• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Bibliography CLASSROOM INTERACTIONS INSPEAKING CLASS OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT OF MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA.

N/A
N/A
Info
Unduh - Bebas
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Bibliography CLASSROOM INTERACTIONS INSPEAKING CLASS OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT OF MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA."

Copied!
6
0
0

Memuat.... (Lihat teks lengkap sekarang)

Unduh sekarang ( 6 Halaman )

Teks penuh

(1)

Bibliography

 

 

Abarca, M.F. (2004). Interaction In The English Classroom; An Exploratory Study. Cambridge: 

Cambridge University Press 

 

Allwright, R.L. 1976 "Language Learning Through Communication Practice." ELT Documents, No.  3, London, The British Council, 2‐14. 

 

Allwright, D., (1990): Autonomy in Language Pedagogy. CRILE Working Paper 6. Centre for 

Research in Education, University of Lancaster, U.K.   

Bishop,  Philip.  E.  (2000).  Classroom  Interaction  (Article).  Valencia  Community  College. 

Courtney Cazden,  Classroom  discourse:  The  language  of  teaching  and  learning. 

Portsmouth:NH 

 

Dagarin,  MAteja.  (2004).  CLASSROOM  INTERACTION  AND  COMUNICATION  STRATEGIES  IN 

LEARNING 

Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Teaching and Researching Motivation. London: Pearson Education Limited.    

(2)

Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 

_________(1999).  Learning  a  second  language  through  interaction.  Amsterdam:  John 

Benjamins. 

 

_________(1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 

Inc.   

_________(1985). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 

Inc.   

Fauziati, Endang. 2002. Teaching of English as a Foreign Language. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah  University Press.  Second Language Acquisition, 16: 283–302. 

 

Gass, S. (2003). Input and Interaction. In C. J. Doughty & Long. M.   

(3)

Gas and Selinker. (2001). Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course (2nd Edition).  Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 

 

Hatch, E. M. (1983). Psycholinguistics: A second language perspective. Massachusetts: Newbury  House Publishers, Inc. 

 

HALL, J.K. ; VERPLAETSE, L. (Eds.). Second and Foreign Language Learning through Classroom  Interaction. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2000. 

 

Hatch. E. (1992). Discourse and Language Education. Cambridge: Cambridge University.   

Inamullah, M. (2005). Pattern of Classroom Interaction at Different Educational Levels in the  Light of Flanders Interaction Analysis. Dissertation. Pakistan. 

 

Johnson, K. (1992a). The relationship between teachers' beliefs and practices during literacy  instruction for non‐native speakers of English. Journal of Reading Behavior 24: 83‐ 108. 

 

Krashen,  S.  (1981).  Second  language  acquisition  and  second  language  learning.  Oxford: 

Pergamon Press. 

 

 Luoma, S. (2004). Assessing speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.   

Lochtma, K. (2002). Oral corrective feedback in the foreign language classroom: how it affects  interaction  in  analytic  foreign  language  teaching.  International  Journal  of  Educational Research, 37, 271‐ 283. 

 

Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C.   

Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in  communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 37‐6. 

 

LONG, M.H. The role of linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In : RITCHIE, C;  BHATIA, T. K. Bhatia (Eds.) Handbook of second language acquisition. San Diego:  Academic Press, 1996. p. 413–468. 

(4)

Long, M. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. C. 

Mackey, A. (Ed.). (2007). Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection  of empirical studies. Oxford: Oxford. University Press. 

 

Mackey, Alison. 2007. “Input, Interaction and Second Language Development, An Empirical 

Study Question Formation in ESL”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition (SSLA)  Journal, 21, 557‐587. 

 

Mackey, Alison. 1999. “Input, Interaction and Second Language Development, An Empirical 

Study Question Formation in ESL”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition (SSLA)  Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. 

 

PICA, T. (1987)Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second‐language learning  conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, v. 44, n. 3, p.493–527, 

1994. 

 

PICA, T. Second language acquisition, social interaction in the classroom. Applied Linguistics. v.  7, n. 1. p. 1‐25,  

(5)

Rivers. W.M. (1987). Interaction as the Key to  TEAching Language for Communication  in  Interactive Language Teaching; e.d. W.M. Rivers. Cambridge: Cambridge University   

Richards and Lockhart.(1994).  Aim to develop a reflective approach to Teaching. Cambridge  University Press, Mar 25, 1994 

 

____________________(1994). Reflective Teaching in Second Language Classroom. Cambridge: 

Cambridge University Press 

 

Rivers, Wilga M. 1987. Interactive Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.   

Sheen, Y. (2004). Corrective feedback and learners uptake in communicative classrooms across  instructional settings. Language Teaching Research, 8 (3), 263‐300. 

 

Seliger,  H.W.  1983  "Learner  Interaction  in  the  Classroom  and  Its  Effects  on  Language 

Acquisition."    

Seliger and Long (eds): Classroom‐Oriented Research in Second Language Acquisition, Rowley,  Mass., Newbury House, 246‐267. 

Second  language  acquisition  (SLA)  &  second  language  development.  (n.d.).  Retrieved 

September  6,  2001,  from  http://alex.edfac.usyd.edu.au/ 

(6)

White, L. (1996). Adverb placement in second language acquisition: Some effects of positive  and negative evidence in the classroom. Second Language Research, 7, 133–161.   

Williams, J. (2001). The effectiveness of spontaneous attention to form. System, 29, 325‐ 340.   

Thornbury, S. (2005). How to Teach Speaking. England: Pearson Educational Limited.   

TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 28, No. 2 (Summer, 1994), pp. 377‐389 Published by: Teachers of English 

to  Speakers  of  Other  Languages,  Inc.  (TESOL)  Stable  URL: 

http://www.jstor.org/stable/3587438\. The Internet TESL Journal, Vol. IV, No. 7, July  1998 http://iteslj.org/ 

VYGOTSKY, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes.  Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.  

 

Walqui  Aida.  (2000).  Contextual  Factor  in  Second  Language  Acquisition.  July  17,  2007. 

http//www.cal.org/resources/digest/0005contextual/html. 

 

Office for Standards in Education (OFSTED) (2008). The changing landscape of languages, an  evaluation  of  language  learning  2004/2007.  London:  HMSO.  Retrieved  from 

http://.ofsted.gov.uk/Ofsted‐home/Publications‐and‐research/Documents‐by‐type/Thematic  

reports/The‐changing‐landscape‐of‐languages. 

 

http://www.ehow.com 

http://www.wikihow.com 

Referensi

Unduh sekarang ( PDF - 6 Halaman - 167.31 KB )

Dokumen terkait

APOLOGIZING STRATEGIES USED BY THE STUDENTS OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT OF MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA Apologizing Strategies Used By The Students Of English Department Of Muhammadiyah University Of Surakarta.

There are 56% students who are fail to choose appropriate apologizing strategies in relation with power property of the speakers, relative age between the speakers,

ERROR IN ORAL PRODUCTION BY ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS OF MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA Error In Oral Production By English Department Students Of Muhammadiyah University Of Surakarta.

The aims of this study are (1) to classify the type of errors, (2) to analyze the frequency of error utterances in oral production, (3) to analyze the dominant type of error,

ERROR IN ORAL PRODUCTION BY ENGLISH DEPARTMENT STUDENTS OF MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA Error In Oral Production By English Department Students Of Muhammadiyah University Of Surakarta.

The result of this study shows that (1) the writer found four types of error namely: speech error, pronunciation error, grammatical error, and code switching; (2) The frequency

INTRODUCTION Corrective Feedback Found In Speaking Class At The English Department Of Muhammadiyah University Of Surakarta.

What are the types of corrective feedback used by the lectures in speaking class. at the English Department

CORRECTIVE FEEDBACK FOUND IN SPEAKING CLASS AT Corrective Feedback Found In Speaking Class At The English Department Of Muhammadiyah University Of Surakarta.

The purpose of analyzing the corrective feedback in teaching speaking is to get the correct TL (target language) on every student speaking activity. The native speaker

SPOKEN INTERLANGUAGE ERRORS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS MADE BY STUDENTS OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT Spoken Interlanguage Errors In Microteaching Class Made By Students Of English Department Of Muhammadiyah University Of Surakarta.

Lastly, Rahmawati (UMS, 2011) conducted a research on A Psycholinguistic Analysis of Speech Errors Made by Rachel Ray TV Show. The result of the study shows that there is

INTRODUCTION Spoken Interlanguage Errors In Microteaching Class Made By Students Of English Department Of Muhammadiyah University Of Surakarta.

This paper focuses on the type of utterance containing of spoken interlanguage errors in microteaching class made by students of English Department of

SPOKEN INTERLANGUAGE ERRORS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS MADE BY STUDENTS OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT Spoken Interlanguage Errors In Microteaching Class Made By Students Of English Department Of Muhammadiyah University Of Surakarta.

SPOKEN INTERLANGUAGE ERRORS IN MICROTEACHING CLASS MADE BY STUDENTS OF ENGLISH DEPARTMENT OF MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF SURAKARTA. Muhammadiyah University