FINAL Biotech CPE Printout with Notes

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

(7)

http://www.fda.gov/food/guidanceregulation/guidancedocumentsregulatoryinform

ation/labelingnutrition/ucm059098.htm

(8)

IFIC

Foundation,

Your

Food,

Farm

to

Table:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1XbEpNZ5yk&list=UUn2k5w1PhSWv_umuKm

QkHrQ

http://www.usmint.gov/mint_programs/medals/?action=medal&ID=25

(9)

http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/wsfs/docs/expert_paper/How_to_Feed_t

he_World_in_2050.pdf

(10)

(11)

http://www.csiro.au/Outcomes/Food

‐

and

‐

Agriculture/What

‐

is

‐

the

‐

difference

‐

between

‐

conventional

‐

and

‐

GM

‐

plant

‐

breeding.aspx

http://www.foodinsight.org/sites/default/files/BiotechGuide3rdEdition%20%282%2

9.pdf

(12)

(13)

(14)

Sugar beet DNA study‐

Klein,

et

al.,

Nucleic

acid

and

protein

elimination

during

the

sugar

manufacturing

process

of

conventional

and

transgenic

sugar

beets.

J

Biotechnol.

1998

Feb

26;60(3):

145

‐

53.

(15)

http://anrcatalog.ucdavis.edu/pdf/8183.pdf

http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/home/publication/Annex_EFSA%20statem

ent%20DNA%20proteins%20gastroint.pdf

http://alfalfa.ucdavis.edu/+symposium/proceedings/2005/05

‐

273.pdf

(16)

(17)

FDA. Genetically engineered animals. 2012;

http://www.fda.gov/AnimalVeterinary/DevelopmentApprovalProcess/GeneticEngineering/GeneticallyEngineeredAnimals/ default.htm.

FDA. Regulation of genetically engineered animals. 2012; http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm048106.htm

(18)

(19)

http://www.foodinsight.org/sites/default/files/BiotechGuide3rdEdition%20%282%29.pdf

(20)

http://www.cga.ct.gov/2013/KIDdata/Tmy/2013HB‐06527‐R000305‐ Scientific%20Bodies%20Afffirming%20Safety‐TMY.PDF

(21)

http://www.cga.ct.gov/2013/KIDdata/Tmy/2013HB

‐

06527

‐

R000305

‐

Scientific%20Bodies%20Afffirming%20Safety

‐

TMY.PDF

(22)

Batista R, Nunes B, Carmo M, Cardoso C, José HS, et al. 2005. Lack of detectable allergenicity of transgenic maize and soya samples.J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.116:403–10

http://www.foodinsight.org/sites/default/files/BiotechGuide3rdEdition%20%282%29.pdf

(23)

(24)

http://www.foodinsight.org/sites/default/files/BiotechGuide3rdEdition%20%282%29.pdf http://www.allgov.com/departments/department‐of‐agriculture?detailsDepartmentID=568

http://www2.epa.gov/aboutepa/our‐mission‐and‐what‐we‐do http://www.fda.gov/

http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome http://www.epa.gov/

For

more

information

on

the

FDA’s

1992

Statement

of

Policy:

Foods

Derived

from

New

Plant

Varieties

,

visit:

http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocuments

RegulatoryInformation/Biotechnology/ucm096095.htm

For

more

information

on

APHIS,

including

official

documents,

guidance

for

GE

developers,

application

status,

news,

and

upcoming

events,

visit:

www.aphis.usda.gov/biotechnology/brs_main.shtml

http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm352

(25)

067.htm

http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/fdcc/?set=Biocon

http://www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/PressAnnouncemen

ts/2009/ucm109066.htm

(26)

Material Fact_: _A _fact _that _would _be _important _to _a _person _in _deciding _whether _to _engage _or

not to engage in a particular transaction, i.e. purchasing an item; an important fact as opposed to an unimportant detail.

http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInfor

mation/ucm059098.htm

(27)

http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInfor

mation/Biotechnology/ucm096095.htm

(28)

http://www.foodinsight.org/sites/default/files/FINAL%20Full%20Report_IFIC%2020

14%20Food%20Tech%20Survey.pdf

http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome?contentidonly=true&contentid=

organic

‐

agriculture.html

For the full DRAFT Guidance for Industry: Voluntary Labeling Indicating Whether Foods Have or Have Not Been Developed Using Bioengineering, visit:

http://www.fda.gov/food/guidanceregulation/guidancedocumentsregulatoryinformation/la belingnutrition/ucm059098.htm

(29)

(30)

9.pdf

Gonsalves D.

Virus

‐

resistant

transgenic

papaya

helps

save

Hawaiian

industry.

California

Agriculture

2004;

58(2):92

‐

93.

Citrus greening information: USDA ARS http://www.ars.usda.gov/citrusgreening/

(31)

9.pdf

(32)

9.pdf

Background Point: Tilling the soil, done in preparation for planting and for weed control, can cause top soil to blow away or harden. Hard soil does not absorb water well, which causes sediment, fertilizer, and chemicals to run into ground water. Excessive tillage is also less suitable for growing healthy crops and reduces the ability of the land to support beneficial insects and microorganisms living in the soil.

• Conservation tillage, which reduces the amount of soil disturbance, has been widely adopted, with 63% of all U.S. farmland being treated with this technique. As of 2009, two‐thirds (65%) of soybeans were being grown using conservation tillage, resulting in a

93% decline in soil erosion, and preserving an estimated 1 billion tons of top soil. • A practice known as “no‐till farming”, which eliminates soil tillage, has increased 35%

since the introduction of biotechnology. It is more easily adopted with herbicide‐tolerant crops (See below)because they eliminate or greatly reduce the need to till for weed control.

Herbicide‐Tolerant Crops: Crops that have been developed to survive (tolerate) exposure to particular herbicides by the incorporation of certain gene(s), either through genetic engineering or traditional breeding methods. The herbicide can therefore be applied to the

(33)

field for weed control without damaging the crop.

(34)

Pesticide reduction

-http://www.foodinsight.org/Background_on_Food_Biotechnology Carbon footprint

-http://www.foodinsight.org/sites/default/files/FINAL%20IFIC%20Biotech%20Guide% 20PPT_withnotes.pdf

View video:

http://www.geneticliteracyproject.org/2014/01/13/video-bill-gates-tackles-controversy-over-genetically-modified-crops/

(35)

http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome?navid=AGRICULTURE&contentid

=BiotechnologyFAQs.xml

Rommens CM,

et

al.

Low

‐

acrylamide

French

fries

and

potato

chips.

Plant

Biotechnol

J.

Oct

2008;

6(8):843

‐

53.

9.pdf

Lehrer SB, Bannon GA. Risks of allergic reactions to biotech proteins in foods: Perception and reality. Allergy. 2005;60(5):559‐564.

Newell‐McGloughlin M. Nutritionally improved agricultural crops. Plant Physiology. 2008;147:939–953.

United Nations University, Institute of Advanced Studies. Food and nutrition biotechnology: Achievements, prospects and perceptions. 2005.

(36)

(37)

(38)

(39)

(40)

IFIC Foundation, Evaluating Evidence:

http://www.foodinsight.org/Content/3862/FINAL%20FNCE%20Brochure%20‐ %20Communication%20Shades%20of%20Grey.pdf

(41)

(42)

USDA’s Biotechnology Information:

http://www.usda.gov/wps/portal/usda/usdahome?navid=BIOTECH

‐ Learn more about USDA’s position on Agricultural Biotechnology, how the U.S.

Government regulates biotech plants, answers to biotechnology FAQs, and a Glossary of important biotech terms.

FDA’s Biotechnology Information:

http://www.fda.gov/food/foodscienceresearch/biotechnology/

‐ Get more information about FDA’s policy on biotechnology, the FDA’s role in regulating GE foods, and FAQs on food from GE crops.

Q1 Source:

Key,

et

al.

J

R

Soc Med.

2008

Jun

1;

101(6):

290–298

(43)

FDA FALCPA:

http://www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation /Allergens/ucm106890.htm

(44)

(45)

(46)

(47)

(48)

(49)

(50)

(51)

(52)

(53)

(54)

(55)

(56)

http://www.fda.gov/ForConsumers/ConsumerUpdates/ucm352067.htm

http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/fdcc/?set=Biocon

http://cspinet.org/new/pdf/biotech

‐

faq.pdf

(57)

http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/fedregister/BRS_20081009.pdf

(58)

http://www.aphis.usda.gov/brs/fedregister/BRS_20081009.pdf

http://cspinet.org/new/pdf/biotech

‐

faq.pdf

(59)

(60)

www.nal.usda.gov/afsic/pubs/agnic/susag.shtml

(61)

9.pd

f

(62)

9.pdf

(63)

James

C.

Global

status

of

commercialized

biotech/GM

crops.

ISAAA

Brief

No.

44.

Ithaca,

NY:

ISAAA;

2012.

Pray

CE,

Huang

J.,

Hu

R.,

Rozelle S.

Five

years

of

Bt cotton

in

China—the

benefits

continue.

The

Plant

Journal.

2002;31(4):423

‐

430.

http://www.gatesfoundation.org/What

‐

We

‐

Do/Global

‐

Development/Agricultural

‐

Development.

http://www.foodinsight.org/sites/default/files/BiotechGuide3rdEdition%20%282%29.

pdf

(64)

www.pgeconomics.co.uk/pdf/2012globalimpactstudyfinal.pdf

http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/agricultural_biotechnology/download/a

gricultural_biotechnology.pdf.

http://www.foodinsight.org/sites/default/files/BiotechGuide3rdEdition%20%282%29.

pdf

Carbon Footprint: Amount of greenhouse gases, specifically carbon dioxide or other carbon compounds, emitted by individuals, companies, or countries (i.e., a person’s activities or a product’s manufacture and transport) during a given period of time. Indicator of air quality often used to measure an entity’s environmental impact.

(65)

(66)