T BING 1302691 Bibliography

(1)

Yustika Nur Fajriah, 2015

COMPREHENSIBLE INPUT, EXPLICIT TEACHING, AND CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK IN GENRE BASED APPROACH TO TEACHING SPOKEN HORTATORY EXPOSITION

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | \.upi.edu perpustakaan.upi.edu BIBLIOGRAPHY

Agudo, J. D. (2012). Investigating spanish EFL students' belief and preferences regarding the effectiveness of corrective feedback. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(19), 121-129.

Al-Darayseh, A. (2014). The impact of using explicit/ implicit vocabulary teaching strategies on improving students' vocabulary and reading comprehension. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4 (6), 1109-1118

Archer, A. L., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). explicit instruction; effective and efficient teaching.

New York: The Guiford Press.

Bernstein, B. (2003). Class, codes, and control towards a theory of educational transmissions. London: Routledge.

Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (1992). Qualitative research for education.Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Boot, D., Fahey, R., Feez, S., & Sue Spinks, C. Y. (2000). Using functional grammar .

Sydney: Macquarie.

Brown, D. (2001). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy.

New York: Longman

Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Chamot, A. U., Barnhardt, S., El-Dinary, P. & Robbins, J. (1999). The learning strategies handbook. New York: Adison- Wesley Longman.

Christie, F. (2005). Language education in the primary years. London. Continuum Cresswell, J. W. (2010). Educational research. New Jersey: Prantice Hall.

Derewianka, B. (1997). Exploring how texts works. Sydney: Primary English Teaching Association.

Derewianka, B. (2004). Exploring how texts work. Victoria: McPherso'n printing group. Derewianka, B. (2011). A new grammar companion for teachers. New South Wales: PETA Derewianka, B., & Jones, P. (2012). Teaching language in context. Melbourne: Oxford

University Press.

(2)

Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia | \.upi.edu perpustakaan.upi.edu

Eggins, S. (1994). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics. London: Printer Publisher, Ltd.

Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (second edition).

London: Continuum.

Eggins, S., & Slade, D. (1997). Analysing casual conversation. London: Cassell. Ellis, R. (1992). Second language acquisition and language pedagogy. Clevedon:

Multilingual Matters Ltd.

Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Ellis, E.S., & Worthington, L.A. (1994). Research synthesis on effective teaching principles

and the design of quality tools for educator. Eugene: University of Oregon. Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective feedback and teacher development. L2 Journal, 1(1), 3-18. Emilia, E. (2005). A critical genre- based approach to teaching academic writing in a

tertiary EFL context in Indonesia. Doctorate Dissertation Department of Language, Literacy, and Arts Education Faculty of Education the University of Melbourne. Unpublished Dissertation.

Emilia, E. (2011). Pendekatan genre based dalam pengajaran bahasa inggris: petunjuk bagi guru. Bandung: Rizqi Press.

Emilia, E. (2014). Introducing functional grammar. Bandung: Pustaka Jaya.

Feez, S. (1998a). Text-based syllabus design. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.

Freedman, A & Medway, P (1994a). Learning and teaching genre. Portsmouth, N.H: Boynton/Cook.

Gall, M.D., Gall, J.P., & Borg, W.R. (2003). Educational research, an introduction. Boston: Pearson Education Inc.

Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2008). Scond language acquisition: An Introductory Course.

UK: Routledge.

Gebhard, Jerry G. (2009). Teaching English as a foreign or second language (second edition). United States of America: The University of Michigan

Gerot, L., & Wignell, P. (1994). Making sense of functional grammar.Sidney: Gerd Stabler. Gibbons, P. (2002). Scaffolding language, language learning: Teaching Second Language

(3)

Grimes, D. A., & Schulz, K. F. (2002). Descriptive studies: what they can and cannot do. Lancet vol.359. [online] Retrieved on http://www.lancet.com [15/03/15].

Hatch, E. (1979). Apply with caution. Studies in second language acquisition 2: 123-143. Halliday, M. A. K. (1975). Learning how to mean: Exploration in the development of

language (exploration in language study). London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A.K. (1985b). Spoken and written langage. Victoria: Deakin University Press. Halliday, M. A. K. (1985c). Part A of language, context, and text: Aspects of language in a social semiotic perpective. Halliday, M. A K. and Hasan, R. (1985). Burwood, Melbourne: Deakin University.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994a). An introduction to functional grammar ( 2nd edition). London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. (2002b). On grammar. London: Continuum.

Halliday, M. A. K. & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: literacy and discursive power (critical perspective on literacy and education). London: Falmer Press.

Halliday, M. A., & Matthiessen, C. M. (2004). An Introduction to functional grammar ( 3rd edition). London: Arnold.

Harmer, J. (2007a). The practice of english language teaching. Malaysia: Pearson Education. Hasan, R., & Halliday, M. A. (1976). Cohesion in english. London: Longman.

Hasan, R. (1996). Ways of saying: ways of meaning. London: Cassell.

Hatch, E., & Farhady, H. (1982). Research design and statistics for applied linguistics. Rowley: Newbury House Publisher, Inc.

Heighham, J., & Crocker, R.A. (2009). Qualitative research in applied linguistics. England: Palgrave Mc.Millan.

Hood, M. (2009). Case studies. In J. Heigham & R.A. Crooker (Eds.), Qualitative research in applied linguistics (66-90). Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillan.

Hyland, K. (2004). Genre and second language writing. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Katayama (2007). Learners' perceptions toward oral error correction. In K. Bradfor- Watts (E.d), JALT conference proceeding, 284-299. Tokyo: JLAT

(4)

Knapp, P., & Watkins, M. (2005). Genre, text, and grammar. Sydney: UNSW Press Book. Krashen, S.D. (1980). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. In J. Alatis (Ed.),

Current issues in bilingual education (144-158). Washington, D.C,: Georgetown University Press

Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Oxford: Pangamon Press.

Krashen, S.D. (1985). The input hypothesis. issues and implications. New York: Longman. Krashen, S.D. (2003a). Explorations in language acquisition and use: The Taipei lecture.

Portsmoth: Heinemann.

Lemke, J. (1995). Textual politics. Discourse and social dynamics. London: Taylor and Frances, Ltd.

Long, M. (1981). Input, interaction, and second language acquisition. In H Winitz (Ed.),

native language and foreign language acquisition, 379 (259-278). New York: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Long, M. (1982). Native speaker/ non-native speaker conversation in the second language classroom. In M. Long and C. Richards (Eds), Methodology in TESOL: a book of readings (pp. 339-354). New York: New Burry House.

Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In Ritchie, William; Bhatia, Tej. Handbook of Second Language Acquisition. San Diego: Academic Press. pp 413-468.

Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation on Form in Communicative Classrooms: Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 37-66. Macken-Horarik, M. (2002). Something to shoot for a systemic functional approach to

teaching genre in secondary school science. In Johns, A.M. (2002). Genre in the classroom: multiple perspective. New Jersey: Lawrence Elbraum.

Mackey, A., Gass, S, & McDonough, K. (2000). how do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in second language acquisition, 22 (4), 471-497

(5)

Martin, J. R. (1985). Factual writing: Exploring and challenging social reality. Melbourne: Deakin University Press.

Martin, J. R., & Rose, D. (2008). Genre relations. Mapping culture. London: Equinox McMillan, J. H., & Schumacher, S. (1989). Research in education. London: Harpler Collins

Publisher.

Musthafa, B. (2010). Teaching English to young learners in Indonesia: Essential Requirements. Educationist, 4(2), 120-125.

Nassaji, H., & Fotto, S. (2011). Teaching grammar in second language classroom:

Integrating form-focused instruction in communicative context. Newyork: Taylor & Francis

Nhlapo, M. (1998). Case study of teacher's questions in an English Second Language (ESL) classroom. Unpublished master thesis, Rhodes University. Retrieved August, 4, 2015 from http://www.eprints.ru.ac.za/23001/NHLAPO-Med-TR99-58.pdf

Nowbakht, M. & Shahnazari (2015). The comparative effects of comprehensible input, output and corrective feedback on the receptive acquisition of L2 vocabulary Items.

Advances in Language and Literacy Studies (ALLS) 6(4), 103-114.

Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. United States of America: Cambridge University Press.

Oktaviani, D. W. (2011). Students' preferences toward correction of oral errors in EFL classroom. Thesis. Indonesia University of Education.

Panova, I., & Lyster, R. (2002). Patterns of corrective feedback and uptake in an adult ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 537-595.

Purnawarman, P. (2011). Running head: Impacts of teacher feedback on ESL/EFL students' writing (impacts of different types of teacher correctife feedback in reducing

grammatical errors on ESL/EFL students' writing . A dissertation. Virginia Politechnic Institute and State University.

Rahmawan, Rifan. (2014). Teachers' questioning durin building knowledge of the field in Genre Based Learning. Thesis. Indonesia University of Education.

(6)

Salikin, H. (2001). correcting errors in communicative speaking class. Jurnal Ilmu Bahasa dan Sastra , 1 (1). Retrieved from www.unej.ac.id.

Schachter, J. (1991). corrective feedback in historical perspective. Second Language Research,7, 89-102.

Schawartz, B.D. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 15, 147-163.

Sheen, Y., and Ellis, R. (2011). Corrective feedback in language teaching: Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. New York: Routledge.

Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S.M Gass & C. Madden (Eds), Input in second language acquisition (235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House

Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook, & B. Seidlhofer, Principle and practice in applied linguistics: Studies in honor of William E. Rutherfold (125-144). Oxford: Oxford University Press

Swain, M., &Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A Step towards second language learning. Applied linguistics, 16 (3), 371-391.

Thai, M. D. (2009). Text-based language teaching. St Cecil Hills: Mazmania Press.

Tomczyk, W. (2013). Perceptions of oral errors and their corrective feedback: Teachers vs. Students. Journal of Langauge Teaching and Research, 5, 924-931.

Trusscott, J. (1999). THe Case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A Response to Ferris. Journal of Second Language Writing. 8(2), 111-122

Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

White, L. (1987). Against comprehensible input: The input hypothesis and the development of L2 competence. Applied Linguistics 8/1, 95-110.

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of child and psychiatry & allied discipline, 17(2), 89-100.

(7)