• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Metaphor and image building in Emily Dickinson`s I Like To See It Lap The Miles to express a private experince : a cognitive study - USD Repository

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2019

Membagikan "Metaphor and image building in Emily Dickinson`s I Like To See It Lap The Miles to express a private experince : a cognitive study - USD Repository"

Copied!
79
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

METAPHOR AND IMAGE BUILDING IN EMILY

DICKINSON’S “I LIKE TO SEE IT LAP THE MILES” TO

EXPRESS A PRIVATE EXPERIENCE : A COGNITIVE STUDY

AN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS

Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree ofSarjana Sastra

in English Letters

By

CISILIA PENI TRIINDRIASTUTI.

Student Number: 034214113

ENGLISH LETTERS STUDY PROGRAMME DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LETTERS

FACULTY OF LETTERS SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY

(2)

i

METAPHOR AND IMAGE BUILDING IN EMILY

DICKINSON’S “I LIKE TO SEE IT LAP THE MILES” TO

EXPRESS A PRIVATE EXPERIENCE : A COGNITIVE STUDY

AN UNDERGRADUATE THESIS

Presented as Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree ofSarjana Sastra

in English Letters

By

CISILIA PENI TRIINDRIASTUTI.

Student Number: 034214113

ENGLISH LETTERS STUDY PROGRAMME DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH LETTERS

FACULTY OF LETTERS SANATA DHARMA UNIVERSITY

(3)

ii

ASarjana SastraUndergraduate Thesis

METAPHOR AND IMAGE BUILDING IN EMILY

DICKINSON’S “I LIKE TO SEE IT LAP THE MILES” TO

EXPRESS A PRIVATE EXPERIENCE: A COGNITIVE STUDY

(4)

iii

(5)

iv

Courage is not the absence of fear, but more to the judgement

that somethingelse is more important than fear

(6)

v

Dedicated to

(7)

vi

STATEMENT OF WORK’S ORIGINALITY

I honestly declare that this thesis, which I have written, does not contain the works

or parts of the work of other people, except those cited in the quotations and the

references, as a scientific paper should.

Yogyakarta, August 30, 2011

(8)

vii

LEMBAR PERNYATAAN PERSETUJUAN

PUBLIKASI KARYA ILMIAH UNTUK KEPENTINGAN AKADEMIS

Yang bertandatangan di bawah ini, saya mahasiswa Sanata Dharma :

Nama : Cisilia Peni Triindriastuti Nomor Mahasiswa : 034214113

Dengan ini saya memberikan kepada Perpustakaan Universitas Sanata Dharma karya ilmiah saya yang berjudul :

Metaphor and Image Building in Emily Dickinson’s “I Like to See It Lap the Miles” as Tool to Express a Private Experience: A Cognitive Study

Beserta perangkat yang diperlukan (bila ada).Dengan demikian saya memberikan kepada Perpustakaan Universitas Sanata Dharma Hak untuk menyimpan, mengalihkan dalam bentuk media lain, mengelolanya di internet atau media lain untuk kepentingan akademis tanpa perlu meminta ijin dari saya maupun memberikan royalty kepada saya selama tetap mencantumkan nama saya sebagai penulis.

Demikian pernyataan ini saya buat dengan sebenarnya.

Dibuat di Yogyakarta

Pada tanggal : 30 Agustus 2011

Yang menyatakan

(9)

viii

ACKNOWLEGMENTS

First of all, I would like to thank Jesus: “Thank you.. for being my Lord”.

To my beloved parents, I would like to give my deepest gratitude to them for their

support in everything: for their prayers, for their unexhausted encouragement and

so much compassion.

I would like to thank my advisor, Bu Luluk, for her encouragement,

suggestion, evaluation and critics during the process of this thesis. I would also

like to thank Bu Tata, who gives me her insight and correction.

For all my friends ’03, thanks for the moment we have shared and the

friendship we have. And for all my friends who are still struggling: “Keep

fighting, guys! I will be waiting to hear good news from you”. For Wahmuji,

thanks for sharing a great website for many great books I hardly could find before

and for his willingness to spent his time to read and give suggestion, especially at

the beginning of the process. Thanks Mei Ratri, with her way, for pushing me to

finish my study.

I would like also to thank Margaret H. Freeman who is generously posting

and making free many of great works on dealing with cognitive study and Emily

Dickinson. A lot of inside I was desperately looking for I could finally find and

learn in her works.

Finally, I would like to thank my Marietta Sinaga and Duma Simbolon for

(10)

ix

STATEMENT OF WORK’S ORIGINALITY... vi

LEMBAR PERNYATAAN PERSETUJUAN PUBLIKASI KARYA ILMIAH UNTUK KEPENTINGAN AKADEMIS... vii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ……… viii

TABLE OF CONTENTS ……… ix

ABSTRACT ……… xi

ABSTRAK ……… xii

CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION ……… 1

A. Background of the Study ……… 1

B. Problem Formulation ……… 7

C. Objectives of the Study ……… 8

D. Definition of Terms ……… 8

CHAPTER II: THEORETICAL REVIEW……… 10

A. Review of Related Studies……… 10

B. Review of Related Theories……….. 12

1. Theories on Cognitive ...………. 12

2. Theories on Metaphor ...….………... 13

3. Theories on Image Schema ...…….. 15

4. Theories on Poetic Iconicity ...………. 18

C. Biographical Background ...19

D. Theoretical Framework ………. 21

CHAPTER III: METHODOLOGY……… 23

A. Object of the Study……….. 23

B. Approaches of the Study ……… 24

B.1. Cognitive Approach……….. 24

B.2. Biographical Approach ………. 27

(11)

x

CHAPTER IV: ANALYSIS………... 30

A. Projection from the of Imagery to Metaphor, and Its Establishment...30

B. Metaphor and Its Image Building ……….. 41

C. Emily Dickinson and “I Like to see it lap the Miles”... 58

CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION...62

(12)

xi ABSTRACT

CISILIA PENI TRIINDRIASTUTI. 2011. Metaphor and Image Building in Emily Dickinson’s “I Like to see it lap the Miles” as Tool to Express A Private Experience: A Cognitive Study. Yogyakarta: Department of English Letters, Faculity of Letters, Sanata Dharma University.

“I Like to see it lap the Miles” is a poem written by Emily Dickinson. This poem is well known as a poem about a train with strong metaphorical language. It consists of four stanzas with each stanza employs quatrin except for the third one.

The objectives of this study are to find out how this poem is built through its metaphor and image building (imageries and form) and what is its significance to Emily Dickinson’s world. Those two question are proposed to consider that so far analysis to this poem were not involving its form as the performance of its author in building the poem.

This study is done by using library research method. Cognitive approach and biographical are applied in this study. Cognitive approach is applied to analyze the metaphorical and its image building, while biographical is applied to strengthen the argument by providing evidence from the author contextual background.

(13)

xii ABSTRAK

CISILIA PENI TRIINDRIASTUTI. Metaphor and Image Building in Emily Dickinson’s “I Like to see it lap the Miles” as Tool to Express A Private Experience: A Cognitive Study. Yogyakarta: Jurusan Sastra Inggris, Fakultas Sastra, Universitas Sanata Dharma.

“I Like to See It Lap the” Miles merupakan sebuah puisi yang ditulis oleh Emily Dickinson. Puisi ini sangat dikenal sebagai puisi yang menggambarkan sebuah kereta dengan pembahasaan metafora yang kuat. Puisi ini terdiri dari empat bait, empat baris pada tiap bait kecuali pada bait ketiga.

Tujuan yang hendak dicapai melalui studi ini adalah mengetahui bagaimana metafora dan pembangunan puisi ini dibentuk dan juga mengetahui apa signifikansi pembentukan tersebut terhadap dunia yang dimiliki oleh Emily Dickinson. Kedua tujuan ini dikemukakan karena analisa terhadap puisi “I Like to see it lap the Miles” sejauh ini tidak menyertakan bentuk puisi dan kehadiran pembicara ke dalam analisa.

Studi ini dilaksanakan menggunakan studi kepustakaan. Pendekatan yang diterapkan adalah pendekatan kognitif dan biografis. Pendekatan kognitif diterapkan dalam menganalisa penggunaan bahasa metaforis dan pembentukan gambar puisi, sedangkan pendekatan biografis diterapkan untuk menghadirkan bukti–bukti yang diambil dari latar belakang penulis sebagai penguat analisa.

(14)

1 CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

A. Background of the Study

“I can show you more than I can tell you”

The above expression was quoted from Breaking Down (2008), a novel written by Stephanie Meyer, which reminded the writer to Emily Dickinson. It

shows that things we want to express can not always simply being told. A well

expression is not only containing information but it is also containing whole

things that the encoder wants to reveal to the decoder: idea, thought, and feeling.

The above expression shows that the encoder consciously understands that if

he/she directly reacts to the decoder by telling them the information they’ve

asked, he/she will not completely reach what he/she wants. There will be

something that is still missing unless it is being showed. And by showing, the

encoder is displaying or demonstrating it and letting the decoder detects

himself/herself. The important thing from the act of showing if it is compared to

the act of telling is that the encoder wants to reach more than just giving an

information.

Expression is a personal way to respond something. It takes a fundamental

part in human’s life because it is a tool to force out emotion, ruling taste, feeling,

or thought which is somehow repressed in human’s mind, from simple thing to

complex thing. Therefore, a well expressed expression would release a man’s

(15)

bring difficulties to the person who feels it. In general, there are two kind of

expression: verbal and non-verbal. Verbal expression can be manifested in

utterance or written form, while non-verbal expression can be manifested in facial

look or body language.

According to Joanna R. William (William, 1993: 94), in her essay

Expression and Communication as Basic Linguistic Functions, there is a difference between verbal expression such in utterance and in written form. In an

utterance, the process of encoding of the thought is more spontaneous than in a

written form. We often hear people saying, writing down feelings would release

one’s emotion. “Writing focuses on the process of expression as the conscious

composition of a text. It confronts the individual with their own word” (1993: 94).

There is no one presence to wait their respond. The benefit of writing from

utterence lays down on the process of encoding the thought which can be more

conscious and reflective.

Emily Dickinson is one of the greatest American poets, but her popularity

arouse not in her lifetime. It was only after her death, more than seventeen

hundreds poetry and eleven hundreds letters was found, published and well

known. In her life time, she rarely met her relatives and spent most her lives in her

father’s house or even in her own room. But, eventhough she withdrew herself

from her surrounding, it doesn’t mean that she was completely disappearing. It

was seen from her continuity to send her relatives and companions a letter or

poem. A written form was chosen to communicate and express something which

(16)

Emily Dickinson is well known of having a unique character, the way she

saw the world actively can hardly be argued in contrast to her reluctance to

socialize herself to the society. She placed herself between existence and non

existence. Throughout her life, the letters she had sent and poem attached to it

contributed her to maintain a connection with the outside world and impressed

them by her original style (Lied, 2008: 25). This unique character often

establishes curiosity among the readers and up till this time still creates various

inspirations for many writers to get to know about her unique world and

understand her poems better.

Poetry, conservatory, and family were the priority of Emily Dickinson’s

responsibility and life, and the biggest of all was poetry. In poetry she adored,

argued, and sought life. She dedicated herself into boundless of lexicons. As

someone who rarely met other people, and spent most of time privately in her

house, she was surprisingly able to capture the outer world extravagantly through

her works (2008: 51). Ironically her works were unnoticed by public during her

lifetime. It was because she kept large amounts of her works mostly for herself,

and decided not to publish them continually to be known by other. One of the

reasons of her rejection to publication was to protect the original elements that has

often been edited by the editor before a text will be published. Yet, she just

persisted to write, seeking life and remain her world untouchable.

On one hand it is obviously not easy for someone who has difficulty in

socializing herself with the society like Emily Dickinson to express her world in a

(17)

that she needed it. How Emily conducted herself and did not sigh about her life,

her ‘weird’ behavior in others’ eyes, were just reflection and loyalty to her believe

which brought her to the stick decision to where she would live her life. Never she

would escape her believe and disobey the believe she embraced. Justina I.F Lied

(2008) interestingly called the way Dickinson conducted her life as living in the

private bubble. It allowed Dickinson to see the outside and it also allowed the

outside to see her but remained to be untouchable. This makes the writer

interested to know her poem.

Considering the fact above, it is not surprising the poems that Emily

Dickinson wrote are as unique as her character. The sacredness of all elements in

poems cannot be argued, no changes can be made without distracting its function

in the poem. Each element would become important to capture the whole meaning

of the poem. As Emily Dickinson strongly expressed her complaint when there

were some changes that the editorial made seen as followed:

Edited Original

Success is counted sweetest Success is counted sweetest By those who ne’er succeed By those who ne’er succeed To comprehend a nectar To comprehend a nectar Requires sorest need Requires sorest need

Not one of all the purple host Not one of all the purple Host Who took the flag to-day Who took the Flag today Can tell the definition Can tell the definition So clear, of victory, So clear of Victory

(18)

Even “when two editor of newspapers had asked her if they could publish some of

her poem, she used the expression: they asked for my Mind” (2008: 29)

Punctuations, dashes, and capitalizations are markers of Emily

Dickinson’s poems, there are also two other elements which become the material

in building the concept of her thought into a poem, namely: metaphor and

imagery. These two elements cannot be separated from Emily Dickinson’s

poems; it gives such a vivid representation. In poetry, metaphor may perform

various functions. From the mere noting of likeness to the evocation of

associations; it may exist as a minor beauty or it may be the central concept and

controlling image of the poem (Merriam, 1995: 756). While imageries, in The Literary Heritage, “..are used to create concrete picture of experiences so that it can be seen, heard, tasted or felt” (Guth, 1981:721).

Metaphor lies at the heart of poetry. As unique as Emily Dickinson’s

character, metaphor is a unique language. Metaphor is a unique language not only

because it presents something as something else but also because it reflects of how

people actually conduct their life. As stated by cognitive linguists, Lakoff and

Johnson “…metaphor is pervasive in everyday life, not just in language but in

thought and action” ( Lakoff and Johnson, 1980: 3). For example, a person who

accepts LIFE IS A JOURNEY metaphor would have different action and thought

from a person who accepts LIFE IS A GAMBLING GAME metaphor. And words

or images that would be presented for each single concept of metaphor would be

(19)

There is an interesting thing about cognitive study to language, it sees

phenomenon of language that is firmly rooted from human thought. This study is

an expansion of cognitive science or the science of human mind which studies

they way information is presented and transformed in the brain. The earlier

cognitive study to language namely Cognitive Linguistics, it primarily analyzes

the conceptual and experiential basis of linguistic categories the formal structures

of language that are studied ‘.. not as if they were autonomous, but as reflections

of general conceptual organization, categorization principles, processing

mechanisms, and experiential and environmental influences.’ (Geeraerts and

Cuykens, 2007 : 3). In other words, they work from the assumption that language

reflects patterns of thought which means to study patterns of conceptualization

that we get from our understanding of our experience with the external world. The

next cognitive study to language taking a birth is Cognitive Poetics. Cognitive

Poetics is literary criticism that applies cognitive linguistics concept and insight,

in an attempt to explore more systematically their explanatory potential and

cognitive poetics in analyzing literary texts. The difference between the two is that

cognitve poetics assumes that poetic texts do not only have meaning or convey

thought, as often been concerned by cognitve linguist, but also display emotional

qualities.

In this thesis the writer chose “I Like to see it lap the Miles””, a poem written by Emily Dickinson that has received little critical attention, perhaps

because this poem is taking for granted to be a poem about a train (iron horse)

(20)

with mixed images pictures on it, but apparently its reference is displayed to be

“in-visible” by the speaker who only appear once in the first line and consequently

left the poem with no specific reference about the object that is mentioned.

“In-visible” here borrow from Margaret Freeman’s term for pointing the thing which

is “lying latent, hidden as another dimensionality” (Freeman 2009b: 176). This

arouses a curiosity to analyze the mixed images pictures further in its form and its

metaphorical expression, and then reflect it to Emily Dickinson’s life to generate

possibility/ies since she, as an author, is known of her well awarness about the

detail of her poem to be important.

Considering the facts above, the writer will apply cognitive approach to

unfold the poem due to its basis focuses on language as an embodied

understanding within the cognitive processes that enable the human mind to

conceptualize experience based on the interaction with our knowlegde of the

world; and its explanatory power, which according to Margaret Freeman, ‘ for

making explicit our reasoning processes and for illuminating the structure and

content of literary text’ (2000: 253). That is why it seems to be worth study as a

provocation to the study of cognitive theory to a literary text, since its newness

and insightfulness, especially in English Letters Department of Sanata Dharma

University.

B. Problem Formulation

1. How are metaphor and imagery in Emily Dickinson’s “I Like to see it

(21)

2. How can the metaphors and image building in Emily Dickinson’s “I

Like to see it lap the Miles” be seen as an expression of her private

experience?

C. Objective of the Study

The objective of this thesis is to study the cognitive processes of the

embodied human mind that include conceptualizing, forming and feeling from the

metaphor of a poem in constructing its image and how the image could reveal the

hidden expression of the speaker.

This thesis is aimed to answer and explain the question mentioned in the

problem formulation above. First, the writer wants to find out how such concept

or reason was built through the presented metaphor and image building. Second,

is to find out how the metaphors and image building were used as an expression of

Emily Dickinson’s private experience in revealing an idea.

D. Definition of Terms

Metaphor

The definition of metaphor is developing , in Merriam Webster,

Encyclopedia of Literature, the wordmetaphoris [Greekmetahoráchange of a word to a new sense, metaphor, a derivative of metaphérein to

(22)

used in place of another to suggest a likeness or analogy between them; it

is an implied comparison of simile (Merriam, 1995: 756) to the recent

study as Lakoff and Johnson stated that metaphor is a property of concept,

not of words (Lakoff and Johnson, 1980: 25).

To express

The term to express is used in contexts indicating a revival of the root

meaning ex-pressus, from ex-premere, which means ‘to press out’. Abrams takes one statement about expression from Aristotle that says

“Poetry is indirect expression in word, most appropriately in metrical

words, of some of overpowering emotion, or ruling taste, or feeling, the

indirect indulgence where of is somehow repressed (Abrams, 1953: 48).

Cognitive Study

Cognitive study here is a study to know the way language characterize

meaning, a study of psychological result of perception and learning and

reasoning (Freeman, 2007a: 1179). Cognitive study mainly turns the figure

(23)

10 CHAPTER II

THEORETICAL REVIEW

A. Review of Related Studies

This part contains reviews of some studies that related to the study. Study

on expression, Emily Dickinson, metaphor and imagery. These studies are chosen

to support the argument in this undergraduate thesis.

First chosen study is written by Joanna R. Williams, Expression and Communication as Basic Linguistic Functions, different from the common modern linguistic theory which is based on the assumption that the primary and

fundamental function of language is communication, she argues that there are two

basic linguistic functions of a language; besides the function of communication,

there is also other more fundamental function of a language that is the function of

expression. She noted that a thought has to be expressed verbally before it can be

verbally communicated. Therefore, “expression is a prerequisite to

communication” (Williams, 1993: 94).

The second study is on the way Emily Dickinson lived which is suggested

by Justina I.F. Lied, in her doctoral thesisEmily Dickinson in Her Private Bubble: Poems, Letters and Condition of Presence (2008). In her thesis, Lied is using an interesting term,bubble, to picture the way how Emily Dickinson lived. There are some reasons behind the term bubble. Lied explains that Dickinson’s reason in

(24)

interference of the outside world. She wanted to only allow the thing which was

important to her and then continued it to the production of her poems. Because of

that reason, Lied added:

…she has at her disposal the lenses through which she can bring nature to focus and control the caption she wants to apprehend. From that position Dickinson can concentrate her personal feelings, anxieties, and visions (Lied, 2008: 14).

Emily Dickinson withdrawal from the outside world is not merely disappearing;

she could accept the thing she wanted to see and being seen by the outside world

but without being touched.

John B. Pickard in Emily Dickinson: An Introduction and Interpretation

said that “I Like to see it lap the Miles” is a poem about train that consists of

breathless accumulation of action verbs lap, lick, stop, feed, and step in the first stanza alone. And then he adds ‘These run-on lines and the internal rhyme rush

the poem to its painting finish’ (Pickard, 1967: 76). Melanie, an academic teacher

who concerns a lot about Emily Dickinson’s works stated ‘…adopting a childlike

wonder and enthusiasm, Dickinson plays with the metaphor of the train as an

"iron horse." In her day, the similarities would have had vividness and immediacy

that have been lost in ours’

(http://academic.brooklyn.cuny.edu/english/melani/cs6/train.html).

“I Like to see it lap the Miles” is known of its vividness through the

metaphor and imageries, but rarely been analyzed further. This thesis, tries not

only to explore the poem through its the metaphor, vivid images, but also through

(25)

study, the writer believes that this poem is not only talking about train but also the

process her creativity in producing this poem by also analizing its form on the

page.

B. Review of Related Theories

1. Theories on Cognitive

Theoretical frameworks which are applied in this study are taken from the

Cognitive Linguistics and Cognitive Poetics insight. Both are using the word

‘cognitive’ to analyze language, and supposedly there is a doctrine about what

‘cognitive theory’ really is to analyze language. Apparently, the cognitivists in

both areas agree that there is no single uniform or single person’s enterprise

doctrine to define ‘cognitive theory’ itself. Instead, cognitive study “embraces a

broad array of theoretical frameworks..” (Freeman, 2006: 404), and “...it arises

from the combination of various pioneering ideas, that acting as a separable

strands of one whole, that have drawn together..” (Dirven and Ibanez, 2010: 13).

Although there is no specific cognitive theory, but from the different frameworks

they have applied, they believe and seek the same thing. They believe that we are

an embodied being and they seek how language characterizes meaning.

Characteristics of meaning from cognitive theories, according to Dirk

Geeraert (2006: 4-5), are:

 Perspectival :

Meaning is not just an objective reflection of the outside world, it is a

(26)

 Dynamic :

Meaning changes. New experiences and changes in our environment

require that we adapt our semantic categories to transformations of

circumstances.

 Encyclopedic:

It arises from the cumulative association of experience,

conceptualization, context, and culture. It is not separate from other from

other forms of knowledge that we have.

These characteristics of meaning are important to have in mind, especially in

dealing with ‘figurative’ or indirect language because one picture can be

described variously or even one picture can be used to refers something else. The

meaning then, is basicly based on the scene that is being described by the

producer. Perspectival forces to evaluate from which stand point or position the scene is described,dynamicforces to imagine the mental spaces presented and see the creativity, and encyclopedic demands not only knowledge of word meaning but knowledge of word in context from the producer of situation. Following are

the theories under cognitive theory that are applied to seek the meaning to prove

the cognitive believe of the embodied being and language.

2. Theories on Metaphor

Metaphor generally is known as calling one thing into another, from one

domain of thought to another. As commonly known, in the theory of imagery,

(27)

picture some abstract feeling in an experience, then that imagery would not stand

for an image alone because in vividly picturing an experience there was always a

concept behind our picture in our mind that derives us to the image. “An image

alone does not make a poem. The image has to refer to a complex field of thought

and feeling beyond itself; it has to suggest or to call up a parallel idea, to become

what we call metaphor” (Lakoff and Turner, 1989: 36).

Moreover, Lakoff and Johnson in Metaphor We Live By explain that metaphor is not only used as an instrument to express an experience. According to

them metaphor have entailments that organize our experience, uniquely express

that experience and create necessary realities. For example in “TIME IS MONEY

metaphor, it entails that TIME IS A LIMITED SOURCE, which entails that TIME

IS A VALUABLE COMMODITY” (1980: 9).

From the above example it is inevitably seen that the concept behind a

metaphor leads us the come to an action based on that concept. Here for Lakoff

and Johnson, metaphor primarily matters of thought and action: “… metaphor is

pervasive in everyday life, not just in language but in thought and action” (1980:

3). The "isolated similarities" are indeed those created by metaphor, which simply

create a partial understanding of one kind of experience in terms of another kind

of experience. They are grounded in correlations within our experience. As hiding

and highlighting, for example in ARGUMENT IS WAR metaphor, the metaphor

would highlight the action toward the argument therefore word like attack,

(28)

Metaphor in poetry is not different phenomenon from metaphor in

everyday language but Lakoff and Turner (Lakoff and Turner, 1989) poetic

metaphor exploits and enriches the everyday metaphors available to any

competent speaker of the language. Therefore, the same as metaphor in ordinary

language, poetic metaphorical expressions must also be based on basic

metaphorical concept.

The term conceptual metaphor is derived from the nature that metaphor

always involves understanding one domain in terms of another domain.

‘Technically, metaphor can be understood as a set of mappings from a source

domain to a target domain’ (Lakoff, 1992: 4) or across the conceptual domains in

way that the projected source domain is consistent with the inherent target domain

structure (1992: 10). According to Lakoff, there are two types of mappings:

conceptual mappings and image-mappings (1992: 40). Concept derives the image,

so that from that image/s we can understand the concept. Image mapping is

mapping of the motor-sensory images evoked by linguistic expression. Thus,

metaphorical expressions are used not only just for talking about thing but also for

reasoning about it as well.

3. Theories on Image Schema

“Image schemas derive from sensory and perceptul experience as we

interact with and move about in the world ...” (Evans and Green, 2006 : 178). The

term ‘image’ in ‘image schema’ is equivalent to an imagistic experience relates to

(29)

because it comes from sensory-perceptual. The term ‘schema’ in ‘image schema’

is also very important. It means that image schemas are not rich and detailed

concepts, but rather abstract concepts consisting of patterns emerging from

repeated instances of embodied experience.

Image schema is pre-conceptual. One the recurrent patterns of sensory

information have been extracted and stored as an image schema, sensory

experience gives rise to conceptual representation. This means that:

Image schema are concepts, but of a special kind: they are the foundations of conceptual system, because they are the first concept to emerge in the human mind, precisely because they relate to sensory-perceptual experience, they are particularly schematic (2006 : 180).

The central idea is that image schemas, which arise recurrently in our perception

and bodily movement, have their own logic, which can be applied to abstract

conceptual domains. It is not merely mental or merely bodily, but body-mind

because there is an underlying continuity that connect our physical interaction in

the world with our activities of imagining and thinking. Image-schematic logic

then serves as the basis for inferences about abstract entities and operations.

Allan Cienki (2005: 431) gave description to some example of image

schemas as follows :

 CONTAINER : A container has boundary that separates an insides from

the outside. It can hold things. We can be contained (e.g. in a room), and

our own bodies are containers.

 CYCLE : A cycle begins, proceeds through a sequence of connected

events, and returns to the original state to start a new. We experience

(30)

 FORCE : Force ussually implies the exertion of physical strenght in

one or more directions. We can experience force in terms of compulsion,

attraction, blockage, or enablement.

 PATH : A path is a route for moving from a starting point to an

end point. We can follow an existing path, or make a path with our own

movement.

These image schema emerge within our daily experience along with our perception and bodily movement:we explore physical objects by contact with them; we experience ourselves and other objects as containers with other objects inside or outside of

them; we move around the world; we experience physical forces affecting us; etc.

It structures our sensory motor-experience and serves as the basis of many of our

metaphorical thinking. For example, in metaphorical expression ‘The customer is

boiling with anger’ or ‘He just exploded when i told him that’. This metaphorical

expressions employs CONTAINER schema which comes from our encounter with

our body when we are eating (we put the meal into our mouth) and our encounter

(31)

4. Theories on Poetic Iconicity

“Poetic Iconicity is the means by which poetry creates the semblance of

felt life” (Freeman, 2007b: 472) or illusion of experience. Our intentional

relationship and our consiousness is realized by our bodily experience with the

world is called phenomenological world. Semblance of felt life means that poetry

is an attempt to capture this experience in its sense and significance through the

creation of forms symbolic of human feeling. Feeling, when we aware of the

world around us and we interact with them, arises from two sources: the first is

sensation, the interaction with the external world through senses, and the second is

emotion, which are internally generated (2009b: 174). These two are effecting one

another with sensation from the external world triggers emotion and emotion

colors sensation. Whereas form is the existance of words on page, this is the

medium that pictures feeling or shows our certain intentional relationship with

the world. It makes the invisible to be visible in various ways.

This Poetic Iconcity theory is appliying the cognitive process of the

embodied mind that not just includes conceptualizing but forming and feeling too.

The relation between form and feeling in poetic iconicity is a total integration. “It

would be misleading to think of them as separate attributes, just as it is misleading

to think of form and meaning as separate entities” (2009b: 175). Then, it involves

mapping between meaning and form. When a poem achieved poetic iconicity

means that the writer in compossing poetry conceives the feeling from which

form-meaning emerges: feeling of sense-emotion creates form-meaning which

(32)

(2009a: 14-15), when poetry when acheives poetic iconicity or becomes icon of

the of the reality, it bridges the gap between language and the world, between

conceptualization and senses experience. She also stated that poetic iconicity

occurs when seemingly meaningless poetic attributes like sound pattern, meter,

etc, all work together with imagery and emotion in making a poem which does not

mean but be. Then, the effects of poetic iconicity is to create sensation, emotion

and images that enable the mind to encounter them as phenomenally real (exist in

the here and now moment). It would moves the reader “from the semiotic world of

the poem-world to the phenomenological (world as we experience it) of the

poet-world” (2009b: 189).

C. Biographical Background

Emily Dickinson is well known as a private poet. Her companions, as she

mentioned to Higginson:

You asked of my companions. Hills, sir, and the sundown and dog as large as my self, that my father bought me. They are better than beings because they know, but do not tell; and the noise in the pool at noon excels my piano

<http://www.earlywomenmasters.net/essays/authors/higginson/twh_dickin son2.html >.

And, she eventually rarely met other people and rarely went outside the house.

But, over one thousand poem she had produced proves that her mind is so active

in contrast to her physical presence in the society. Dickinson proclaimed the

freedom of her active mind, no matter how tight she was being ‘shut’, in one of

(33)

closet/Because they like me ‘still’-/ Still! Could themselves have peeped/And seen

my Brain –go around–” (Franklin, 1999: 206).

‘Prose’, throughout Dickinson’s works is associated with “..sermons,

religious practices, patriarchy, and constrain” (Martin, 2002: 5). These are things

that she did not like because she placed herself in a resistance toward dominant

discourse. But ‘poetry’ which in one of her letter to Higginson she refered it as her

mind: “ Two editors of journals came to my father’s house this winter, and asked

me for my mind”

<http://www.earlywomenmasters.net/essays/authors/higginson/twh_dickinson2.ht

ml>, throughout her works “.. is allied with liberating darkness and inner

freedom” (2002: 5).

The interrelation between poetry, mind and her inner freedom can be seen

in:

The Heart is the Capital of the Mind – The Mind is a single State –

The Heart and the Mind together make A single Continent –

One – is the Population – Numerous enough-This ecstatic Nation

Seek – it is Yourself (Franklin, 1998: 1202)

Means that her writing and her mind accomadate her to reach her ownself and

finally liberate her inner freedom. This circle was her main concern, things she

dedicated her life to, which gave her joy and even power of living:

Take all away from me, but leave me Ecstasy, And I am richer then than all my Fellow Men – Ill it becometh me to dwell so wealhily

When at my very Door are those possessing more,

(34)

D. Theoretical Framework

This thesis will focus on the concept behind metaphor in “I Like to see it

lap the Miles” in constructing its image and how the image could reveal the

hidden expression of the speaker in order to catch the idea presented by the writer.

There are some theories used in thesis. They are theory on metaphor, theory on

metaphor and theory on poetic iconicity.

Theory on metaphor is used to find any concept from the metaphor both

covertly and overtly. Theory on image schema is used to help in understanding the

basic reason of the conceptual metaphor that that is by restoring the primacy of

bodily functions in the world: the bodily movement through space, perceptual

interaction, and ways of manipulating object. Theory on poetic iconicity is used to

relate the all the images to the form of the poem.

Metaphor theory is used, first, to find some concept covertly. It is done

by the analysis one-to-one conceptual level mapping of the source domain to any

possible target domain presented by the speaker. Second, metaphor theory is also

used to find the overt concept. It is done by system level mapping which is

mapping between the conceptual domains mediated by the text.

Since there is no reference presented in “I Like to see it lap the Miles”,

this theory is important to find the reference and how the metaphor organizes the

poem. Theory on image schema is used to help in understanding the basic reason

of conceptual metaphor that is by restoring the primacy of bodily functions in the

world: the bodily movement through space, perceptual interaction, and ways of

(35)

conceptual metaphor. Theory on poetic iconicity is applied to explain whether or

not the poem succesfully in creating semblance of felt life. The writer will see the

dynamic flows of the image shemas and conceptual metaphors by mapping them

to the organization of all images in the text world (the speaker, object, and the

imaginary figure) and the appearence of the poem on the page (form) as the

medium of the author’s conceived feeling. Then illuminte which concept is most

interlinking to all of them. When there is interconnection between these aspect

(36)

23 CHAPTER III

METHODOLOGY

A. Object of the Study

The object of this study is a poem entitled “I Like to see it lap the Miles”.

This poem consists of four stanzas. Each stanza contains four lines, except the

third. The breathless accumulation of the action verbs (lap, lick, stop, feed, stepin the first stanza alone), the run-on lines, and the internal rhyme rush the poem to its

painting finish (1967: 76).

“I Like to see it lap the Miles” is a poem written by Emily Dickinson, one

of American greatest poets, whose poems are well known for its richness of

metaphor. That richness can be seen from the wide range interpretations that are

welcomed by the text up till now. “I Like to see it lap the Miles” was written

when her father was one of the proud founders of the Amherst-Belchertown

railroad, he functioned as “Chief Marshal” when the first train arrived in Amherst

about her young age 1850s.

(37)

B. Approach of the Study

To analyze “I Like to see it lap the Miles”, the writer used two different

approches namely cognitive approach and biographical approach.

1. Cognitve Approach

Cognitive approach to language studies the way language characterize

meaning, and mainly turns figure ofspeech to figure ofthought. The term comes from the word cognition.Cognition “is used to refer to all information processing activities of the brain, ranging from the analysis of immediate stimuli to the

organization of subjective experience” (Tsur, 2003: 3). Cognitive approach to

language was originated “in the late seventies and early eighties in the work of

George Lakoff, Ron Langacker, and Len Talmy that focus on the language as

instrument for organizing, processing, and conveying information” (Geeraerts and

Cuykens, 2007: 3). These researchers were applying cognitive science (study of

the brain), particularly in work relating to human categorization and gestalt

psychology, to the study of language. They identified themselves as cognitive linguist.

Cognitive linguist believes that language reflects pattern of thought. Their

basic assumption is that there is an intimate relationship between meaning and

knowledge of the world, which has risen out of our embodied interaction with the

world (Gavins and Steen, 2003: 8). The nature of human mind is largely

determined by the form of the body. All aspects of cognition such as ideas,

thoughts, concepts dan categories are shaped by our body. These aspects include

(38)

and interactions with our environment and the understanding of the world that is

built into the body and the brain.

Cognitive linguist rejects traditional’s view that special language, such as

metaphor, as a kind of figurative language which merely function as fancy or

decorative language. When cognitive linguists trace back the metaphorical

expression to the way how mind or brain works, what is called figurative language

apparently pictures the cognitive process of the human mind. For example, we

have statement “My mind is overloaded” because we have experienced the

“container”, our body is a container, which can be empty or overloaded. Once it is

overloaded, it hardly can work properly. Then, “overloaded” would not be

attached to the “mind” if we do not have “container” concept that we get from our

embodied experience. Margaret Freeman stated that meaning from the cognitive

perspective is “..encyclopedic: that is arise from the cumulative association of

experience, conceptualization, context, and cultural-historical.” (Freeman, 2007:

483). “One of the highly significant cognitive abilities that human being possess is

the ability to categorize: that is, we can see sameness in the diversity” (Shogimen,

2009: 9), it means that:

“An understanding of how we categorize is central to the understanding of how we think and how we function, and therefore central to an understanding what makes us human” (Lakoff, 1987: 6).

This embodiment understanding of the mind relects in language then is

expanded to the cognitive investigation of literary text, especially poetic text. This

(39)

cognition, conceptualization, construal, etc, are often also applied in analyzing

issues relevant in specifically analyzing literary or poetic text. But eventually, as

stated by Reuven Tsur, Cognitive linguistics focuses on the conceptualizing

process of the mind and “shows very succesfully how wide range of quite

different metaphor comes from or be reduced to the same underlying conceptual

metaphor” <http://cogprints.org/3239/> sometimes is not enough to analyze

literary, especially poetic text. That’s why Cognitive Poetics also recognizes the

importance of the role of feeling and the existance of the words on the page

(form). As stated by Margaret Freeman, “cognitive process of the embodied mind

include not just conceptualizing but form[ing] and feeling too” (Freeman, 2009:

174).

Poetry, as art in general, argued by Susan K. Langer is “semblance of felt

life.. anillusion experience” : “What [the author] makes is a symbol – primarily a symbol to capture and hold his own imagination of organized feeling, the rhythms

of life, the forms of emotion” ( Freeman, 2009: 177). To handle this, Elena

Semino who is the editor of Cognitive Stylistics: Language and cognition in the text analysisnoted:

Cognitive poetics therefore combines the detailed analysis of linguistic choices and patterns in the text with systematic consideration of the mental processes and representation that are involved in the process of interpretation (Freeman, 2006: 6).

At its best, cognitive poetics is Janus-faced: looking toward the text and toward

the mind.

In this study, the cognitive approach that is applied is cognitive poetics –

(40)

does not directly call it cognitive poetics is because the application of cognitive poetics in this study focuses on the metaphor and image building but does not

involve sound pattern, as the writer has read in some of cognitive poetics study to

literature (especially in Reuven Tsur works which rarely leave the analysis of how

cognitive processes shape and constrain poetic rhythm and the rhythmical

performance of poetry), which might enrich the analysis. And this is the limitation

of this study.

.

2. Biographical Approach

In relating the poem to the poet, the writer uses Wilfred Guerin

biographical approach because biographical approach assert the necessity for the

appreciation of the author’s ideas, thought and feeling to understand literary

object. It means that a work of art is an expression of the author’s life and

experience.

There two reasons why cognitive approach (cognitive poetics – the

application of cognitive linguistics to literature) and biographical approach are

chosen for analying Emily Dickinson’s “I Like to see it lap the Miles”. First,

because cognitive approach could handle the richness, the complexities of its

metaphor, image, and even its form on the page as an integration of the whole

poem. It is interesting to see how the mind works, how the knowledge from the

experience with the world is being manipulated to see what human can do to

create semblance of felt life. Second, because in cognitive approach has to deal

(41)

biographical approach would help in supplying evidences that the analysis does

not violate the poet knowledge and believe so that it would strenghten the

analysis.

C. Method of the Study

In analyzing the thesis, the writer collected the data such as theories from

some books in the library and from internet. It means that the most of the

references both primary and secondary were taken from the library and also

internet. The primary data was Emily Dickinson’s Iron Horse (1940s), the secondary data consists of some criticisms from other researchers, and reviews on

the biographical background of the author and theories related to the study.

In analyzing the works, the writer mainly applied close readings on the

work by extracting the poem till there was nothing left to be extracted. There

would be three layer extraction that are applied. The first and the second would

answer problem formulation number one and the third layer extraction would

answer the problem formulation number two.

On the first extraction, the writer would identify the imaginary figure to

find what picture is being presented by generally mapping the nature and

characteristics of that imaginary figure because there’s no explicit reference of the

object appears in the poem. The second layer extraction, the writer revealed what

the picture stands for by applying conceptual and image schema mapping on

(42)

Third layer extraction, continued its findings to reach the coherent path to

go deeper and reached the coherent path in analyzing how this poem can be seen

as the expression of Emily Dickinson’s felt experience. First, after studying the

metaphor mapping and image schema mapping, the writer would map it to

speaker and the form (system mapping). It means that the writer would relate the

data to generate backward reasoning that finally connect up with speaker and the

existance the poem on the page itself. Second, relating the speaker, and the poem

on the page to the action of the writer. After having done the analysis, the last

(43)

30 CHAPTER IV

ANALYSIS

I Like to see it lap the Miles And lick the Valleys up

And stop to feed itself at Tanks -And then - prodigious step Around a Pile of Mountains – And supercilious peer

In Shanties – by the sides of Roads – And then a Quarry pare

To fit it’s sides, And crawl between Complaining all the while In horrid – hooting stanza – Then chase itself down Hill And neigh like Boanerges Then – prompter than a Star Stop – docile and omnipotent

At it’s own stable door – (Franklin, 1999: 176)

1 I see it] I hear it 9 sides]Ribs

14 And] And, ‘then (written,And, or then) 15 promter than] punctual as

Division3 at quatrain. (Johnson, 1998: 448)

Emily Dickinson’s poem, “I Like to see it lap the Miles”,is an interesting poem. Even in the first reading, the reader could never fail to feel such an

immediate movement, and power brought in it since the picture is vividly

presented through its imageries. But then, when we try to find what object that is

being presented by the speaker, there is no explicit reference of the object can be

seen here though it is the main subject that is being described. There is no other

way to understand this poem unless we understand what the speaker has

(44)

In this analysis the writer is going to reveal its reference, what ‘it’ really is,

to catch an easier understanding to know this poem better.

A. Projection from the Imagery to Metaphor, and Its Establishment

In general, “I Like to see it lap the Miles” describes about the nature of an

object, it, that is observed and enjoyed by speaker. On this first layer extraction, the focus is to get general picture about how the object is being presented. From

the close reading there are some characteristics of the object that make the poem

is vividly pictured. They are: ‘lap’, ‘lick’, ‘feed itself’, and ‘step’ in the first stanza; ‘fit its sides’, ‘crawl’, ‘complaining’ and ‘chase’ in the third stanza; and

‘neigh’ and ‘stop’ in the last stanza.

In the first stanza the speaker presents ‘it’ as able to ‘lap’ and ‘lick’. From

those images, we can notice that this object is presented as ananimal since lap’ and ‘lick’ characterize verb of an animal. Both verbs are employing tongue.

Literally ‘lap’ means to drink something with quick movement of the tongue and

‘lick’ means to take something with tongue. But then, what being lapped is not

substance but ‘Miles’ and what being licked is ‘Valleys’:

I like to see it lap the Miles– (1.1)

And lick the Valleys up (1.2)

So here we could paraphrase these lines as: I like to see it quickly pass through the

miles and climb the valleys up. Next:

And stop to feed itself at Tanks – (1.3)

(45)

In the second stanza we are invited to see the settings when ‘it’ travels in a

distance move:

Around a Pile of Mountains – And, supercilious, peer

In Shanties – by the sides of Roads –

And then a quarry pare (Second Stanza) When it is around a pile of mountains, and in supercilious feeling, ‘it’ arrogantly

spies the shanties that lay between roads. After that, ‘it’ runs to the quarry.

The third stanza describes its movements through the quarry:

To fit it sides, And crawl between Complaining all the while In horrid – hooting stanza –

Then chase itself down hill (Third Stanza)

While it has to fit the sides in passing through the quarry, its sound reverberates

all the while that produce such a loud terrifying sound. Then, it moves fast down

the hill.

In the first stanza we already have a picture that the object is being

presented as ananimal. Last stanza provides some hints, ‘neigh’ and ‘stable’, that

the object is being presented as not just an animal but specifically pointed as a

horse. The word neigh is characteristic sound of a horse, while ‘stable’ means a farm building for housing horses. The last stanza, it describes the ending of its

distance moves. After the hill has been passed down:

Neigh like a Boanerges Then – promter as a Star Stop – docile and omnipotent

(46)

The horse neighs powerfully like Boanerges, when it comes on time as a Star. Then ‘it’ stops, it is harmless, but still the power is seen when ‘it’ is in its own

house door.

In the following analysis, the writer will explicate the poem for the second

extraction by applying Cognitive Metaphor theory to see how the metaphor is

built. According to the Cognitive Metaphor theory, metaphor is “understanding

one conceptual domain in terms of another conceptual domain” (Kövecses, 2002:

4) which is formulated in TARGET DOMAIN IS SOURCE DOMAIN. The

comprehension of target domain in terms of source domain is based on a set of

mapping or correspondence between those conceptual domains (2002: 29).

Because there is no explicit name of references from the domains to be drawn for

the full metaphorical mapping, so the writer firstly will map the concept from

imageries lays on the metaphorical expressions in this poem which potentially

lead to the domain. After the domains for both target and source are clear, the

writer secondly will then draw the full mapping mapping to see the metaphorical

establishment.

From the previous finding which has been found, it appears that the

presentation of the imageries are characterizinga horse. It can be seen especially

from the utilization of the words ‘neigh’ and ‘stable’ so for the source domain we

get the spesific reference that is a horse. Then to find the target domain, we need

to see the element presented that does not belong to the characteristics of a horse.

The speaker provides a hint, lies in the third line of the first stanza:

(47)

Here, the word ‘Tank’ does not characterize a horse. ‘Tank’ means a large

container (usually metallic) vessel for holding gases or liquid. In other words, this

horse actually is a machine that needs to ‘feed itself’ or be filled up with fuel. As

we get the key that ‘it is actually not a horse but a machine, or specifically a vehiclebecause it needs to ‘feed itself’ with fuel in order to be alive. The last line

of this stanza glides with the above concept:

And then – prodigious step (1.4)

This last line emphasizes the previous line ‘it feed self at Tanks’ gives certain

effect to the ‘it’. That after ‘feed itself’ with fuel, ‘it’ immediately moves

prodigiously.

In order to know what kind of vehicle is meant here, let us jump to the last

stanza:

Neigh like Boanerges (4.1)

Then – prompter than a Star (4.2)

This stanza firstly offers us a sound, and then presenting the second line ‘Then –

promter than a Star’.‘Prompter’ means done immediately without delay, while a Star, although it has been already made with a schedule but still sometimes cannot be seen when the cloud covers it. This picture of the second line shows its arrival

and, as the reader, we are invited to imagine its arrival, even more time than the

star does. Then right after the sound come, the vehicle appears. This vehicle is

characterized to be always come on time without delay more than a star. Besides,

the last two lines also characterize ‘it’.

Stop – docile and omnipotent (4.3)

(48)

When it stops and has its own door to pass through. Now, it is clear that the

vehicle is a trainbecause there is no other vehicle which has its own stable door

at its house. Then we haveTRAIN IS IRON HORSEmetaphor. The concept of IRON HORSE in this poem to picture the train is well known. According to the

interpretation of John B. Pickard in Emily Dickinson: an Introduction and Interpretation and many other interpretations, “I Like to see it lap the Miles” is seen as a poem about a train which has been presented vividly as a horse (Pickard,

1967: 76).

Now, both the source and the target domain is clear. the writer will apply

cognitive metaphor theory to see how the metaphor TRAIN IS IRON HORSE

works. It is done by mapping the source domain of a horse to the target domain of

a train based on the image projection. If the poem is under TRAIN IS AN IRON

HORSE metaphor then this concept would structure the activity in mind, and

consequently influence the language to fit the concept . The following of this part

is the complete explication of this poem.

I like to see it lap the Miles (1.1)

And lick the Valleys up (1.2)

There is a speaker in this poem who tells the reader that the speaker likes

to see the train with its movement to pass through the miles and valleys. The

movement is experienced as the lapping and licking of a horse. With this picture,

the speaker transfers mental picture of a quick movement of a horse taking up

liquid into mouth using the tongue to quick movement of the train passing through

(49)

Since this second layer extraction is under TRAIN IS AN IRON HORSE

metaphor, we have to see these lines base on the underlying concept above. The

first line contains metaphorical expression IT LAP THE MILES, the second line

contains IT LICK THE VALLEYS UP. To whateveritrepresents,the milescould not be lapped literally. This metaphorical expression maps that LAPPING THE

MILES IS QUICKLY PASSING THROUGH THE MILES. This metaphorical

expression comes from the basic metaphorical concept PASSING THROUGH IS

CONSUMING. One basic metaphorical concept can create various metaphorical

expressions for example, from PASSING TROUGH IS CONSUMING metaphor

we could have: metaphorical expression like ‘I have eaten all of my work’, ‘I

consume 20 miles a day in exercising my body’.

Imagine the process of consuming base on the imagery brought to the

metaphorical expression. Lap literally means drinking quickly, this imagery highlight speed or rush and lap the Miles expression hides the liquid object that should be lapped. This new meaning that derived from the combination of the

source domain and target domain is called blending (see Figure 1). The process of

conceptualizing the target domain onto the source domain for the second line is

more or less similar to the conceptualizing process on the first line.

From the above figure, it is easier to picture the metaphorical expression.

Although the image of this expression doesn’t emphasizes on virtual forward

movement of ‘it’, but the speaker notice that passing through is a matter of

reaching one point from another point. Imagine there are some points on the

(50)

It (A) lap the Miles , And lick the Valleys up

Horse space

Train Space

Figure 1. The metaphorical mapping process oflap the Miles;And lick the Valleys up

points when those miles are being lapped; first the A point, then B, then C, then

D, and stop. When ‘it stops lapping, the miles right in front of ‘it is E. So the location ofitis now at E.

And stop to feed itself at Tanks (1.3)

And then – prodigious step (1.4)

The third line contains metaphorical expression. Plausibly, the English

readers posses an underlying metaphorical concept view of MACHINES AS

LIVING CREATURES. Therefore there is a metaphorical expression as implicitly

presented that TRAIN FEED ITSELF WITH FUEL. The metaphorical expression

as TRAIN FEED ITSELF WITH FUEL is entirely commonplace. In terms of

metaphorical concept theory this metaphorical expression is underlied from the

metaphorical concept that MACHINE IS A LIVING CREATURE metaphor. This

conceptual metaphor maps container onto container, substance onto substance, A lap the miles and lick the valleys up

Lap and lick help:

A to be animate being (reaching is consuming)

Miles and valleys as the object to be consumed by A

Miles and valleys moves inside A quickly.

(51)

abstract concept onto abstract concept. When we embodied in our mind base on

the mental process of conceptualizing MACHINE IS A LIVING CREATURE

metaphor, it able us to map food onto fuel, body onto container, biologically

active onto move, and spend the energy onto spent the fuel. And the fourth line

presents the effect afteritbunkered (see Figure 2).

Figure 2

The fourth line still derives from the MACHINE IS A LIVING

CREATURE metaphor entails MACHINE NEEDS FOOD TO ALIVE that

creates the metaphorical expression TRAIN IS AN IRON HORSE, with fuel as

food and fuel makes the train able to biologically move. After it feed itself at

IT (A) FEED ITSELF WITH FUEL

Metaphorical mapping

A feed itself with fuel

fuel map:

A to be alive

A is living creature

A ingest gasoline

A is a train

fuel helps: A to run

A uses gasoline Feed helps:

(52)

Tanks,follows byAnd then –on the fourth lines to emphasize direct effects of the previous statement. . Whileprodigious stepgives some image of a distance moves just in a single step. It maps the travel from one station to another station,

therefore there is only single step whichprodigious.

Around a Pile of Mountains – And supercilious peer

In Shanties – by the sides of Roads –

And then a quarry pare (Second Stanza)

This second stanza presents the journey ofitstravel. Whenitis surrounded by a pile of mountains and in supercilious feeling, it watches searchingly the shanties that are by the sides of roads. BeingAround a Pile of Mountainsenableit

to superciliouslypeer. It shows howitsfeels toward theshantiesas if theshanties

is nothing compared toit since the shanties is seen as its quarry which are trapped by the sides of roads.Superciliouswhich projects the arrogance of the horse refers to the power of the train compared to shanties. Since this poem is built from

TRAIN IS A HORSE metaphor, this train able to superciliously peers the shanties

that is by the sides of roads. Again the words And then appears, to shows that a quarry pareis happened as the result of the previous act that is And, supercilious, peer. A quarry pare here means it cuts the shanties by passing between as its quarry.

To fit its sides, and crawl between

Complaining all the while In horrid – hooting stanza –

(53)

This third stanza pictures whenitpasses through, between the shanties and roads that is pictured on the previous stanza as its quarry. But is the shanties really

itsquarry? No, this stanza counters the previous stanza. Instead of directly ‘hunt’ its quarry, itneedsTo fit its sides,and crawl between. This first line pictures both a narrow space left foritto pass through and a crowded situation. The wordcrawl

emphasizes these mental pictures: because the shanties are crowded, makesit has crawled or moved slowly between them. So the quarry is just in it-s imagination. The result is that it has to complaint all the while to be able to pass it through. But

still the quarry in it-s imagination, we can see it from how it sounding. It is complaining, In a horrid – hooting stanza. Horrid hooting stanza shows how it sounds. It produces loud and horrifying sound that would drive out the crowd automatically. The length of the sound is like stanza, long, it consists of lines. The

last line also emphasize that the quarry is only in it-s imagination. After it

horrified the quarry, there is no victim appears, or pictures about slaughtering. Instead,itmoves to chase itself downhill, not to chase anything from the shanties.

And neigh like Boanerges Then – prompter then a Star Stop – docile and omnipotent

At its own stable door – (Fourth stanza)

After its long travel, it produces powerful sound to signal its arrival to its station. Here, neigh, the original sound of the horse is compared toBoanerges, a name Christ gave to the disciples James and John, meaning ‘son of thunder’

(Pickard, 1967: 77), which could also means a loud preacher or orator. The time

when Emily Dickinson wrote this poem was when the first train arrived at her

(54)

and most people were infected, only Emily and her brother, Austin, did not join

them because their orthodox approach failed to satisfy her. She kept searching for

deeper answer and not being apathetic, once she read about new preacher in

Philadelphia, she commented to her brother: ‘I’ve read about Dr. Wardsworth

being presented with elegant casket filled with five-dollar gold pieces…. He must

touch men’s soul or they’d never open their pocket so wide. If only I could hear

him sometime!” (Fisher, 1966: 91). This is how the power of an orator or preacher

is waited. Beside, it also influences people life by touching the soul with their

words.

Different from the other comparisons in the poem, both the first and

second line comparison of this last stanza uses simile to separate and differentiate

it visually as an indication that these lines does not come from the characteristic of

a horse. But it is the horse that is also been characterized asBoanergesanda Star. Boanergesshows not only thatithas a loud sound which is like a thunder but also

ithas a power on itsneighlike a preacher or the Christ’s disciples, and it has been waiting enthusiastically by a lot of people. The arrival of the train is compared to

the arrival of a Star, a star always has a schedule. The results: as it neigh, then punctually as a star it arrives, to control its door to stop docilely and omnipotent foritto enter its stable.

B. Metaphor and Its Image Building

This part will analyze the poem on its third layer extraction: relate the

Gambar

Figure 1. The metaphorical mapping process of lap the Miles; And lick the Valleys up
Figure 2The fourth line still derives from the MACHINE IS A LIVING
Figure 3Again,
:Figure 4Continue to process the mind
+2

Referensi

Dokumen terkait