnLagonist1c activity.
CollPtotric}111 m
gloeosµorioidPs, C11n·ulari1La/j'inis.
birwontrnlf ffsc::wy, chi Ii •wlytic had. "l'H"l
ャセtrodu ct i oiG|@
Chit.in 1s a poly s1-1cclrnride cons1stmg of P· 1. 1-:\ -acelylgl ucosanu ne (Glc:NAc) residues t.h:tt. are
highly cross·hnked by hydrogen bonds Ch1trn is one of the most abundant renewable natmnl resou rce after c"llulos0. Chitin is widely distributed m nature as 1t is found in Lhc cut1cl1's nf 111sPCts, sl1ells of crnst.aceans, nPrnaLud"'s and <:Pll Wt-llls of most fnng1 (CJohel el ril. , 200fi,
ヲセィオlQN。」|Q。イケ。@ el ul, 2007; Arnnnz el 1d., RPセA IN@
Curuulciria rt//inis tine! CollPtntrichttm glMo.<1porioides are 1'11ng-1 c:n11sir1g ll-'af hlight :incl le;1f spots disease on oil palm nursery which rli:>cri>ase lf.s £>cononuc valut>. ln lndo1ws 1H I hi> cl1sPr sP was
slill categorized as secondary diseases but 111 Thruland it seems to be scnous disease in plant when'
•' 1.01°0 causc-d by Gunularir.L sp and
22°0
causl'dby
Colletotrichum sp. (i\.itt1morakul et u.l .. 20la>1 h us. I.ht> st.11<ly nho11t. 1 ·m ly prevention uf tl11s dts<'HS<' 1s r<>quuro. Ch1t.m 1x11.t.n11wd m 1 lic c<'ll walls mycelium, stalks and spor·'S ofpathogcmc funKI are able to degraclt> h\' ch1tinase A_NZMエᄋセイN@ 2Ci<_l5>
ChiL111ase 1s a b"l'Ollp of i:>nzymes that can dPgradt> chit.in polymer キゥエィセ@ slng-Ps Endocl11t inasP
'8C 3.2.1. l l) dflgrn<lP the p olymer into ッィセッQQQp イウ@ Lhen degraded t o monomers by exoch it 1nAsP
Reo.
J.Microuiol., 2014
bacteria (Liu et al., 2010), aclinomyeet.es (Gherbawy et al. 2012), fungi (Lee et al., 2009), insects
(Bansode trnd BaJekal, 2001:>) and plants HセQ。エウオウィQQョ。@ el
oL
2006) 1'he usP of ch1trnase some thisdecades is increasing along with the wide range application of this enzyme. One of them is used
as a bioconlrol againsL v11rio11s types of fungal pathogens (L)e la Vega \セi@ al., 2006) which is
expected t.o reduce
the
USP of synthetic fungi.c1des. Those efforts are <:onlmue<l Lhroughoutthe
worldwide to increase the production of clutinase from various bacterial isolates. The most species is often
used as b1ocontrol agent from group Bacillus. Vanous chitinase pmclucing Barillus species have
been reported among
B.
cere1ts
(Huanget al.,
2005),B.
thuringien.<1is
(De la Vegaet
al.,
200()) andB. li<:heniformis
(Kamilet al.,
2007). Some of the latest characteristics of bacterial chitinasc hasbeen \\'idely reporte<l (Dhaltacharya el al., 2007). However, therP were still no reports about the
purification and characterization of indigenous bactenal chitinase which used as a b1ocontrol agent
of C.
affinis
and C.gloeosporioides.
The objectives of the study were to evaluate paitial purifiedand cl1araclPl'i?.e ・クエNイ。」セャャオャエゥイ@ ch1tmase of b」オZゥャャキセ@
lhuringiensis
SAlli\ 12.08 and det.erminE> ll spotenC'y ns b1ocontrol of
C.
alfinis
nnclC.
[!loPo:::;porioirJes.
M A'l'E RI ALS .1-\J\l ) ).1E'J' llO DS
Microorganis m straiu n nd growth conditio n s: Bacillus
thuri11g1e11s1s
SAHA 12.08 waspreviously isolated from soil in ,J amb1, Indonesia (1 luryanto, 2013). Cultur0 was grown and
lllHtnt.anwd on sol11l lllfo'cllllrn d11t 111 ai;:ir at ;{/<lC. Th!:' t'1111i;al pathoi;ens
r.
affini.'I
セュj@C. gl.oi'.'usporioides are is•Jla!Pd from mf•'Ct.:..'Cl c.1} polm leaves (Hurynnto. 2013; Ptu·namasan, 2013).
ThP isc-.1:-il.Pcl fungi were grown 011 'ot ;1to Oi>xtrose 1\gur iPDA.1 pl1Jtrs ancl rnc·11hat,ed at 28"C for 1-6 days.
Tlw
both of isolate m'f' oolle<:L1><l ::it. IPB Cu lt.uri> CoUect 1011, DepartmPnL of D1ology, f ucu llyof Mathcmot1cs and Naturnl Scic1wcs. l3ogor Agricultural U111ve1·sil.y. Indonesia.
l\Jodclli n g bacterial growt h c u rYc fro m isolat e'-a n d c h iti n ase produ ctio n : lnr>culat10n of
2-4 loopful of selected 1so at"S mt<• 50 mL nutrient brnth \>18) suppl2mcntC'd with PNSセッ@ chitin c:olloi(h1l Arnl incubale<.l HI [セW」」@ for lG h T11 amount of Jllb c11lt111'1> (JO· cells mL-) was mocul11Lecl rnt.o 100 ml. NB wit.h eol loi(J:.il !'!iii 111 which used P11zy111e prnd11ct.io11 m""'.hun1. Ench c11lt.1u·t> was
incubatPcl at :n°C. 120 qrn1 and r•ollf'l'INI f?ve1y t) 1m11l 72 Ii :nul t.l1Pir opt.ical dens1t.y were
lllPAS 1 r1>;\ SJl"Ctrophol rn 11rt 1·11 :-ii Iv it. 1)()() nm TI ., c11 l:.111·r!' W""I., t.h..,n •·entr fuf.. :it. l)()()i') qHn
(centnfugc Hermie with rotor 220 07) for 20 1mn tr1 obtrun t ht' 」ョ エ、エセ@ e:-.."tracl of e>..trnccllular
ch1tin .. セウ・@ enzyme.
セ ヲ ・ Zエ ウオイ・ ョ キ オ エ@ o f c hi t in ns1! acfi\. il y a n d p rote i n 1·0 11 cen t ra tion: C lut.11111SP acl1v1t.y wns
111Pas 11 <>d hy Sprncller ( l '.)fl'iJ tィセ@ en HIP 1 •xl l'acl of pxlQᄋキpャャQQャセQQ@ ヲ^ャャセIGャョp@ w: • ._ n1ld1>d 111 () 3°0 c111loid;il c:h1Lin and 0 I J\.f phosplrntP bu fff't 111. :37"C, pH 7.0 and ng1LatPcl at I '.?O rpm . The mixturP was rncub;_1led at :J0°C fol' 30 min. A.fhr 1x· nt.rifugat1ou at 8.l(J() g for 5 min, lhe Jiltru Le was ad<l0d to
750 µL tlist1Uotcd wat.er and 1500 pL セS」ャイョQ」ウ@ reagent (1\-Fernsrnnida and 0.5 M セ「
R
cH|I@ and theP11xtu wus lio1lf"J at lO(J°C for 10 n1111 Enzy1m .. 11d1v1t._\. was dPt·nr11wd by m1•11s1111ni:;
absorbancf" <1l. セ@ 20 nm anJ using <_;1.·-'.\l,1C'I as a st:.mda1 d P1·ot 1?111 MOC•'ntratwn was detci mine.J
by the Bradford ( 1971)) 11s111i; buvi1,.. sv1·11111 albumrn :is :1 standard.
Parti:l I purifi catio n o f c h iti nasc" l 'a11.wl purifical10n was ーᄋセイヲッイュ・、@ using ammonium sulphat:.l' .
Crud., .-nzyn P obl.a11wd \\·ns p1ec11 1tnh I with n11ir11on11irn snlphal e c. nee 11.rflt.ion 0 -100, up to
130-70°0 (Scopes, 1!1\:1.ti. Pr0c1p1tat .. s nrc stored at 1°(' for セᄋQ@ h and GBセョャョエGオァM・、@ at 6000 rpm
(centnfuge Hormlc with rotor 220.t)7) for 30 min at -!°C. Tho pnitern pellet was added to
Res. J. Microbiol., 2014
Electrophorf>.s is and :1y m ogram : ThP protein pellet was adcle<l by phosplrnte buffer (0 1 Ml
pH 7. Electrophoresis was carried out under dennlured prot ems (SOS-PAGE) 'lnd zymO{,ri·:.:im. Chitinase solution from crude enzyme and ammonium sulphalo prf'cip1tation was viewed using Sodium Dodocyl Sulphatc-Polyacrylamidc Gel ElecLt·ophoresis (SOS-PAGE) (La<'mmh, 1970) w1t.h 4% acrylam1de concentrat10n rn the stflcking gel ancl 10% acrylarmdc m the scporol1on gel. After electrophorcs1s, gels were stained with coomassie brilliant blue G-250. The chitrnase activities were
also detected on gels by using
SDS-PAGF.
and zymoE,'1'am supplemented withO.a
0o
colloida) d11tin.C ha1·acterization of o hitinase activity: The crude ex-tract and partially punficatJ.on was characterized at its optimum pH and temperature w1th iLs stability wns determin<l al optimum pH
and temperature. The optimum pH for chitinasc activity was determined
by
measurements atdifferent pH values (4.0-10.0) using colloidal clutm as a substrate under standard assay conditions.
The buffers used were HS follows: 0. 1 M citrate buffer (pl I 4..0-6.0), 0 .1 M phosphate buffer
(pH 7.0·8.0) ancl 0.1 M glycme-NaOH buffer (pH 9 0-10.0). The optimum temperat.ure was determmed by incubHt.i11g Lhe react.ion mntures al <lifferent rnngP of lempPrnt.uri> from 2R·•30°C with 5°C 111l.1>1val from thP optimum pl I obt.runed fm111 the previous Pl<per1111t>11t.. The stahi11t.y t•f
dutmasc was investigated by incubal111g the enzyme with optimum pH and opt.rnrnrn エ・ューIャGセGエオイ」@
for 180 mm.
Effect of c hitinase 011 fungal patl1ogcn s by in vitro t est : The effect of isolot•' S;lliA 12.08 •vas
t..;-st..ed ai;mnsl C. affillis 1-111d C. gloeosJ>oriuides on f>I);\ Anlagornst 11· adiv1ly wns tPst.e1.L by 11s111g
ct>ll culturf>, c1 ude chil.rnase and partial p1mficat.io11 Pnzyme of LlH' st.ram with ni;ar wf>ll diffusion
method. Well containing
200
µL
cultur e or crude chit.inase was at distance of:..; cm frum margin ofPDApla1.e Opposit.P t.lw well, at a clistancn of' aL I Nist. :'I cm, suspc'Clc<l pathogenw f1111g1 Wf>n' placNI.
,\fter incubation for 6 <lays at 27°C rnh1bit10n of the pathogens dcvdopm('nl was ossesso<l with param1.::tcr. The percentage of mhib1t1011 of radial gmwth can be estimated by follcwrng e<"JUat.ion:
lnlub1ti on L'f radial growlh (0o) - r, -r, l 00
i:
where, 1 1 ts le11brl.h of rachal growt.h Lowards plate tnnrgrn (3 cm) and l'z is l!engt h nf 1·adial gt owt.h t.owarcls antagonistic (Fokkoma, 1D73).
Biocoutrol n.ssa.y by detached leaf tes t : The 60 h cell culture, crude clutmasc and part.ml purification clntmas(' \.''Cl'f"' tested to b10control effcrlivencss (Ile tJ>t al, 2003) . Oil palm kaf\.\'CIS washed using st.AriJe aquodt•sL. Treul.rni>nl. consists of t10 h cell c:ult.111·P, ernclP Pll'l.yrnr-s ond pnrl.1nl punf1cut11m fmzyrni>. For nPgaL1ve co11Lrnl oil pa lm 1P1wes wen' 111oculat.ed w1tli funi;t ptilho!-fl'JIS
only, 11smg C. a//inis and C. gloeosporioides. The wholP trcatnH'llLs were co11d11ct.ed fom· t imPs.
P..<ich leaf was treated, cut. up to size of I x;3 cm ThPreaO er the IPaf wns dipp,,d 11110 t.J セ。エNQQQ・QQエ@ s for 30 min th0n 3u· dned The leaves put and placed mlo a petn clish cc:inl..umng ,, wet filler papr1 to
maintain thl" humichty. After 1-2 h , 50 µL of ヲオョァセエャ@ pathogens Ill a concentratwn uf 4x 10" sporns
m l, l Lu Lli!:-' ()flP. end of Lhe surface
ur
I.he leaves mid then Jlll:ltbHt.Pd i'or i dnys lll thL· thll'kcond1tions ol room temp1'rature. Pe1 contage of b1oconlrol ッヲヲjN」。ᄋセy@ of treatnwn' LBC) and D1s•.'ose
Incidence (DI) calculated 11smg the eciuat1on ofChancha1chaov1vat <>f rd <20071 ·
T-A
BC(%) =-->< LOO
and:
Where:
BC
=
Bioconl.rol pfficacyRes. J. kf icro ln:ol., 2014
DI("'•) -セカ@ 100
T
T
= No.of
infected spots inoculated with pathogens onlyA
=
No. of in fed.eel spots inoculated wiLh ontogomsL and pathogensDI = Disease incidence
S tati c ti cal a na lysis: Data was analysed usrng :MS.Excel Software.
R ESULTS
G r o w t h c u rve a tul c h iti n ase act ivity o f i!·m la t e: The isolnt.es wer't' [;l'Own 1n !\B \.\'as enriched
by collmdal ch1L111 (pH 7 Ol al 37°C. The gruwt.h rate of S;\HA 12.08 1sc1laL£' wns nscendetl fru111
0 -24 h of incubation ttnd LhE>n grov.th was rdat1vdy stabk up to GO h 111cubation and descended
ofter 72 h 111c11bot1on (P1g. 1) . The r.h1hnM;F wns produced from
:m
h 111c11bntion and relot1velyincreased unLil f)O h 111cubaLion. The highest chiLrnasc actn'lty wus fcund at the 130 h incubation,
after 1-36 h 0f mcuhnt 1011 th., aclivily was nol l'ou ncl \Fri::" I)
Par tial purific•a t ion o f c h itinase: The purtr;il pt1l'ificaLio1 procP<lun:>s oft.hi.> ch1t.inase secreti.>d
hy Lhf' SA H:\ 12.0R isolnl" 。ョセ@ summanz0<l 111 Tubk 1. The rPs111ts or ーQセᄋ」QQhエ@ ul.1011 QQウQョセ@ om111011111111
sulphate 0·10% 11p lo ti0-70% (w/v) sl10wed i.liat. ::I r.once 11Lnitio11 of ZセPE@ 11. wns able Lo produr.E:> :1
'l'ablc 1: SlUnmru·y of cht111moc partially pwification producoo h.v 8. OOキイゥQQーゥ・QQウセ@ SM-1.i\ l !! 08
Steps 'l'ota\ protPin (mp.) 'l'ot1I ·11·t1v1ty {l!) セー・ョ@ fir Mllv1ty (ti mg) Purificatfon Cfoldl Yiclrl I" • l
cョクャ・・クエイ[ッセiN@ 1D.ll80U 142150 7 2 10 1.00 IM
ZIHヲセ@ am.ntC'll.lWll SuJph&tlP VJ'f'<.'ll)J_la_ll_On _ _ __ o_.08'_1:! _ _ _ _ _ J_ll _ _ __ _ J_7_l_'>_J _ _ _ _ _ :...._> a_s _ _ _ _ l_.o_J_
••S ')
r'
(,
•Jl
MMセ@ C) セ@
UI
0 '>.t•
Nセ@
クセ@
H
セ@
--0--1 .... L<ll
-0-\ricllK' ch1lina.,_ •<II\ II\ 11 ュセ@ 'rrnWn)
{ ^MMセMセ^MMM\スMMMサスMMNNNNLNNNM ... MMNMM MNNN M セMMMNMMMN MM\Iヲャ@
"
iセ@ }セ@"'""' lh
fゥセN@ 1 Growth a11d chit 11rnse acl1v1Ly of Lh P
n.
tli11riugiens1:.. 8Al1A 12.08 1solal<: on produd.1011Res.
J .
Microbiol., 2014mruamum clutmase specific activity 17 .061 U mg-1 (Fig. 2) and increase the purit.y upt.o 2.3n fold.
Furthermore, ammonium sulphate at 30°0 (w/v) was used for prPcip1tal.lon of protein 111 cr11cfo
enzyme.
Chitmase from precipitation method was analyzed by SDS-PAGE to obtain the number of
protein bands And mohx:ulal' weight Zymogrom was analyzed using- 0.3% colloidal dutu. us a
substrate (Fig. 3) The result of SDS-PAGE usrng Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 (CBB G-2 50)
showed at ィ セ。ウ エ@ seven bands (molecular) of SAJ fA 12.08 chit.inns!> prol.1>in fracLion of 30%
Rmmonium sulphato wit.h an estimated ュッ ャ nセオャョイ@ weight viz 107, 102, 82, 63, 5G, 46 and 44 kDa.
Zymogram result using 0.1 % Congo red showed one protein molecule which had chitinase acL1VlLy
with molecular weight of 82 kDa . It was calculated on the basis relative mobility of standard proteins.
18 o <;upcmaiant
i!f
16 0Proc1pit.ltC2, I;
f' ;. iセ@
Mセ@ 10
... "" ;:; R
セ@ (>
" セ@
..
!:
セ@
5
0 <Htl
i\mmorulQJl sulphAI< Cl1n.:cnrration iセI@
Fig. 2. Effect of ammoniu m s ulphate conccntratii:.n on precip1tat1on of B. i h uringir>n.c;is SAHA 12.! 18
dnlmase Barn represent sLandard f>rror
70 l<lla
l\OkD•
so Hla
セッ@ to.
M
107 ill•
11>' Uh
x2 t na
61 U>a
SS k.Da
4C> kl)a 44 LUa
F'1g. 3· SDS·PAGE and zymogram of chitmase SAHA 12.08 Al: Molecular wc-1ght ウャ。ョ、。イ、セN@
1: SDS PAGE crude e nzyme, 2: SDS PAGE of 30°0 (NJ14')2S(j1 prec1p1tat1on, 3: Zymog-ran1
[image:10.618.38.515.269.671.2]Res. d . Microbial., 2014
C h ara c t e riza t.ion o f c hitinas e a cti vity: Maximum pH of the crude enzyme and partially
punficat1on enzyme isolate, SAHA 12.08 was max'imurn at pH 7.0 with the actlv1ty 0 697 an<l
0.721 U
mL-.
respectively (Fig. 4). Among the different temperature tested, the chitmaseactivity of crn<l<> <'llZ) me was most active al セUᄚc@ bemg 0.722 U mL-1 bul maXJmum activity of
partially purification of enzyme was observed at 25, 45 and 6D°C being 0.722, 0.723 and
0 719 U mL-1, respPclively (Fig. 5).
To
<lelemune its slabilily. Lhe crude ・ョセケュp@ and pnrt.ialpurification enzyme was incubated at optimum temperature for a period of
3 h.
Doth chitinase werestable at maximum plI and temperature up l.o 180 min of incubaLion (F'ig. 11).
Effect of chitina.se o n funga.J pathoge ns b y in vitl"o test : lnhibit10n of the growth of fungal
pathogens i P , C. affini.<J and C. gloeosporioides was observed
in
Pilro by using 60 h cell culture,crude chitinase and partial purification ch1tinasc on agar well-diffusion method (Fig. 7). lnhibit.J.on
of those fungal pathogens by SAHA 12.08 1solnlf' ehit.inase showl.'Ci that 1t. was able to rnh1b1t
C. affinis better than
C.
gloeosporioides after 5 、。セ@ s mcubat1on. PaTt1al purification chitinasc could0 l ruck cnr1nc
c Paru;1lly pnnht'tl ・ョセQQQQNA@
1111
I
,...l
E
セ@
C·
Zセ@ ()I.]
セ@
ᄋセ@
セ@
.§
:c
(_.
0"1
J Cl 5 0 60 7 1• 80 l>.O 10.0
f 11;;". 4 Effrd. uf pH vnl ul's on eh1t 11rns0 art.1 v1t.y
"r
c11Hh• Pnzyrne and pm·t.1Hlly p11nf1ed Pnzyme ofR.
tl111ri11git>11.<iis SlJ IA ャセj |XN@ ThP :id 1v1ty --::is nwasurPd at :l'i°C Bars l'PpresenL sL:i11dardPl 1'111 S
ll.?i Cl\Klc <"lr:l.:I
Partially pwiiiro cnJ";•n""
--
0.7}-:::.
セN@ 0 71 .?.
i
QQセᄋQ@
G 11.1>7
111
Fig. 5 Effed oft,• 111pPrat.11rp on cl11tm11se ocl.1v1L.' of <:r11df> enzymf> nnd port 1aJly p111ified Pnzynw
of B. tlwringiensis SAHA 12.08. The activity was measurcJ at pH 7.0. Bars n:prcscnl
[image:11.618.93.520.340.476.2]Res.
J.
A!icrobiol., 201./0. 74 -0-Cnidc cmzymc
-l::r-hrual punlkarion enzyme
PNVTKMセセ セセセセセセ セMNMセ セ セセMMNNMセセNMMセMイセセNNNMセ MMLMセ セMNMセMMN@
0 15 JO 60 75 90
ョュセHュゥョI@
\OS 120 ISO \6) 18(1
Fig 6: StabiliLy of crude chitinase and partially punfied ch1linase al opt.imu m pl l 'lnd temperoture
of
B.
thuringiensi.9 SAHA 12 08. Bars represent st1111d11rd errorFig 7(a ·h)· E:ffoct1venPss of antagonist.
B.
lh11ringi1'1tsi . .; SAIIA 1'..l 08 at;nrnslr·
r1/fi11is 11ndC. gloeosporioides in antagomst assoy aft.1'r 7 days incub:\t1011 on PDA medium . For
C. Affinis (a) 60 h cell culture, (b) Crud0 enzyme, (c) Partial punfic:ition セョコケュ・L@
td) Control.
F'01
C. glo<>o1>porioides (e) 60Ii
c ....JI
c:ullui e cell.(fJ
Crud,.. t>nzymP, (g)Pm Lrn1 pur1f1c:nlion enzyme and (h) Contrnl of ofl "r 7 day 1ncubat1011
10l11lHt t.he growth of C. uffinis and ('. gloeosporioirle:; bHt t.t>r l han 1-r11de clut 11wse and ()() h cell culture for abo .1t. 39.89 and 35.80%, rcspecti vely aft.('r 5 cla;.·s moc ulal10n. Obse1 vations for 9 days
showC'd that culture cell 60 h, capable to 111hib1L C. a(finis up t.u 9 days whiJe th1 crude C)..i.ltlcl has
Llw h 1 ghPst rnl 11lnt.1on of fu llKnl pall1ogrns tiL Lhc• <'n rl y 1111 J<'lll nl1on and I I 1e ncli v II v I<' 11< l t 11 cl Pi セャGpョウ」@
unl1l 0 days ThC' same result was also showed by pnrtial punfication enzyme, th L ab1ht.y t0 mh1b1t
WflS decreasf'd . T Towevt>r, il was still higher t hrm ll1P olhe1· l 1·ealnit>nt.s r'F1g 811). Whe1 >'llS the
mh1h1t.10n of C. glur,ospo ru>ides among !.hose t.hrPf' t.iPaln11•11ts showed t.lit> snrnJm prit.t ·rns 111 "hi di
th1'rf"I wns a dcclrning of thP nctivity alung-tlw 111n1bot.1<11i P•'l'lod <Fir;. fib)
Biocontrol assay by detached leaf test: B10<..-ontrol C'fficacy test. used twn tr·'atmcnt.s, as
cell culture 60 h and crude enzyme. However, partiol punfi.cation of cnzym(' was nol done
berausE> the i>nzymf' cfln clPst.ruct. LhP testi:>rl ]P:lVPS f.ff.,,,, ivi:> t.i:>c;I nf th• b1· .co11t.rnl from
[image:12.624.16.545.90.561.2]セッ@ 1a)
o 6() h 」セャャ@ cultun:
':' 4o o Crude e•trnct
e • rart1:ll purified ・ョセケュ」@
c
.g 'O
SI
セ@
'9 セNQ@
セ@
I()Res.
J.
Microbiol., 2014Fig 8(t1-b): Growth reduction of (a) (;ryptocoryne a/finis nncl <b) CollPlolrirhum gloeosporioidPs in
t.)11" ーQᄋpウpQQQセp@ of B. thuri ngiensis SAflA l 2.08 ch if i rrnses
fig. 9(a·1): Effcct1vf•ness of antagonist B. thurin{!iensis SAHA 12.08 agamst leaf blight
d1SPHSP 1•;1l1SP.J by C. tl{fini.<> <lfld (';, (Jf<W08f>OI'ioir/t>,q lll b10assay using oil pAlm
lf>HVPS as for r', affins, (:11 60 Ii t:Pll c:11lt 11r1>, (h) C'rudi> • nzyme, (c) Control Nセュ、@ for
C. gloen.<:porioides, (d) 6(1 h cell, 10) Crude 0nzym0 ;md (f) Control
e:1ch l.r?11t.mf'11ts showed that the cull.11rf' cell 60 h and tho crude chiti1rnse have the ability to inhibit
[image:13.616.44.537.109.663.2] [image:13.616.108.538.128.419.2]Res. J. Al icrubiol., 2014
120 o Biocontrol cfficocy (DC) oDiscase incidence (DI)
100
..
80"°
g
82.90 rVTセ@ 83.60
セ@
Sl.63"
..
60 Il:!
&:'.
40
20
0
ti
0 0
l
l
l
l
2 3
Trea1mcnts
Fig. l 0: Effectiveness of Lhe treat.men Ls B . lhuringiensiH SAHA 12 08 in reduct.ion of disease
incidence m C.
affinis
and C . gloeosporioides. 1. 60 h cell culture cell+
C.
uffinis.2. Crudo enzymc>
+
C. alfl.nili, :1: 60-h coll cult.urc+
C. glm101>porioidP.'11 1: CrudP Pnzymc
+
C. gloeosporioides, 5: Con t rol of C. a/finis and 6: Conlrol of C. glot>o1:q>orioid<N'I after5 days incubation
leaf bhght caused by C. 。ヲヲゥョゥセ@ liPl.Le1· t.h::in thP cell cu)ltffe 1)0 h wit It the pffeC'f 1veness val11e of
b iocontrol for about 86. 15% or w1th d isease incidence for about 13.5%. \Vhercas , tho rcducl1on of leaf blight rF111sPd by C. glot>osporioidP.'I showPcl by uc;inr; 1)0 h ci>ll cul1 ure WAS bPll er lhHn c:rnde
enzyme for abouL 83.6% m· with d1sease i11cide1WP for aboul 16 36% (F15 10). The rPsulls indtN\U>d
that ther e was correlation between tho act1vity of in vitro antagonist and biocontrol efficacy bY
detAched lea! assAy Lest.
D I SCUSSIO N
fsolate cf
n.
lhnringiensi.s SAi I/\ 12.08 p rnd11rPd exlrncellular d11l.111asP whtr.h ATP cap11hle to hydrolyze substrates suc•h as c0Uoulr1l ch1Lin The> specifu; 。」ャN Qカゥlセ@ or t hP ・ョコケュセ@ began lo f111d al Lhc stationary phase when エNィセ@ n11mlwr of c..-11 lend t.o dc<!rt>asP Thr h 'hhcst spPcif1c acLi v1t" 1f Lht->enzyme occunP<l 111 I.hi> l)Q h of rnc11bF1t.ion. Tht> n1glrnst. t>nzynw prc><l11ct1011 WH'> also prevwusly
reported by Nfll'ayana 11nd Vij11yHh1kshmi (2009), lhe mnx11rn1111 chiLirrnsP producl1t)ll of
Str.?ptom:yces sp. ANC 6277 observ1'<l 3t. 60 h of mcubat.1011 ancl L.1111led to dC>Crcase d1w t.•> the
mcri>asmg of mcubat.1011 per iod. Almost all ch1l 1 nase from hactena h.1s shown rnaximum 1w1.1v1ty
at 30-96
h
of incubation (7.hu et al., 2007; F'anirnnrzi (Jl cil., 2009; t\unlPbyandarn Pf nl., 20 10).Crude exLrucLs of en:1.yrn0 obt.111 rwd from l.ltl' highes t f'llll)'rne pn1d 11ct.ion coulc.I be prec1p1t rtl.lKI
wtth ammomum sulphatE-:30% (w/v) and capable l.o 111et'PHSP Lhe punt.y ••
r
2 35 fold. Tlte percent.agPsaturation of mnmonium sulphat.P for @acl1dull11flse from d1ffPrPnl 1sol.1tes was 110L the sa111P The
p1>r ccmtago soluraLion of iltn m on111m s1 1lphuLP f'ot each cl11t.inas0 f'1·n111 、Qヲヲ・イQセQQエN@ i-;olat.Ps w:is not.
same The salurall.on levPI of pr@r1p1totio11 are r:rnged from 30-85% (Zhung el al. 2001; Kun f'/ <Li,
20();3; Rabeeth el al. , 2011 ). Previous stud res reporLed t.hnl clnLi1rns0 fn ,m B. c·irc11lm1s \\.1,- 1 セキ。ウ@
cnpoblc to pnx:1p1Lal.P with 10°0 amn1r.mun1 s11lpl1:1 l.P (\•VatnnHhc et 1d, l'.)91). Tl11' 111olPc11lm· W•'1gl1t of I.hf' prnt ern was fou 11d l.o be flhou t 107 , 102, 82, 63, RR, 116 and ·l I k IJa by 10°o SDS PArn·: and showf'd a single band 82 kDa 011 J0°o zymogrnrn analysis rntbc:1t1111:: thi> ch1trn:1si> achvtly The
molecular we1ghL of dut.mase of H1u:ill1Ls sp 1.1 . B. thuringiPm.is was analyzcJ by SDS-1'.\GE,
had morP than one prolern molecul f> 111 the range of 32-125 kDa (IJe la VPgA el al., 2006;
[image:14.624.111.548.123.274.2]Res .• T. Micru/Jinl., 2014
The highest aclivit.y of both enzymes was at pH 7.0. Chitinase isolates both crude enzyrn"' nnd partial enzyme showed a wide range pH from 4·10. Wang and Chang (1997) suggested that the optimum dutrnase of most bacteria arc varieties from acidic pH to alkaline. The highest activity
of both cHzymes wos nt.
pH
7.0. The Slimt' results also reported lhot chitinasc of B. thuringiensi.s(Gomaa, 2012) and
Bacillus
sp. (Mubarik etal.,
2010) bad the highest activity at pH 7.0. Theenzyme tlcl.ivit.y was dPt.ermined by the presence of donor protons an<l donor Acceptors on t.he
degree of ioruzation, obtained at pH optimum pH (Wilson and Walker, 2005). Proton donors and
flcceptors contained many degrees of ionization on Lht> sites of catalytic enzyme to support optimum
conditions, moreover, the
pH
also affects the solubility of Lhe substrALe. ExtremepH
caused changesin the structure of the enzyme and then decrease the e ffectiveness and efficiency of enzyme activity (Farnbee, 2001 ).
Crudo enzyme showed the highest activity at
35°C.
\Vhile the pa1tial enzyme showed thehighest range ucliv1ty at. a Lcmperaturc of 25, 45 and 60°C. MosL of the chilinase ofbactcna have
maximum activity at a wide tempe1alure. Various rcpo1ts mchcatcd that the max:imum activity was
al. 30-7n°C Wrandberg and Schurer, 1994; Sakai Pl al.., 1998; Barboza-Corona et al., 2008;
t..lubarik l' I ul , 2010, Tluagarajan et al., 2011; Jlaggag and Abdallh, 2012; Margino et ed., 2012).
f3oLh of crudf' chitinasf' and partial chil.inase st.<ible at optlmlltn エ・ュー・イ。エオョセ@ for 180 mtn of
rncubat.1on Kuzu et al \2012) also report.ed the s1Jrne tlnng on
R.
lhttringi<•nsis ssp. ku.'lrlakiH BK-51 whu:h rem ams slable and active for 3 h at. セPM I 200C.
Ch1l11111s<' Pnzyme is ctu-rently us<'d in 「QッャッセjQZョャ@ control of fungal put.hog011s because of 1ls
ability to degrade clutrn rn fungal coll walls (Ulhoa and Pcberdy, 1991). This study was conducted
t.o analyzp Llw ahil1 Ly of 60 h cell cullurc. crude e nzyme and pa1t1ol enzyme of B. エィ。イゥイゥァゥ」ュセャセGャ@
SAIIA 12.08 isolate to 10lub1t the growth of leaf bbght pathogens (C.
affinis
andr.
gloeosporioid1>s)
by in ntm t .... <;t The t nree ch1trnnsP t reatment.s wPre capable Lo mh1b1t t.he growth of hot.h
pathogenic fungi in vitrn. inhibition by partial ch1Lrnase was bf'Uer than crude onzymc and 60 h
cP.11 cult.11ro agni nst these fungal pal.l1ogens. ThosP results were probably ca11sed by the length of
Lune ュセ・、」^、@ h.\ L11e cell QセQQャエNオイ・@ to pro<lu<.-e chitmase while pmtial clnt.rnase an<l crude Pnzymi> WPre capab]P t.o hydrolyze ch .t.m found in fungal cell walls directly D1fferE>nces mllong the ab1lit.y of
rnh1b1t.11 11 オセ@ 1111st. ヲオQQセ。ャ@ pathogens キセョN NL@ causi>d h) t.l1e conccnl1 ot.1011 of hyw·ulyt1c Pnzy11m or
socondary mc-tobohc compounds found in partial enzyme or crude enzyme (Propai;dce et al., 2008).
Effect of tl'catment of chitinaso agrunst leaves infected of fungal pathogens by detached leaf
test has b0cn conducted and the results are presented 111 Fig 10. Crude enzyme has inhibitory
agamsl C. affinis, beUPr than 60 h <x->11 culture I lowever, different things 11re shown tigmnsl
C. gweosporioides 60 h roll culture capable of inh1b1trng better than crude enzyme. The results
indicated t.lrnt. LhffP wns correlation beLween the Activit.y of
irt
11itro anlagonist. and biocontrolefficacy h.v int iuu lest. The l'esults causC'Cl by t.lw syrwrgism of action of b10contrul mcchmusms of
rell cult 11n s111:h us ant1l11ol 1c pr0duct1on and induct.um of plant resistance wllh genes a<.:Lival1011
such as dntinasc\
P
1. :.-l·r;lucanase, pel'Oxydases and phenylalanine ammonia lyase (Chani; <?t al.,2007). AJthough there are no reports on oil palm leaf bhght b10control using chitinaso from
Bacillus sp. Several
Bacill11s
species have been widely used as b1ocontrol agents pothoge111c fungiboth of cdls, crude onzymi: and partial chit.rnase mclud.rng the gcrnnnation of seeds protected with
n.
liche11i/orr11is and B. I/11tringiensis
for si-ed mfestPd w1lh A./tiger
(Gomaa, 20121 and ch1lrnnseof
B.
tlwringiensis ssp. uizawai able to protect of bean seeds infested with six phytopathogenicfungi (DP 111 V<>i;a el CLl., セPPVIN@
Res.
J.
Microbiol., 2014CONCLUSION
Bacillus
thuri11giensis SAHA 12.08 produced chitinase at 60 h incubation. This clntinase waspurified 2.35 fold with 30% ammonium sulphate. Crude dulrnase and partially chitinasP had
maXlmum pH al. 7.0, 35 and 45°C, respectively with molecular weighL of 107, 102, 82, 63, 55, 46
and
44
kDa on SOS-PAGE analysis and 82 kDa on zymogram.The
bothof
ch1tinascwere
stableat
optimum temperature and pH for 180 min . This chiLinasP couldbetter
inh1b1L C. af[inis t.hanC'. gloeosporioides in uitro and detached leaf assay and has potential application as b1ocontro]
agents
for C.
a/finis andC.
gloeosporioides.ACKNOWLEDG MENT
This
research was funded byBOPTN
scheme from DirectorateGeneral
ofI hgher
EducationRPpublic of Indonesia in 2013 and ADS Funds from colhboratJ.on CRC IPB-University of Got.t.mgen
rn 2014 to Nisa Rachmania Mubank
REFE RENCES
Aranaz,
T.,
>.Il\lengibar R.
Hains,I
Panos nnd8
:\lil'alles et al., RPPY セ@ Functionalcharactenzat1on of chitin and ch1Losan. Curr. Chem.
D101.,
3: 203-230.Bansode, V 8. and SS. bセェpォ。ャL@ 2006. Charact.P1faaLion of ch1Lim1ses from rmcroor(;Jflnisms isolated
from Lonar Lake. l11drnn J. Biol.t>chnol., !) [セUWNSQI[[@
Barboza-Corona,
J
K, D.M. l\eyes -Hic.s,R.
Salccclo-llcrnanclcz andD.K.
D1deslu, 2008. Nlolccularand biochemical charact.P1·izaLion of an endochilinttsf> (ChLt\.-IID73) from Bucill11s ャィQQイゥョQゥ・ョウゥZセ@
subsp kurstaki
IID-n
Mol. D1ot.echnol. 39: RY M セW@Dhattacharya, D., A. Nagpur0 and R.J(. Gupta, 2007. lbctenal chiLinases: Properties and potential.
Crit. l?t>v.'Riot.Pdin ol , '27. 21-'28.
Bradford, M \1., 1976 A rnp1cl and •wnsit1ve melhcxl fo r thE> q11nntitation of micnib'Tam アオセイョィエゥ・ウ@
of prolem utilizing the principle of protein-dye bindrng. Anol. Biochom., 72: 218-25·1.
Chanchaichaovivnt., A , P. Rue11wo11g-sa and 13. Panijpan, 2007 Screenmg and 1clPnlilic1-1l.ion of'
yeast strains from fru1ls and VPt;PI ables Polen ti al for b1olog1cal conlt ul of,>' ·st hai vt>sl. duJI i anLhracnosc (Collet.>tri<·hum r·upsici). Rtol. Cont.ml, 12. ZIRQSMセゥZゥg@
Cha ng, W.T., Y.C. Che11 mid
C.L.
Jao, セPPW@ Ant1fu11gal act1v1Ly mid P11huncemenLnl
planl. l:t'O\\othby Bacillus cPreus grown on shell fish chit rn キ。ウャセウ@ Bioresom Technol , 98 122-l-l RセPN@
De la Vega, 'L.M, J E. BMboza-Corona, M.G. Agudrl1·-Uscanga and M. Ram11·1'z-Lrp0, 200n
Purific11tion an<l chm·ad.Prizat.1on of mt exochit.inase frrJm Ba<:il/1t.<{ tlwringi.ensis subsp
Aizawai
and tls ad ion Agmnst phytopathogPmc funb"l. Ca n,J
セNヲゥ」イッィQッャ@ 52 1'.fil-11fi7ParabC'o. 'v1..T., 2001. Enzymn: O rgn111 c Catalyst..
v-.;
11 1··rccm1u1 urnl Co, IJSA.Faramarz1, M.A., M. Fmrnh, MT Yal!d1, S. Aclnmgi. K.J Al AhmAdi, N Tasliarrofi セイョ、@
F.A. MohsPm 2009. Opt1mizal1t n of cultunil concl111ons fot proclucl.lon of cl 11 1nast> by u soil isolatP of -'!rzssilia Lim<>1WP R1ot.1 -dmolog-y , R: 93-ml
Fokkenrn, N.J., I 073. The ml11 o.f sAp1·ophyLic fungi in :1111.ago111sm against [)rer-h.'11f'f'f£ sorol.·inianu
(Helminthosporium sali1•11m) 011 ngHr plati>s and on lY<' leaves wit.h polli>n Phy510] Plan1
PaL11ol , 3: I !)fi-205
Frandberg, E. a ncl .J Schurer. 1 mH. Ch.ii 111olyt.1c Pl 'O[lf>l'tl/._>S of Hu.ci / [u.<; pab11 Ii Kl. ·'. ,\pplit>d Bacteriol., 7o: セェヲIャN[セVWN@
Gherbawy, Y., 11.t-.I. Elh :mry, A. All.alh1, 13. El-Deeb and
n
f\ lnrnlla, 20I 2. l\[oll'1·ular s<.:n•Pningof Streptomyce.ci 1solates for anl1fungaJ activity and fnmi ly J!:) ch itinase enzymPs. J M1c1·objoJ.,
50: 1159-468.
&s.
J.
Microbiol., 2014/
Gohel, V., A. Smgh, M Vimal, P. Ashwini and H.S . Chhatpar, 2006. Review-Bioprospecting and
antifungal potential of chitinolytic microorgarusms. Afr. J . Biotechnol., 5: 54-72.
Gomaa, E.Z., 2012.\Plut.mase production by Bacillus thuringiensis and Bacillus ャゥ」セョゥヲッイュゥウ Z@
Their potential m antifungal biooontrol.
J .
Microbiol., 50: 103-11 1.Haggag, W.M and
E
G. Abdallh , 2012.'Punfication and charactenzallon of chitmase produced byendophybc Streptomyceshygroscopicus against some phytopathogens.
J.
Microb101. Res. ,2: 145-151.
Haryanto, A., 2013. "lsolation of chitinolylic bacteria used as biological control of suspected
pathogenic fungi on oil palm seedlings. Bogor Agricultural University, Begor, Indonesia.
http://repository.1pb.ac.idlbitst.ream/hanclle/123456789/67770/Gl3aha.pdr?sequence=l
He,
D., X.D.
Zheng,Y.M.
Yin,P.
Sun and H.Y. Zhang,2003 .
..teast application for controlling applepostharvest diseases associated with Penicillium expansum. セエ N@
Bull.
AcadSin.,
44: 211-216.Huang, C.J., T.K. Wang, S.C. Chung and C.Y. Chen, 2005. Identification of an anb.fungal
chitinase from a potential biocont.rol agent, Bacillus cereus 28-29. J . Biochem. Mol. Biol.,
38: 82-88. v
Ka.mil,
Z., M. Rizk, M.
Saleh and S. Moustafa, 2007. lsolation and identification of rhizosphere soilchitinolytic bacteria and their potential in antifungal biocontrol. Global J. Mol. Sci., 2: 57-66.
Kim, K.J., Y.J. yセイョァ@ and J.G. Kim, 2003. "Purification and character1zat1on of chitinase from
Streptomyces sp . M-20. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol., 36: 185-189. ..;
Kittimorakul, J ., C. Pornsuriya, A. Sunpapao and
V.
Petcharat, 2013. Survey and incidence of leafblight and leaf spot diseases of oil palm seedlings in southern Thailand. Plant Pathol. J., 12: 149-153.
Kuzu, S.B., H.K. Guvenrnez and A.A. Denizci , 2012. Production of a thermostable and alkaline
chitinase by
Bacillus thuringiensis
subsp.kurstaki
strain HBK-51. Biotechnol. Res. Int.,Vol. 2012. 10.1155/2012/135498
Laemmli, U .K., 1970. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of
bacteriophage T4. Nature, 227: 680-685.
v
Lee, Y.G., KC. Chung, S.G. Wi, J.C. Lee and H.J . Bae, 2009. Purification and properties of a
chitinase from Penicillium sp. LYG 0704 . Protein Expression Punf., 65: 244-250.
Liu, D., J . Cai, C.C. Xie, C. Liu and Y H. Chen, RPQPセオイゥヲゥ」。エゥッョ@ and partial characterization of
a 36-kDa clutinase from Bacillus thuringi.ensis subsp. colmeri and its biocont.rol potential.
Enzyme Microb. Technol., 46: 252-256.
Margino, S ., C. Behar and W. Asmara, 2012.'rsolation and punfication of Clutmase Bacillus sp.
D2 isolated from pot.at.a rhizosfer. Indonesian J . Biotechnol., 17: 69-78.
Matsushima,
R.,
R. Ozawa, M. Uefune, T. Gotoh and J. Takabayashi, 2006. )ntraspecies variationin the Kanzawo spider mite differentially affects induced defensive response in lima bean
pl8:1ts .
J.
Chem. Ecol .'. 32_: RUPQ ᄋ RセQRN@ . ,V . .
.
Mubarik, N.R., I. Mahagiaru, A. Anmdyaputr1, S. Santoso and I. Rusmana, 2010. Chitinolyt1c
bacteria isolated from chili rhi.zosphere: Chitinase characterization and its applicab.on as
biooontrol for whitefly (Bemisia tabaci Genn.). Am J. Agric. Biol
ScL,
5. 430-435.Narayan a, K J .P. and M. Vijayalakshmi, 2009.'thitinase production by Streptomyces sp . ANU
6277. Brazilian
J.
Microbiol., 40: 725-733.V,
Nurdebyandaru, N., N.R. Mubarik and T.S. Prawasti, 2010. Chiti.nolytic bacteria isolated from
Chili rhizosphere: Chitinase charac±erizalion and application as b1ocontrol for Aphis gossypii.
Microbiol. Indonesia, 4: 103-107.
&s.
J.
Microbial.,
2014Peter,
MG,
2005;/ Chitin
and
chitosan
in
fungi .
Biopolymers
Online,
10.1002/3527600035.bpol6005
.../
Prapagdee, B., C. Kuekulvong and S. Mongkolsuk, 2008. Antifungal potential
ofextracellular
metabolites produced by
Streptomyces hygroscopicus
against phytopathogeruc fungi. Int.. J. Biol.
Sci. ,
4: 330-337.
Purnamasari, D.,
RPQSセ@
[Isolation and screening of cellulolytJ.c bacteria inhibit fungal
growth on otl palm tree). Institut Pertanjan Bogar, Bogor. http ://repository.1pb .ac.Hllhandlef
123456789/67780.
.,/Rabeeth, M., A. Anitha and G. Srikanth, 2011. Purification of an antifungal endoclutinase from
a potential biocontrol Agent
Streptomyces griseus.
Pak. J. Biol.
Sci.,14: 788-797.
Sakai, K., A Yokota, H. Kurokawa, M. Wakayama and M. Moriguchi, 1998. Purification and
charactenzalion of three thermostable endoc.lulinases of a noble
BacillUBstralll, MH-1, isolated
from chitin-contaming compost. Applied Environ. Microbial., 64: 3397-3402.
Scopes , R.K., 1994. Protem Purification: Prmciples and Practice. 3rd Edn., Springer-Verlag, New
York, ISBN-13: 978-0387940724, Pages: 380.
Spindler, K.D., 1997. Chitinase and Chitosanase Assays. In: Chitin Handbook, Muzarelli,
R.A.A. and M.G. Pet.or (Eds.). Alda Tocnografica, Grottamare, Italy, pp: 229-235.
Tluagarajan, V., R. RevaV'i,
K.
Aparanjini, P. Sivamani, M. Girilal, C.S. Priya and
P.T. Kalaichelvan, 2011. Extra cellular chitinase production by
Streptomyces
sp. PTK19
insubmerged fermentation and its lytic activity on
Fusarium oxysporum
PTK2 cell
wall.Int. J . Curr.
Sci.,1: 30-44.
UThoa, C.J. and J .F. Peberdy, 1991. Regulation of clutinase synthesis m
Trichoclerma harzianum.
J.Gen. Microbial., 137: 2163-2169.
Wang, S.L. and W.T. Chang, 1997. Purification and characterization of two bifunctional
chitinases/lysozymes extracellularly produced by
Pseudomona:J aensginosa
K-187 in a shrimp
and crab shell powder medium. Applied Environ. Microbial., 63: 380-386.
Watanabe, T., Y. Ito, T . Yamada, M. Hashimoto, S. Sekine and H. Tanaka, 1994. The roles of the
C-terminal domain and type III domains of chitinase Al from
Bacilluscirculans
WL-12 in
chitin degradation.
J.Bacteriol., 176: 4465·4472
Wilson, K. and J. Walker,
RPPUNセ。」「」。ャ@
Biocherrustry: Principles and Techniques. 5th Edn .,
Cambndge University Press, Cambridge, UK., ISBN-13: 978-0521651042, Pages: 802.
Zhang, Z., G.Y. Yuen, G. Sarath and A.R. Penheiter, 2001. Chitinases from the plant disease
biorontrol agent,
Stenotrophomonas 'J.altophilia
C3. Phytopathology, 91 : 204-211.
Zhu, X.F., Y. Zhou and
J.L.Feng, 2007. :Analysis of both chitinase and chit.osanase produced
bySphingomonas
sp. CJ-5.
J.Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B, 8: 831-838.