• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

PERBEDAAN HASIL SISWA BELAJAR DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN QUANTUM BELAJAR DAN INSTRUKSI LANGSUNG DI SUBTOPIK WAVEIN FISIKA ELEKTROMAGNETIK TINGKAT PERTAMASMA NEGERI 1 BERASTAGI TAHUN AKADEMIK 2011/2012.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "PERBEDAAN HASIL SISWA BELAJAR DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN QUANTUM BELAJAR DAN INSTRUKSI LANGSUNG DI SUBTOPIK WAVEIN FISIKA ELEKTROMAGNETIK TINGKAT PERTAMASMA NEGERI 1 BERASTAGI TAHUN AKADEMIK 2011/2012."

Copied!
9
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

THE DIFFERENCE OF STUDENTS’ LEARNING OUTCOMES BY USING QUANTUM LEARNING AND DIRECT INSTRUCTION

IN SUBTOPICS ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE IN PHYSICS OF FIRST GRADE OF

SMA NEGERI 1 BERASTAGI ACADEMIC YEAR

2011/2012

By:

Ruth Fricilia H. Ginting Id. Number 408121087

Program Study Bilingual Physics Education

THESIS

Submitted to Fulfill the Requirement for Getting the Degree of Sarjana Pendidikan

PHYSICS DEPARTMENT

FACULTY OF MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCES STATE UNIVERSITY OF MEDAN

(2)
(3)

iv

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

First of all, I would like to thanks God almighty who has been giving me everything to

accomplish this thesis: Patience, health, wisdom, and blessing. Without all these things, I can’t

finish this thesis while it is a condition in order to fulfill of the requirements for the Bachelor

degree from Physics Department, State University of Medan.

I would like to express the sincere gratitude to the Dean of Faculty of Mathematics and

Science State University of Medan: Prof. Drs. Motlan, M.Sc, Ph.D and also as my examiner, I

would like to thanks my great Supervisor, Prof. Dr. Sahyar,MS,MM for guiding me and giving

his precious time, and also great ideas that enable me to complete this thesis. I also want to

convey my sincere gratitude to my academic supervisor, DR. Drs. Ridwan Abd.Sani, M.Si and

my entire examinor: Alkafi Maas Siregar,M.Si and Drs.Makmur Sirait,M.Si. They have given

me many contribute in preparing this thesis well. Beside it, I also want to convey great thanks to

the principal of SMAN I Berastagi, Alberto colia, M.Pd and to Physics teacher there, K. br

Sembiring,S.Si, thanks a lot for making it easy and friendly.

I want to convey a great thank you to all of lecturers for their great contribution in

sharing knowledge and advice during my academic years. I could not complete this thesis well

without their good contribution and ideas.

I would like to express thanks to my beloved parent: R. Ginting and F. Sitorus (the

deceased) who have been giving me encouragement, Motivation, and all of support that I need in

whole of my life. I myself realize that they have much love to give to me and I cannot pay for it.

Then I would like to thanks to my brother and sister: Andrew Valentino Ginting and Tria Puspita

Dewi Ginting. Beside it I won’t forget my friends in my boarding house ‘KOST 121’: Fenny

Sitorus, Dewi Sihotang, Juniati Sembiring, Kak Natalia Girsang, Santi Manalu, and Lisna

Lingga, they are great boarding house members of me and surely my second family here. Thanks

for make me smile while I can’t, all of you are my friends to laugh, to cry, and to share. Believe

me, it means everything. Thanks to b’Rambo that have taught me when I don’t understand about

my research, you give me your spare time to discuss. Thanks to Ebi “tempat

penitipan/peminjaman barang” without you I can’t follow this final examination, hehehe. Thanks

to Reslina and Lia that want to accompany me during the research. Thanks to my friends in my

(4)

v

for me. Also thanks to my Eklesia Choir that give me place to grow up. Last but not least, I want

to express sincere gratitude to my special one: MJ.Tampubolon for giving me support,

compassion, care, ideas, and also reference to complete this thesis.

I will never forget my entire close friend during my academic years here, Ester, Nawi,

Zia, Febri, Tika, Majid, Lukman, Azwar, Alfan, Risdo, Nurul, Ella, Arini, Bobby and to all

friends that I can’t mention here. I will not forget everything that we’ve shared together.

Finally, I myself realize that this thesis is still far from being perfect, therefore I would

appreciate and welcome some constructive advice to improve this thesis and I hope it will be

precious as it should be.

Medan, July 2012

(5)

iii

THE DIFFERENCES OF STUDENTS’ LEARNING OUTCOMES BY USING QUANTUM LEARNING AND DIRECT INSTRUCTION

IN SUBTOPICS ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVE IN PHYSICS OF FIRST GRADE OF

SMA NEGERI 1 BERASTAGI ACADEMIC YEAR 2011/2012

Ruth Fricilia (48121087) ABSTRACT

This research is purpose to know the differences of students’ learning outcomes by using Quantum Learning and Direct Instruction in subtopics Electromagnetic Wave in Physics of first grade of SMA Negeri 1 Berastagi academic year 2011/2012.

This research included to the quasi experiment. The population in this research is all of classes in first grade (X) semester II SMA Negeri 1 Academic Year 2010/2012, this population is eight classes in amount. The sample in this research is class X – 7 and class X – 8 (two classes are selected of eight classes). Kind of sampling that is applied in this research is simple random sampling. Instruments that used as learning result test namely objective test as big as 20 items that contains of five options and already valid.

From the research obtained the average of pretest in experiment class is 28.57 with standard deviation is 6.55 and average of pretest in control class is 24.05 with standard deviation is 9.30. Calculation of posttest average in experiment class is 74.76 and control class is 66.19. Data already tested is normal distribution and homogeny. To do hypothesis test used with t two parties obtained tcalculate = 3.15 and ttable = 2.02. From the research also obtained the average of

(6)

LIST OF TABLES

Pages

Table 3.1. The study design posttest control group Pre – test design 26

Table 3.2. Basic Material Specification table of Electromagnetic Wave 28

Table 3.3. Manual of Observation of Student’s Activity 29

Table 3.4. Assessment Criteria of Student’s Activity 29

Table 4.1. Pretest data of experiment and control class 34

Table 4.2. Posttest data of experiment and control class 35

Table 4.3. Calculation Summary of Normality Test 36

Table 4.4. Summary Calculation of Homogeneity Test 37

Table 4.5. Calculation Summary of the t Test in Pretest 37

Table 4.6. Summary of t Test in Posttest 38

(7)

LIST OF FIGURES Pages

Figure 2.1 Spectrum of Electromagnetic Wave 19

Figure 4.1 Bar chart of data pretest of experiment class and control class 35

Figure 4.2 Bar chart of data posttest of experiment class and control class 36

(8)

LIST OF APPENDIXES

Pages

Appendix 1 Lesson Plan of Experiment Class 48

Appendix 2 Lesson Plan of Control Class 58

Appendix 3 Table Specification of Outcomes test on the subtopics EW 69

Appendix 4 Descriptor of observation of student’s activity 77

in Experiment class

Appendix 5 Descriptor of observation of student’s activity 79

in Control class

Appendix 6 Student’s Learning Activity Sheet 80

Appendix 7 Observation data distribution sheet of student learning 81

activity in Experiment class

Appendix 8 Observation data distribution sheet of student learning 85

activity in Control class

Appendix 9 Recapitulation of student’s activity value 86

in experiment class

Appendix 10 Recapitulation of student’s activity value in control class 89

Appendix 11 Recapitulation of Student’s learning outcomes of Pretest 90

Appendix 12 Recapitulation of Student’s learning outcomes of Posttest 93

Appendix 13 Value of Pretest and Posttest of Experiment Class 94

Appendix 14 Value of Pretest and Posttest of Experiment Class 95

Appendix 15 Calculation of Average Value, Variants and 97

Deviation Standard

Appendix 16 Normality Test 99

Appendix 17 Homogeneity Test 104

Appendix 18 Hypothesis Testing 106

(9)

REFERENCES

Arikunto, Suharsimi., (2009), Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan, penerbit PT Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.

Auliyah, Puji., Efektivitas Penggunaan Model Pembelajaran Quantum Learning Tipe Kinesthetic untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Mata Diklat Algoritma dan Pemograman. Jurnal FMIPA UPI.

Aunurrahman., (2011), Belajar dan Pembelajaran, penerbit Alfabeta, Bandung

Bobby and Mike., (2000), Quantum Learning Membiasakan Belajar Nyaman dan Menyenangkan, penerbit Kaifa, Bandung.

Dikrullah, Dikdik, Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Quantum Learning untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (TIK), Jurnal FMIPA UPI.

http://www.newhorizons.org/strategies/accelerated/deporter2.htm (accessed on 12th February 2012)

Kusno dan Purwanto, Joko., (2011) Effectiveness of Quantum Learning for Teaching Linear Program at The Muhammadiyah Senior High School of Purwokerto in Central Java, Indonesia, International Journal for Educational Studies, EDUCARE.

Purwanto, Budi., (2009), Theory and Application of Phyiscs 1, penerbit Tiga Serangkai, Solo.

Sabri, Ahmad., (2010), Strategi Belajar Mengajar, penerbit Quantum Teaching, Ciputat.

Sardiman., (2011), Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar, penerbit RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta.

Selman, Victor., (2000), Quantum Learning: Learn Without Learning, International Business and Economics Research Journal.

Singer, Sarah., (1998)., Result of Implementing Quantum Learning in the Thornton High School District, South Holland, IL.

Sudjana., (2002), Metoda Statistika, penerbit Tarsito Bandung, Bandung.

Suryabrata, Sumadi., (2009), Metodologi Penelitian, penerbit PT RajaGrafindo Persada, Jakarta

Gambar

Table Specification of Outcomes test on the subtopics EW 69

Referensi

Dokumen terkait