• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

vol18_pp117-125. 106KB Jun 04 2011 12:06:02 AM

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "vol18_pp117-125. 106KB Jun 04 2011 12:06:02 AM"

Copied!
9
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

SOME RESULTS ON GROUP INVERSES OF BLOCK MATRICES

OVER SKEW FIELDS∗

CHANGJIANG BU†, JIEMEI ZHAO, AND KUIZE ZHANG

Abstract. In this paper, necessary and sufficient conditions are given for the existence of the group inverse of the block matrix A A

B 0

over any skew field, whereA, Bare both square and rank(B)≥rank(A). The representation of this group inverse and some relative additive results are also given.

Key words. Skew, Block matrix, Group inverse.

AMS subject classifications.15A09.

1. Introduction. LetK be a skew field and Kn×n be the set of all matrices

overK. ForA∈Kn×n, the matrixX Kn×n is said to be the group inverse ofA, if

AXA=A, XAX=X, AX=XA.

We then writeX =A♯. It is well known that ifAexists, it is unique;see [16].

Research on representations of the group inverse of block matrices is an important effort in generalized inverse theory of matrices;see [14] and [13]. Indeed, generalized inverses are useful tools in areas such as special matrix theory, singular differential and difference equations and graph theory;see [5], [9] [11], [12] and [15]. For example, in [9] it is shown that the adjacency matrix of a bipartite graph can be written in the

form of

0 B

C 0

, and necessary and sufficient conditions are given for the existence

and representation of the group inverse of a block matrix

0 B

C 0

.

In 1979, Campbell and Meyer proposed the problem of finding an explicit

repre-sentation for the Drazin (group) inverse of a 2×2 block matrix

A B

C D

in terms

of its sub-blocks, whereAandDare required to be square matrices;see [5]. In [10] a

condition for the existence of the group inverse of

A B

C D

is given under the

as-∗Received by the editors October 11, 2008. Accepted for publication February 20, 2009. Handling

Editor: Ravindra B. Bapat.

Department of Applied Mathematics, College of Science, Harbin Engineering University, Harbin

150001, P. R. China ([email protected], [email protected], [email protected]). Supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province, No.159110120002.

(2)

sumption thatAand (I+CA−2

B) are both invertible over any field;however, the rep-resentation of the group inverse is not given. The reprep-resentation of the group inverse

of a block matrix

A B

0 C

over skew fields has been given in 2001;see [6]. The

rep-resentation of the Drazin (group) inverse of a block matrix of the form

A B

C 0

(A

is square, 0 is square null matrix) has not been given since it was proposed as a prob-lem by Campbell in 1983;see [4]. However, there are some references in the literature

about representations of the Drazin (group) inverse of the block matrices

A B

C 0

under certain conditions. Some results are on matrices over the field of complex num-bers, e.g., in [8];or whenA=B=Inin [7];or whenA, B, C∈ {P, P∗, P P∗}, P2=P

andP∗ is the conjugate transpose of

P. Some results are over skew fields, e.g., in [1], whenA=In andrank(CB)2=rank(B) =rank(C);in [3] whenA=B, A2=A. In

addition, in [2] results are given on the group inverse of the product of two matrices over a skew field, as well as some related properties.

In this paper, we mainly give necessary and sufficient conditions for the

exis-tence and the representation of the group inverse of a block matrix

A A

B 0

or

A B

A 0

, where A, B ∈ Kn×n, rank(B) rank(A). We also give a sufficient

condition forAB to be similar toBA.

Letting A∈Km×n, the order of the maximum invertible sub-block of Ais said

to be the rank of A, denoted byrank(A);see [17]. LetA, B∈Kn×n. If there is an

invertible matrixP ∈Kn×n such that B =P AP−1, thenA and B are similar;see

[17].

2. Some Lemmas.

Lemma 2.1. Let A, B ∈ Kn×n. If rank(A) = r, rank(B) = rank(AB) =

rank(BA), then there are invertible matrices P, Q∈Kn×n such that

A=P

Ir 0

0 0

Q, B =Q−1

B1 B1X

Y B1 Y B1X

P−1,

whereB1∈Kr×r,X Kr×(n−r), and Y K(n−r)×r.

Proof. Sincerank(A) =r, there are nonsingular matricesP, Q∈Kn×nsuch that

A=P

Ir 0

0 0

Q, B=Q−1

B1 B2 B3 B4

(3)

where B1 ∈ Kr×r, B2 Kr×(n−r), B3 K(n−r)×r, and B4 K(n−r)×(n−r). From rank(B) =rank(AB),we have

B3=Y B1, B4=Y B2, Y ∈K(n−r)×r.

Sincerank(B) =rank(BA),we obtain

B2=B1X, B4=B3X, X ∈Kr×(n−r) .

So

B=Q−1

B1 B1X

Y B1 Y B1X

P−1.

Lemma 2.2. [6] Let A Kr×r, B K(n−r)×r, M =

A 0

B 0

∈ Kn×n.

Then the group inverse of M exists if and only if the group inverse of A exists and

rank(A) =rank

A B

. If the group inverse ofM exists, then

M♯=

A♯ 0

B(A♯)2 0

.

Lemma 2.3. [6] Let A ∈ Kr×r, B Kr×(n−r), M =

A B

0 0

∈ Kn×n.

Then the group inverse of M exists if and only if the group inverse of A exists and

rank(A) =rank

A B

. If the group inverse ofM exists, then

M♯=

A♯ (A)2B

0 0

.

Lemma 2.4. [2] LetA∈Km×n,BKn×m. Ifrank(A) =rank(BA),rank(B)

=rank(AB), then the group inverse ofAB andBAexist.

Lemma 2.5. Let A, B Kn×n. If rank(A) = rank(B) = rank(AB) =

rank(BA), then the following conclusions hold:

(i) AB(AB)♯A=A,

(ii) A(BA)♯BA=A,

(iii) BA(BA)♯B=B,

(iv) B(AB)♯A=BA(BA),

(4)

Proof. Supposerank(A) =r. By Lemma 2.1, we have

A=P

Ir 0

0 0

Q, B=Q−1

B1 B1X

Y B1 Y B1X

P−1,

whereB1∈Kr×r,X Kr×(n−r),Y K(n−r)×r.Then

AB=P

B1 B1X

0 0

P−1, BA=Q−1

B1 0

Y B1 0

Q.

Since rank(A) =rank(B), we have thatB1 is invertible. By using Lemma 2.2 and Lemma 2.3, we get

(AB)♯=P

B1−1

B1−1

X

0 0

P−1

, (BA)♯=Q−1

B1−1 0

Y B1−1 0

Q.

Then

(i) AB(AB)♯A=P

Ir 0

0 0

Q=A,

(ii) A(BA)♯BA=P

Ir 0

0 0

Q=A,

(iii) BA(BA)♯B=Q−1

B1 B1X

Y B1 Y B1X

P−1=

B,

(iv) B(AB)♯A=Q−1

Ir 0

Y 0

Q=BA(BA)♯,

(v) A(BA)♯=P

B1−1 0

0 0

Q= (AB)♯A.

3. Conclusions.

Theorem 3.1. Let M =

A A

B 0

, where A, B∈Kn×n,

rank(B)≥rank(A)

=r. Then

(i) The group inverse ofM exists if and only ifrank(A) =rank(B) =rank(AB) =

rank(BA).

(ii) If the group inverse ofM exists, thenM♯=

M11 M12 M21 M22

, where

M11= (AB)♯A(AB)A2(BA)B,

M12= (AB)♯A,

M21= (BA)♯BB(AB)A2(BA)+B(AB)A(AB)A2(BA)B,

(5)

Proof. (i) It is obvious that the condition is sufficient. Now we show that the condition is necessary.

rank(M) =rank

A A

B 0

=rank

0 A

B 0

=rank(A) +rank(B),

rank(M2) =rank

A2+AB A2

BA BA

=rank

AB A2

0 BA

.

Since the group inverse ofM exists if and only ifrank(M) =rank(M2), we have

rank(A) +rank(B) =rank(M2)

≤rank(AB) +rank

A2 BA

≤rank(AB) +rank(A),

rank(A) +rank(B) =rank(M2)

≤rank

AB A2

+rank(BA)

≤rank(BA) +rank(A).

Thenrank(B)≤rank(AB), andrank(B)≤rank(BA). Therefore

rank(B) =rank(AB) =rank(BA).

Fromrank(B) =rank(AB)≤rank(A), andrank(A)≤rank(B),we have

rank(A) =rank(B).

Sincerank(A)+rank(B)≤rank

AB A2

+rank(BA),andrank

AB A2

≤ rank(A),we getrank

AB A2

=rank(A). Thus

rank

AB A2

=rank(AB).

Then there exists a matrixU∈Kn×n such thatABU =A2. Then rank(M2) =rank

AB 0

0 BA

=rank(AB) +rank(BA).

So we get

(6)

(ii) Let X =

M11 M12 M21 M22

. We will prove that the matrix X satisfies the

conditions of the group inverse. Firstly, we compute

M X=

AM11+AM21 AM12+AM22

BM11 BM12

,

XM =

M11A+M12B M11A M21A+M22B M21A

.

Applying Lemma 2.5 (i), (ii), and (v), we have

AM11+AM21=A(AB)♯AA(AB)A2(BA)B+A(BA)BAB(AB)A2(BA)

+AB(AB)♯A(AB)♯A2(BA)♯B

=A(BA)♯B,

M11A+M12B= (AB)♯A2(AB)A2(BA)BA+ (AB)AB

= (AB)♯A2(

AB)♯A2+ (

AB)♯AB

=A(BA)♯B.

Using Lemma 2.5 (i), (ii), and (v), we get

AM12+AM22=A(AB)♯A−AB(AB)♯A2(BA)♯ =A(AB)♯A−A2(BA)♯

= 0,

M11A= (AB)♯A2(

AB)♯A2(

BA)♯BA

= (AB)♯A2(AB)A2

= 0.

From Lemma 2.5 (ii), we obtain

BM11=B(AB)♯A−B(AB)♯A2(BA)♯B,

M21A+M22B= (BA)♯BAB(AB)A2(BA)A+B(AB)A2(BA)A(BA)BA

−B(AB)♯A2( BA)♯B

= (BA)♯BA[B(AB)A2(BA)AB(AB)A2(BA)A]

−B(AB)♯A2(BA)♯B

(7)

Using Lemma 2.5 (ii), we have

BM12=B(AB)♯A,

M21A= (BA)♯BA−B(AB)♯A2(BA)♯A+B(AB)♯A2(BA)♯A(BA)♯BA

=B(AB)♯A.

So

M X=XM =

A(BA)♯B 0

B(AB)♯AB(AB)A2(BA)B B(AB)A

.

Secondly,

M XM =

A A

B 0

A(BA)♯B 0

B(AB)♯AB(AB)A2(BA)B B(AB)A

=

X11 X12

X21 0

.

Applying Lemma 2.5 (i) and (iii), we compute

X11=A2(BA)♯B+AB(AB)AAB(AB)A2(BA)B

=AB(AB)♯A

=A,

X12=AB(AB)♯A=A,

X21=BA(BA)♯B=B.

Hence

M XM =

A A

B 0

.

Finally,

XM X =

M11 M12 M21 M22

A(BA)♯B 0

B(AB)♯AB(AB)A2(BA)B B(AB)A

=

Y11 Y12 Y21 Y22

.

Then

Y11= (AB)♯A2(

BA)♯B(AB)A2(

BA)♯BA(BA)B+ (AB)AB(AB)A

−(AB)♯AB(AB)A2(BA)B

= (AB)♯A−(AB)♯A2(BA)♯B

(8)

and

Y12 = M12B(AB)♯A

= (AB)♯AB(AB)A

= (AB)♯A

= M12.

We can easily get

Y21=M21A(BA)♯B+M22B(AB)♯A−M22B(AB)♯A2(BA)♯B

=M21;

Y22=M22B(AB)♯A=M22.

So we haveX =M♯.

Theorem 3.2. Let M =

A B

A 0

, where A, B∈Kn×n,rank(B)rank(A)

=r. Then

(i) The group inverse ofM exists if and only ifrank(A) =rank(B) =rank(AB) =

rank(BA).

(ii) If the group inverse ofM exists, thenM♯=

Z11 Z12 Z21 Z22

, where

Z11= (AB)♯A−B(AB)♯A2(BA)♯,

Z12=B(AB)♯−(AB)♯A2(BA)♯B+B(AB)♯A2(BA)♯A(BA)♯B, Z21= (AB)♯A,

Z22= −(AB)♯A2(

BA)♯B.

Proof. LetX =

M11 M12 M21 M22

. By Lemma 2.5, we have

M X=XM =

B(AB)♯A A(BA)BB(AB)A2(BA)B

0 A(BA)♯B

.

Furthermore, we can proveM XM=M, XM X =X easily. Thus,X=M♯.

Theorem 3.3. Let A, B ∈Kn×n, ifrank(B) =rank(AB) = rank(BA). Then

AB andBAare similar.

Proof. Suppose rank(A) = r, using Lemma 2.1, there are invertible matrices

P, Q∈Kn×n such that

A=P

Ir 0

0 0

Q, B=Q−1

B1 B1X

Y B1 Y B1X

(9)

whereB1∈Kr×r, XKr×(n−r), Y K(n−r)×r.Hence

AB = P

B1 B1X

0 0

P−1

= P

Ir −X

0 In−r

B1 0 0 0

Ir X

0 In−r

P−1,

BA = Q−1

B1 0

Y B1 0

Q

= Q−1

Ir 0

Y In−r

B1 0 0 0

Ir 0

−Y In−r

Q.

SoABandBAare similar.

REFERENCES

[1] C. Bu. On group inverses of block matrices over skew fields. J. Math., 35:49–52, 2002. [2] C. Bu and C. Cao. Group inverse of product of two matrices over skew field. J. Math. Study,

35:435–438, 2002.

[3] C. Bu, J. Zhao, and J. Zheng. Group inverse for a class 2×2 block matrices over skew fields.

Appl. Math. Comput., 204:45–49, 2008.

[4] S.L. Campbell. The Drazin inverse and systems of second order linear differential equations.

Linear Multilinear Algebra, 14:195–198, 1983.

[5] S.L. Campbell and C.D. Meyer. Generalized Inverses of Linear Transformations. Dover, New York, 1991 (Originally published: Pitman, London, 1979).

[6] C. Cao. Some results of group inverses for partitioned matrices over skew fields. Heilongjiang Daxue Ziran Kexue Xuebao(Chinese), 18:5–7, 2001.

[7] C. Cao and X. Tang. Representations of the group inverse of some 2×2 block matrices. Int. Math. Forum, 31:1511–1517, 2006.

[8] N. Castro-Gonz´ales and E. Dopazo. Representations of the Drazin inverse for a class of block matrices. Linear Algebra Appl., 400:253–269, 2005.

[9] M. Catral, D.D. Olesky, and P. van den Driessche. Group inverses of matrices with path graphs.

Electron. J. Linear Algebra, 17:219–233, 2008.

[10] X. Chen and R.E. Hartwig. The group inverse of a triangular matrix. Linear Algebra Appl., 237/238:97–108, 1996.

[11] G.H. Golub and C. Greif. On solving block-structured indefinite linear systems. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 24:2076–2092, 2003.

[12] I.C.F. Ipsen. A note on preconditioning nonsymmetric matrices. SIAM J. Sci. Comput.,

23:1050–1051, 2001.

[13] K.P.S. Bhaskara Rao. The Theory of Generalized Inverses over Commutative Rings. Taylor-Francis, New York, 2002.

[14] G. Wang, Y. Wei, and S. Qian. Generalized Inverse Theory and Computations. Science Press, Beijing, 2003.

[15] Y. Wei and H. Diao. On group inverse of singular Toeplitz matrices. Linear Algebra Appl., 399:109–123, 2005.

[16] Wa-Jin Zhuang. Involutory functions and generalized inverses of matrices over an arbitrary skew fields. Northeast. Math. J., (Chinese) 1:57–65, 1987.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

whether a specied real, symmetric matrix is a member of any of several closely related classes: the MMA-matrices; the inverse MMA-matrices; the strictly positive, positive

The Soules approach to the inverse eigenvalue problem for nonnegative symmetric matrices with n ≤ 5. A note on the eigenvalues of

Block matrix, Determinant, Quaternion matrices, Universal factorization, Involu- tory matrices, Idempotent matrices.. AMS

In a recent paper Holtz showed that M–matrices satisfy Newton’s inequalities and so do the inverses of nonsingular M–matrices.. Since nonsingular M–matrices and their inverses

Circulant matrix, A -Factor circulant matrices, Block Vandermonde and Fourier matrices, Rotation and hyperbolic matrices, Generalized Euler formula matrices, Periodic solutions..

Following the result of Feingold and Varga, a well-known theorem of Taussky on the eigenvalue distribution is extended to block diagonally dominant matrices and block H − matrices

In this paper, we study matrix functions preserving sets of generalized nonnegative matrices such as the set of real n × n eventually nonnegative matrices, the set of real n ×

In this paper, we investigate the perturbation of the generalized Drazin invertible operators and derive explicit generalized Drazin inverse expressions for the perturbations