b18 comparation body composition and somatotype characteristics spinter athletes aue and ysu

(1)

Lg18l

dfrn**{8

Th. D.0.4f &lSof

gporiSoLno.nd Y.o|Iblo6' DhAlon

D.F|V Hlnbb.oa ALStatr

Enhro|nit

Mlnblrt ot Yq||h ard 3ro.tr

(2)

RTPARIICIPAT]ON Adr surulE. Made sn Dryr L€s(a

RYLXEFCISE IN CYMNACTI'S MO-Fimaisyah, lidonesia Uiive6ry ot E

DMINTON SERV NG ACCURACY ! Pdn$oonihms hm5s, A. Sripan an d S Boonveoabul, srioakh arinwir

EMENf Or SbOPT Torro Sr.l

Xu r% wda ([ oi a Aorra' "

- h-G-I\'ON/ OI POSIT]VISM PARADICMC UPoN TFE OE/ELOPMENT oq

SC ENCES YOGYAKARTA STATE UN VERS TY) dAiwaa Ha Amiru rah Frchman, s

YNERGYTO IMPROVE AN ECONOM]C VALUE d a a ' & n e s h a U n i V e L t y o | E d d . a o n r n d o n e s i a

S.Slheman Sialeuntre6ryof Ydq\.faia lndoiesia

sosilo, srale un voFily or YoqFka a, Indon€s a

EO LINEAR MODEL 10 DEIERMNE FITNESS CAPACITY

PrMnto, B. P€mono, Hadi..aAsnar E., At.nqs. UniveGiy,Indonesia AIENT SE,ARCH INSCHOOL (WAYS OFSEARCI]ING TALENTED ATHLETES) ldra@n 3 sapb h rra P| d

" Seberc va€rU .e6.v lldon* '

IAND PSYCHOLOGICAL FACTOR AS POIENIAL NDICATORS SPORT ] ALENT OF ROWING Sbre llrivereily of S!Ebaya, Irdon6 a

VA[|D N OF FUTS L 5h LL TEsT

S O F I H E A B L L N W O M E N S 3 A

ib srare LrnNersry ofYoq?rra'ra hdoie-a

SloN oF BoDY cor'4Pos r oN

(3)

COI\iPARASION OF BODY COI/IPOSITION AND SOMATOTYPE CHARACIERISTICS OF SPRINIER ATHLETES AT AUE AND YSU Eddy Purnomo, Rla f uminluaEo, Norikarsd krsuga. Hid€tj suzukl

Star. Unive6lty ol Yogya*arr.

ln a e[tdl to dNibe the p\sique and bady canpositu a@i pedqn.rce ol Unilersity tevel sp nter athLqtes of AUE and ySlJ, fhjs

,he _{ffiatoahan indicated thal wintars at AUE and ySU e e} n*onaryl6 lhe body lat percentage _{at auE js (10,9 ! 2,3/a) atJ at ysu is}

1,7) fh6 was rallected in theit eh.Jm*phb conp@ents which is towbt k athtetes d AUE (2,17!0,59) and YsU (2,39.0,41. Iteworyhy cmp@eft dlnebs at AUE is (3,77t1,22), which is 1,.|.q than rhe spnnbr.thlebs H.aeo,67) , bu the ectanqpic canponents sqinter athi6r6s at At)E is (41 which is highet than spinter dthleles at ySU (2,79!0,45) fhis n@ns th?l d etes at VsU .rc n6e nusc.ted than ar AUE.

Keywor&: Body Cadp6ition, Somatolype.

The measu€menl and appr€honsion ol lhe basic mo.photoqtcatchakq ot alhetes s lha toundation _{on which a training prc@ss may be buitt i} anlhopohetnc charccleistidi are need€d to be su@ssfut in Gn. n sponing er is also imporlanr lo noie lhat ther6 ar€ sme difforcnces in bodv structu @frposilion of spons peGons inwlwd in individua and leam sporis. tt6

.lhlale6 hon AUE on avahge are m years aid, 171,6 cn tatt ad @igh 6 sqhtq dhlelB han Ysu on atetage are 2a.57 ye*s ald, 16&a7 cn tatl, dl

tact lhal iunnere n€€d lo cafiy Ineir bodyw€ight, which means lh6v need too cordrcted oh 12 sprintd athlet* ton AUE and e s$kt6r athlebs non Ysu

the lorce of gmvity on differentnidanGs, slipulat6 a specific {t€an) lody @m 61-62 kg. Besides heighl ahd weight, sit skinfojds, trlo bi@ndt!il beadhs gitlhs wsa nwed. _{Sonatalwa evaluations were nada according k he} Can$ nolhad. Body fat patentage was assssed ,sng lhe eguatbr pre Baz*r el at gMt wds catc":larF.t as bodt ?as dry;dcd by heght equM.I

soTepre.l\. su.\ as sonntins. aFq!'te sp*.hL€no aife.ent iion e&t oth.r r@ tho sucessful phrsiquos. This prccess wher6 by rhe physioat demands ot lead to selecron ot body types bBst suited to that spon is known as .MorDh Optimjs.lion". Runnlnq evants in lrack€nd-tietd .re marked bv €n oxc€otionat of duGlion of a singlo €venl, ene€elic demands and lhe lempo of on€rgy Et€a

as a prerequisir€ _{tor frore efiicient and eco.omic podornan@ in a shgto} Alhlat6s who have or acquired the optinat physique for a pald4t r ewl d likoly lo tucceed lhan ro6e Mo ..Lk .ne q.ne6' chd€ctcristi.r S somalolype of alhleies, elite athtetes and olympic aihtetes have q€n€Euysh s(rength and speed dependent athteles lended lo be basicaly mesomoihl dislan@ dep€ndant alhtetes w6r6lound lo be more eclomoDhic with llhited an mesomolphic duscu arry.

(4)

I

eresi _{d lhe /rysqur ir.slr.ifFrrr} _{.j lh. re.nr d L.i}

^1':po

n arnet.s, bo.ly.omrcs Lnrn _{ior.!r.5 rrt: rrd.y !s.C t. n.es.rb. C.sEb.} il,l..y !n:err's. r. oprrrTe ..mfrer{_r ne,f-..r. .;d

nn r0 I s o'jr.r.i I a...pl!d lh.t I .!er orrl!e bdijyf:t s{te.r"r," r",.,.""i.r,t .Dr.perlr.f m Dosl 0r lh. sDons rn;s s r,.mm.

"rrto"a r.dv f:r alls lo ltre i c ' . _ a r . d _{r . r ! e q r r t u r i b . . t . t r j r i . n i a /}_{n : j r c r l r , . a . l ! t - " s r i r t f _ . if. i,.i! ::.o,r.d} , : l : m r !r:vrr 1eo nsrr rLrp,.oL !:rt rrerra s rill .rt,o,1

" i p , . o , . o a

i-.jt:"I!1,1.

(:q tunnnr) n (.,,rq

"r

-r 3ub mar.,t .p,,.j r."

"i1'5.."

-i

' ' ' : - *

r"

^ - - . : ' " I o o o { . p ' - o

i

'"

I'IATERIAL _{AND IJEf HODS} Itrnt/ spr ri.r

rrr.r.5 fron AlE .id a ir.nj ysu Au lm sp it.f allrel.! e.r.|ro if 0r. i|r!ti: o d : n J l d k r a n q . ; e r . j c a l l e . j r a r trr.s

F i y i [ i n * l l l ] y ' 2 n i i s f t

.olnry Afd.fi s!bi..lnn. r.:.ns,.,,er;rron _{nrom..t cu}

' r f 7 : r 0rr0! rr r. + 0 r .-.1:_F r - ! r r r

" . r : f r !

l B ) = s ! D r : i . i s r n r o d . n . l

., j/ c shair.r iirilz r L E r j t ! =

,--. Itr.w mmprro!!.a bo.ry ri,.rgues Lfcr. i,k..: rr.r!nl, f.,e!rd, br.:ath,t arths or upp.r arm Jnd torcr €q oi rhe I lhl std-c skni!ds; r:eps slpG, a., srb{c.FLrrar .hest, :b.lomci :ni;a r rn" ri_"nnt

"* n,.*u,"a ry mars or stiar.m€l.y Lj lhe maresr 0 5 .nj dnd : brl

--:-1

"-l !-

|::"'

:: "'

o, !- o. 3.

i-' " , . " r r r T . / - ( r ! J

(5)

Toral _{weight of Fat = (we thr x percent}ofiat)/100

BMI(Kq/m2)= (Body mass in Kg)(stature tn irelers), (Nlelzer el at., 19BB) bearaodyJ'rass=(Heiqht 100)r10%(H€shr-100)

L6an Bony Mass = 100%-TWF%

Considennq _{the pu.pose ol tie study mean and slandard devation @E} comput€d tor Lhe slalislica lGalment oi the data. The oblaned data was treated wlh anlaysis ot independenl l-tesr for linding oll lhe difi€rence ber{een grcups wh6n ths oblarned I €lio found lo be s gnificant al 0.05 tevet.

Based on Tabte 1, we can co.ctude lhal physicat and anlhrcpomotic parameleG behteen 6L5l.le spnnleF al auE and Ysu occur. Atmosi all lhe paBnele6 are v6ry siqnincani differefces except n weighr, BMI and €tt circumfeen@. _{wbil6 lhe ideat heiqht and body mass for sprint€rc}_{al auE is higher} lhan al YSU, spnd€rs at YSU have hum€rus and fehur omponents targer lhan sprinteB at AUE. Th€ circunlerenG of bic6ps al YSU a.e atso greatef than spnnbE at

Tabl6 1 Varirs physical paranereA and .thropohetric rha€creF ot th.

!PM!98 -_

Ls!-

__a:q!L

[image:5.595.49.551.18.807.2]

The sk nfotd measurement _{r6ults prese ed in Tabte 2 show thal among athtelE} spnnl€F ai AUE and YSU lhere is no signiti€nl differen€ jn fat thicknesa in lha compone.ts suprEspinar€, subs€pular, abdominatand cal. How€ver,lhe thicknes of rat in lhe lrceps, fDnl thigh and supE-illiiaca have a !€ry signtticanl differenc, which AUE has qreateroflhan sonnteG at YSU.

Table 2. Diffe€nl skinfotd measument of Ihe

3,247 _ G.C€ti(.h)

lr9!llirsl144r)

e.q&l

Tabie 3 summa zes the

sprnler ath eles There we€ no signticanr differences body composlion and somatolype in body compositionvalues oJ lhe 3,102

(6)

! m p o n ! n 1 5 f r 1 1 . L r , \ L r E a r d Y S U s t l i L e f 1 r ' 1 e L . s J L l l h e r e a f . ' . r i / s q n f i a n l dfle en.es in s.mrl(nrp. 1., po,.il5 n. ne I lh€ c. n'ij,!nl. dr.r.ddrp ry ri,er. :li eies 3l YsU !" L. 0rai lr,. /\UE alh,.1€s :,s n.l rs lrre

.omp.i.ns e.icnr.rpht !h.fe a hljh.r !:u,. l5a. Ysu ]\

!slr:r,ec n lhe G.ri,h 1

i. Dinn,,;i skiniriolJ

in*.i;-*,i"

of lre spritrer rthLetgt

h.trl mF-.sirio.

/\r,r!

I

,:! !11

I

t l

ofson'itlqfq.r!

l L r r l 0 l

r Zl!

| q!

and lher suilsbr ly flrh ih€ sp.d.ccds l! bc nLprov. D.rro,o.n.e in.pcd.

ro' lrl:il sc.rl. r !!e y :D.t llolrever. lnr I n body .!,rpos rnn a.i :,.naldlypc alhr.ics n e.cr qDon

: , l l m l . n | 5 o i : l o ' y . e S e v e r a r o l r € r . o ! r l . € :

m d l s , r . t o n t o r r o r f . , n 3 i . e n s D . 1 . O r e . 1 r h e ,. s u i l 3 d l r . r . r . r c . n d r . l e . i i N l L r s o r l r l l l : t s s , , 1 r B r . d o i . r ! l . , x y 3 r : r r p o n t l i . P m l .

.l AusLri Lr Jllrele.

srn3l.lype rrc.e _{n lrre.lo rr.: rza. lll}

. . l . o n h y r t h n v . L . t 0 2 9 r . n d ! . . r t , r . p h r - l (lea.i F' ,.r,!,1!rr rh.

(7)

2 0 (eclo mesomorphy) li!

resuts ol research on lndiansruden6 sam. was reporred somatolype:thl-Fle by shafeeq vA, er at (2010) _sprinlers_{2,53 4 31 1o306}in lhe

".,,"

:?X'i.o'J?;" :,111,-["ff.:,,jfj

rq Ihe]sF,rin,e,.AuE-s,!ds,s

$ma,o,]!.

::ilr:,vp:

y"tu"':

2 3e .1

s6

. 2 7s {"",.

;;#i)."Yn;'i!"il ifii:"j

ff::r:ii:":.i:ii;::::.:"tf"l

;.3

,1";r,

y..:T;

ir: u";i

t1lil., r1,;:ii:

;:{ : ;i":

;1 T:"

;; :rj'x

ji:i ;!iij

endomorphy _{(Nodof k.. eta 1r9s6)}

- . i'-;::.il:"-:ll;:;l

:'"ff:::

,".":

:",:r;:l;:"

'

# i""T i;.i

' h , g r , a n d .ob'L.: a. quE 4.- r9 -r,. _{" , . - ' , 5 U . ru n l - . y o . - , n F ., t . . o . r w t}

I :ff 1

:: ;]"::I"j'

;S:" ::; :iJ;I"" :tt:,?l;..i"

"",,

* q"r':

i"","

. . , _{] *} * - r - . I n e p d . a n i 1 u d . . . d . a i d + d , , . , o r o a . . o. .o.or..-B"rauE

;.:;" :" :'l: " ":,:;'"",:,J";.1,,

"j:'

:::,"" : ;":;;1.

; ""x :,i ;:;;l;

l1ll"":,,i?:3

# "", ; : 1 ",';'j,':r"

;. j -. .";';

j.:l-j,.

";;';;;: ;;

"" "1':1"

";1;.,;i";1x1

,;:; x:,::."";:i"

";"-:

"j:

""1

i,,::;

:'; "r : i.; i:l"l'

:":::

i- ;;"":

.:. 1".-".,

i,i".,'jll;;

r ::1,;r

j,!r

'".'il

".p " :?"0-"

' . ho. ) oo ' tr onr

."rc* 1,, r,"

;1;jJ.1;:""""'

:,1";1"*:

l.:".:,".""r",,1:

""i t';.i:. :.::;".

;",;;;;

A l o . ) d , D . 2 0 O . . . . o n o a l i r .

. - . p o i , s r r , r o a l

",",.,:'J::::"!.t:"'",.T

, "-"._,

;, "*.;, ",";-,il::,il.;ll; ;r..,"

:,"::ti,"";:,;

i!i1,T"1"'- ^

"; "^""",i""":i

::.j

C a n e r _{J E L lrq34) phFcalsku,}_{r u E o r O r m o k A ( h e l e l}

o,,

o,.

1 p a,h

-.. v"o ..

"." "0"; . "",-.

.", :.i:1"..:;,"';;':iT"

"

"""' :."..'"':;":':'":i:''.;;:;:lli' o' ""ri*" -a 'pp*'"

aa avoo.r,r"j .a 2ooo I ro,o ..

3:'"

: ::'"il,",:':',.::,;

r'"

r: :9. .oL -onrc I

^ - o - M - d - D € F a o a , 3 ... Ino b oe4u

- " i"", 1,*'

'"' "i"1,"""':,;l:,-:""""

. "*^ "''

(8)

p l f r s i9 e a c h t . r i6l

Jor.sln BL Nct5on JK (r3i2) pr..L.r

e d u c a t o n _{s d e e t p u ! . . ( o i L r . h r d i . t 6 s - 1 6 7} , 3 .

N q r f N P h n e h t 9 4

l l a r l l r D E , c o e , P E ( 1 9 9 1 ) B € r l e r _{l r J n i r n f o r D s t , n . € R l i r . r : H ! n a i { n ! r . ,} ihrkov. Br Mir!.1DuEkor. _{M j,rtatkofii. B Jsikrfia s R!ft t. Leko c} K0ndra ill {200-3) Ntorfob!icar DiJ.r€nies.t Elte cronLar s...e.l,iay-"rs

' d ro I P / V ' . . ' 3 "

f l p e n e n 3 r o n _{. l c l i E ! d . n r . l 4 l r 3 a 7 3 / l}

q d r . r f D _{l r ' l o r}_{y . r i i D . A u s 3 . 1 . , f o r . 3 , n} _{w . [ e s 3 f . r r f d c . n € r i}

1 2 0 0 0 ] Knrnlhrop.nelry n Alr.an spo r bony c.mpc:ilo.:rd som3l.(/p. ol rvod.t P ' b ( , r ! n . A d € r d c p p l 7 5 2

scdrr HS (1936) skiDfotd p:ilern oJ T.p lrdr.n Arrr€res:nd spodlnri n modenr o - o r.e P l

. o . - o i . , _{^ , 3 u}