ORGANIZATIONAL THEORY AND
MANAGEMENT CYBERNETICS
Organization
“In public service the organization’s
money is the means and operations are the goal. In private corporations money is the goal and business the means”
Organizations are the product of the
surrounding society whose needs they serve. Organizations are creation of man,
Organization [2]
The distinctive mark of the human
organization:
It represents certain preferences
regarded as a unit.
It makes decisions and tries to
implement and optimize them.
It determines its own internal structure
and the aims of the subsystems.
The origin of modern trading
corporation
To solve large-scale problems of different kind has always implied the compiling and combining of resources with labour.
The trading corporation soon grew in size with its practices of using partnership.
Problem:
The possibility to raise enough capital for large
projects.
Each partner was responsible for all the other
The origin of modern trading
corporation [2]
The demands to be satisfied by
well-working corporation:
The accumulation of large sums of capital
should be enhanced.
The life span of the corporation should
outlast the life span or interest of its owner.
Risks and liabilities of those participating in
the corporation should be limited.
It should be possible to participate without
Organizational Stakeholders
Shareholders Lenders
Suppliers Customers
State and community Competitors
The development of
organizational theory
Frederik Taylor (1856 -1915) Conclusion the problem:
The used method in production were built on old
habits instead of systematical studies.
A rigid hierarchical structure managed the
production with implacable discipline and individual worker skill was not utilized.
No measures existed regarding individual working
performance or the average achievement per day for a standard worker.
Workers opposed every attempt to increase
The development of
organizational theory [2]
Taylor recommended four measure:
Every task should be studied according to
scientific methods, not heuristics.
A good corporations between management and
workforce must be established in order to facilitate and develop scientific methods in production.
The most skilled worker should be selected for
every specific task and thereafter be trained and developed for this very task.
Assignments and responsibility should be shared
The development of
organizational theory [3]
Elton Mayo (1880-1949)
The working man on the plant floor
claims gratitude and safety.
The group standards of the working
force are stronger than prevailing standards of the company.
Social standards together with technical
and physical prerequisite define production output.
Every company has both a formal and
The development of
organizational theory [4]
Max Weber (1841-1925)
Authority and responsibility should go hand in
hand
Order and method should always prevail
The wholeness is more important than the parts Every employee should only have one superior Information should flow through official channels All persons working in the organization must
show discipline
The development of
organizational theory [5]
Henry Fayol (1841-1925) Hierarchical structure
Rigid organization High formalization Departmentalization
Specialization and division of labor. Strict distribution of responsibility Vertical chain of command
Well defined internal relations and clear lines
command
The development of
organizational theory [6]
Henry Fayol (1841-1925)
Official reporting is used for coordination. The superior has the right to command the
subordinate.
Program management
A system of authority which is impersonal and belongs
to the position rather than individual.
Position awarded on the basis of formal competence. A system is responsibility and accountability
Safe employment and regulated system of promotion
with possibility to earn one’s living
Distinct separation of members’ organizational and
The development of
organizational theory [7]
Amitai Etzioni
Normative Power (symbolic means like
prestige, appreciation, devotion)
Benefit Power (founded in material
benefit like food, clothing, money)
Compulsive power (violence, physical
The development of
organizational theory [6]
Philip Selznick
Creative leadership
Responsible leadership Institutionalizing
The development of
organizational theory [7]
Contingency Theory [1970]
Organizational strategy Organizational size
The non-avoidable hierarchy
Hierarchical design of various kind of
organizations will continue to exist, because leaders exist.
Concept hierarchy is basic part of
man’s mental world.
People want to know who is in
Organizational Design
General problem in organizational
design the balance between
centralization and decentralization.
Centralization decision taken in
higher levels of organization.
Decentralization decision-making
Organizational Design [2]
No matter how the structure is arranged, qualities
of an organization:
Some of its components are living variables (human being).
The responsibility for choice between possible
alternatives of action in a specific situation are shared by one or more individuals and/or groups.
Decisions can be related after function, geographical position, time.
Functionally distinguished groups are conscious about each other’s actions by communication or by
observation.
Organizational Design [3]
Classical Organization Functional Organization
Product/division Organization Matrix Organization
Classical Organization
“Who is the boss’s boss”
Tells nothing about the ever-existing
informal relation in the organization.
The size of hierarchy depends of the
size of the organization.
Strong leader give rise to strong
Functional Organization
The main value: specialization in procedures
for problem-solving and a homogenous
background with the same terminology and description model.
Disadvantages: inclination toward self-isolation
of the various functional departments and a tendency to get into conflict with each other.
Power, coordination, and critical information is
Product/division Organizational
A design which is particularly useful when there are clearly separated groups of
products or services.
The central management or concern
management nominates and dismisses the boss of each division, stipulate expected results, approve the budget and so on. The concern management also reserves
Matrix Organization
Has a double profit responsibility
where no particular person has a
total, responsibility for what is going on.
Gives the possibilities both to protect
desirable dissimilarities between different business areas and take
advantage of existing dependencies.
Problem: unclear responsibility,
Project/
ad hoc
Organization
Handle problems which overstep the borders between various internal function.
The project director normally has total command over the participating specialist.
Advantages:
Freedom to act in a better way
More solid and well thought out solutions
Instructive and inspiring for the participators Creates new pattern of cooperation
Project/
ad hoc
Organization [2]
Phases of Project
Project formulation Planning
Execution
Coordination
Project/
ad hoc
Organization [3]
Critical Success Factor:
Aims
Project goals are clearly defined
Organization
Resources are sufficient
Control mechanisms are in place and used Project has support of top management Communication channels are adequate Feedback exists
Contractors are responsive to clients
People
Virtual Organization
Take advantage of an entrepreneurial
situation in which organizations exploit opportunities and take advantage of shared expertise,
Virtual Organization [2]
Permanent Virtual
Organization Virtual Teams
Temporary
ent Across organization Internal to an organizational function or departmental unit
Across
organization Across functions and organizations
Members
hip Typically smaller, but scalable Small, local Typically larger Indeterminate
Mission All functions and full functionality as a working organization
Teams on
specific ongoing tasks
Multiple functions
responding to a market
Project Permanent Membership varies, form is permanent
Temporary Temporary
Uses of IT Channel for marketing and distribution
Multiple perspectives of
management cybernetics
Organizations as organisms
Organizations as control systems Organizations as brains
Organizations as machines Organizations as cultures
Organizations as political systems Organizations as theatres
Life-cycle stages of
organizations
The entrepreneurial stage The collective stage
Life-cycle stages of
organizations
Phas
e Evolutionary Phase Revolutionary Phase
1 Growth through creativity
Leadership crisis
2 Growth through direction Autonomy crisis 3 Growth through
delegation Control crisis
4 Growth through collaboration
Staff crisis
5 Growth through
Organization = cybernetics control system
Organization are strongly influenced
by their environment and therefore must be able to control it in order to survive.
Organization must assume a
measuring device giving information.
Negative or positive feedback should
Organization = cybernetics control system [2]
Keynumber is data which has been aggregated and
transformed into information and communicated throughout the organization.
“Balanced Scorecard” a number of keynumbers
which make clear the balance between different organizational perspectives.
Financial from the keynumber profit-margin
The customer’s from the keynumber satisfied customer Process-oriented from the keynumber stock-turnover
velocity
Human-oriented from the keynumber personal-turnover Renewal and development-oriented from the keynumber
Organization = brain
Organization as integrated information,
communication, and decision making systems capable of learning how to learn.
Holographic qualities the parts reflect the
nature of the whole.
Each nerve cell is connected with millions of others,
creating the total effect of a brain being both generalized and specialized at the same time.
Employee interact in networks of personal
computers and audiovisual facilities.
Holographic organization = information
System Approach in ten points
Organizations change according to processes
that take place on its own organizational level.
The organizational environment is both natural
and social.
The organization is the result of both human
interaction and conscious design.
The organization is not reducible to to the sum
or their parts.
Systems on higher levels of organizations are
System Approach in ten points [2]
Organizations evolve by developing progressively higher organizational level through convergence. The organization is operated by human beings
but are not entirely under control of any individual.
The organization’s component may also
compose parts of other organizations which integrate them.
The organization is a self-determined system which evolution cannot be predicted.