• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Directory UMM :Data Elmu:jurnal:S:Soil & Tillage Research:Vol57.Issue1-2.Sept2000:

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2017

Membagikan "Directory UMM :Data Elmu:jurnal:S:Soil & Tillage Research:Vol57.Issue1-2.Sept2000:"

Copied!
8
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Snowmelt runoff, sediment, and phosphorus losses

under three different tillage systems

N.C. Hansen

*

, S.C. Gupta, J.F. Moncrief

Department of Soil Water and Climate, University of Minnesota, 1991 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA

Received 29 February 2000; received in revised form 25 July 2000; accepted 31 July 2000

Abstract

In cold climates, snowmelt runoff often exceeds rainfall runoff during the year. Conservation tillage practices may be effective in reducing runoff during the cropping season but not during the snowmelt period. A plot study was conducted on a cropped hillslope to assess how tillage practices affect snowmelt runoff and the associated losses of sediment, phosphorus (P), and chemical oxygen demand (COD). Tillage systems were fall moldboard and chisel plowing with spring disking, and a ridge till system utilizing only the tillage associated with summer row cultivation. Tillage and planting were done up and down the slope. Ridge tilled plots had higher fall residue cover, retained more snow, had less surface roughness, and consequently produced more runoff than the moldboard plow treatment. The amount of runoff from chisel plowed plots was similar to runoff from ridge tilled plots despite a relatively rough surface and moderate amount of residue cover. Phosphorus losses in runoff were higher for the ridge till and chisel plow systems than for the moldboard plow system. For all tillage systems, soluble P represented a major portion (75%) of the total P loss in snowmelt runoff. Although erosive losses in snowmelt were low, the P losses were substantial and merit consideration in studies evaluating management systems impact on surface water quality in regions where snowmelt runoff is important.#2000 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Keywords:Surface runoff; Phosphorus losses; Snowmelt

1. Introduction

Excessive nutrient inputs to surface waters degrade water quality through the process of accelerated eutro-phication. In many watersheds, phosphorus (P) from agricultural sources is an important pollutant (Sharp-ley et al., 1994; Lee et al., 1978). Conservation tillage is a management practice that is recommended for reducing runoff and diffuse source pollution. This practice is generally effective at reducing erosion and runoff for the critical period between planting

and canopy development. However, in cold climate regions a signi®cant fraction of annual runoff occurs in spring as a result of melting snow. Less is known about how different tillage practices impact runoff and P losses during this time. Snowmelt runoff is not as erosive as runoff caused by rain, but loss of water-soluble contaminants can be substantial (Ginting et al., 1998).

Concentration and loss of water soluble contami-nants from reduced tillage systems are often higher than from conventional tillage systems for rainfall induced runoff (McDowell and McGregor, 1984; Romkens et al., 1973; Sharpley et al., 1995). Reasons for increased soluble nutrient loss from reduced tillage systems include: (1) accumulation of nutrients at or

*Corresponding author. Tel.:‡1-320-589-1711;

fax:‡1-320-389-4870.

E-mail address: hansennc@mrs.umn.edu (N.C. Hansen).

(2)

near the soil surface due to reduced mixing of applied fertilizers or manure (Eckert and Johnson, 1985; Weil et al., 1988; Baker and La¯en, 1982), and (2) leaching of nutrients from crop residues at the soil surface (Schreiber and McDowell, 1985; Ginting et al., 1998). The importance of these factors during snow-melt runoff is not known.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the impacts of different tillage practices on runoff, sedi-ment, and P losses for the period between primary tillage in the fall and secondary tillage in the spring. Tillage treatments for this study were fall moldboard and chisel plow based systems and a ridge till system with no fall tillage.

2. Materials and methods

2.1. Runoff plot set-up

Tillage treatments for this study were implemented in the fall of 1995. The results reported in this paper are for springs of 1996 and 1997. Rectangular runoff

plots (3 m22 m) were established on a Clarion silt

loam (Typic Hapludoll, ®ne-loamy, mixed, mesic) with an 8±10% slope. The site is located in Scott County, Minnesota, and is part of the lower Minnesota River Basin. Prior to the study, the site was in a ridge

till based corn [Zea mays(L.)]-soybean [Glycine max

(L.) Merr.] rotation for 10 years. The treatments were replicated four times in an experiment having a ran-domized complete block design. Treatments were fall moldboard plow, fall chisel plow, and ridge till (no fall tillage) with all tillage done parallel to the slope. Ridge till plots were established using existing ridges. Each plot was isolated around the perimeter with vertical metal borders driven 10 cm into the soil to prevent leakage. Galvanized metal runoff collectors at the bottom of the plots channeled ¯ow to a 10.2 cm diameter polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe and to a tipping bucket ¯ow gauge. A data logger recorded the number and rate of tips with the use of a magnetic closure switch on each tipping bucket. Volume of runoff was calculated by the use of a calibration equation relating ¯ow rate to the rate of tipping. A composite runoff sample for each plot and each runoff event was collected by mechanically capturing a fraction of the water from each tip. Rain amounts

were measured with an electronic, tipping bucket-type rain gauge as well as with a manual rain gauge. Snow depth and density measurements were made prior to anticipated snowmelt events to determine the amount of water available for runoff. Snow depth was mea-sured with a meter stick at 20 random locations per plot. Snow density was measured by inserting a metal ring (30.5 cm diameter) through the snow pro®le, measuring the depth of snow inside the ring to calcu-late the snow volume, collecting all of the snow within the ring, determining the mass of collected snow gravimetrically, and then dividing the mass by the volume. Average snow depth and density were then used to calculate an equivalent depth of water stored on each plot.

2.2. Cultural practices

Corn stalks were chopped after corn harvest each year for all tillage systems. Moldboard plowing was done on November 7, 1995, and October 24, 1996. Chisel plowing was done on November 8, 1995, and November 20, 1996. During the growing seasons, the plots were cropped to corn. Ridges were re-built with cultivation on June 26, 1995, and June 27, 1996, with a Hiniker Series I Econ-O-Till row cultivator (Hiniker,

Mankato, MN1). On the same days, the moldboard and

chisel plowed plots were row cultivated with the Hiniker row cultivator with the ridging shares in the up position leaving only 56 cm wide sweeps running at 5 cm deep. There was no application of phosphorus fertilizer during the study.

Extractable soil P (Bray and Kurtz, 1945) and organic matter content (Nelson and Sommers, 1982) were determined on 10 core composite samples taken at 0±7.5 cm and 7.5±15 cm depths from each plot on June 6, 1996, and May 22, 1997. The line transect method (La¯en et al., 1981) was used to determine percent residue cover. Cover measurements were made each spring following snowmelt in order to characterize the cover present at the time of runoff.

Surface roughness was measured in 1.0 m2areas for

each tillage system by measuring the soil surface elevation on a 10 cm grid with an electronic laser

1The company names are provided for the benefit of the readers

(3)

survey tool (TOPCON GTS-303D, TOPCON

Mid-west, Arlington Heights, IL1). The data was

interpo-lated to a grid format by kriging with the software

Surfer (version 6.04, Golden Software, Golden, CO1).

Elevation data was corrected for slope with a least squares linear regression between grid elevation and the distance along linear cross-sections parallel to the slope. Roughness was calculated as the standard deviation of the residuals between the grid elevation data and the corresponding regression line and

aver-aged over six cross-sections for each 1 m2area.

2.3. Water quality measurements

Composite runoff water samples were stored at 48C until analyzed for concentration of sediment, total phosphorus, soluble phosphorus, and chemical oxy-gen demand (COD). Total solids concentration was determined by drying duplicate 50 ml aliquots at 1058C and weighing the remaining solids. Soluble P concentration was determined colorimetrically on

®ltered samples (0.45mm, millex-ha, Millipore,

Bed-ford, MA1) by the method of Murphy and Riley

(1962). Total P was determined similarly on samples following a complete nitric/perchloric acid digestion of un®ltered samples (Olsen and Sommers, 1982). Particulate P was calculated as the difference between total P and soluble P. COD was determined by adding 2.5 ml runoff samples to commercially prepared 10 ml borosilicate glass reagent vials containing potassium dichromate and standard reaction catalysts (accu Test

COD, low range, Bioscience, Bethlehem, PA1). Vials

were heated to 1508C for 2 h and then absorbance of light was measured at 440 nm. Losses of sediment, soluble P, total P, particulate P, and COD were com-puted as the product of runoff volume and the corre-sponding concentration.

2.4. Statistical analysis

Analysis of variance was carried out using Statis-tical Analysis System software (SAS, version 6.12,

Cary, NC1). Data for runoff, sediment, P, and COD

losses were transformed to logarithmic values to control non-homogeneous variances. The means reported are geometric means. When treatment effects were signi®cant, the Duncan multiple range test was used to separate means…P<0:10†.

3. Results and discussion

3.1. Snow water equivalent

Because of the transient nature of snow cover, the frequency and intensity of measurements required to monitor changes in snow depth with time and space were beyond the scope of this study. Our objective in measuring snow depth was to identify whether tillage practice affected the amount of water stored in the snowpack prior to melting and runoff. Snow measure-ments were made on January 11, 1996, March 27, 1996, and March 7, 1997, in anticipation of ensuing snowmelt (Table 1). On January 11, 1996, snow water equivalent averaged 5.9 cm and there was no differ-ence due to the tillage systems. This snow partially melted on several different occasions and was com-pletely gone by March 14, 1996. The snow determina-tion on March 27, 1996 corresponds to a new accumulation of snow. On this date, the snow water equivalent was greater for the ridge tilled plots (7.0 cm) than for the moldboard (5.2 cm) or chisel plowed plots (5.1 cm). On March 7, 1997, snow water equivalent was also greater in the ridge tilled plots (9.4 cm) than in the moldboard plowed plots (5.5 cm), but neither of these measurements were different from those for the chisel plowed plots (6.3 cm). Since all plots were in close proximity to each other, it is assumed that snowfall was initially uniform. The observed differences in snow depth were due to dif-ferences in the removal of snow by wind. Furrows associated with the ridge till system protected snow from removal by wind and resulted in greater snow depth than for the other tillage systems.

Table 1

Effect of tillage on the average water equivalent snow depth measured on three datesa

Measurement date Average water equivalent snow depth (cm)

Moldboard

aTillage comparisons are made within each measurement date.

Means followed by the same letter are not signi®cantly different

(4)

3.2. Residue cover

Residue cover did not differ between the two study years and is reported as the mean of both years. Residue cover was 93% for the ridge till system, 40% for the chisel plow system, and 10% for the moldboard plow system. These differences in residue cover between

tillage systems were highly signi®cant…P<0:001†.

3.3. Surface roughness

Soil surface elevations are illustrated in Fig. 1 for each tillage system. Surface roughness was affected by tillage treatment…P<0:001†. The order of

increas-ing roughness was ridge till (0.12 cm), chisel plow (0.76 cm), and moldboard plow (1.0 cm). The ridge till treatment had smooth surfaces parallel to the slope and roughness was signi®cantly less than for the chisel and moldboard plow treatments. Roughness for the fall moldboard and chisel plow treatments were not signi®cantly different from each other.

3.4. Soil extractable phosphorus and organic matter content

Soil extractable P and organic matter content were not different for the two study years and are reported as the mean of both years. Extractable P levels were very high for all tillage systems and re¯ect the history of manure application at this site. At the 0±7.5 cm

depth, P levels were affected by tillage…Pˆ0:002†

and were higher for the ridge till system (89 mg kgÿ1)

than either the moldboard (58 mg kgÿ1) or chisel plow

systems (64 mg kgÿ1). Extractable soil P

concentra-tions at the 7.5±15 cm depth did not differ among

tillage systems and averaged 43 mg P kgÿ1. Organic

matter content in the 0±7.5 cm depth differed with

tillage …P<0:007† and was higher for ridge till

system (30 g kgÿ1) than either moldboard (22 g kgÿ1)

or chisel plow systems (23 g kgÿ1). Both P and

organic matter were concentrated in the surface layer of the ridge till treatment due to limited mixing of crop residue that accumulates at the soil surface.

3.5. Runoff

Five runoff events occurred in 1996 and three occurred in 1997 (Table 2). A runoff event on January

18, 1996, was the result of 2.5 cm of rain falling on existing snow with an average water equivalent of 5.9 cm. The remaining runoff events resulted from melting snow. Analysis of variance for runoff from individual events showed a signi®cant tillage effect on some dates but not on others (Table 2). When sums of snowmelt runoff within each year were compared,

there was a signi®cant effect of year …Pˆ0:001†

and tillage …Pˆ0:006† and there was no year by

tillage interaction…Pˆ0:514†. Average runoff depth

was higher in 1996 (9.5 cm) than in 1997 (3.7 cm). Runoff from the ridge till and chisel plow plots was greater than for moldboard plow plots.

Differences in runoff volume among tillage prac-tices are partially due to the differences in the amount of water stored in the snow. One way to normalize for snow depth is to compare the percent of available water measured as runoff. The snow depth measured Fig. 1. Soil surface roughness of a 1.0 m2area for moldboard plow,

(5)

on March 27, 1999 (one day prior to runoff) provides the best comparison because (1) snow loss by wind drift was minimal, (2) no additional snow was deposited, and (3) snow was completely gone by the end of the runoff event. In other words, for this event

snow dissipation was mainly due to runoff and in®l-tration. The runoff hydrographs for March 28±April 3, 1996, along with air temperature are plotted in Fig. 2. The percent of available water that ran off was 84, 80, and 51% for the chisel plow, ridge till, and moldboard Table 2

Effect of tillage on runoff from individual snowmelt events for 1996 and 1997 and for the sum of snowmelt runoff for each yeara

Runoff date Runoff (cm) ANOVA;Pvalue: tillage

Ridge till Chisel Moldboard

Individual events

1996

January 18 2.9 1.7 0.10 0.002

February 9±10 0.83 0.71 0.10 <0.001

February 23±25 4.4 4.8 1.7 0.230

March 9±14 0.27 0.15 0.18 0.740

March 28±April 8 4.4 4.0 2.4 0.280

1997

February 17±March 2 0.24 0.89 0.26 0.440

March 8±11 1.8 2.6 1.0 0.110

March 17±27 1.5 2.2 0.55 0.370

Sums

1996 13 11 4.5 0.001 (tillage)

1997 3.5 5.7 1.8 0.006 (year)

0.514 (tillage by year)

Average 8.3 a 8.7 a 3.2 b

aGeometric means of four replications are reported. Means followed by the same letter are not signi®cantly different…P<0:10†.

(6)

plow systems, respectively. Thus, moldboard plowing was more effective in limiting snowmelt runoff than ridge tilling or chisel plowing, mainly due to surface storage. Runoff from the ridge till and chisel plow treatments suggests that neither roughness nor residue cover measurements are good indicators of how these practices affect snowmelt runoff when tillage is par-allel to the slope.

3.6. Sediment, phosphorus, and COD losses

Snowmelt runoff is not expected to cause substan-tial interrill erosion because snow normally melts gradually and because soil detachment is limited

when the soil is frozen. Average annual sediment loss

(Fig. 3) differed with tillage practice…Pˆ0:016†and

year…Pˆ0:009†but there was no signi®cant tillage

by year interaction…Pˆ0:826†. Sediment loss

aver-aged 0.26 and 0.11 Mg haÿ1 for 1996 and 1997,

respectively. Average sediment loss was lower for the moldboard plow system than for the chisel plow system. This difference was mainly due to differences in runoff volume between these tillage systems. Sedi-ment losses were not different between the moldboard plow and ridge till systems. Higher runoff with the ridge till treatment was offset by a lower sediment concentration than with the moldboard plow treat-ment. Lower sediment concentrations for the ridge

(7)

till system were due to the high degree of residue cover.

The moldboard plow treatment resulted in less soluble, particulate, and total phosphorus loss than either the ridge till or chisel plow treatments (Fig. 3). For all tillage systems, soluble P loss was the dominant form of P loss in snowmelt runoff, averaging 75% of the total P loss. Relative differences in P loss among tillage systems followed a trend similar to that observed for runoff. However, the relative magnitude of particulate P loss did not follow the trend observed for loss of total solids. This indicates that solids in runoff from plots with different tillage systems dif-fered in P concentration. The ratio of particulate P loss

(g haÿ1) to sediment loss (kg haÿ1) represents the

average P concentration of the solids in runoff

(g kgÿ1). Average concentration of P in runoff solids

followed the order: ridge till (2.2 g kgÿ1), chisel plow

(1.1 g kgÿ1), and moldboard plow (0.82 g kgÿ1). This

difference in P concentration of solids in runoff is due to the accumulation of P at the soil surface of the ridge till and, to a lesser extent, the chisel plow systems.

The magnitude of all P losses, especially soluble P, in this study were large compared to other plot studies that evaluated annual loss of P in runoff (Ginting et al., 1998). Snowmelt runoff can be an important source of P to receiving waters. Tillage practices with no fall tillage are more susceptible to losses of soluble P in snowmelt runoff due to a smooth soil surface, the accumulation of P at the soil surface, and the leaching of P from crop residue.

Average annual losses of COD were affected by

tillage …Pˆ0:001† and year …P<0:001† and there

was no tillage by year interaction…Pˆ0:647†. Losses

were higher with both the chisel plow and the ridge till systems than with the moldboard plow system. As with P losses, the difference in COD losses among tillage systems were mainly due to differences in runoff volume.

4. Conclusions

When compared to a moldboard plow based system, snowmelt runoff was higher for the ridge till system with no fall tillage. This difference was due in part to an increased snow depth in the furrows of the ridge till system, but also to the lack of roughness parallel to the

direction of runoff. Despite differences in snowmelt runoff, sediment loss was not different between the ridge till and moldboard plow systems. Surface crop residue with the ridge till system did not limit runoff but did reduce the concentration of sediments in run-off. For the chisel plow system, surface roughness and residue cover were intermediate to the other tillage systems. However, both runoff and sediment losses were greater than for the moldboard plow system and similar to the ridge till system.

Soluble P, particulate P, and total P losses were lower for the moldboard plow system than for the ridge till and chisel plow systems. Soluble P domi-nated total P loss for all tillage systems, averaging 75% of total P loss. Due to an accumulation of P at the soil surface, suspended sediments lost in runoff from the ridge till system had a higher P concentration than sediment from the moldboard plow system. Runoff volume and the P concentration at the soil surface had a more important effect on P loss in snowmelt runoff than the reduction of particulate matter in runoff.

Conservation tillage practices implemented to reduce erosion and the movement of P to surface waters during spring and summer months can result in an increase in runoff during the snowmelt period. This runoff can be an important source of P, with losses mainly as soluble P. The relative importance of runoff during this time period compared to summer months deserves consideration when recommending tillage practices for cold climate regions.

References

Baker, J.L., La¯en, J.M., 1982. Effects of corn residue and fertilizer management on soluble nutrient runoff losses. Trans. ASAE 25, 344±348.

Bray, R.H., Kurtz, L.T., 1945. Determination of total, organic, and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Sci. 59, 39±49. Eckert, D.J., Johnson, J.W., 1985. Phosphorus fertilization in

no-tillage corn production. Agron. J. 77, 789±792.

Ginting, D., Moncrief, J.F., Gupta, S.C., Evans, S.D., 1998. Interaction between manure and tillage system on phosphorus uptake and runoff losses. J. Environ. Qual. 27, 1403±1410. La¯en, J.M., Amemiya, M., Hintz, E.A., 1981. Measuring residue

cover. J. Soil Water Conserv. 32, 341±343.

Lee, G.F., Rast, W., Jones, R.A., 1978. Eutrophication of water bodies, insights for an age-old problem. Environ. Sci. Technol. 12, 900±908.

(8)

Murphy, J., Riley, J.P., 1962. A modi®ed single solution method for the determination of phosphate in natural waters. Anal. Chim. Acta 27, 31±36.

Nelson, D.W., Sommers, L.E., 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In: Page, A.L., et al. (Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, 2nd Edition. Agron. Monogr. 9, ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI, pp. 539±579.

Olsen, S.R., Sommers, L.E., 1982. Phosphorus. In: Page, A.L., et al. (Eds.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, 2nd Edition. Agron. Monogr. 9. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI, pp. 403± 429.

Romkens, M.J.M., Nelson, D.W., Mannering, J.V., 1973. Nitrogen and phosphorus composition of surface runoff as affected by tillage method. J. Environ. Qual. 2, 292±295.

Schreiber, J.D., McDowell, L.L., 1985. Leaching of nitrogen phosphorus and organic carbon from wheat straw residues. I. Rainfall intensity. J. Environ. Qual. 14, 251±256.

Sharpley, A.N., Chapra, S.C., Wedepohl, R., Sims, J.T., Daniel, T.C., Reddy, K.R., 1994. Managing agricultural phosphorus for protection of surface waters: issues and options. J. Environ. Qual. 23, 437±451.

Sharpley, A.N., Robinson, J.S., Smith, S.J., 1995. Assessing environmental sustainability of agricultural systems by simula-tion of nitrogen and phosphorus loss in runoff. Eur. J. Agron. 4, 453±464.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Demikian Pengumuman Pemenang Pelelangan ini dibuat dan ditandatangani pada hari, tanggal dan bulan sebagaimana tersebut di atas untuk dipergunakan sebagaimana

Penyusunan Rencana Kerja (Renja) Dinas Cipta Karya dan Penataan Ruang tahun 2015 merupakan amanat perundangan yang diantaranya adalah Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 8 Tahun

Sehubungan dengan pelaksanaan pengadaan barang/jasa metode Pelelangan Sederhana Pengadaan Pakaian Batik Tradisional (Seragam Batik Siswa SD/SMP) dimana hasil dari unsur –

Solusi perbaikan yang diterapkan di area Mesin Maker-Packer adalah membuat instruksi kerja berkaitan dengan tumpahan tembakau olahan yang kondisinya masih bersih,

Panitia Pengadaan pada Dinas Pendidikan Kota Batu akan melaksanakan Pelelangan Sederhana dengan pascakualifikasi secara elektronik untuk paket pekerjaan pengadaan

Paket pengadaan ini terbuka untuk penyedia barang/jasa yang memenuhi persyaratan, dengan terlebih dahulu melakukan registrasi pada Layanan Pengadaan Secara

[r]

Improvement of re-layout in test room resulting in a better design of layout, showing result of reducing total travel distance of material in testing process.. The new layout