• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

ENGLISH STUDENT BOOK EVALUATION IN SCHOOL BASED CURRICULUM (KTSP) CONTEXT : A Case Study of “English Student Book” Published by Directorate General Management of Primary and Secondary Education Nomor Panggil TBING MAR e-2012.

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "ENGLISH STUDENT BOOK EVALUATION IN SCHOOL BASED CURRICULUM (KTSP) CONTEXT : A Case Study of “English Student Book” Published by Directorate General Management of Primary and Secondary Education Nomor Panggil TBING MAR e-2012."

Copied!
22
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

TITLE ……… i

APPROVAL PAGE ……….. ii

DECLARATION ………. iii

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ……….……… iv

ABSTRACT …….………. v

TABLE OF CONTENTS ……….. vi

LIST OF TABLES ……… ix

CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background ………. ……….. 1

1.2 Research Objectives ………… ………. 4

1.3 Research Problem.. ……… 5

1.4 Scope of the Study ……….……… 5

1.5 Significance of the Study ..……….……… 6

1.6 Clarification of Terms ……… 6

1.7 Thesis Organization ……… 7

CHAPTER II TEXTBOOK EVALUATION 2.1 Textbook……….. 8

2.2 The Role of Textbook in the Classroom..………. 9

2.3 Types of Textbook ……… 10

2.3.1 Traditional Textbook ………. 11

2.3.2 Communicative Textbook ………. 12

2.4 Criteria of Good Textbook ………..………. …… 12

2.5 Justification for Textbook Evaluation………..… 14

2.6 Perception in Language Learning… ……… 16

2.7 Textbook Evaluation Scheme ……… 17

(2)

2.9 The analysis of the Textbook ……… 21

3. RESEARCH METHOD 3.1 Research Site and Participant ………. 23

3.2 Research Design ……. ……… 23

3.3 Data Collection Techniques ………. 24

3.4 Data Analysis……….. 25

3.5 Validity Issues ………. ……… 25

4. FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION 4.1 Findings……… ………. 27

4.1.1 The Strengths and The Weaknesses ……….. 27

4.1.2 Teacher’s Perception ………. 29

4.1.3 The Relevancies to the KTSP ………. 30

4.2 Discussions ……… 36

4.1.1 The Textbook Package-Value, Content & Methodology 36 4.1.2 Layout & Design ……….. 41

4.1.3 Activities and Tasks ………. 50

4.2.4 Skills ………. 52

4.1.5 Language Type and Content ……….……. 58

4.1.6 Subject & Content ……….……….. 62

5. CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS 5.1 Conclusions ………..……….……… 65

5.2 Suggestions ……… 66

REFERENCES ………... 68

APPENDICES ……… 73

Appendix 1 Student Textbook Evaluation ……….. 73

(3)

Appendix 3 Author Textbook Evaluation Form ……… 88

Appendix 4 Researcher Textbook Evaluation Form ………. 92

Appendix 5 List of Questions for Students ……… 96

Appendix 6 List of Questions for the English Teachers ……… 101

(4)

LIST OF TABLES

Table Page

(5)

CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background

English language instruction has many important components and

essential constituents. Too many ESL/EFL classrooms and programs are the

textbooks and instruction materials that are often used by language instructors. As

Hutchinson and Torres (1994:315) suggest:

"The textbook is an almost universal element of [English language] teaching. Millions of copies are sold every year, and numerous aid projects have been set up to produce them in [various] countries…No teaching-learning situation, it seems, is complete until it has its relevant textbook.”

Other theorists such as Sheldon (1988) agree with this observation and

suggest that textbooks not only "represent the visible heart of any ELT program”

but also offer considerable advantages - for both the student and the teacher -

when they are being used in the ESL/EFL classroom. Another advantage

identified by Cunningsworth (1995) is the potential which textbooks have for

serving several additional roles in the ELT curriculum. He argues that they are an

effective resource for self-directed learning, an effective resource for presentation

material, a source of ideas and activities, and a reference source for students, a

syllabus where they reflect pre-determined learning objectives, and support for

less experienced teachers who have yet to gain in confidence.

Hutchinson and Torres (1994) have pointed out that textbooks may play a

pivotal role in innovation. They suggest that textbooks can support teachers

(6)

and/or untried methodologies, introduce change gradually, and create scaffolding

upon which teachers can build a more creative methodology of their own.

Deighton (1971:214) points out that the term textbook refers to the

materials which are employed by school or college students as standard works on

a particular skill or subject. They are designed for classroom use with appropriate

vocabulary items, illustration, students’ exercises and teachers’ aids. They range

from pre-primer to the technical, medical, and scientific materials used in graduate

education. The content of the book are intended to be essentially practical in

nature. However, some underlying principles or guidelines for evaluation are

necessary in order to give a rationale to the evaluation criteria that are used.

Alwasilah (2008) states that textbooks embody legitimate knowledge to be

taught to students. Even, for some cases, where teacher-learner interaction is very

limited, textbooks seem to become the most powerful teaching tool. It is important

to remember, however, that since the 1970's there has been a movement to make

learners the center of language instruction and it is probably best to view

textbooks as a resource in achieving the aims and objectives that have already

been set in terms of learner needs. Moreover, they should not necessarily

determine the aims themselves (components of teaching and learning) or become

the aims but they should always be at the service of the teachers and learners

(Brown, 1995). Consequently, we must make every effort to establish and apply a

wide variety of relevant and contextually appropriate criteria for the evaluation of

the textbooks that we use in our language classrooms. Cunningsworth, 1995 stated

(7)

selected closely reflect [the needs of the learners and] the aims, methods, and

values of the teaching program.

The evaluation of textbooks which is conducted by our National

Evaluation Committee is intended to investigate the appropriateness of textbooks

and the current curriculum. The development of the curriculum requires the

availability of the textbooks since they cannot be separated from teaching and

learning process which attempt to acquire the target curriculum. In current

context, textbooks used by teachers should be in accordance with the School

Based Curriculum or KTSP.

The criteria for evaluating the textbook therefore must be standardized to

the achievable of the textbook, the practical considerations, also the life-skills

purpose for the students’ improvement. This standardization covers all the content

aspects, through all language skills; speaking, writing, listening and reading. The

materials presentation aspects, the language type aspects and also the design or

layout aspects. Alwasilah stated on his article (2005) that textbook must be

specific, accurate, clear, relevance to the curriculum and up to date.

English Student Books for Grade VII is designed to facilitate all State

Junior High School in Central Java, since it is published by Directorate General

Management of Primary and Secondary Education. It means that this book is the

preeminent book mostly used by students and teachers in their teaching learning

process. A thorough evaluation, therefore, would enable the managerial and

teaching staff of a specific institution or organization to discriminate between all

(8)

familiarity with a book's content thus assisting educators in identifying the

particular strengths and weaknesses in textbooks already in use. This would go a

long way in ultimately assisting teachers with making optimum use of a book's

strong points and recognizing the shortcomings of certain exercises, tasks, and

entire texts.

Textbook evaluation seems to involve a few numbers of teachers and no

student. Neglecting the roles of teachers and students in textbook evaluation

seems to be unfair since they are the main actors in teaching and learning process.

The relationship between teachers and textbooks has a great influence on the

success of students’ learning. Good textbooks provide great deal of help to

teachers in carrying out EFL classroom activities. Tyson-Bernstein and

Woodward (1991) in Altbach (1991) and Cunningsworth (1995) state that the

heavy use of textbooks suggests a relationship between the quality of textbooks,

effective teaching and students’ achievement. Textbook should correspond as

closely as possible to the aims of the teachers and both seek to meet the needs of

learners to the highest degree. This phenomenon has led the researcher to

investigate the textbook used in SMP N 2 Pekalongan. The study also seek to find

out teachers’ perception toward EFL textbook and difficulties faced by then in

using the textbook.

1.2 Research Objectives

As indicated in the background, the objectives of this study are formulated

based on the problems to be investigated. Thus, the objectives of this study are as

(9)

1. To find out the strengths and weaknesses of English Student Book?

2. To find out the teachers’ perception toward the book in SMP N 2 Pekalongan.

3. To find out the relevancy of the materials found in the book toward School

Based Curriculum (KTSP).

1.3 Research Problem

In line with the objectives of the study above, the formulation of the

research questions are broken down as follows:

1. What are the strengths and weaknesses of the textbook presented in the book?

2. What are the teachers’ perceptions toward the book in SMP N 2 Pekalongan?

3. What are the relevancies of the materials found in the book toward School

Based Curriculum (KTSP)?

1.4 Scope of the Study

This study is limited in time spent to obtain the data and the scope of place

for study. This study attempts to evaluate the textbooks used in SMP N 2

Pekalongan. Moreover, this study investigates the strengths and weaknesses of the

textbook as a product. This means that the use of qualitative checklist seems to be

appropriate to evaluate the textbook in use. In addition, this study only involved

an English teacher of the seventh grade as the user and an English lecturer as a

producer. Therefore, the findings of this research are limited in its transferability,

in a sense that the result may not be representative of the general use of textbooks

(10)

1.5 Significance of the Study

In general, the findings of this research are expected to contribute

significant improvement of English language teaching and learning in SMP N 2

Pekalongan. The result of this study can be considered as critical base in selecting

textbooks used in SMP N 2 Pekalongan to develop teaching learning process and

to improve students’ achievement. In addition, this study can help inexperienced

teachers in this school in selecting and developing the materials. For the authors

and book designers, this research provides feedback on the development of

English textbooks. It is expected that the authors can improve the quality of their

textbook by considering teachers’ interests, students’ needs and local resources.

1.6 Clarification of Terms

On the pages which follow, you will find definitions of key terms in the

context of this study. To keep the study on its track, several terms have been

defined for this research:

1. Textbook is a set of learning and teaching materials bound in a form of a

book, used as source and curriculum of a course. Hornby (1989:1327) defines

textbook as a book giving instruction in a subject. Deighton (1971:214) points

out that the term textbook refers to the materials which are employed by

school or college students as the standard works on a particular skill or

subject. Student English Book is one of the textbook which is used in Central

(11)

2. Evaluation is primarily about decision making. It requires three components;

information, interpretation, and decision making (Genesee & Upshur, 1998).

In this case, the three components are used in the evaluation of textbooks.

3. Relevancy means the degree to which something is related or useful to what is

happening or being talked about. It indicates the relevance between the

materials on the textbook towards the standard and the basic competence

based on School Based Curriculum.

4. Curriculum is defined as the group of subjects studied in a school, college, etc.

School Based Curriculum is also known as KTSP. In 2006, the Indonesian

government introduced School Based Curriculum (KTSP) as a new

curriculum replacing Competence Based Curriculum 2004 (CBC 2004). The

breakthrough is intended to enhance the quality of teaching English.

1.7 Thesis Organization

This thesis is presented in five chapters. Chapter one is the introduction to

this study. It illustrates the aims and research problems, scope of the study,

significance of the study and the clarification of terms. Chapter two attempts to

describe theoretical foundation for this study which covers discussion on the role

of textbooks, justification for textbook evaluation, curriculum, school-based

curriculum and practical conceptions about textbook evaluation. Chapter three

elaborates the research methodology. Chapter four illustrates data presentation

and discussion. Chapter five is the conclusion and suggestions of the study of the

(12)

CHAPTER III

RESEARCH METHOD

This chapter attempts to describe aspects of carrying out the research,

namely research site and participant, research design, data collection techniques,

data analysis, validity issues, reliability.

1.1 Research Site and Participant

The book is the compulsory book which must be used in all state school in

Pekalongan. Based on that view, the source of data in this research is crucial to be

evaluated. This book is given for free by the government to all students from the

schools’ libraries. The other respondents are the students and the teachers who use

this book in their teaching learning process. The study took place in SMP N 2

Pekalongan. There are some reasons for conducting the research in this place,

among others this school is the best school in Pekalongan and becomes the first

and only international school. It is the best and the most favorite junior high

school in Pekalongan.

1.2 Research Design

The approach will be used in this research is qualitative. It means that the

data are analyzed qualitatively. The data will therefore be in the form of complete

(13)

found and the results of the investigation in her own words, not in the form of

numbers and calculations.

This study employs a qualitative design (Berg, 2007, Silverman, 2005),

especially a case study design (Travers, 20021, Nunan, 1992, Berg 2007) since a

case study is considered sometimes to be learned from studying just one

individual, one classroom one school district, in addition, a case study is generally

conducted in “small scale single case” (Stake 1985, cited by Emilia 2006).

1.3 Data Collection Techniques

The data for this research was collected using multiple data collection

method, document analysis, questionnaire and semi-structure interview. The

researcher was continually doing the checklist analysis on the textbook, then

supplementing her analysis with in-depth interviews of selected participants. The

data therefore will be obtained by using questionnaire and also interview. The use

of multiple data collections aims at enhancing the construct validity and reliability

(Yin, 2003) and to gain more rounded and thorough accounts on teachers’

perceptions toward textbook. In collecting data, the researcher did the following

steps:

(1) Collecting the data by identifying the content materials found in the textbook

through checklist analysis.

(2) Observing the textbook package in terms of value, content and methodology

of the materials in the textbook to find their relevance with those in the KTSP

(14)

(3) Distributing some questionnaire to students and teachers to gain their

perception as well as their judgments of the textbook content.

(4) Interviewing the English teachers. The interview was addressed to two English

teachers. The purpose of this interview was to get the former description of the

teaching learning process that would be adapted by using the textbook as the

basic foundation of the data analysis later.

1.4 Data Analysis

In qualitative research, analysis begins when the data is first collected and

is used to guide decisions related to further data collection. In communicating or

generating the data, the researcher must make the process of the study accessible

and write descriptively so tacit knowledge may best be communicated through the

use of rich, thick descriptions (Myers 2002 in Neill, 2006). In this study, the data

was analyzed by using processes of identifying, collecting, evaluating and

thinking (Seidel, 1998). The purpose of this model is to show that there is a

simple foundation to the complex and rigorous practice of Data Analysis.

Meanwhile, to count the numbers of overall evaluation data, the data is transferred

into percentage.

1.5 Validity Issues

Dealing with the validity upon this study, triangulation method was used

(15)

measure the validity of data by using other instruments. Constructivism values

multiple realities that people have in their minds. Therefore, to acquire valid and

reliable multiple and diverse realities, multiple methods which are checklist

analysis and semi-structured interview of searching or gathering data are in order.

If this calls for the use of triangulation in the constructivism paradigm, then the

use of investigators, method and data triangulations to record the construction of

reality is appropriate to test or maximize the validity and as a result the reliability

(16)

CHAPTER V

CONCLUSIONS AND SUGGESTIONS

5.1 Conclusions

This study did identify disconcerting problems with English Student Book,

the results of the analysis seemed to demonstrate that this particular textbook

actually stood up reasonably well to a systematic in-depth analysis and that the

positive attributes far out-weighed the negative characteristics. Despite a few

reservations and shortcomings, the teacher felt that the book was relatively

compatible with the current curriculum which is KTSP for junior high school

students.

The textbook fulfills criteria of a good textbook in term of practical

consideration which concerns with accessibility and physical characteristics. In

term of layout and design, the textbook seems to be organized effectively. In

addition, the textbook seems to present appropriate materials considering learners

interest and needs, the right level of language, authenticity of language and the

coverage of materials recommended by the current curriculum. Moreover, the

textbook seems to not contain gender bias and negative stereotypes. Aside from

its strengths, the textbook seems to have weaknesses in terms of the authors’

credentials information and teachers’ guides. Regarding language skills and

activities, the textbook seems to fail to present language skills proportionally.

(17)

drawback. It seems that teachers know some criteria of good textbook. They

perceived positively toward the book in general

Moreover, the teachers found that the book actually raised their students'

interest in further language study and would voluntarily choose to use the

textbook again while the majority of students reported that the textbook was

somewhat stimulating and useful for their purposes (See Appendix: 2).

Based on the analysis, the book is relevance to the current curriculum

which is KTSP. It covers 83, 58 % materials which are suitable with the indicators

stated in the curriculum. On the other hand, 16, 42 % from all the materials do not

exist in the textbook which need to be added to make this book perfectly in line

with the KTSP.

5.2 Suggestions

From the results of the study, it is suggested that:

(1) Teachers should find the materials as required by KTSP from other resources

to enrich the materials which have already been found in the book given by

the government.

(2) Textbook author should use KTSP as their main reference in writing materials

in the textbooks to suit with current curriculum.

(3) Some materials (introducing someone else, expressing like and dislike,

expressing compliment, reading into right intonation and describing stuff list)

(18)

In short, the book can be neither whole-heartedly recommended nor

unreservedly utilized in this particular teaching and learning situation.

Nevertheless, it still can be an effective textbook in the hands of a good teacher

and instructors should not be discouraged from using it with the appropriate

(19)

REFERENCES

Allwright, R. L. 1990. 'What Do We Want Teaching Materials For?' in R.Rossner and R. Balitho (Eds). 1995. Currents of Change in English Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Alwasilah, A. C. 2008. Contextializing Teaching Materials. Jakarta: The Jakarta Post.

Alptekin, C. 1993. 'Target-Language Culture in EFL Materials'. ELT Journal. Vol. 47.

Arikunto, S. 1990. Manajemen Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Baron, R. A. 1995. Psychology 3rd Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon

Berg. B. L. 2007. Qualitative Methods for Social Sciences. Boston: Pearson Edu. Inc.

Brazil, D., M. Coulthard, and C. Johns. 1980. Discourse Intonation and Language Teaching. London: Longman.

Brown, J. 1995. The Elements of Language Curriculum. Sydney: Heinle &Heinle

Bruning, R.H., G.J., Schraw, and R. Ronning. 1999. Cognitive Psychology and Instruction. New York: Prentice Hall.

BSNP. 2006. Panduan Penyusunan Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan Jenajng Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional.

Canale, M. and M. Swain. 1980. 'Theoretical bases of Communicative Approaches to Second Language Teaching and Testing'. Applied Linguistics. Vol. 1.

Cathcart, R. 1989. Authentic Discourse and the Survival English Curriculum. TESOL Quaterly. Vol. 23

Chambers, F. 1997. 'Seeking Consensus in Coursebook Evaluation'. ELT Journal. Vol 51/1.

Clarke, J. and M. Clarke. 1990. 'Stereotyping in TESOL Materials' in B. Harrison (ed.). Culture and the Language Classroom. ELT Documents 132. Modern English Publications/British Council.

Cauldwell, R. and M. Hewings. 1996. 'Intonation Rules in ELT Textbooks'. ELT Journal. Vol 50/4.

(20)

Deighton, Lee C. 1971. Encyclopedia of Education. New York: Crowell-Collier Educational Corporations.

DEPDIKBUD. 2006. KTSP Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Inggris SD/MI, SMP/MTs, SMA/MA. Jakarta.

Ellis, R. 1997. 'The Empirical Evaluation of Language Teaching Materials'. ELT Journal. Vol 51/1.

Emilia, Emi. 2008. Menulis Tesis dan Disertasi. Bandung: Alfabeta,cv.

Fraenkel, J.R. and Wallen, N.E. 1994. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: McGraw-Hill,Inc.

Garinger, D. 2001. Textbook Evaluation. TEFL Journal. [Online]. http:// www. Teflnet- j.org/vin1/garinger.html. [Juli 12th 2012]

Gattegno, C. 1972. Teaching Foreign Language in Schools. Londn: Educational Solutions

Grant, N. 1987. Making the Most of Your Textbook. London: Longman

Grey, J. 2000. 'The ELT Coursebook as Cultural Artifact'. ELT Journal. Volume 54/3.

Harmer, J. 1996. The Practice of English Language Teaching. London: Longman.

Haycroft, J. 1998. An Introduction To English Language Teaching. Longman

Hornby, AS. 1989. Oxford Advanced Learners’ Dictionary. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Haycroft, J. 1998. An Introduction To English Language Teaching. Longman.

Hutchinson, T. and E. Torres. 1994. 'The Textbook as Agent of Change'. ELT Journal. Vol 48/4. [Online] http://eltj.oxfordjournals.org [Juli 2nd 2012]

Hymes, D. 1972. 'On Communicative Competence' in J.B. Pride and J. Holmes (eds.). Sociolinguistics.

Jacobs, G. M., and J. Ball. 1996. 'An Investigation of the Structure of Group Activities in ELT Coursebooks'. ELT Journal. Volume 50/2. http://www.georgejacobs.net

Kitao, K. and S. Kitao. 1997. 'Selecting and Developing Teaching/Learning Materials.' The Internet TESL Journal.Vol. IV, No.4. Web-Site: Http://www.aitech.ac.jp/-iteslj/Articles/KitaoMaterials.html. [June 21st 2012]

(21)

Krashen, S. and T. Terrell. 1983. The Natural Approach. New York: Pergamon Press.

Larsen-Freeman, D. and M. Long. 1994. An Introduction To Second Language Acquisition Research. London: Longman.

Littlewood, W.T. 1981. Communicative Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Long, M.H. 1990. 'Task, Group, and Task-Group Interactions' in S. Anivan (ed.).

Language Teaching Methodology for the Nineties. SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.

McDonough, J. and C. Shaw. 1997. Materials and Methods in ELT. London: Blackwell.

Nunan, D. 1998. Language Teaching Methodology. London: Prentice Hall.

O'Neill, R. 1982. 'Why Use Textbooks?' in R. Rossner and R. Bolitho (Eds.). 1995. Currents of Change in English Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Phillipson, R. 1992. Linguistic Imperialism. Oxford University Press.

Posner, G. J. 1992. Analayzing the Curriculum. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.

Ramelan. 1992. Linguistic and Its Contribution to Language Teachers. IKIP Semarang Press.

Richards, J. and T. Rodgers. 1996. Approaches and Methods in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rossner, R. and R. Bolitho (eds.). 1990. Currents of Change in English Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Rutherford, W. 1995. Second Language Grammar: Learning and Teaching. London: Longman.

Sheldon, L. 1988. 'Evaluating ELT Textbooks and Materials'. ELT Journal. Vol 42/2. http://eltj.oxfordjournals.org

Silverman, David. 2005. Doing Qualitative Research. London: SAGE Publication

Skehan, P. 1996. 'Second Language Acquisition Research and Task-Based Instruction' in J. Willis, and D. Willis (eds.) Challenge and Change in Language Teaching. London: Heinemann.

(22)

Sudjana, Nana. 1989. Pembinaan dan pengembangan Kurikulum di Sekolah. Bandung: Sinar Baru.

Swan, M. 1985. 'A Critical Look at the Communicative Approach'. ELT Journal.Volume 39/2.

Vygotsky, L.S. 1978. Mind in Society. London: Harvard University Press.

Wesbury. 1985. The International Encyclopedia of Education. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

White, R. 1997. The ELT Curriculum: Design, Innovation and Management. Oxford: Blackwell.

Widdowson, H.G. 1978. Teaching Language as Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Williams, D. 1983. 'Developing Criteria for Textbook Evaluation'. In ELT Journal. Vol 37/3.

Willis, D. 1996. 'Accuracy, Fluency and Conformity'. In Willis, D. and J. Willis (eds.) Challenge and Change in Language Teaching. London: Heinemann.

Willis, J. 1996. 'A Flexible Framework For Task-based Learning'. In Willis, D. and J. Willis (eds.) Challenge and Change in Language Teaching. London: Heinemann.

Willis, D. and J. Willis. 1996. 'Consciousness-Raising Activities'. In Willis, D. and J. Willis (eds.) Challenge and Change in Language Teaching. London: Heinemann.

Wiles, John and Joseph Bondi. 1989. Curriculum Development a Guide to Practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Williams, D. 1983. Developing Criteria for Textbook Evaluation. In ELT Journal. Volume 37/3.Colombus: Merril Publishing Company

Young, D. 1991. 'Activating Student Background Knowledge in a Take Charge Approach to Foreign Language Reading'. In Hispania. Vol. 74.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

textbooks based on the 2013 Curriculum, the result of this research is useful as the. reference for those who want to conduct a research on

Since the School Based Curriculum is one of curriculum in the Indonesian education system, it is very important for the teachers to know and master the implementation of KTSP

textbook to provide classroom activities based on 2013 curriculum. Task is an activity in which the target language is used by the

writer choose the English textbook entitled “English on Sky 2” because this. book is not appropriate with the School Level -

From the explanation, the writer want to whether the textbook claiming that they are based on the KTSP curriculum are relevant with the curriculum or not , especially textbook

This study was aimed at investigating what the English teachers at SMAN 1 Banda Aceh felt about the KTSP (School-Based Curriculum) and the 2013 Curriculum, to find out the

Based on the results of teacher responses to the suitability aspect between the content with the curriculum and the graphic aspectsof the in- teractive e-book based

The analysis of English for Vocational High School III textbook showed that 66.67% indicators demanded on the curriculum and 41.67% types of communicative activities