Management Control
Systems
Management Control Systems are a means of
gathering and using information to aid and
coordinate the planning and control decisions throughout an organization and to guide the behavior of its managers and other employees
Management Control
Systems
Many management control systems contain
some or all of the balanced scorecard perspectives:
1. Financial 2. Customer
Management Control
Systems
Consist of Formal and Informal control
systems:
Formal systems include explicit rules,
procedures, performance measures, and
incentive plans that guide the behavior of its managers and other employees
Informal systems include shared values,
loyalties, and mutual commitments among members of the company, corporate culture, and unwritten norms about acceptable behavior
Evaluating
Management Control Systems
To be effective, management control systems
should be closely aligned to the firm’s strategies and goals
Systems should be designed to fit the
Evaluating
Management Control Systems
Effective management control systems should
also motivate managers and their employees
Motivation is the desire to attain a selected
goal (goal-congruence) combined with the resulting pursuit of that goal (effort)
Two Aspects of Motivation
Goal Congruence exists when individuals and
groups work toward achieving the
organization’s goals – managers working in their own best interest take actions that align with the overall goals of top management
Effort is exertions toward reaching a goal,
Organization Structure and
Decentralization
Decentralization is the freedom for managers
at lower levels of the organization to make decisions
Autonomy is the degree of freedom to make
decisions. The greater the freedom, the greater the autonomy
Decentralization vs.
Centralization
Total decentralization means minimum
constraints and maximum freedom for managers at the lowest levels of an organization to make decisions
Total centralization means maximum constraints
and minimum freedom for managers at the lowest levels of an organization to make
decisions
Companies structures generally fall somewhere
Benefits of Decentralization
Creates greater responsiveness to local needs Leads to gains from faster decision makingIncreases motivation of subunit managers Assists management development and
learning
Sharpens the focus of subunit managers
Costs of Decentralization
Leads to Suboptimal Decision Making, which
arises when a decision’s benefit to one
subunit is more than offset by the costs or
loss of benefits to the organization as a whole.
Also called Incongruent Decision Making or
Costs of Decentralization
Focuses manger’s attention on the subunit
rather than the company as a whole
Increases costs of gathering information Results in duplication of activities
Decentralization and
Multinational Firms
Multinational firms – companies that operate in multiple countries – are often decentralized
because centralized control of a company with subunits around the world is often physically and practically impossible
Decentralization enables managers in different countries to make decisions that exploit their knowledge of local business and political
conditions and to deal with uncertainties in their individual environments
Biggest Drawback to International
Choices About
Responsibility Centers
Regardless of the degree of decentralization,
management control systems uses one or a mix of the four types of responsibility centers:
Cost Center
Revenue Center Profit Center
Investment Center
Transfer Pricing
Transfer Price – the price one subunit
(department or division) charges for a product or service supplied to another subunit of the same organization
Management control systems use transfer
Transfer Pricing
The transfer price creates revenues for the
selling subunit and purchase costs for the buying subunit affecting each subunit’s operating income
Intermediate Product – the product or service
transferred between subunits of an organization
Three Transfer Pricing
Methods
1. Market-based Transfer Prices
2. Cost-based Transfer Prices
Market-Based Transfer Prices
Top management chooses to use the price ofsimilar product or service that is publicly available. Sources of prices include trade associations, competitors, etc.
Market-Based Transfer Prices
Lead to optimal decision-making when threeconditions are satisfied:
1. The market for the intermediate product is
perfectly competitive
2. Interdependencies of subunits are minimal 3. There are no additional costs or benefits to
Market-Based Transfer Prices
A perfectly competitive market exists when there is a homogeneous product with buying prices equal to selling prices and no individual buyer or seller can affect those prices by their own actions
Allows a firm to achieve goal congruence, motivating management effort, subunit
performance evaluations, and subunit autonomy Perhaps should not be used if the market is
currently in a state of “distress pricing”
Cost-Based Transfer Prices
Top management chooses a transfer pricebased on the costs of producing the
intermediate product. Examples include:
Variable Production Costs
Variable and Fixed Production Costs
Full Costs (including life-cycle costs)
One of the above, plus some markup
Useful when market prices are unavailable,
Cost-Based Transfer Pricing
Alternatives
Prorating the difference between the
maximum and minimum cost-based transfer prices
Dual-Pricing – using two separate
transfer-pricing methods to price each transfer from one subunit to another. Example: selling
division receives full cost pricing, and the buying division pays market pricing
Negotiated Transfer Prices
Occasionally, subunits of a firm are free tonegotiate the transfer price between
themselves and then to decide whether to buy and sell internally or deal with external parties
May or may not bear any resemblance to
cost or market data
Often used when market prices are volatile Represent the outcome of a bargaining
Comparison of
Transfer-Pricing Methods
Transfer
Pricing
Illustrati
on
Minimum Transfer Price
The minimum transfer price in manysituations should be:
Incremental cost is the additional cost of
producing and transferring the product or service
Opportunity cost is the maximum contribution
Multinational Transfer Pricing and
Tax Considerations
Transfer prices often have tax implications Tax factors include income taxes, payroll
taxes, customs duties, tariffs, sales taxes,
value-added taxes, environment-related taxes and other government levies
Multinational Transfer Pricing and
Tax Considerations
Section 482 of the US Internal Revenue Code
governs taxation of multinational transfer pricing
Section 482 requires that transfer prices
between a company and its foreign division or subsidiary equal the price that would be
charged by an unrelated third party in a comparable transaction
Transfer price could be market-based or “cost-plus”