A CASE STUDY ON THE
USE
OF WOMEN'S
LANGUAGE FEATURES ·BY FEMALE
AND MALE
WITNESSES AT COURT
A THESIS
As Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements
For che Sarjana Pcndidikan Degree in
EnJiisb
Lanpaae
Teaching Faculty
TOL TEPI ' ~ 0 f - 09 -ZOc.f
~
l--1 01 H
No BUKU
fK-Ij
By:
W(/
ej~l_
__
AGNES DYAH WUAYANTI
' ' ,.
ICF I {satu)
1213094134
- - - 1 _ _ --.:...._ _ _UNI-VERSITAS KATOLIK WIDYA MANDALA SURABAYA
FAKULTAS
lCEGURUAN DAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN
JURUSAN PENDIDIKAN BAHASA DAN SENI
PROGRAM STUDI PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INOORIS
APPROVAL SHEET
(1)
T!lis th~sis is entitled A CASE STUDY 0~ THE CSE OF W0:\1E~·s
LAXGUAGE FEATURES BY FEMALE ANTI ~t:\LF \\1Th"ESSES AT
COURT, prepared and submitted by AG1\"ES DYAH WTJAYAl'.IIT has been
approve-d and accepted as partial fulfillment of the requirement for the Sarjana
P~ndidikan Degree
in
English language Teaching by the following advisor:APPROVAL SKEET
(2)
This thesis
hasbeen examined by tho! committee on mal examination
witha grade
of __________________________________________________ ___
On
200tDrs.S~Pd.
Chair Person
-Approved hy:
ACKNO\VLEDGE~fENT
It's a miracle that this thesis can be tinished after years of obstacles. That
is why the \\Titer should thank God first for His guidance throughout the years.
She would like also to express her appreciation to her family , v.ho has given her
big support in finishing the thesis.
She must thank particularly Dra. Susana Teopilus, !l.i.Pd. - the writer's
advisor - who has patiently read and helpfully assisted her on earlier draft wuil
the end of this thesis. The v.riter is also very grateful for the helps of the attorney
and clerk of the court in Pengadilan Negeri Surabaya who have willingly recorded
the testimonies.
The \'ITiter also gives thanks to l.:!er colleagues in the office, who
understandingly and cheerfi11ly supported her during
thewriting of this thesis.
This thesis might never be done without the attention and suppot1s of those around
the \\Titer.
TABLE OF CO~TENTS
ApproYaJ Sheet (1) ... ... ... ... .. .... ... ... ... .. .. .. ... .. .. . _,
i\pproval Sheet (2) ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. .... ... ... 11
Ackno"·ledgement ... ... .. . .... ... .. ... ... .. . ... . ... iii
Table of Contents ... ... ... ... .. ... ... ... .. ... .... ... . ... .... ... 1v
.4.bstract ... . ... .. .. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .. .
viChapter I: Introduction ... ... ... ... ... ... ...... 1
1.1.
Background of the Study ... ... ...
...
Jv 1.2. Statement of the Problems ... . ... ... .... .. ...... 21.3. Obje(;tives of the
Study ... . ... ... .. . ... .... ...
21.4.
Significance of theStudy .. ... . ... ... .... .... ...
.31.5. Scope and Limitations .. ... .. ... ... ... ... ..... 3
1.6. Titeoretical Framework ... ... .. ... . ... -1
1.7.
Defmition of the Key Terms ... ... .. . ... . ...
...
-11.8.
Organization
of the Thesis ... ... ... . .. ... . .. . ... . ..... 5Chapter II: Review ofthe Related Liter<~tur~ ... . ... ... ... .... fi 2 .1. The Nature of Sociolinguistics ... .. ... .. 6
2.2. Social Factors and Social Dimensions ... .... ...
/'12.3. Gender and Conversational Styles ... .. ... ...
.
92 . ~. Women's Language ... .. .. ... ... ... .. ... ... .... II
2 .5 Previous Studies . .. .. ... .. ... .. ... .... ... . ... . l.J
iv
PB RP IJ'il
Uni•c:rdw K •mllll l k
Chapter Ill: Research Methodology ...... 16
3 .1. The Nature of lhe Study and Design ... 16
3 2. The Subjects .. . .... .... .. ... . ... .. ... . .. .... ... . .... I"' 3.3. The Research lnstntments ... . ..... 17
3.4. The Data ... . . ... ... ... .....
r
J 5. The Procedures of Collecting Data ... ... 183.6. The Techniques of Data Analysis ... .. .... 18
3. 7. The Backgrolmd of the Subjects ... ... 19
Chapter lV: Data Analyses, Findings and Discussions ... ... ..... 20
4.1 . The Data and Data Analysis ... .. ... .. .. .. .... ... ..... JJ 4.1.1. The Analysis of the First Tesrimony ... .. ... .... J I 4.1.2. The Analysis of the Second Testimony .... 28
4.1.3. The Analysis of the Third Testimony ... JJ 4.1.4. The Analysis oft he Fourth Testimony ... .... -10
4.2 . The Findings ... .... ... ... ... ... ... . ... .. ..... .--12
Chapter V: Conclusion ... ... .. ... .. ... . ... -18
5.1. The Results of cbe Research ... .. ... .... -18
5.2. Suggestions ..... 50
Bibliography ... ... . ... . ... .... .. .. .. . ... ... .. .. .. .. ... ... ... .. 51
Appendices ... . ... .. .... ... ... ... . ... . ... . ... . .. .... 5:!
ABSTR\CT
Agnes Dyah \Vija_yanti. 2001. A
Case
Study on the Use of Women ·s Languag\!Feamres by Female and .\'lale Wimesses at Court. Thesis. Program Smdi
Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan
Universitas Katolik \\'idya .\Iandala Surabaya.
Advisor: Dra. Susana Teopi1us, M. Pd.
Key words: powerless language, witness, and lack of confidence.
This thesis is a sociolinguistic study. Sociolinguistics is the study of the relationship between language and society, since language is a tool for conununicating to enter social life~ we cannot separate language fi·om society.
What is most interesting about sociolinguistics is that the study about the
backgrounds why each individual uses ditTerent way in speaking. Of course, the
differences also happen between male and female speakers. TI1erefore, the writer
is
interested in tl1is field and decided to conduct this sn1dv. Tl1e sntdv is intended-
.
lo analyze
the using
ofpo,.,erless
language by \\Omen and menwitnesses. Tile
writer tries to fmd out the factors that correlate with the using of powerless language d~'\lices besid~s tlle SJX'aker's gender and to find our whether it is true or not that women use more \\"omen·s Language devices i.n the way they speak than.m~n. The ~ubject5 of the study are two male and t~.vo female witnesses who give testimony at Pengadilan i\egeri Suraba:y a. TI1e \virnesses come from di fleren~
social backgrounds.
Thij 5ociolingui~tic s.tudy based on the five theorie:;, namely { 1) the nature of :-;xiolinguistics, (2) S(lCial facl\.)rs and social dimensions, (3) gender and conversational style, ( 4} women's language and (5) previous stud it-::.
The data is collcct.;od through the tape re..:ordings that recorded rhe uia1s. Then the tapes are analyzed, based on the frequency distribution of pm-vedess language fcamres in the speech of the witnesses. After analyzing the data, the
writ'i!r dis~11sses the findings ofrhe resl;!arch.
From the analyses and the findings, the '.Hiter finds out that the subjects
11nder rhe srmly, rhe lllllfe and femt1k wirnes.:.e.:,, in u.-~ing po\verle:,:. hmguag~· m~~:
b<;! rd:.Hed more the s•xial ::,;Ullu~ th;m to l.h<! ~ex of the speaker. So. it \\ill be
Pl'Ssibl~ that in certain situation, ma!e and f~mak us~ the same number of P•.)werkss language fearures. It is 5ugg~red that the tollowi.ng researchers, who deal with sociolinguistics especial!y with language, and power difference::, bet\\een male and female, i.ndude wider scv~'\Jo! that covers the subjects or the ana?y~~s