• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

NILAI UAS SEMESTER GANJIL 2013 2014 | Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian SATOP FAO KELAS H M

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "NILAI UAS SEMESTER GANJIL 2013 2014 | Fakultas Teknologi Pertanian SATOP FAO KELAS H M"

Copied!
2
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

SATUAN OPERASI DAN PROSES KELAS H

50%

10%

40%

NO NAMA NIM

NILAI UTS (BRW)

Nilai Tugas

(FAO)

Nilai UAS

(FAO)

Nilai Akhir

Huruf Mutu

1 VALENS NGALI P. 115100900111001

82.5

80

40

65.3

C+

2 YUSUF ILHAM ARIF H. 115100900111003

82.5

80

50

69.3

C+

3 JUWITA AMANDA L 115100900111004

77.5

80

91

83.2

A

4 MENTARI KINASIH 115100900111005

70.0

80

75

73.0

B

5 AYU WULAN RAMADHANI 115100900111009

72.5

80

90

80.3

A

6 AMANDA NATASHA MURTI 115100900111011

80.0

80

65

74.0

B

7 ARIFATI MUNFARIDA 115100900111013

85.0

80

65

76.5

B+

8 KHOIRUN NISA 115100900111015

77.5

80

55

68.8

C+

9 RABIATUL ADAWIYAH 115100900111017

82.5

80

60

73.3

B

10 MUHAMMAD REZA FAHMI 115100900111020

77.5

80

55

68.8

C+

11 LILIS SURYANINGSIH 115100900111021

85.0

80

60

74.5

B

12 FACHRUN NISA 115100900111022

87.5

80

65

77.8

B+

13 AYU KUSUMAWARDHANI 115100900111027

62.5

80

35

53.3

D+

14 ADYNDA PUTRI PAMUNGK 115100900111029

77.5

80

65

72.8

B

15 FITRIA RATNA SARI 115100900111030

77.5

80

95

84.8

A

16 BETY SIWI NARWINDAH 115100900111032

87.5

80

35

65.8

C+

17 DEVY SUKMAWATI K 115100900111034

97.5

80

80

88.8

A

18 ARIO WICAKSANA 115100900111035

77.5

80

60

70.8

B

19 ERINA APRILIA HIDAYA 115100900111037

77.5

80

73

76.0

B+

20 LAYYIN YEPRILA N. 115100900111039

77.5

80

88

82.0

A

21 ANDITA INTAN LARASATI 115100901111001

100.0

80

100

98.0

A

22 LAZUARDI CANDRA APRILITA 115100901111003

77.5

80

65

72.8

B

23 ISTIANAH HIDAYANI 115100901111005

72.5

80

75

74.3

B

24 SUNARSIH 115100901111007

80.0

80

60

72.0

B

25 RIFNY ARDIANITA 115100901111009

95.0

80

95

93.5

A

26 TIA ERSANTI WARDHANI 115100901111010

92.5

80

45

72.3

B

27 ENDAH YULITASARI 115100901111011

65.0

80

45

58.5

C

28 RIZKI DWIKA AMALIA 115100901111012

92.5

80

95

92.3

A

29 ACH QIRMIZIYUSH SHOBAH A 115100901111013

75.0

80

80

77.5

B+

(2)

31 ISDA FAQIHATUL FUADIYAH 115100901111015

92.5

80

65

80.3

A

32 DESTY WIDYASTUTI 115100901111016

80.0

80

70

76.0

B+

33 GINANJAR AJI SANTOSO 115100901111017

87.5

80

85

85.8

A

34 DESI IVANASTUTI 115100901111018

85.0

80

80

82.5

A

35 MARDIYANTI ADNAN AKSA 115100901111019

85.0

80

45

68.5

C+

36 NURUL WAHYUTY 115100901111020

52.5

80

30

46.3

D

37 AJENG NUFFIDAH OKTAREZA 115100901111023

90.0

80

100

93.0

A

38 YURIEKE PETROSINA R 115100906111005

97.5

80

35

70.8

B

39 ARIDHA PUTRI 115100907111002

80.0

80

35

62.0

C+

40 PUJI SRI LESTARI 115100907111004

77.5

80

85

80.8

A

41 ADHITYA WINDHA FARDHANY 115100907111006

72.5

80

30

56.3

C

42 SAKTIA INDRA LAKSMANA 115100907111008

87.5

80

45

69.8

C+

43 SITI DESIREE NASFHIA 115100907111009

70.0

80

55

65.0

C+

44 RENANDA ARISKA FARADINA 115100907111010

95.0

80

65

81.5

A

45 FATMAWATI USWATUN H 115100907111011

70.0

80

80

75.0

B+

46 APRILIA DWI ASTUTIK 115100907111013

70.0

80

70

71.0

B

47 ZAKIA AHDIANY SANTOSA 115100907111014

82.5

80

55

71.3

B

48 CHARISTA DEWA 115100907111015

80.0

80

90

84.0

A

49 SITI MUAMANAH 115100913111001

82.5

80

80

81.3

A

50 M AINUR ROFIQ 115100913111002

65.0

80

30

52.5

D+

51 RIZA FARADINA 115100913111003

77.5

80

85

80.8

A

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

[r]

The Solow condition is examined in an intertemporal model that blends the shirking and the turnover models of efficiency wages with managerial supervision.. It is shown that the

[r]

[r]

changes in income have a smaller effect on consumption than negative changes violating myopia and liquidity constraints.. According to standard consumption theory, agents attempt

[r]

Using data describing team performance, overall salary levels and the Herfindahl–Hirschman index of intrateam salary concentration, panel- estimation indicates that higher total

On the other hand, when there is too much of the commodity, agents want to have only a small portion of the commodity, and prefer a solution that offers a small lower bound..